This study compares teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of block scheduling during the first and second year of implementation with their perceptions during the third and fourth year at four high schools. Variables included initial perception, subject area taught, and years of teaching experience. Results show a consistent rating among teachers from year one to year four.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Averett, C. P.1994. Block scheduling in North Carolina high schools. Raleigh, N.C.: Public Schools of North Carolina.
2.
Fitzpatrick, J. E., and M. Mowers. 1997. Success and the four block schedule: Stakeholders buy in. NASSP Bulletin81 (588): 51–56.
3.
Fleming, D. S.; V. Olenn; R. Schoenstein; and D. Eineder. 1997. Moving to the block: Getting ready to teach in extended periods of time. Washington, D.C.: NEA Publishers.
4.
Khazzaka, J.1997. Comparing the merits of a seven-period school day to those of a four-period school day. The High School Journal81 (2): 87–97.
5.
Kramer, S. L.1997. What we know about block scheduling and its effects on math instruction, Part II. NASSP Bulletin81 (586): 69–82.
6.
Queen, J. A.; B. Algozzine; and M. Eaddy. 1998. Implementing 4 x 4 block scheduling: Pitfalls, promises, and provisos. The High School Journal81 (588): 107–114.
7.
Shortt, T. L., and Y. Thayer. 1995. What can we expect to see in the next generation of block scheduling?NASSP Bulletin79 (571): 53–62.
8.
Skrobarcek, S. A.; W. M. Chang; C. Thompson; J. Johnson; R. Atteberry; R. Westbrook; and A. Manus. 1997. Collaboration for instructional improvement: Analyzing the academic impact of a block scheduling plan. NASSP Bulletin81 (589): 104–111.
9.
Smith, D. L., and M. H. Barber. 1997. Teacher and student practices in Tennessee high schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of MSERA, Memphis, Tenn.
10.
Staunton, J.1997. A study of teacher beliefs on the efficacy of block scheduling. NASSP Bulletin81 (593): 73–80.
11.
Wilson, J. W., and L. C. Stokes. 1999. A study of teacher perceptions of the effectiveness and critical factors in implementing and maintaining block scheduling. The High School Journal83 (1): 44–54.
12.
Wyatt, L. D.1996. More time, more training: What staff development do teachers need for effective instruction in block scheduling?The School Administrator8 (53): 16–18.
