Family structures and dynamics in the Philippines have long been rather traditional, yet the country has undergone substantial economic and cultural change over recent decades. During a time of increased modernization, marriage and fertility rates have declined, while cohabitation and singlehood rates have increased. Using a sample of young adult women and men, this study examines the respective aspirations for marriage and childbearing in the Philippines. The results show that while a majority of both sexes do prefer to marry someday, approximately one-fifth of young women do not aspire to have children. Pronatalist attitudes are shown to be very minimal, suggesting that the valuation of having children is markedly low. The marriage and fertility aspirations of young women are substantially associated with parental factors, while the aspirations of young men appear to be more individualistic. The implications of the findings, along with the future of marriage and childbearing patterns in the Philippines, are discussed within a framework of the Second Demographic Transition and developmental paradigm.
AbalosJ. B. (2014). Trends and determinants of age at union of men and women in the Philippines. Journal of Family Issues, 35(12), 1624–1641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x14538024
2.
AbalosJ. B. (2024). Do Filipinos still say “I do”? The continuing increase in non-marriage and cohabitation in the Philippines. Journal of Family Issues, 45(5), 1326–1349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x231182366
3.
AbalosJ. B.YeungW.-J. J. (2023). Demographic, socioeconomic, and cultural factors for the rise in one-person households in developing countries: The case of the Philippines. Journal of Population Research, 40(20), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-023-09312-z
4.
AcederaK. F.YeohB. S. A. (2022). The intimate lives of left-behind young adults in the Philippines: Social media, gendered intimacies, and transnational parenting. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 20(2), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2022.2044572
5.
AlcantraA. N. (1994). Gender roles, fertility, and the status of married Filipino men and women. Philippine Sociological Review, 42(1), 94–109.
6.
CarrollJ. S.BadgerS.WilloughbyB. J.NelsonL. J.MadsenS. D.BarryC. M. (2009). Marriage readiness and the transition to adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24(3), 349–375.
7.
CastilloG. (1979). Beyond Manila: Philippine rural problems in perspective. International Development Research Centre.
8.
CruzR. V. (2024). The wife, the mother, and the slut: Sexual pleasure for the Filipino woman a grounded theory approach. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 39(2), 323–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2022.2031150
9.
DeGraffD. S.BilsborrowR. E.HerrinA. N. (1996). Children’s education in the Philippines: Does high fertility matter?Population Research and Policy Review, 15(3), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00127050
10.
EderJ. F. (2006). Gender relations and household economic planning in the rural Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 37(3), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022463406000701
11.
GettlerL. T.KuoP. XBasA.BorjaJ. B. (2019). The roles of parents in shaping fathering across generations in Cebu, Philippines. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(3), 662–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12568
12.
GipsonJ. D.HicksA. L. (2017). The delinking of sex and marriage pathways to fertility among young Filipino women. Journal of Biosocial Science, 49, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932015000462
13.
GipsonJ. D.HindinM. J. (2015). Inter-generational relationships between women’s fertility, aspirations for their children’s education and school completion in the Philippines. Journal of Biosocial Science, 47(6), 825–844. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932014000510
14.
GuiT. (2023). Coping with parental pressure to get married: Perspectives from Chinese “leftover women”. Journal of Family Issues, 44(8), 2118–2137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x211071053
15.
KuangB.Perelli-HarrisB.PadmadasS. (2019). The unexpected rise of cohabitation in the Philippines: Evidence of socioeconomic disadvantage or a second demographic transition?Asian Population Studies, 15(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2018.1560664
LesthaegheR.van de KaaD. (1986). Two demographic transitions? In LesthaegheR.van de KaaD.D. (Eds.), Population: Growth and Decline (pp. 9–24).
19.
MaL.RizziE.TurunenJ. (2019). Childlessness, sex composition of children, and divorce risks in China. Demographic Research, 41(26), 753–780. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2019.41.26
20.
MedinaB. (2001). The Filipino family. The University of the Philippines Press.
21.
MedinaB.GuzmanE. A. (1994). Filipino families and households in three selected Philippine areas. Philippine Sociological Review, 42(1), 110–118.
22.
MiralaoV. A. (1997). The family, traditional values, and the sodocultural transformation of Philippine society. Philippine Sociological Review, 45(1), 189–215.
23.
National Statistics Office & ICF Macro. (2009). Philippines national demographic and health survey 2008. National Statistics Office.
24.
PaatY.-F.HopeT. L. (2015). The effects of marital culture and social structure on marital aspirations and attitudes in fragile families. Journal of Family Social Work, 18(3), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2015.1023388
RubioR. J.GreenR. J. (2011). Filipino men’s roles and their correlates: Development of the Filipino adherence to masculinity expectations scale. Culture, Society, and Masculinities, 3(2), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.3149/csm.0302.77
27.
SasslerS.GoldscheiderF. (2004). Revisiting Jane Austen’s theory of marriage timing: Changes in union formation among American men in the late 20th century. Journal of Family Issues, 25(2), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x03257708
28.
SobotkaT. (2021). World’s highest childlessness levels in East Asia. Population & Societies, 595(December), 1–4.
29.
SorianoC.LimS.Rivera-SanchezM. (2015). The Virgin Mary with a mobile phone: Ideologies of mothering and technology consumption in Philippine television advertisements. Communication, Culture, and Critique, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12070
30.
SunM.WuY. (2024). Changing family styles in China: The influence of traditional media and internet use on the acceptance of premarital cohabitation. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 52(1), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2022.2068695
31.
ThorntonA. (2005). Reading history sideways: The fallacy and enduring impact of the developmental paradigm on family life. University of Chicago Press.
32.
ThorntonA.PhilipovD. (2009). Sweeping changes in marriage, cohabitation, and childbearing in Central and Eastern Europe: New insights from the developmental idealism framework. European Journal of Population, 25(2), 123–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9181-2
33.
WilliamsL.GuestM. P. (2005). Attitudes toward marriage among the urban middle-class in Vietnam, Thailand, and the Philippines. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.36.2.163
34.
WilliamsL.KabamalanM.OgenaN. (2007). Cohabitation in the Philippines: Attitudes and behaviors among young women and men. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(5), 1244–1256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00444.x
XenosP.KabamalanM. M. M. (2007). Emerging forms of union formation in the Philippines. Asian Population Studies, 3(3), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730701746417
