The rapid expansion of knowledge in all science domains, and the provisional nature of much new knowledge, present the science curriculum with several important challenges. The inquiry-based classroom approach is designed to struggle with the difficulties of the subject in a way that reflects best current understanding about teaching and learning. This article describes the features that characterize student and teacher roles and tasks in a classroom that is representative of a culture of inquiry. Suggestions for principals are included.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altobell, C., J. Falk, and B. Drayton. 2001. Three models of hands-on activities and their relation to the inquiry-based classroom. Cambridge, Mass.: TERC, Inc.
2.
Drayton, B., and J. Falk. 2000. Dimensions that shape teacher-scientist collaborations for inquiry-based teacher enhancement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 24-28 April, New Orleans, La.
3.
Drayton, B., and J. Falk. 2001. Reforms in collision: Overlapping mandates and systemic strategies in six Massachusetts districts. Paper to be presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 10-14 April, Seattle, Wash.
4.
Driver, R., P. Newton, and J. Osborne. 2000. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education84: 287-312.
5.
Falk, J., and B. Drayton. 2000a. Cultivating a culture of inquiry. Hands on!23 (2): 1, 16-19.
6.
Falk, J., and B. Drayton. 2000b. The inquiry-based classroom in context: Bridging the gap between teacher’s practice and policy mandates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 24-28 April, New Orleans, La.
7.
Falk, J., and B. Drayton. 2001. High stakes accountability and the inquiry based classroom: Complementary of colliding visions of reform. Paper to be presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 10-14 April, Seattle, Wash.
8.
Falk, J. K., and B. Drayton. 1997. Dynamics of the relationships between teachers and scientists in an innovative mentorship collaboration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 24-28 March, Chicago, Ill.
9.
Falk, J. K., and B. Drayton. 1998. Before the innovation hits the classroom: Teachers’ self-image as an element of teacher enhancement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 13-17 April, San Diego, Calif.
10.
Huberman, M.1993. The model of the independent artisan in teachers’ professional relations. In Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts, edited by J. W. Little and M. W. McLaughlin. New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
Knapp, M. S., J. D. Bamburg, M. C. Ferguson, and P. T. Hill. 1998. Converging reforms and the working lives of frontline professionals in school. Educational Policy12: 397-418.
12.
Kohn, A.1999. The schools our children deserve. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13.
Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory life. 2nd ed.Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
14.
Little, J. W.1990. Conditions of professional development in secondary schools. In The contexts of teaching in secondary schools: Teachers’ realities, edited by M. W. McLaughlin, J. E. Talbert, and N. Bascia. New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
Medawar, P.1984. The limits of science. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
16.
National Research Council (NRC). 2000a. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Expanded edition. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
17.
National Research Council (NRC). 2000b. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
18.
Raizen, S., and R. D. Britton. 1997. Bold ventures. Vols. 1, 2. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19.
Rothstein, R.1998. The way we were?New York: The Century Foundation.
20.
Sarason, S.1996. Revisiting ‘the culture of the school and the problem of change.’New York: Teachers College Press.
