Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Animal models historically used to assess the acute gastric irritation potential of accidental ingestion of consumer products include the dog, pig, rabbit, and cat. In looking at alternative methods that are of shorter duration and more cost-effective, the rat is being evaluated as a potential model. Acute gastric irritation is known to increase as the reserve alkalinity of the formulation increases. In initial experiments to assess the rat as a potential model, animals were dosed via oral gavage with 1 of 4 formulations ranging in reserve alkalinity from 4.0 to 10.8. Necropsies were performed at 15 and 60 min after dosing. Macroscopic and microscopic evaluations of the stomach revealed morphological differences in the various treatment groups that distinguish granular formulations having either a low (R.A. = 4.0), moderate (R.A. = 7.1), or higher (R.A. = 10.8) reserve alkalinity. Additionally, it was observed that the acute gastric changes in rats dosed with a liquid formulation having a low (R.A. = 4.2) reserve alkalinity were similar to those in rats dosed with a granular formulation having a moderate reserve alkalinity (R.A. = 7.1). This suggests that other factors such as types of ingredients, pH, and physical form influence the extent of acute gastric irritation and demonstrates that an evaluation of only reserve alkalinity is not sufficient to ensure the safety of these products. This preliminary work supports the rat as a potential model to assess the acute gastric irritation potential of alkaline formulations or substances.

Keywords

Cleaning products accidental ingestion use of rat model

References

1. Andrews ED , Ward BC , and Altman NH (1979). Spontaneous Models of Human Disease. Academic Press, New York.

2. Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers (1991).

3. Ashcraft KW and Padula RT (1974). The effect of dilute corrosives on the esophagus. Pediatrics 53: 226–232.

4. Baker HJ , Lindsey JR , and Weisbroth SH (1979). The Laboratory Rat—Anatomy and Histology. Academic Press, New York.

5. Baker HJ , Lindsey JR , and Weisbroth SH (1980). The Laboratory Rat—Research Applications. Academic Press, New York.

6. Berenson MM and Temple AR (1975). Detergent toxicity: Effects on esophogeal and gastric mucosa. Clin. Toxicol. 8: 399–404.

7. Bloom W and Fawcett DW (1980). A Textbook of Histology. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

8. Borja AR , Ransdell HT , Thomas T , and Johnson W (1969). Lye injuries of the esophagus—analysis of ninety cases of lye ingestion. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 57: 533–538.

9. Bosher LH , Richmond V , Burford TH , and Ackerman L (19xx). The pathology and experimentally produced lye burns and strictures of the esophagus. J. Thorac. Surg. 21: 483–489.

10.

10. Gumaste VV and Dave PB (1992). Ingestion of corrosive substances by adults. Amer. J. Gastroenterol. 87: 1–5.

11.

11. Haller JA , Andrews HG , White JJ , et al (1971). Pathophysiology and management of acute corrosive burns of the esophagus: Results of treatment of 285 children. J. Pediatr. Surg. 6: 578–584.

12.

12. Hebel R and Stromberg MW (1976). Anatomy of the Laboratory Rat. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland.

13.

13. Kikendall JE (1991). Caustic ingestion injuries. Gastroenter. Clin. North Am. 20: 847–856.

14.

14. Lee JF , Monowitz DS , and Block GE (1972). Corrosive injury of the stomach and esophagus by non-phosphate detergents. Amer. J. Surg. 123: 652–656.

15.

15. MacDonald WE , Beasley AG , Cubit DA , and Deichmann WB (1972). The acute oral toxicity and the hazard associated with the oral administration of two detergents. Ind. Med. 41: 9–14.

16.

16. Messersmith JK , Oglesby JE , Mahoney WD , and Baugh JH (1970). Gastric erosion from alkali ingestion. Amer. J. Surg. 119: 740–741.

17.

17. Muggenburg BA , Mauderly JL , Hahn FF , Silbaugh SA , and Felicetti SA (1974). Effects of ingestion of various commercial detergent products by beagle dogs and pigs. Toxicol. Applied Pharmacol. 30: 134–148.

18.

18. Rothstein FC (1986). Caustic injuries to the esophagus in children. Ped. Clin. North Am. 33: 665–672.

19.

19. SAS Institute (1982). Statistics. Cary, North Carolina.

20.

20. Vancura EM , Clinton JE , Ruiz E , and Krenzelok EP (1980). Toxicity of alkaline solutions. Ann. Emerg. Med. 9: 118–122.

21.

21. Vergauwen P , Moulin D , Buts JP , Veyckemans F , Hamoir M , and Hanique G (1991). Caustic burns of the upper digestive and respiratory tracts. Pediatrics 63: 701–702.

22.

22. Walker AP (1979). Esophageal corrosion: Methodology, animal data and extrapolation to man. Vet. Human Toxicol. 21(S): 26–30.

23.

23. Williams JB and Taber D (1972). Assessing detergent safety: A comparison of a non-phosphate laundry detergent with phosphate detergents. J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc. 49: 539–551.

The Rat as a Model to Evaluate the Gastric Irritation Potential of Alkaline Products

Abstract

Keywords

References