Abstract
Proponents of famology stress the unique qualities of the family as exemplified in certain differentiating characteristics of the family realm. When these characteristics are examined in the light of recent research by other family scientists, they appear to disregard negative aspects of family life, present stereotypical roles for both male and female family members, and minimize significant aspects of the interface between families and other institutions and organizations in society. In light of diverse and complex family needs, judging the wisdom of a move to famology should include careful consideration of the defining characteristics of the family realm as identified by those proposing the creation of a new discipline for the family field. At the same time, it seems wise to question famology proponents' inordinate uneasiness with “borrowed” theory and the emphasis on a private-public dichotomy as a given in the study of the family.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
