This article discusses survey data and research evidence in favor of providing after-school programs for middle and high school students. It explains the benefits and key elements of after-school care, and examines existing initiatives. Community and youth responses to different programs are noted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Academy for Educational Development (AED). 2001. Promising practices in after-school initiative: Preliminary results from the survey of after-school program directors and staff. Washington, D.C.: AED.
2.
Capizzano, J., K. Tout, and G. Adams. 2000. Child care patterns of school-age children with employed mothers. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
3.
Fight Crime: Invest in Kids. 2000. The prime time for juvenile crime, or youth enrichment and achievement. Washington, D.C.: Fight Crime: Invest in Kids.
4.
Fight Crime: Invest in Kids. 2001. More than two-thirds of public say boosting investments in kids is higher priority than tax cut. Washington, D.C.: Fight Crime: Invest in Kids.
5.
Fox, J. A., and S. Newman. 1997. After-school crime or after-school programs: Tuning into the prime time for violent juvenile crime and implications for national policy. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
6.
Gally, M.2000. Extra benefits tied to extracurriculars. Education Week, 18 October: 8.
7.
Hart Research Associates. 1999. The Shell education survey. Houston, Tex.: The Shell Oil Company.
8.
Lake Snell Perry & Associates and The Tarrance Group. 1998. Mott Foundation/JC Penney nationwide survey on after-school programs. Washington, D.C.: Afterschool Alliance.
9.
Lake Snell Perry & Associates and The Tarrance Group. 2000. Mott Foundation/JC Penney nationwide survey on after-school programs. Washington, D.C.: Afterschool Alliance.
10.
National Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP). 1999. After-school programs and the K-8 principal: Standards for quality school-age child care. Revised ed.Alexandria, Va.: NAESP.
11.
National Center for Education Statistics. 1996. Schools serving family needs: Extended-day programs in public and private schools. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
12.
National Commission on Time and Learning (NCTL). 1994. Prisoners of time. Washington, D.C.: NCTL.
13.
National Institute on Out-of-School Time (NIOST). 2000. Number of children in self-care. Wellesley, Mass.: NIOST.
14.
National Opinion Research Center. 1998. Family involvement in education: A snapshot of out-of-school time. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
15.
Newman, S., J. A. Fox, E. A. Flynn, and W. Christeson. 2000. America’s after-school choice: The prime time for juvenile crime, or youth enrichment and achievement. Washington, D.C.: Fight Crime: Invest in Kids.
16.
Online after-school programs poll. 1998. Teen PEOPLE, 11 June.
17.
Richardson, J. L., B. Radziszewska, C. W. Dent, and B. R. Flay. 1993. Relationship between after-school care of adolescents and substance use, risk taking, depressed mood, and academic achievement. Pediatrics92: 32-38.
18.
School-Age Child Care Project. 1997. School-age care out-of-school time resource notebook. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
19.
Seppanen, P. S., J. Love, D. deVries, L. Bernstein, M. Seligson, F. Marx, and E. Kisker. 1993. National study of before- and after-school programs. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
20.
Snyder, H., and M. Sickmund. 1999. Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
21.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. A child’s day: Home, school, and play 1994. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau.
22.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1995. Adolescent time use, risky behavior, and outcomes: An analysis of national data. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
23.
YMCA of the USA. 2001. After school for America’s teens. Washington, D.C.: Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates.
