Instructional supervision should be an important component of a successful staff development program. This article examines the literature and research on instructional supervision and addresses the importance of supervision for fostering professional growth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acheson, K. A., and M. D. Gall. 1997. Techniques in the clinical supervision of teachers: Preservice and inservice applications. 4th ed.New York: Longman.
2.
Alfonso, R.; G. Firth; and R. Neville. 1981. Instructional supervision: A behavior system. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
3.
Arredondo, D. E.; J. J. Brody; D. P. Zimmerman; and C. A. Moffett. 1995. Pushing the envelope in supervision. Educational Leadership53 (3): 74–78.
4.
Beach, D. B., and J. Reinhartz. 1989. Supervision: Focus on instruction. New York: Harper & Row.
5.
Bolin, F. S., and P. Panaritis. 1992. Searching for a common purpose: A perspective on the history of supervision. In Supervision in transition: The 1992 yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, edited by C. D. Glickman. Alexandria, Va.: ASCD.
6.
da Costa, J. L., and G. P. Riordan. 1997. Teacher efficacy and trust in supervisory relationships. The Canadian Administrator36 (6): 1–11.
7.
Daresh, J. C., and M. A. Playko. 1995. Supervision as a proactive process, concepts and cases. 2d ed.Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press.
8.
Darling-Hammond, L., and M. W. McLaughlin. 1995. Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan76 (8): 597–604.
9.
Drake, T. L., and W. H. Roe. 1999. The principalship. 5th ed.Columbus, Ohio: Prentice-Hall.
Glickman, C. D.1981. Developmental supervision: Alternative practices for helping teachers to improve instruction. Alexandria, Va.: ASCD.
12.
Glickman, C. D.; S. P. Gordon; and J. M. Gordon. 1997. Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach. 3d ed.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
13.
Goldhammer, R.; R. Anderson; and R. Krajewski. 1993. Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers. 3d ed.Toronto: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
14.
Goldsberry, L.1997. Do teachers benefit from supervision? Yes. In Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies, edited by J. Glanz and R. F. Neville. Norwood, Mass.: Christopher-Gordon.
15.
Griffin, G. A.1997. Is staff development supervision? No. In Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies, edited by J. Glanz and R. F. Neville. Norwood, Mass.: Christopher-Gordon.
16.
Haefele, D. L.1993. Evaluating teachers: A call for change. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education7: 21–31.
17.
Hoy, W. K., and P. D. Forsyth. 1986. Effective supervision: Theory into practice. New York: Random House.
18.
Krey, R. D., and P. J. Burke. 1989. A design for instructional supervision. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.
19.
Little, J. W.1993. Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis15 (2): 129–151.
20.
Lovell, J. T.1978. Instructional supervision: Emerging perspective. In The roles and responsibilities of instructional supervisors, edited by A. W. Sturges. Washington, D.C.: ASCD.
21.
McQuarrie, F. O., Jr., and F. H. Wood. 1991. Supervision, staff development, and evaluation connections. Theory into Practice30 (2): 91–96.
22.
Mugiri, E. M.1986. Development of education materials for teacher education: Education design, development, and evaluation. In Seminar on evaluation of material developed for B.Ed. (Primary). Report of a seminar held at Mosoriot Teachers College 2-21 January, 1986, edited by H. O. Ayot and J. O. Olembo. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenyatta University.
23.
Nolan, J. F., Jr.1997. Can a supervisor be a coach? No. In Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies, edited by J. Glanz and R. F. Neville. Norwood, Mass.: Christopher-Gordon.
24.
Nolan, J., and P. Francis. 1992. Changing perspectives in curriculum and instruction. In Supervision in transition: The 1992 yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, edited by C. D. Glickman. Alexandria, Va.: ASCD.
25.
Oliva, P. F., and G. E. Pawlas. 1997. Supervision for today's schools. 5th ed.New York: Longman.
26.
Pfeiffer, I. L., and J. B. Dunlap. 1982. Supervision of teachers: A guide to improving instruction. Phoenix, Ariz.: Oryx Press.
27.
Sergiovanni, T. J.1992. Moral authority and regeneration of supervision. In Supervision in transition: The 1992 yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, edited by C. D. Glickman. Alexandria, Va.: ASCD.
28.
Sergiovanni, T. J., and R. J. Starratt. 1993. Supervision: A redefinition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Schain, R. L.1988. Supervising instruction: What it is and how to do it. New York: Educators Practical Press.
30.
Starratt, R. J.1997. Should supervision be abolished? Yes. In Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies, edited by J. Glanz and R. F. Neville. Norwood, Mass.: Christopher-Gordon.
31.
Sullivan, C. G.1997. Is staff development supervision? Yes. In Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies, edited by J. Glanz and R. F. Neville. Norwood, Mass.: Christopher-Gordon.
32.
Waite, D.1997. Do teachers benefit from supervision? No. In Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies, edited by J. Glanz and R. F. Neville. Norwood, Mass.: Christopher-Gordon.
33.
Wiles, J., and J. Bondi. 1996. Supervision: A guide to practice. 4th ed.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Merrill.
34.
Wood, F. H., and S. R. Thompson. 1993. Assumptions about staff development based on research and best practice. Journal of Staff Development14 (4): 52–57.
