ELLs come from diverse backgrounds; some are more proficient than others academically and linguistically. One approach to help teach this group of students is sheltered instruction, a strategic way to make subject matter concepts comprehensible while promoting English language development. Ways to recognize, evaluate, and implement quality sheltered instruction programs are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
August, D., and K. Hakuta, eds. 1997. Improving schooling for language minority children: A research agenda. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
2.
Banks, J., and C. A. M. Banks, eds. 1989. Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
3.
Collier, V.1995. Promoting academic success for ESL students. Elizabeth, N.J.: New Jersey Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages— Bilingual Education.
4.
Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). 1992. Recommendations for improving the assessment and monitoring of students with limited English proficiency. Washington, D.C.: CCSSO.
5.
Crandall, J. A.1993. Content-centered learning in the United States. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics13: 111–126.
6.
Crawford, L. W.1993. Language and literacy learning in multicultural classrooms. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
7.
Echevarria, J., and D. Short. 2000. [Preliminary findings on study of the effects of sheltered instruction on the achievement of limited English proficient students]. Unpublished raw data.
8.
Echevarria, J., M. E. Vogt, and D. Short. 2000. Making content comprehensible for English language learners: The SIOP model. Needham Heights, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
Faltis, C.1993. Joinfostering: Adapting teaching strategies for the multilingual classroom. New York: Macmillan.
10.
Goodlad, J. I.1984. A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Gonz·lez, J. M., and L. Darling-Hammond. 1997. New concepts for new challenges: Professional development for teachers of immigrant youth. McHenry, Ill.: Delta Systems and Center for Applied Linguistics.
12.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF). 1996. What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College.
13.
Olsen, R. W-B.1997. Enrollment, identification, and placement of LEP students increase (again). TESOL Matters7 (4): 6–7.
14.
Pica, T.1987. Second-language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics8: 3–21.
15.
Sheppard, K.1995. Content-ESL across the USA. Volume I: Technical Report. Washington, D.C.: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
16.
Short, D.2000. Using the ESL standards for curriculum development. In Implementing the ESL Standards for pre-K–12 students through teacher education, edited by M. A. Snow. Alexandria, Va.: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
17.
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL). 1997. ESL standards for pre-K–12 students. Alexandria, Va.: TESOL.
18.
Tharp, R., and R. Gallimore. 1988. Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Thomas, W., and V. Collier. 1997. School effectiveness for language-minority students. Washington, D.C.: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
