Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) presents a pollutant implicated in various toxicological effects. The aim of this experiment was to study the effects of DMBA administration on oxidative stress, histopathological signs, and 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) binding characteristics in rat liver. We also studied the effects of dose stoichiometry, dose frequency, and duration of protocol of DMBA administration. In this study, rats surviving eighteen weeks after DMBA exposure showed mild to moderate histopathological changes in the liver, mainly characterized by glossy appearance of hepatocytes, heterochromatic nuclei, and glycogen overload in the midzonal region of the hepatic lobe. These changes were accompanied by significant rises in oxidant levels, along with declines in nonenzymic antioxidants, indicating that DMBA induced oxidative stress in the liver. This finding correlated well with decreases in TSPO binding capacity in the liver of the rats in our study. Other studies have shown that TSPO can be affected by oxidative stress, as well as contribute to oxidative stress at mitochondrial levels. Further studies are needed to assay whether the decreases in TSPO density in the liver are part of the damaging effects caused by DMBA or a compensatory response to the oxidative stress induced by DMBA.

Keywords

liver 7 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)oxidative stress 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO)rat

Introduction

The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA), which is abundantly present in cigarette smoke, polluted air, and charcoal-broiled and smoked food, has been implicated in various toxicological effects, including atherogenesis and carcinogenesis (Curfs et al. 2004; Miller and Ramos 2001; Van Schooten et al. 1998; Waldman et al. 1991). For example, exposure to PAHs, including DMBA, can lead to toxicological changes in the liver, including oxidative stress and production of carcinogenic metabolites (DiGiovani and Juchau 1980). Notably, DMBA is among the most potent chemical carcinogens known (Samy et al. 2006; Singletary and Liao 1989). In this context, in vitro experiments have indicated that DMBA in rat liver microsomes causes dose- and time-dependent production of the oxidant H₂O₂, which is closely associated with tumor promotion (Frenkel et al. 1981; Frenkel et al. 1993). For these reasons, in many studies DMBA is used to induce oxidative stress in mice, and the animals' livers are used to assay the level of oxidative state (Choi 2008).

It is well known that mitochondria are particularly vulnerable to oxidative damage. Lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation can affect many metabolic enzymes in the mitochondrial matrix, including the electron transport system (Netto et al. 2002; Oliveira et al. 2006; Szeto 2006). In the present study, we investigated the potential involvement of the 18 kDa mitochondrial translocator protein (TSPO) in harmful effects of DMBA in the liver. The TSPO is present in various organs, including the liver (Gavish et al. 1999). The TSPO’s primary intracellular location is the outer mitochondrial membrane (Anholt et al. 1986; Krueger and Papadopoulos 1990; O’Beirne et al. 1990; Veenman et al. 2007). Studies have suggested that the TSPO is involved in the regulation of the mitochondrial electron transport system (Hirsch et al. 1989; Moreno-Sánchez et al. 1991).

In addition, a large number of studies have indicated that mitochondrial TSPO is involved in various other functions. It is well documented that the TSPO is involved in the regulation of cholesterol transport into mitochondria in relation to bile production and steroidogenesis, in oxidative stress and apoptosis, and in inflammatory and immune responses (Gavish et al. 1992; Knudsen et al. 1993; Krueger and Papadopoulos 1990; Kunduzova et al. 2004; Papadopolous et al. 2006; Veenman and Gavish 2006; Veenman et al. 2007; Veenman et al. 2008; Veenman et al. 2010; Veenman et al. forthcoming). Previous studies have suggested that TSPO density may be correlated with the antioxidant status of liver cells (Fischer et al. 2001) and that it may play a role in organisms' response to pollution (Giannaccini et al. 2004). Interestingly, we have found that the TSPO appears to be an active participant in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) at mitochondrial levels and in the modulation of the mitochondrial membrane potential, thereby participating in the induction of the mitochondrial apoptosis cascade (Kugler et al. 2008; Veenman et al. 2008; Zeno et al. 2009). In turn, ROS levels are also known to affect TSPO function (Delavoie et al. 2003). Recently, we found that the TSPO is down-regulated in the aorta wall of rats in correlation with pathological changes in the aorta wall resulting from DMBA exposure (Dimitrova-Shumkovska et al. 2010a). Thus, we assumed that, in addition to causing oxidative stress and pathological changes in the liver, DMBA exposure of rats would also lead to changes in TSPO binding characteristics in this organ.

Several studies have focused on the effects of DMBA on biochemical and antioxidant parameters in the liver (Choi 2008; Girolami et al. 2008; Muqbil and Banu 2006). As the liver is considered to suffer from oxidative stress owing to toxicological stress following DMBA exposure (Choi and Kim 2009), we applied various doses and times of DMBA exposure and assayed potential dose-dependent effects of DMBA on hepatic histopathology and oxidative stress. In the present study, we applied DMBA to otherwise healthy, outbred animals to be able to better study the effects of DMBA per se, that is, without concomitant phenotypic and/or genotypic peculiarities. Apart from evaluation of liver histopathology and oxidative stress parameters, we assayed changes in TSPO binding characteristics in the liver following DMBA exposure of rats.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Wistar rats were obtained from the Military Medical Academy (VMA, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia) and maintained and bred in our own animal facilities at the Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of the Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. Rat feed was obtained from Filpaso (Filpaso, 52.11, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia). [³H]PK 11195 was obtained from New England Nuclear (Boston, MA, USA) and PK 11195 from Sigma-Aldrich (Rehovot, Israel). 7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Enzyme-colorimetric test kits were obtained from Human Diagnostics (Wiesbaden, Germany). The SOD determination kit RA20408 was obtained from Fluka-Biochemika (Steinheim, Germany). The glutathione assay kit (CS0260) and glutathione reductase assay kit (GRSA114K4000) were from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Trichloracetic acid (TCA), 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane (TEP), 5,5′-dithio2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB), T-chloramine, and 1M phosphate buffer solution (PBS) were from Sigma-Aldrich. 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH), Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, guanidine chloride, ascorbic acid, and ammonium iron (II) sulfate -(NH₄)₂ Fe (SO₄)₂ were obtained from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany. Standard chemicals and consumables were obtained from various commercial sources.

Research Subjects

Male Wistar rats, 20 weeks old at the start of the experiment, were used. The rats were kept on a regular dark/light cycle, and they received water and regular chow ad libitum. All animals procedures were reviewed and approved by the local ethics committee, in accordance with National Institutes of Health (USA) Guidelines for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1996).

Treatment and Tissue Handling

Administration of DMBA

For each experiment, DMBA was dissolved in sesame oil, as described previously (Carter and Carter, 1988; Whitsett et al. 2006; Dimitrova-Shumkovska et al. 2010a). The animals received different doses of DMBA by intragastral intubation, as described previously (Löcher et al. 2001; Motoyama et al. 2008; Dimitrova-Shumkovska et al. 2010a) and were sacrificed at various periods after DMBA application, as listed below.

The control group (C) was exposed to vehicle, that is, 1 mL of sesame oil administered once by intragastral intubation, and sacrificed 18 weeks after DMBA administration (n = 16).

The DS 10 group (n = 6) received a single dose of DMBA (10 mg in 1 mL of sesame oil). Animals of the DS-10 group were sacrificed 10 weeks after DMBA administration.

The DS 20 group (n = 18) was exposed to a single dose of DMBA (20 mg /1 mL sesame oil), and sacrificed 18 weeks after DMBA administration.

The DR 20 group (n = 24) was exposed to DMBA four times at weekly intervals (i.e., 4 × 5 mg of DMBA in 0.5 mL of sesame oil), and sacrificed 18 weeks after the first dose of DMBA.

One of the goals of this experiment was to correlate the stoichiometry of dose, frequency of administration, and time period after DMBA initiation. The main set of goals was to determine potential correlations in the liver between TSPO binding characteristics, oxidative stress, and histopathological changes after exposure to DMBA.

Tissue Collection

The rats were heavily anesthetized with a ketamine/xylazine mixture (90 mg/kg ip and 10 mg/kg ip, respectively), applied after an overnight fast of twelve hours. Blood was taken from the heart by cardiac puncture. Liver tissue samples were harvested between 10:00 AM and noon. The livers were flash-frozen, weighed, and stored at –80°C until further analysis.

As described previously (Dimitrova-Shumkovska et al. 2010a,b), for assays of the oxidative stress markers thiobarbituric acid–reactive substances (TBARs), glutathione (GSH), protein carbonyls (PC), superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), and glutathione reductase (GSSG-Red), tissue homogenates were prepared in 1.12% KCl at + 4°C. For advanced oxidation protein products (AOPPs), tissue homogenates were prepared in 50 mM PBS at + 4°C. For these oxidative stress assays, we used an ultrasonic homogenizer (Cole-Parmer Instrument Co., Chicago, IL, USA), as described previously (Dimitrova-Shumkovska et al. 2010a,b). For TSPO binding assays, tissue homogenates were prepared in 50 mM PBS on ice using a Kinematika Polytron, as described previously (Danovich et al. 2008; Dimitrova-Shumkovska et al. 2010a,b).

Histopathology

Livers of the rats in the four experimental groups were subjected to histopathological analysis. The liver was blocked in 10 × 5 × 5 mm pieces. After removal and dissection, the liver blocks were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and processed for embedding in paraffin. Sections (3–5 µM) from blocked liver of animals from each experimental group were cut with a microtome and examined with a light microscope mounted with a video camera (Nikon-Eclipse Düsseldorf, Germany). All slides were routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and with the Periodic Acid Schiff method (PAS) for glycogen deposits (Merck, Germany).

Protein Quantification

General protein content of liver homogenates for carbonylization assays was measured according to Levine et al. (1990). For [³H]PK 11195 binding assays and specific assays for oxidative stress, general protein content in the tissues in question was measured according to Lowry et al. (1951).

Lipid Peroxidation Assays

Lipid peroxidation products (LPO) from liver were measured as TBARs in 2.5% (w/v in 1.12% KCl) of liver homogenates according to the method of Okhawa et al. (1978), modified by Draper and Hadley (1990). For oxidant-stimulated lipid peroxidation, liver homogenates were incubated for thirty minutes with 4 × 10⁻⁵ M Fe²⁺ − 2.6 mM ascorbic acid. The results of the TBAR assays were presented as nanomoles of TBARs per gram liver tissue, using 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxipropane (TEP) as external standard, measured at 535 nm with a spectrophotometer (Cintra, UV/Vis Spectrometer, GBC, Melbourne, Australia).

Protein Carbonyl Assays

Levels of protein carbonyls (PC) were determined in liver homogenates (2.5 % w/v in 1.12% KCl), according to Levine et al. (1990). The carbonyl content was calculated from the spectrophotometric absorbance measurement at 340 nm (Cintra) with the use of a molar absorption coefficient of 22,000 M^-1cm⁻¹.

Advanced Oxidation Protein Product Assays

Levels of advanced oxidation protein products (AOPPs) in liver homogenates were determined spectrophotometrically at 340 nm (Cintra, UV/Vis Spectrometer) and calibrated with chloramine-T solutions, which in the presence of potassium iodide absorb at 340 nm (Witko-Sarsat et al. 1996). Briefly, 1 mL of 2.5% tissue homogenate diluted 1/20 in 50 mM PBS (containing butylated hydroxytoluene, 100 µM and EDTA, 1 mM) was placed in quartz cuvettes and 50 µL of 1.16 M potassium iodide was added, followed by 200 µL of acetic acid after two minutes. In quartz cuvettes, used as blanks, 50 µL of 1.16 M potassium iodide was added to 1 mL of PBS followed by 200 µL of acetic acid. Advanced oxidation protein product concentrations were expressed as nanomoles per mg protein of analyzed tissue.

Tissue Antioxidant Analysis

Flash-frozen liver tissue was ground to a fine powder and treated with 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) followed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g, at 4°C, for ten minutes. The supernatant was assayed spectrophotometrically for activity of SOD, GSH, and GSSG-Red. Briefly, liver superoxide dismutase activity (SOD) (EC 1.15.1.1) was assayed according to Winterbourn et al. (1975), with an SOD determination kit (RA20408, Fluka, Biochemika, Steinheim, Germany), according to which one unit of SOD activity is defined as the amount of enzyme activity that causes 50% inhibition of the reduction of tetrazolium salt, WST-1 (2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4 -disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt). Superoxide dismutase is capable of inhibiting the formation of the water-soluble formazan dye typically formed by reduction of WST-1 with superoxide anions. Superoxide dismutase activity in liver was expressed as units of SOD per milligram protein according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Fluka, Biochemika).

Liver glutathione (GSH) content was assayed by measuring acid-soluble glutathione levels using 5,5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) to give a TNB that absorbs at 412 nm with a glutathione assay kit (CS0260), according to methods described previously (Akerboom et al. 1981). Liver glutathione reductase (GSSG-Red; EC 1.6.4.2) activity was assayed with a glutathione reductase assay kit (GRSA 114K4000) according to previously described methods (Dolphin et al. 1989; Garcia-Alfonso et al. 1993).

TSPO Binding Characteristics

Maximal binding capacity (B_max) and equilibrium dissociation constant (K_d) of the binding of the TSPO-specific ligand [³H]PK 11195 were determined in whole cell membrane homogenates from the liver, as previously described (Awad and Gavish 1987). Radioactivity was counted with a 1600CA Tri-Carb liquid scintillation analyzer (Packard, Meriden, CT, USA). Scatchard analysis of [³H]PK 11195 binding was done to determine the B_max and K_d values. In addition, TSPO binding characteristics were determined in other organs such as kidney, brain, testes, and heart, according to the same methods as described for the liver.

Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as means ± SD (n > 5). Significance was determined using analysis of variance and post hoc analysis as appropriate, whereas for dependent groups, the paired-sample t test was used. Significance of association was determined by the two-tailed t test. STATISTICA 5.0 (Stat Soft Inc., Tulsa, USA) was used, and p < .05 was considered indicative of significant differences. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used as a measure of linear association between two variables.

Results

The rats of this study were observed daily, and the vast majority appeared healthy throughout the course of the experiment, with the exception of the death of one rat in the DS 20 group (5.6%) and two rats in the DR 20 group (8.3%). No rats died in the DS 10 group. No morphologically visible abnormal outgrowths appeared in any of the rats. At sacrifice, gross examination of internal organs generally revealed no abnormalities. Thus, no obvious tumorigenic effects were observed in the DMBA-exposed male rats with the gross anatomical investigation of the present study. However, in some rats treated with 20 mg of DMBA, reductions in testis size of approximately 30% were observed (in two DS 20 rats, and in three DR 20 rats).

At gross anatomic levels, DMBA treatment could have resulted in pale and swollen livers in individual rats of the different groups. Histopathology of liver tissue (Figure 1, Table 1) included glossy appearance of hepatocytes and heterochromatic nuclei (Figure 1B, Table 1). In the animals of the DR 20 group, areas of glossy appearance appeared throughout the affected livers of the group (in 15 of 23 animals) (Figures 1B–D), whereas in the DS 10 and DS 20 groups, the glossy appearance was subcapsular, that is, restricted to peripheral regions (in 4 and 11 animals of these groups of 6 and 12 animals, respectively; Figure 1C, Table 1). In affected livers, erythrocytes appeared coagulated, as condensed conglomerates attached to the endothelial surfaces of sinusoids, which were visibly thickened (in 4 animals from the DS 10 group; in 11 animals from the DS 20 group; and in 15 animals from the DR 20 group, which corresponds to 67%, 61%, and 65% of the analyzed samples, respectively) (Figure 1D, Table 1). Mentioned changes did not differ substantially between DMBA treated groups, but some could be more pronounced in animals of the DR 20 group. For example, in some liver slides of the latter, the sinusoid was no longer visible, accompanied by disorganized hepatic parenchyma with mild cell swelling (Figure 1E), observed in 6 animals (26%) of the total analyzed (Table 1). In the DR 20 group, vacuolar degeneration was also visible (Figure 1E). The DMBA treatments also provoked glycogen overload, which was prominent in the midzonal region of the hepatic lobes. This overload was visible in affected animals of all three DMBA-treated groups. In the other animals of the three groups, no signs of pathology in the liver were observed (1, 5, and 2 animals for the DS 10, DS 20, and DR 20 groups, respectively).

Figure 1.

Histopathological effects of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) treatments on the liver. (A) Normal liver tissue. (B) Glossy appearance of hepatocytes with heterochromatic nucleus examples (outlined in left part of the figure), visible in all groups with DMBA administered (DS 20 given as example). (C) Outlined, peripheral, subcapsular glossy appearance that is characterized for groups DS 10 and DS 20 (DS 10 given as example). (D) Coagulated erythrocytes as condensed conglomerates (arrow head) at visible thickened endothelial surface of sinusoids (arrows) (evident only in DR 20). (E) Disorganization of hepatic parenchyma with vacuolar degeneration in DR 20. (F) An increase in glycogen granules (visible as darker dots, examples indicated with arrows) distributed in a centrolobular, midzonal region (group DR 20). Hematoxylin and eosin staining for micrographs A–E, and periodic acid–Schiff staining for micrograph F. Scale bars are 100 μm, as indicated. Experimental groups of DMBA treatment (DS 10, DS 20, DR 20) are as described in the Methods section.

Table 1.

Histological abnormalities in liver in all groups after DMBA exposure (n [%]).

Liver histology	DS 10 (N = 6)	DS 20 (N = 18)	DR 20 (N = 23)
Normal hepatocytes	1 (17)	5 (28)	2 (9)
Glossy appearance, heterochromatic nuclei, condensed erythrocytes (Er), thickened endothelial lining	4 (67)	11 (61)	15 (65)
Vacuolar degeneration, mild cell swelling, hyalinoid degeneration	1 (17)	2 (11)	6 (26)

N indicates number of animals from each group analyzed with light microscopy; n indicates the number of rats with pathology described in the table. The percentages indicate how big the fraction of rats with pathological signs is compared to the total number of rats from the groups investigated in this respect.

Abbreviation: DMBA, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene.

Accompanying the histopathological pathology, DMBA exposure resulted in considerable and significant reductions in liver GSH levels in all three DMBA-treated groups (Figure 2A). In particular, average GSH content was decreased by 79% for the DS 10 group, 77% for the DS 20 group, and 73% for the DR 20 group compared to control liver (Figure 2A). Significant enhancement in average activity of GSH reductase was observed in the DS 20 and DR 20 groups, compared to vehicle control (Figure 2A). Regarding GSH-reductase activity, the DS 10 group showed no difference with the vehicle control. Tissue activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) remained unchanged following the administration of DMBA to all three experimental groups (DS 10, DS 20, DR 20; Figure 2A).

Figure 2.

Oxidative stress assays in liver of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-exposed rats: (A) Significant increases in activity of glutathione reductase GSSG-Red, decreases in glutathione content GSH, and no change in superoxide dismutase SOD levels in DMBA-exposed rats compared to vehicle control rats. (B) Increases in advanced oxidation protein product levels in liver of DMBA-exposed rats compared to vehicle control rats. (C) Increases in protein carbonyl PC levels in liver of DMBA-exposed rats compared to vehicle control rats. (D) Increases in thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBAR) formation in liver homogenates of DMBA-exposed rats compared to vehicle control rats. On the left side, TBAR production nmol/g tissue in tissue sample steady-state reaction. On the right side, TBAR production nmol/g tissue after incubation with 4 × 10⁻⁵ M Fe²⁺ - 2.6 mM ascorbic acid induced lipid peroxidation. C, vehicle control. Experimental groups of DMBA treatment (DS 10, DS 20, DR 20) are as described in the Methods section. *p < .05 versus vehicle control; **p < .01 versus vehicle control.

Reminiscent of the effects on the GSH levels, all groups exposed to DMBA treatment displayed significantly increased average AOPP content in liver, compared to vehicle control (Figure 2B). In detail, this parameter of protein oxidation was enhanced in the DR 20 group by 106%, in the DS 20 group by 62%, and in the DS 10 group by 89%. Measurement of carbonyl residues indicative of oxidative protein damage showed that protein carbonyl content in the liver was moderately, but significantly, higher in the DS 10 (31%) and DS 20 (33%) groups, compared to vehicle control (Figure 2C). The animals of the DR 20 group did not show a significant change compared to the vehicle control.

Regarding TBAR production in liver (Figure 2D), we measured steady-state concentration, which corresponds to physiologic values of lipid peroxide formation (concentration in vivo). Only the DS 10 group showed a significant increase in steady-state levels of TBARs (35%) (Figure 2D, left panel). To further assess this finding, we assayed whether lipid oxidation could actually be activated in vitro. Inducible lipid peroxidation in vitro, as assayed with Fe²⁺ - acorbic acid was significantly lower only in the DS 20 group, by 31%, and unchanged in the other groups (Figure 2D, right panel).

Binding assays with the TSPO-specific ligand [³H]PK 11195 were performed to determine potential effects of DMBA administration on TSPO binding characteristics in rat liver (Figure 3). In the liver of vehicle control rats, the B_max and K_d values for TSPO were in the range of previously described results (Gavish et al. 1999). Representative Scatchard plots in liver presenting both B_max and K_d are shown in Figure 3 for the control and experimental groups. The B_max of [³H]PK 11195 was significantly lower in rat liver in all groups that were administered DMBA compared to vehicle (by 48%, 37%, and 43% for the DS 10, DS 20, and DR 20 groups, respectively, compared to vehicle control, Table 2).

Figure 3.

Representative Scatchard plots of saturation curves of [³H]PK 11195 binding to membrane homogenates of liver, respectively of vehicle control rats (A) and of rats exposed to DMBA (B–D). B, bound; B/F, bound over free; C, vehicle control. Experimental groups of DMBA treatment (DS 10, DS 20, DR 20) are as described in the Methods section. Explanation of further abbreviations as in Figure 1.

Table 2.

Effect of DMBA exposure on TSPO binding characteristics in various tissues.

	Control		DS 10		DS 20		DR 20
Tissue	n	B_max, (fmol/mg)	n	B_max, (fmol/mg)	n	B_max, (fmol/mg)	n	B_max, (fmol/mg)
Liver	10	1960 ± 933	6	1012 ± 325*	14	1244 ± 663*	14	1116 ± 460*
Heart	13	4387 ± 1800	6	6650 ± 2042*	7	6437 ± 1812*	7	4929 ± 1282
Testis	12	3001 ± 400	6	4017 ± 1066	9	4610 ± 1685**	7	5289 ± 1609***
Kidney	7	4270 ± 860		N/A	7	4400 ± 900		N/A
Brain	7	300 ± 82		N/A	7	351 ± 48		N/A
	n	Kd (nM)	n	Kd (nM)	n	Kd (nM)	n	Kd (nM)
Liver	10	1.7 ± 0.4	6	1.2 ± 0.2**	14	1.3 ± 0.3*	14	1.4 ± 0.5
Heart	13	1.8 ± 0.9	6	2.3 ± 1.0	7	2.1 ± 0.7	7	1.5 ± 0.4
Testis	12	0.8 ± 0.3	6	1.0 ± 0.2*	9	1.2 ± 0.7*	7	1.2 ± 0.5*
Kidney	7	1.9 ± 0.9		N/A	7	1.8 ± 0.5		N/A
Brain	7	1.5 ± 0.4		N/A	7	1.5 ± 0.4		N/A

Average B_max values (fmoles / mg) protein of [3H]PK 11195 binding to TSPO of DMBA-exposed rat tissues versus vehicle control. Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric, one-way analysis of variance was used, with Mann-Whitney as the post hoc, nonparametric test.

*p < .05

**p < .01

***p < .001.

Abbreviations: DMBA, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene; TSPO, 18 kDa translocator protein.

Regarding tissues other than liver, compared to vehicle control, [³H]PK 11195 binding assays of the testis of our experimental groups showed a significant enhancement in the B_max of TSPO resulting from DMBA administration, in two DMBA-treated groups, namely, DS 20 and DR 20 (54% and 76%, respectively), whereas for the DS 10 group no statistically significant increase was observed (Table 2). In homogenates from the heart, the B_max for [³H]PK 11195 binding was also significantly higher in the groups with onetime application of DMBA (52% and 47%, respectively, for the DS 10 and DS 20 groups, compared to vehicle control), whereas no effects of DMBA treatment regarding TSPO binding characteristics were observed for the DR 20 group (Table 2).

Regarding tissues other than liver, heart, and testis, [³H]PK 11195 binding levels in kidney and brain appeared not to be affected by the DMBA. In particular, the binding analysis done on the DS 20 group showed no differences in binding capacity in kidney and brain homogenates, compared to vehicle control (Table 2).

Kidney: Control group, B_max = 4270 ± 860 fmol/mg and K_d = 1.9 ± 0.9 nM; DS 20 group B_max = 4400 ± 900 fmol/mg and K_d = 1.8 ± 0.5 nM

Brain: Control group B_max = 300 ± 82 fmol/mg and K_d = 1.5 ± 0.4 nM and DS 20 group B_max = 351 ± 48 fmol/mg and K_d = 1.5 ± 0.4 nM

As can be seen above, in both the DMBA groups and vehicle control groups, K_d values determined with [³H]PK 11195 binding were in the nM range (0.5–2.3 nM), and no significant differences were observed between the experimental and control groups regarding the K_d for all tissues presented here.

Discussion

One part of this study was to assay potential consequences of dose, frequency of administration, and term from initial DMBA application on liver pathology, oxidative stress, and effects on TSPO binding characteristics in the liver. The repeated dose paradigm (fragmenting one large dose of DMBA to smaller, nonlethal fractions) is considered the optimal application model to induce malignant tumors (Gao et al. 2007; Huggins et al. 1966; Löscher et al. 1993; Mevissen et al. 1996). Depending on the particular report, term from administration of PAH to sacrifice ranges from 24 hours to 270 days. We used three regimens of DMBA application to outbred Wistar rats (DS 10, DS 20, and DR 20) and terms of 70 days (10 weeks) and 126 days (18 weeks) to determine the effect of DMBA per se, that is, under otherwise normal conditions. The different effects of the three regimens are discussed below.

This study served to determine potential correlations between DMBA exposure and oxidative stress in the liver, liver pathology, and TSPO binding characteristics in the liver. We paid special attention to the liver, since metabolic activation and detoxification of DMBA in vivo occur primarily in this organ (Moore et al. 1986; Muto et al. 2003). On the other hand, it is known that DMBA toxicity requires its conversion to 3,4-dyhydrodiol intermediates in the liver (Gao et al. 2007; Miyata et al. 2001). As determined with liver histopathology in the present study, the three DMBA treatments resulted in moderate toxic effects, comparable to cyclosporine-A–induced hepatotoxicity in rat liver (Rezzani et al. 2005). As another parameter of liver histopathology, it has been reported that drug toxicity, including PAH, may be accompanied by glycogen overload owing to disturbed carbohydrate metabolism (Muto et al. 2003; Pereira et al. 2006; Singh et al. 1997). Therefore, we also examined hepatocellular glycogen. It appeared that the rats that were subjected to DMBA exposure suffered from irreversible impairment in glycogen metabolism.

Studies by others applying PAH to outbred rodents described dose- and duration-dependent liver pathology, as we also found in this study (Table 1), including foci of altered hepatocytes, such as hepatocyte hypertrophy, multinucleated hepatocytes, inflammation, pigmentation, necrosis, and highly increased incidence of hepatocellular adenoma (Baker et al. 2001; Mishra et al. 2009; NTP technical report 2006; Safer and Al-Nughamish 1999; Tsuda and Farber 1980).

It has been suggested that possible mechanisms of hepatotoxicity include enhanced production of oxygen-derived free radicals resulting in depletion in intracellular reduced glutathione (Bironaite and Ollinger 1997; Stadlbauer et al. 2005). The present study shows a strongly reduced GSH levels in all three DMBA treated groups. This finding was accompanied by decreased GSH/GSSG-Red ratios in the DS 20 and DR 20 groups, indicating reduced capacity of the liver to scavenge free radicals produced in response to DMBA (Arulkumaran et al. 2007; Wu et al. 2004). It has been suggested that such a reduction in antioxidant capacity may also lead to a decrease in DMBA clearance (Muqbil and Banu 2006; Tsai-Turton et al. 2007). Our results demonstrated no differences in SOD levels following any of the DMBA treatments, which could simply mean that the potential DMBA effects are balanced out by compensatory responses (Valko et al. 2006).

Regarding the potential damaging effects of the oxidative stress in the liver, enhancement of AOPP levels was observed in all three DMBA treatment groups, and enhancement of protein carbonyls were observed in the DS 10 and DS 20 groups. Studies by others have suggested lipid oxidation in the liver resulting from DMBA exposure (Choi 2008; Mugbil and Banu 2006). We measured the profiles of the “steady-state” lipid peroxidation products (LPO) as TBARs. The DS 10 group displayed significantly increased TBAR values in liver, whereas the DS 20 and DR 20 groups did not show significant differences in this respect. To further assess this finding, we also assayed whether lipid oxidation could actually be activated in vitro. For this purpose, we assayed ferro-ascorbate pro-oxidant activity. Under these conditions, the DS 20 group showed decreased levels of TBARs, whereas no effects for the DS10 and DR20 groups were observed. Decreased content of highly unsaturated fatty acids, or modification of structure, composition, and stability of the membranes, as well as decreased concentration of NADPH, or changes in antioxidant status and protective enzymes, could be contributory factors to the lower rates of induced LPO (Cheesman et al. 1986; Kolanjiappan et al. 2003). This may also be the caase for our findings. In any case, in contrast to the effects on protein oxidation, lipid peroxidation does not appear to be a major effect of DMBA treatment in our paradigm.

Taken together, our data deriving from the GSH/GSSG-Red and AOPP suggest significant oxidative stress in the liver induced by acute exposure of rats to DMBA. This finding is consistent with previous reports that DMBA induces oxidative damage in liver in vivo characterized by induced depletion in liver glutathione content, and increased peroxidative damage (Arulkumaran et al. 2007; Choi and Kim 2009; Girolami et al. 2008; Letchoumy et al. 2006; Mishra 2009).

Unexpectedly, the oxidative stress assays regarding the liver, other than GSH and AOPP applied in this experiment (e.g., SOD, protein carbonylation, lipid peroxidation), provided less conclusive results than the GSH and AOPP data, suggesting that DMBA may have specific oxidative stress effects in the liver with the regimens we applied, as opposed to more general toxic effects. No statistical differences were observed in liver LPO measurements in the DS 20 and DR 20 groups, and also not in protein carbonyls in the DR 20 group, which suggests that the liver is able to deal with the induced stress by DMBA. In another study, we applied a high-fat, high-cholesterol (HFHC) diet to rats to evaluate oxidative stress in the liver (Dimitrova-Shumkovska et al. 2010b). In that study, we found not only enhanced protein oxidation but also enhanced lipid peroxidation in the rats' livers. In fact, all parameters indicated enhanced oxidative stress in the rats' livers. As the HFHC diet was chronic, whereas the DMBA exposures of the present study were acute, either the insult of DMBA to the liver was less severe than the insult caused by the HFHC diet, or the liver recovered from the DMBA treatment with regard to lipid peroxidation (LPO) in the time period after the DMBA application. Interestingly, in this respect, although the DS 20 and DR 20 groups were sacrificed 18 weeks after DMBA exposure and showed no effects with the TBAR steady-state assay, the DS 10 group was sacrificed only 10 weeks after DMBA treatment and (still) showed a significant increase with the TBAR steady-state assay of the liver. This finding may suggest that 18 weeks allows for at least a partial recovery from oxidative stress, whereas 10 weeks does not allow for such a recovery. As described above, the obtained results regarding LPO could not fully reflect a picture about levels of liver injury (Fang and Lin 2008). It would be interesting to study other, shorter periods after DMBA exposure, to see whether in such paradigms higher levels of oxidative stress in the liver are detected.

In addition to above mentioned effects on liver toxicity, which are in accord with other studies, our results showed significant decreases in TSPO binding capacity in the livers of all groups given DMBA (Figure 3). In particular, these novel findings of changes in TSPO binding capacity in the liver after DMBA exposure correlated well with (1) increased protein oxidation (AOPP), (2) decreased GSH levels, and (3) histopathological signs. It has been suggested previously that TSPO binding characteristics, such as affinity, may correlate with oxidative stress in the liver (Courtiere et al. 1995). As the TSPO binding capacities in the liver are typically reduced in the present study, this may be a compensatory response directed toward reducing the damaging effects of DMBA. Such a mechanism has been proposed with in vitro studies with the toxin CoCl₂ (Zeno et al. 2009). This conclusion is based on studies in which reductions in TSPO levels via TSPO knockdown by genetic manipulation in vitro resulted in reduced cell death levels, and reduced ROS generation (Levin et al. 2005; Shoukrun et al. 2008; Veenman et al. in press; Zeno et al. 2009). Presently, we cannot definitely conclude whether the reduced TSPO binding capacity is a physiological response to the toxin DMBA and/or oxidative stress induced by DMBA, or that reduction in TSPO binding capacity in the liver is part of damaging effects of DMBA.

Since TSPO appears to control cholesterol transport and modulate steroidogenesis in endocrine tissues (Papadopoulous et al. 1997; Veenman et al. 2007), we also assayed expression of TSPO in testis homogenate of DMBA-treated rats. A significant enhancement in TSPO expression was observed in the testes of DS 20 and DR 20 rats. In another study regarding glandular tissue, with DMBA applied to female Sprague Dawley rats (80 mg/kg, i.e., comparable to our DS 20 and DR 20 groups), a significant increase in TSPO capacity in the nucleus of developed breast tumors compared to control tissue was observed (Mukhopadhyay et al. 2006). Our data and studies of others may allow us to hypothesize that stress induced by DMBA exposure may result in enhanced TSPO binding in glandular and steroidogenic tissues, potentially leading to tumorigenic developments. In parallel, the TSPO response in heart tissue was also significantly higher in the groups with onetime application of DMBA (52% and 47%, respectively, for the DS 10 and DS 20 groups, compared to vehicle control), whereas no effects of DMBA treatment regarding TSPO binding characteristics were observed for the DR 20 group. It is well known that TSPO responds to ischemia (Veenman and Gavish 2006). Thus, we hypothesize that lesions in the aorta observed after DMBA treatment in rats (Dimitrova-Shumkovska et al. 2010a) may contribute to the increase in TSPO binding capacity observed in the heart in the present study.

In brain and kidney, binding assays of kidney and brain in the DS 20 group did not reveal differences with the control group. We did not do assays of the other groups because we thought there would be no difference. In any case, only in the liver and the testes do the changes appear to be consistent.

As in the different organs, TSPO binding capacity may either increase, decrease, or not change, suggesting that TSPO responses to DMBA exposure in the liver and some other organs are organ specific rather than part of a uniform general body response. Thus, the observed TSPO responses in the various organs may be of a physiological, functional nature rather than simply part of the damage caused by DMBA. More studies are needed to verify this hypothesis for the individual organs.

In conclusion, our exposure of rats to DMBA caused oxidative stress in liver, as well as pathological changes in this organ. The pathological changes appeared to be related to dose or duration of DMBA exposure, and they were most consistently elevated upon repeated doses of DMBA totaling 20 mg. The binding capacity of TSPO was decreased in liver after DMBA treatment in correlation with indicators of oxidative stress in this organ. In other organs, such as heart and testis, TSPO binding was enhanced, or not affected (e.g., brain and kidney), suggesting that the effect of DMBA on TSPO binding in liver is tissue specific. We suggest that the reductions in TSPO binding capacity may present protective mechanisms. For example, reductions in ROS generation and cell death may follow reductions in TSPO binding capacity, as demonstrated previously with in vitro studies (Zeno et al. 2009).

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

L.V. and M.G. received support from internal Technion Research Funds: Elias Medical Research Fund; Lazarov Research Fund; K. Rozenblatt Research Fund; L. Aronberg Research Fund in Neurology; Trauma Research Fund; Fund for Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration; Daniel Horovitz Fund–Secondary Brain Damage and Neurodegeneration; Atkins Fund–Gerontology; Alexander Goldberg Memorial Research Fund; Nattie Fisher Alzheimer Research Fund; Jessie Kaplan Research Fund, Alzheimer’s. The Center for Absorption in Science, Ministry of Immigrant Absorption, State of Israel, is acknowledged for their support to S.L. and L.V. Presently, L.V. is supported by a joint grant from the Center for Absorption in Science of the Ministry of Immigrant Absorption and the Committee for Planning and Budgeting of the Council of Higher Education under the framework of the KAMEA program, Israel. We gratefully thank Radmila Crceva Nikolovska, Svetlana Stojanovska and Marietta Sthakleva for their support with the technical work. This work was further made possible by the continuous and generous support, advice, and encouragement of Mr. Gradimir Shumkovski.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

References

Akerboom

T. P.

Sies

(1981). Assay for glutathione, glutathione disulfide, and glutathione mixed disulfides in biological samples. Methods Enzymol 77, 373–82.

Anholt

R. R.

Pedersen

P. L.

De Souza

E. B.

Snyder

S. H.

(1986). The peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor. Localization to the mitochondrial outer membrane. J Biol Chem 261, 576–83.

Arulkumaran

Ramprasath

V. R.

Shanti

Sachdanandam

(2007). Alteration of DMBA-induced oxidative stress by additive action of a modified indigenous preparation- Kalpaamruthaa. Chem Biol Interact 167, 99–106.

Awad

Gavish

(1987). Binding of [3H] Ro5-4864 and [3H]PK 11195 to cerebral cortex and peripheral tissues of various species: species differences and heterogeneity in peripheral benzodiazepine binding sites. J Neurochem 495, 1407–14.

Baker

D. G.

Taylor

H. W.

Lee

S. P.

Barker

S. A.

Goad

M. E. P.

Means

J. C.

(2001). Hepatic toxicity and recovery of fischer 344 rats following exposure to 2-aminoanthracene by intraperitoneal injection. Toxicol Pathol 29, 328–32.

Bironaite

Ollinger

(1997). The hepatotoxicity of rhein involves impairment of mitochondrial functions. Chem Biol Interact 103, 35–50.

Cheesman

K. H.

Collins

Proudfoot

Slater

T. F.

Burton

G. W.

Webb

A. A.

Ingold

K. U.

(1986). Studies on lipid peroxidation in normal and tumour tissues The Novikoff rat liver tumor. Biochem J 235, 507–14.

Choi

E. J.

(2008). Antioxidative effects of hesperetin agianst 7,12-dimethylbenzaantracene–induced oxidative stress in mice. Life Sci 82, 1059–64.

Choi

E. J.

Kim

G. H.

(2009). Hepatoprotective effects of daidzein against 7,12-dimethylbenz[α]anthracene–induced oxidative stress in mice. Int J Mol Med 23, 659–64.

10.

Courtiere

Molard

Reybaud

(1995). Differential effects of in vitro peroxidation on peripheral - and central-type benzodiazepine receptors. Protection by diverse antioxidants. Biochem Pharmacol 50, 1815–22.

11.

Curfs

D. M. J.

Lutgens

Gijbels

M. M. J.

Kockx

M. M.

Daemen

M. J. A. P.

van Schooten

F. J.

(2004). Chronic exposure to the carcinogenic compound benzo[α]pyrene induces larger and phenoltypically different atherosclerotic plaques in apo E-Knockout mice. Am J Pathol 164, 101–8.

12.

Delavoie

Hardwick

Robert

Giatzakis

Peranzi

Maccario

Lacapere

Papadopoulos

(2003). In vivo and in vitro peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor polymerization: Functional significance in drug ligand and cholesterol binding. Biochemistry 42, 4506–19.

13.

DiGiovanni

Juchau

M. R.

(1980). Biotransformation and bioactivation of 7,12 dimethybenz[a]anthracene (7,12 DMBA). Drug Metab Rev 11, 61–101.

14.

Dimitrova-Shumkovska

Veenman

Ristoski

Leschiner

Gavish

(2010b). Chronic high fat, high cholesterol supplementation decreases 18kDa Translocator Protein binding capacity in association with increased oxidative stress in rat liver and aorta. Food Chem Toxicol 48, 910–21.

15.

Dimitrova-Shumkovska

Veenman

Ristoski

Leschiner

Gavish

(2010a). Dimethylbenz[α]anthracene induces oxidative stress and reduces the binding capacity of the mitochondrial 18 kDa Translocator protein in rat aorta. Drug Chem Toxicol. Epub ahead of print.

16.

Dolphin

Poulson

Avramovic

eds. (1989). Glutathione: Chemical, Biochemical and Metabolic Aspects, vols. A and B. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

17.

Draper

H. H.

Hadley

(1990). Malondialdehyde determination as index of lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol 186, 421–31.

18.

Fang

H. L.

Lin

W. C.

(2008). Corn oil enhancing lipid peroxidation induced by CCl4 does not aggravate liver fibrosis in rats. Food Chem Toxicol 46, 2267–73.

19.

Fischer

Schmitt

Bode

J.G.

Häussinger

(2001). Expression of the peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor and apoptosis induction in hepatic stellate cells. Gastroenterology 120, 1212–26.

20.

Frenkel

Grunberger

Kasai

Komura

Nakanishi

(1981) Identification of novel 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene adducts in cellular ribonucleic acid. Biochemistry 20, 4377–81.

21.

Frenkel

Wei

(1995). 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene induces oxidative DNA modification in vivo. Free Radic Biol Med 19, 373–80.

22.

Gao

Lauer

F. T.

Mitchell

L. A.

Burchiel

S. W.

(2007). Microsomal epoxide hydrolase is required for 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene DMBA-induced immunotoxicity in mice. Toxicol Sci 98, 137–44.

23.

García-Alfonso

Martìnez-Galisteo

Llobell

Bárcena

J. A.

López-Barea

(1993). Horse-liver glutathione reductase: Purification and characterization. Int J Biochem 25, 61–68.

24.

Gavish

Bar-Ami

Weizman

(1992). The endocrine system and mitochondrial benzodiazepine receptors. Mol Cell Endocrinol 88, 1–13.

25.

Gavish

Bachman

Shoukrun

Katz

Veenman

Weisinger

Weizman

(1999). Enigma of the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor. Pharmacol Rev 51, 630–46.

26.

Giannaccini

Betti

Palego

Chelli

Gallo

Pirone

Fabiani

Bertellotti

Lucacchini

(2004). In vitro effects of lead ions on peripheral benzodiazepine receptors and adenylyl cyclase activity in the mantle of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 137, 197–206.

27.

Girolami

Abbadessa

Racca

Spaccamiglio

Piccione

Dacasto

Carletti

Gardini

Di Carlo

Nebbia

(2008). Time-dependent acetylsalicylic acid effects on liver CYP1A and antioxidant enzymes in a rat model of 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary carcinogenesis. Toxicol Lett 181, 87–92.

28.

Hirsch

J. D.

Beyer

C. F.

Malkowitz

Beer

Blume

A. J.

(1989). Mitochondrial benzodiazepine receptors mediate inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory control. Mol Pharmacol 35, 157–63.

29.

Huggins

Grand

Fukunishi

(1966). Aromatic influences on the yields of mammary cancers following administration of 7, 12-dimethylbenzaantracene. Pathology 51, 737–42.

30.

Knudsen

Mandrup

Rasmussen

J. T.

Andreasen

P. H.

Poulsen

Kristiansen

(1993). The function of acyl- CoA-binding protein ACBP/dizaepam binding inhibitor DBI. Mol Cell Biochem 123, 129–38.

31.

Kolanjiappan

Ramachandran

C. R.

Manoharan

(2003). Biochemical changes in tumor tissues of oral cancer patients. Clinical Biochem 36, 61–5.

32.

Krueger

K. E.

Papadopoulos

(1990). Peripheral-type bezodizaepine receptors mediate translocation of cholesterol from outer to inner mitochondrial membranes in adrenocortical cells. J Biol Chem 265, 15015–22.

33.

Kugler

Veenman

Shandalov

Leschiner

Spanier

Lakomek

Gavish

(2008). Ligands of the mitochondrial 18 kDa translocator protein attenuate apoptosis in human glioblastoma cells exposed to erucylphosphohomocholine. Cell Oncol 30, 435–50.

34.

Kunduzova

O. R.

Escourrou

De La Farge

Salvayre

Seguelas

M. H.

Leducq

Bono

Herbert

J. M.

Parini

(2004). Involvement of peripheral benzodiazepine receptor in the oxidative stress, death-signaling pathways, and renal injury induced by ischemia-reperfusion. J Am Soc Nephrol 15, 2152–60.

35.

Letchoumy

P. V.

ChandraMohan

K. V.

Kumaraguruparan

Hara

Nagini

(2006). Black tea polyphenols protect against 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis. Oncology Res 16, 167–78.

36.

Levin

Premkumar

Veenman

Kugler

Leschiner

Spanier

Weisinger

Lakomek

Weizman

Snyder

S. H.

Pasternak

G. W.

Gavish

M.,

(2005). The peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor and tumorigenicity: Isoquinoline binding protein (IBP) antisense knockdown in the C6 glioma cell line. Biochemistry 44, 9924–35.

37.

Levine

R. L.

Garland

Oliver

C. N.

Amici

Climent

Lenz

A. G.

Ahn

B. W.

Shaltiel

Stadman

E. R.

(1990). Determination of carbonyl content in oxidatively modified proteins. Meth Enzymol 186, 464–78.

38.

Löscher

Mevissen

Lehmacher

Stamm

(1993). Tumor promotion in a breast cancer model by exposure to a weak alternating magnetic field. Cancer Lett 71, 75–81.

39.

Lowry

O. H.

Rosenbrough

A. L.

Randall

R. J.

(1951). Protein measurement with folin fenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193, 265–75.

40.

Mevissen

Lerchl

Löscher

(1996). Study on pineal function and DMBA-induced breast cancer formation in rats during exposure to a 100-mG, 50-Hz magnetic field. J Toxicol Environ Health 48, 101–17.

41.

Miller

K. P.

Ramos

K. S.

(2001). Impact of cellular metabolism on the biological effects of benzo[a]pyrene and related hydrocarbons, Drug Metab Rev 33, 1–35.

42.

Mishra

Kar

Kale

R. K.

(2009). Prevention of chemically induced mammary tumorigenesis by daidzein in pre-pubertal rats: The role of peroxidative damage and antioxidative enzymes. Mol Cell Biochem 325, 149–57.

43.

Miyata

Furukawa

Takahashi

Gonzalez

F. J.

Yamazoe

(2001). Mechanism of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene–induced immunotoxicity: Role of metabolic activation at the target organ. Jpn J Pharmacol 86, 302–9.

44.

Moore

C. J.

Tricomi

W. A.

Gould

M. N.

(1986). Interspecies comparison of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolism in human and rat mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res 46, 4969–52.

45.

Moreno-Sánchez

Hogue

B. A.

Bravo

Newman

A. H.

Basile

A. S.

Chiang

P. K.

(1991). Inhibition of substrate oxidation in mitochondria by the peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor ligand AHN 086. Biochem Pharmacol 41, 1479–84.

46.

Motoyama

Yamashita

Morina

Tanaka

Kobayashi

Honda

(2008). Hyperthermic treatment of DMBA-induced rat mammary cancer using magnetic nanoparticles. Biomagn Res Technol 25, 2.

47.

Mukhopadhyay

Ballard

B. R.

Mukherjee

Kabir

S. M.

Das

S. K.

(2006). Beneficial effects of soy protein in the initiation and progression against dimethylbenz[α] antracene-induced breast tumors in female rats. Mol and Cell Biochem 290, 169–76.

48.

Muqbil

Banu

(2006). Enhancement of pro-oxidant effect of 7, 12- dimethylbenz[a]antracene DMBA in rats by pre-exposure to restarint stress. Cancer Lett 240, 213–20.

49.

Muto

Takasaki

Takahashi

Hano

Kanai

Wakui

Endo

Furusato

(2003). Initial changes of hepatic glycogen granules and glycogen phosphorylase α after exposure to 7,12-dimethylbenz[α]anthracene in rats. J Toxicol Pathol 16, 153–60.

50.

Netto

L. E.

Kowaltowsky

A. J.

Castilho

R. F.

Vercesi

A. E.

(2002). Thiol enzymes protecting mitochondria against oxidative damage. Methods Enzymol 348, 260–70.

51.

National Toxicology Program (NTP) (2006). NTP technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin TCDD in female Harlan-Sprague Dawley rat gavage studies. Cas. No. 1746-01-06. Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser 521, 4–232.

52.

O’Beirne

G. B.

Woods

M. J.

Williams

D. C.

(1990). Two subcellular locations for peripheral-type bezodizepine receptors in rat liver. Eur J Biochem 188, 131–38.

53.

Ohkawa

Ohishi

Yagi

(1978). Assay for lipid peroxidation in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Analyt Biochem 95, 351–58.

54.

Oliveira

C. P.

Coelho

A. M.

Barbeiro

H. V.

Lima

V. M.

Soriano

Ribeiro

Molan

N. A.

Alves

V. A.

Souza

H. P.

Machado

M. C.

Carrilho

F. J.

(2006). Liver mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of experimental nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Braz J Med Biol Res 39, 189–94.

55.

Papadopoulos

Baraldi

Guilarte

T. R.

Knudsen

T. B.

Lacapère

J. J.

Lindemann

Norenberg

M. D.

Nutt

Weizman

Zhang

M. R.

Gavish

(2006). Translocator protein (18kDa) new nomenclature for the peripheral-typebenzodiazepine receptor based on its structure and molecular function. Trends Pharmacol Sci 27, 402–9.

56.

Pereira

Mapuskar

Rao

C.V.

(2006). Chronic toxicity of diethyl phthalate in male Wistar rats-a dose-response study. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 45, 169–77.

57.

Rezzani

Buffoli

Rodella

Stacchiotti

Bianchi

(2005). Protective role of melatonin in cyclosporine A-induced oxidative stress in rat liver. Int Immunopharmacol 5, 1397–405.

58.

Safer

A. M.

Al-Nughamish

A. J.

(1999). Hepatotoxicity induced by the anti-oxidant food additive, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), in rats: An electron microscopical study. Histol Histopathol 14, 391–406.

59.

Samy

R. P.

Gopalakrishnakone

Ignacimuthu

(2006). Anti-tumor promoting potential of luteolin against 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary tumors in rats. Chem Biol Interact 164, 1–14.

60.

Shoukrun

Veenman

Shandalov

Leschiner

Spanier

Karry

Katz

Weisinger

Weizman

Gavish

(2008). The 18-kDa translocator protein, formerly known as the peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor, confers proapoptotic and antineoplastic effects in a human colorectal cancer cell line. Pharmacogenet Genomics 18, 977–88.

61.

Singh

Chu

Villeneuve

D. C.

(1997). Subchronic toxicity of 2,4,4′-trichlorobiphenyl in the rat liver: an ultrastructural and biochemical study. Ultrastruct Pathol 20, 275–284.

62.

Singletary

Liao

C. H.

(1989). Ellagic acid effects on the carcinogenicity, DNA-binding and metabolism of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA). In Vivo 3, 173–75.

63.

Stadlbauer

Fickert

Lackner

Schmerlaib

Krisper

Trauner

Stauber

R. E.

(2005). Hepatotoxicity of NONI juice: Report of two cases. World J Gastroenterol 11, 4758–60.

64.

Szeto

H. H.

(2006). Cell permeable, mitochondrial-targeted, peptide antioxidants. AAPS J 8, E277–E283.

65.

Tsai-Turton

Nakamura

B. N.

Luderer

(2007). Induction of apoptosis by 9,10 dimethyl-1,2-benzantracene in cultured preovulatory rat folicules is preceded by a rise in reactive oxygen species and is prevented by glutathione. Biol Reprod 77, 442–51.

66.

Tsuda

Farber

(1980). Resistant hepatocytes as early changes in liver induced by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Int J Cancer 25, 137–39.

67.

Valko

Rhodes

C. J.

Moncol

Izakovic

Mazur

(2006). Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer. Chem Biol Interact 160, 1–40.

68.

Van Schooten

F. J.

Hirvonen

Mass

L. M.

De Mol

B. A.

Klienjans

J. C.

Bell

D. A.

Durrer

J. D.

(1998). Putative susceptibility markers of coronary artery disease: Association between VDR genotype, smoking, and aromatic DNA adduct level in human right atrial tissue. FASEB J 12, 1409–17.

69.

Veenman

Gavish

(2006). The peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor and the cardiovascular system.Implications for drug development. Pharmacol Ther 110, 503–24.

70.

Veenman

Papadopoulos

Gavish

(2007). Channel-like functions of the 18-kDa translocator protein TSPO Regulation of apoptosis and steroidogenesis as part of the host-defense response. Curr Pharm Design 13, 2385–2405.

71.

Veenman

Shandalov

Gavish

(2008). VDAC activation by the 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO), implications for apoptosis. J Bioenerg Biomembr 40, 199–205.

72.

Veenman

Alten

Linnemannstöns

Shandalov

Zeno

Lakomek

Gavish

Kugler

(2010). Potential involvement of F(0)F (1)-ATP(synth)ase and reactive oxygen species in apoptosis induction by the antineoplastic agent erucylphosphohomocholine in glioblastoma cell lines: A mechanism for induction of apoptosis via the 18 kDa mitochondrial translocator protein. Apoptosis 15, 753–68.

73.

Veenman

Weizman

Weisinger

Gavish

Expression and functions of the 18 kDa mitochondrial translocator protein TSPO in health and disease. Targeted Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapeutics.

74.

Waldman

J. M.

Lioy

P. J.

Greenberg

Butler

J. P.,

(1991). Analysis of human exposure to benzoapyrene via inhalation and food ingestion in the Total Human Environmental Exposure Study (THEES). J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 1, 193–225.

75.

Whitsett

Carpenter

Lamartiniere

C. A.

(2006). Resveratrol, but not EGCG, in the diet suppresses DMBA-induced mammary cancer in rats. J Carcinog 5, 15–25.

76.

Winterbourn

C. C.

Hawkins

R. E.

Brian

Carrell

R. W.

(1975). The estimation of red cell superoxide dismutase activity. J Lab Clin Med 85, 337–34.

77.

Witko-Sarsat

Friedlander

Capeillère-Blandin

Nguyen-Khoa

Nguyen

A. T.

Zingraff

Jungers

Descamps-Latscha

(1996). Advanced oxidation protein products as a novel marker of oxidative stress in uremia. Kidney Int 49, 1304–13.

78.

Hossein Noyan Ashraf

Facci

Wang

Paterson

P. G.

Ferrie

Juurlink

B. H. J.

(2004). Dietary approach to attenuate oxidative stress, hypertension and inflammation in the cardiovascular system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 7094–99.

79.

Zeno

Zaaroor

Leschiner

Veenman

Gavish

(2009). CoCl(2) induces apoptosis via the 18kDa translocator protein in U118MG human glioblastoma cells. Biochemistry 48, 4652–61.

Decreases in Binding Capacity of the Mitochondrial 18 kDa Translocator Protein Accompany Oxidative Stress and Pathological Signs in Rat Liver After DMBA Exposure

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Materials

Research Subjects

Treatment and Tissue Handling

Administration of DMBA

Tissue Collection

Histopathology

Protein Quantification

Lipid Peroxidation Assays

Protein Carbonyl Assays

Advanced Oxidation Protein Product Assays

Tissue Antioxidant Analysis

TSPO Binding Characteristics

Statistical Analysis

Results

Discussion

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Abbreviations

References