This article provides an overview of the changing and expanding roles of paraeducators, notes the importance of paraeducators as critical team members, offers several ideas that teachers can use to enhance the use of paraeducators in the classroom, and provides some insights for school principals about the benefits of paraeducators and some legal and ethical considerations in their use. Future role definition, function, and opportunities for paraeducators are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blalock, G.1991. Paraprofessionals: Critical team members in our special education programs. Intervention in School and Clinic26 (4): 200-214.
2.
The Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). 2000. What every special educator must know: The standards for the preparation and licensure of special educators. 4th ed.Reston, Va.: CEC.
3.
French, N. K.1998. Working together: Resource teachers and paraeducators. Remedial and Special Education19 (6): 357-368.
4.
French, N. K.1999a. Paraeducators: Who are they and what do they do?Teaching Exceptional Children32 (1): 65-69.
5.
French, N. K.1999b. Paraeducators and teachers: Shifting roles. Teaching Exceptional Children32 (2): 69-73.
6.
French, N. K., and A. L. Pickett. 1997. Paraprofessionals in special education: Issues for teacher educators. Teacher Education and Special Education20 (1): 61-73.
7.
Jones, K. H., and W. N. Bender. 1993. Utilization of paraprofessionals in special education: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education14 (1): 7-14.
8.
Lombardi, T. P.1998. Review of Supervising paraeducators in school settings: A team approach. Teacher Education and Special Education21 (2): 152-153.
9.
Marks, S. U., C. Schrader, and M. Levine. 1999. Paraeducator experiences in inclusive settings: Helping, hovering, or holding their own?Exceptional Children65 (3): 315-328.
10.
Passaro, P. D., A. L. Pickett, G. Latham, and W. HongBo. 1994. The training and support needs of paraprofessionals in rural special education. Rural Special Education Quarterly13 (4): 3-9.
11.
Pickett, A. L.1997. Paraeducators in school settings: Framing the issues. In Supervising paraeducators in school settings: A team approach, edited by A. L. Pickett and K. Gerlach. Austin, Tex.: PRO-ED.
12.
Pickett, A. L., S. T. Vasa, and A. L. Steckelberg. 1993. Using paraeducators effectively in the classroom. Fastback 358. Bloomington, Ind.: Phi Delta Kappa.
13.
Safarik, L.1997. Team roles in instructional settings. In Supervising paraeducators in school settings: A team approach, edited by A. L. Pickett and K. Gerlach. Austin, Tex.: PRO-ED.
14.
U.S. Public Law 105-17. 1997. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997. [20 U.S.C. ß1400 et. seq.]
15.
Vasa, S., and A. Steckelberg. 1997. Paraeducators in school settings: Administrative issues. In Supervising paraeducators in school settings: A team approach, edited by A. L. Pickett and K. Gerlach. Austin, Tex.: PRO-ED.
16.
Wadsworth, D. E., and D. Knight. 1996. Paraprofessionals: The bridge to successful full inclusion. Intervention in School and Clinic31 (3): 166-171.
17.
Welch, M., G. Richards, T. Okada, J. Richards, and S. Prescott. 1995. A consultant and paraprofessional pull-in system of service delivery: A report on student outcomes and teacher satisfaction. Remedial and Special Education16 (1): 16-28.
