Growing diversities among families and households throughout Western societies are documented. The prevailing conceptual approach has been to distinguish “the family” from alternative life-styles. That dichotomy, rooted in functionalist thought (“old action theory”) is rejected. Drawing on what is called “new action theory” a model for conceptualizing contemporary families is presented. The model assumes that persons construct their families within a societal context that, as Giddens argues, is both constraining and enabling. The authors conceive of families as primary groups. There are least four kinds of interdependencies —each with numerous subfacets, and existing in varied combinations—that give rise to perceptions of families: extrinsic, intrinsic, sexual, and formal. The authors identify two broad expressions of primary groups. One is based on generalized exchange and univocal reciprocity. The other rests on restricted exchange and mutual reciprocity/contingency. Because the authors argue that social theory cannot be divorced from social policy, they offer policy implications of this theoretical approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldous, J. (1991). In the families' ways. Contemporary Sociology, 20, 660-662.
2.
Alexander, J. C. (1988). The new theoretical movement. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 77-102). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Allan, G. (1989). Friendship: Developing a sociological perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview.
4.
Ames, K. , Sulavik, C., Joseph, N., Beachy, L., & Park, T. (1992, March 23). Domesticated bliss. Newsweek, pp. 62-63.
5.
Atwater, L. (1982). The extramarital connection: Sex, intimacy and identity. New York: Irvington.
6.
Bates, A. P. , & Babchuck, N. (1961). The primary group: A reappraisal. Sociological Quarterly, 2, 181-191.
7.
Bellah, R. N. , Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
Bernard, J. (1972). The future of marriage. New York: World.
9.
Bernardes, J. (1986). Multidimensional developmental pathways: A proposal to facilitate the conceptualisation of “Family Diversity”Sociological Review, 34, 590-610.
10.
Billingsley, A. (1968). Black families in White America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11.
Blankenhorn, D. (Ed.). (1990). Rebuilding the nest: A new commitment to the American family. Milwaukee, WI: Family Service Association.
12.
Blumstein, P. , & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, sex. New York: Morrow.
13.
Brickman, P. (1987). Commitment, conflict and caring. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14.
Bumpass, L. L. (1990). What's happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change. Demography, 27, 483-498.
15.
Cancian, F. M. (1987). Love in America: Gender & self-development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Cheal, D. (1991). Family and the state of theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
17.
Cherry, K. (1987). Womansword: What Japanese words say about women. Tokyo: Kodansha International.
18.
Christensen, B. (1991). Why families fail: The social costs. Lanham, MD: University Press.
19.
Christensen, H. T. (1964). The intrusion of values. In H. T. Christensen (Ed.), Handbook of marriage and family (pp. 969-1005). Chicago: Rand McNally.
20.
Clanton, G. (1989). Jealousy in American culture, 1945-1985: Reflections from popular literature. In D. D. Franks & E. D. McCarthy (Eds.), The sociology of emotions: Original essays & research papers (pp. 179-193). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
21.
Cochran, M. , Larner, M., Riley, D., Gunnarsson, L., & Henderson, C., Jr. (1990). Extending families: The social networks of parents and children. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Collier, J. F. , & Yanagisako, S. J. (Eds.). (1987). Gender & kinship: Essays toward a unified analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
Condon, J. (1985). A half step behind: Japanese women of the '80s. New York: Dodd, Mead.
24.
Cooley, C. H. (1909). Social organization. New York: Scribner.
25.
Curtis, R. (1986). Household and family theory on inequality. American Sociological Review, 51, 168-183.
26.
Ekeh, P. (1974). Social exchange theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Elder, G. (Ed.). (1985). Life-course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions, 1968-1980. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
Faris, E. (1957). The primary group: Essence and accident. In L. A. Coser & B. Rosenberg (Eds.), Sociology theory (pp. 298-303). New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1937)
29.
Finch, J. (1989). Family obligations and social change. Cambridge: Basic Blackwell.
30.
Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1988). Between husbands and wives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Ganong, L. H. , Coleman, M., & Mapes, D. (1990). A meta-analytic review of family structure stereotypes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 287-297.
32.
Gerstel, N. , & Gross, H. E. (1987). Families and work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
33.
Giallombardo, R. (1966). Society of women: A study of a women's prison. New York: Wiley.
34.
Giddens, A. (1982). Profiles and critiques in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
Godwin, D. D. , & Scanzoni, J. (1989). Couple consensus during marital joint decision-making: A context, process, outcome model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 943-956.
36.
Goode, W. J. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. New York: Free Press.
37.
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
38.
Gravenhorst, L. (1988). A feminist look at family development theory. In D. Klein & J. Aldous (Eds.), Social stress and family development (pp. 79-101). New York: Guilford.
39.
Gubrium, J. F. , & Holstein, J. A. (1990). What is family?Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
40.
Hill, R. (1982). American families during the twentieth century. In T. C. Caplow, H. M. Bahr, B. A. Chadwick, R. Hill, & M. H. Williamson (Eds.), Middletown families: Fifty years of change in continuity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
41.
Hofferth, S. (1985). Updating children's life course. Journal of Marriage and Family, 47, 93-116.
42.
Jewell, K. S. (1988). Survival of the Black family: The institutional impact of U.S. social policy. New York: Praeger.
43.
Kelley, H. H. , Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships. New York: Freeman.
44.
Kingsbury, N. , & Scanzoni, J. (1993). Structural-functionalism. In W. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. Schumm, & S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of theories and methods about families (pp. 195-217). New York: Plenum.
45.
Kondo, D. K. (1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender & discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
Lawler, E. J. , & Ford, R. (in press). Metatheory and friendly competition in theory growth: The case of power processes in bargaining. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Theoretical research programs: Studies in theory growth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47.
Lee, S. C. (1964). The primary group as Cooley defines it. Sociological Quarterly, 5, 23-34.
48.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1957). The principle of reciprocity. In L. A. Coser & B. Rosenberg (Eds.), Sociology theory. New York: Macmillan.
49.
Levine, C. (1990). AIDS and changing concepts of family. Milbank Quarterly, 68, 33-58.
50.
Liebow, E. (1967). Tally's corner. Boston: Little, Brown.
51.
Lindsey, K. (1981). Friends as family. Boston: Beacon.
52.
Lovejoy, N. C. (1990). AIDS: Impact on the gay man's homosexual and heterosexual families. Marriage and Family Review, 14, 285-316.
53.
Martin, T. C. , & Bumpass, L. L. (1989). Recent trends in marital disruption. Demography, 26, 37-50.
54.
Modell, J. (1989). Into one's own: From youth to adulthood in the United States, 1920-1975. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55.
Montgomery, R.J.V. (1988). Family sociology. In E. F. Borgotta & K. S. Cook (Eds.), The future of sociology (pp. 105-119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56.
Moynihan, D. P. (1965). Employment, income and the ordeal of the Negro family. Daedalus, 20, 745-769.
57.
Olson, D. H. , & McCubbin, H. (1983). Families: What makes them work?Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
58.
Parsons, T. (1965). The normal American family. In. S. M. Farber, P. Mustacchi, & R.H.L. Wilson, (Eds.), Man and civilization: The family's search for survival (pp. 31-50). New York: McGraw-Hill.
59.
Perlman, D. , & Fehr, B. (1987). The development of intimate relationships. In D. Perlman & S. Duck (Eds.), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration (pp. 13-40). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60.
Peters, M. F. , & McAdoo, H. P. (1983). The present and future of alternative lifestyles in ethnic American cultures. In E. D. Macklin & R. H. Rubin (Eds.), Contemporary families and alternative lifestyles (pp. 288-307). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61.
Popenoe, D. (1988). Disturbing the nest: Family change and decline in modern societies. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
62.
Rainwater, L. (1960). And the poor get children. Chicago: Quadrangle.
63.
Reiss, I. L. (1990). An end to shame: Shaping our next sexual revolution. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
64.
Richardson, L. (1985). The new other woman: Contemporary single women in affairs with married men. New York: Free Press.
65.
Rindfuss, R. R. (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28, 493-512.
66.
Robinson, W. V. (1992, June). Boston Globe, p. 1.
67.
Ross, C. (1991). Marriage and the sense of control. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 831-838.
68.
Rubin, L. (1985). Just friends. New York: Harper & Row.
69.
Rusbult, C. E. (1987). Responses to dissatisfaction in close relationships: The exit-voice-loyalty-neglect model. In D. Perlman & S. Duck (Eds.), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration (pp. 209-238). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
70.
Scanzoni, J. (1978). Sex roles, women's work and marital conflict. Lexington, MA: D. C. Health.
71.
Scanzoni, J. (1989). Alternative images for public policy: Family structures versus families struggling. Policy Studies Review, 8, 599-609.
72.
Scanzoni, J. (1991). Balancing the policy interests of children and adults. In E. A. Anderson & R. C. Hula (Eds.), The reconstruction of family policy (pp. 11-22). New York: Greenwood.
73.
Scanzoni, J. (in press). Families and relationships: A contemporary view. New York: McGraw-Hill.
74.
Scanzoni, J. , & Godwin, D. D. (1990). Negotiation effectiveness and acceptable outcomes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 239-251.
75.
Scanzoni, J. , & Marsiglio, W. (1991). Wider families as primary relationships. Marriage and Family Review, 17(1/2), 117-133.
76.
Scanzoni, J. , Polonko, K., Teachman, J., & Thompson, L. (1989). The sexual bond: Rethinking families and close relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
77.
Scanzoni, J. , & Szinovacz, M. (1980). Family decision making: A development sex role model. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
78.
Schoen, R. (1992). First unions and the stability of first marriages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 281-284.
79.
Seeley, J. R. , Sim, R. A., & Loosley, E. W. (1956). Crestwood Heights. New York: Basic Books.
80.
Seligman, J. (1989). Variations on a theme. Newsweek, pp. 20-24.
81.
Simmons, R. G. , Klein, S. D., & Simmons, R. L. (1977). Gift of life: The social and psychological impact of organ transplantation. New York: Wiley.
82.
Smith, D. (1993). The standard North American family: SNAF as an ideological code. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 50-65.
83.
Stacey, J. (1990). Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late twentieth century America. New York: Basic Books.
84.
Stack, C. (1974). All our kin—Strategies for survival in a Black community. New York: Harper & Row.
85.
Stellway, R. (1990). Christiantown USA. New York: Haworth.
86.
Thornton, A. (1989). Changing attitudes toward family issues in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 873-893.
87.
T'ien, J.-K. (1944). Female labor in a cotton mill. In K. H. Shih (Ed.), China enters the machine age (pp. 178-195). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
88.
Turner, J. H. (1988). A theory of social interaction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
89.
Wallerstein, I. , & Smith, J. (1990). Households as an institution of the World-Economy. In J. Sprey (Ed.), Fashioning family theory: New approaches (pp. 34-50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
90.
Whitbourne, S. K. , & Ebmeyer, J. B. (1990). Identity and intimacy in marriage: A study of couples. New York: Springer Verlag.
91.
Wilson, P. & Pahl, R. (1988). The changing sociological construct of the family. Sociological Review, 36, 233-272.
92.
Yankelovich, D. (1981). New rules: Searching for self-fulfillment in a world turned upside down. New York: Random House.
