This article explores some of the societal issues addressed by after-school programs and describes examples of programs found in secondary schools that have been effective in addressing these issues. Among the examples are those that provide support to academic achievement as well as those that address other areas of learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
After-School Corporation. Policy Studies Associates. 2000a. Increasing and improving after-school opportunities, evaluation results from the TASC after-school program’s first year. New York: TASC.
2.
After-School Corporation. Policy Studies Associates. Policy Studies Associates. 2000b. Increasing and improving after-school opportunities, parent survey. New York: TASC.
3.
Lake Snell Perry & Associates and The Tarrance Group. 2001. Mott Foundation/JCPenney nationwide survey on after-school programs. Washington, D.C.: Afterschool Alliance.
4.
National Commission on Time and Learning (NCTL). 1994. Prisoners of time. Washington, D.C.: NCTL.
5.
Newman, S., J. A. Fox, E. A. Flynn, and W. Christeson. 2000. America’s after-school choice: The prime time for juvenile crime, or youth enrichment and achievement. Washington, D.C.: Fight Crime: Invest in Kids.
6.
Owings, W. A., and L. S. Kaplan. 2001. Alternatives to retention and social promotion. Fastback 481. Bloomington, Ind.: Phi Delta Kappa.
7.
Superintendents’ Task Force. 1999. Service learning linking classrooms and communities. Sacramento, Calif.: California Department of Education.
8.
U.S. Department of Education. 2000a. 21st century community learning centers: Providing quality after-school learning opportunities for America’s families. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
9.
U.S. Department of Education. 2000b. Working for children and families: Safe and smart after-school programs. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
10.
U.S. Department of Education. 2001, June. Summary of 21st Century Learning Centers grantee reports. Adriana De Kanter speech at the Mott Foundation Afterschool Evaluation Forum. Flint, Mich.: C.S. Mott Foundation.
11.
University of California at Irvine, Department of Education. 2001. Evaluation of California’s after-school learning and safe neighborhoods partnerships program: Preliminary report. Irvine, Calif: University of California, Department of Education.
