What is meant by a "standards-based system?" Will the process of becoming more standards-based enhance our overall educational prod uct ? Do state and federal mandates relating to the development of standards-based educational systems work?
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bartman, R.E.1997. Urban schools must measure up to high expectationsSt. Louis Post-Dispatch, July 7: 7B.
2.
Center for Education Reform.1996. A national survey of Americans' attitudes toward education and school reformWashington, D.C.: Center for Education Reform.
3.
Cotton, K.1995. Effective schooling practices: A research synthesis, 1995 updatePortland, Oreg.: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (NWREL).
4.
Davidson, M.R., and K.W. Howell.1997. State standards: Authenticity vs. diversityDiagnostique22: 164-81.
5.
Dorn, S.1998. The political legacy of school accountability systemsEducation Policy Analysis Archives [On-line]. Available FTP: olam.ed.asu.eduDirectory:epaa/v6n1.html 6 (1998).
6.
Finn, C.E., Jr.1998. First, do no harm: The federal role in education reformThomas B. Fordham Foundation [On-line]. Available FTP: vs1.channel1.comDirectory:users/hudson/library/first.html 2.
7.
Finn, C.E., Jr.; M.J. Petrilli; and G. Vanourek.1998. Fordham report: The state of state standards."Thomas B. Fordham Foundation [On-line]. Available FTP: Hostname: vs1.channel1.com Directory: users/hudson/standards/ summary.html 2.
Marzano, R.J.1997. Designing standards-based districts, schools, and classroomsPaper presented at the Tenth Connecting School Improvement Institute, Des Moines, Iowa, May.
10.
Marzano, R.J., and J.S. Kendall.1996. A comprehensive guide to designing standards-based districts, schools, and classroomsAurora, Colo.: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory (McREL).
11.
National Association of Secondary School Principals.1996. Breaking ranks: Changing an American institutionReston, Va.: NASSP.
12.
National Commission on Excellence in Education.1983. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reformWashington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13.
Office of Educational Research and Improvement.1996. Studies in education reform: Systemic reform (Contract No. RP 91-172005)Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
14.
Pickering, D., and B. Gaddy.1996. Developing and implementing standards-based systemsAurora, Colo.: McREL.
15.
Porter, A.C.1993. School delivery standardsEducational Researcher22: 24-30.
16.
Ramirez, A., and R. McClanahan.1992. Reporting to the publicThe American School Board Journal25: 33-35.
17.
Ravitch, D.1996. The case for national standards and assessmentsThe Clearing House69: 134-36.
18.
Schrag, P.1998. New page, old lesson: Why educational standards fail the political testThe American Prospect37: 71-76.
19.
Seltzer, D.1995. Connecting school improvement in Iowa: Establishing shared directionPaper presented to the Ninth Connecting School Improvement Institute, Des Moines, Iowa, November.
20.
Sipe, T.A., and W.L. Curlette.1997What are the most effective curriculum interventions from a decade of educational research?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Ill., March.
21.
Stetson, E.G.1996. Current trends in state curriculum reform: A comparison of two opposing national models ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 415 137.
22.
Twing, J.S.1998. Implementing a district-wide standards-referenced assessment systemDraft report presented to the Assessment Literacy Task Force of the Iowa Department of Education, Des Moines, Iowa, July.
23.
U. S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education.1997. Standards: Making them useful and workable for the education enterpriseWashington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
24.
U.S. News & World Report.1998. U. S. News school standards pollU.S. News [On-line]. Available FTP: Hostname: usnews.com Directory: usnews/news/stanpoll.html September.
