Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to determine the predictors of positive and negative parenting practices among mothers of two-to-three-year-old children in Tirana, Albania. Cross-sectional data were obtained from a representative sample of 328 mothers of two-to-three-year-old children recruited through eight randomly selected public nurseries in Tirana. Results from bivariate regressions showed significant associations between the key relevant maternal characteristics and maternal parenting practices, in line with previous studies conducted in Western societies. Results from multiple regressions showed that maternal attitudes towards child maltreatment were a dominant significant predictor of negative parenting practices (punitive parenting, inconsistent parenting, and child maltreatment) and that maternal sense of parental competence was a dominant significant predictor of positive parenting practices. The findings suggest a strong, consistent link between maternal belief systems and parenting practices among mothers of toddlers in Tirana and call for the implementation of parent training programmes that address attitudes towards child maltreatment and sense of parental competence in the Albanian society.

Keywords

Parenting Mothers Toddlers Tirana Albania

Introduction

Parenting Practices and Their Implications

The parent–child relationship is one of the most unique bonds among humans, characterised by interdependence, power dynamics, and involuntary nature (Maccoby, 2000; Thompson, 2015). The attitudes and actions of children’s parents and the environment that they create, shape children and the course of their intellectual, psychological, behavioural, and social development (Domitrovich & Bierman, 2001; Roksa & Potter, 2011). The quality of parent–child interactions provides the foundation for the child’s capacity to self-regulate as well as for all his/her future social interactions (Barrero-Castillero et al., 2019; Bayındır & Ural, 2019; Kuczynski & Mol, 2015; Nordling et al., 2016). Parenting in the first three years of life has been established as particularly important for long-term functioning and key to public health improvement (Gustafsson & Cox, 2012; Simkiss et al., 2013).

Parenting practices can be grouped into positive and negative parenting practices. Positive parenting practices include attentive, nurturing, warm, and accepting behaviours towards children (Lachman et al., 2014; Sherr et al., 2017). Negative parenting practices include punitive, abusive, harsh, and inconsistent behaviour (Bornstein, 2015). Early positive parenting has been associated with reduced risk for conduct disorder, crime, and delinquency (Chronis et al., 2007; Loeber & Stouthamer-Loeber, 1986) as well as with reduced risk for child depression (Dallaire et al., 2006). Positive parenting has been further found to predict increased empathy and pro-social behaviour (Davidov & Grusec, 2006), as well as to be one of the most robust protective factors for children exposed to various adversities (Luthar et al., 2015). On the other hand, negative parenting has been associated with adverse early language and social skill development (Assel et al., 2002), poor school performance (Glascoe & Leew, 2010), as well as increased antisocial behaviour (Caspi et al., 2004) and increased risk of developing a broad range of mental health conditions later in life (Elgar et al., 2007).

Predictors of Parenting

The identification of predictors of parenting behaviours early in the child’s life offers the possibility of intervention before the onset of negative consequences, thus allowing for long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness (Bakermans-Kranenburg et al., 2003; Wilson et al., 2009). The existing literature on individual predictors of parenting is substantial. The literature suggests that predictors of positive parenting include perceived parental competence (Ngai et al., 2010), parental self-efficacy (Bryanton et al., 2008; Coleman & Karraker, 1998), good perceived partner support, increased maternal education, maternal mental health (Bryanton et al., 2009), higher socio-economics status (McConnell et al., 2011), as well as maternal positive perception of the birth experience (Bryanton et al., 2008).

Negative parenting on the other hand has been associated with low levels of partner support (Kendler et al., 1997), low socio-economic status (Trentacosta et al., 2010), parental depression (Davis et al., 2011; Fujiwara et al., 2012; Glascoe & Leew, 2010), parental anxiety disorders (Kendler et al., 1997), low maternal self-control (Nofziger, 2008), high levels of maternal ADHD symptoms (Chronis-Tuscano et al., 2008), maternal substance use (Kelley, 1998), maternal emotional stress (Assel et al., 2002), inadequate social support (Cooklin et al., 2012), and exposure to violence (Westbrook & Harden, 2010). Research shows that mothers who have experienced a high number of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), such as exposure to maltreatment and household dysfunction, report higher levels of parent-to-child aggression, thus perpetuating the intergenerational cycle of violence and trauma (Shin et al., 2022). Mothers who have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) have been further found to be more likely to exhibit negative parenting towards their offspring (Gage & Silvestre, 2010; Herbell et al., 2020). With few exceptions (e.g. Thomson et al., 2014), the current research has however focused on specific risk factors, rather than on many potential predictors, thus making comparative evaluation among all potential predictive factors of parenting practices difficult.

Parenting Practices in Albania and in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries (LMICs)

Even though violence against children in Albania is unlawful, nearly 77% of children aged 2–14 experience physical punishment and/or psychological aggression as a form of ‘discipline’ at home, and many parents still believe that physical punishment is a necessary method in childrearing (INSTAT, 2018; Mijatović, 2018). The normalisation of child maltreatment in Albania is also embedded in common expressions, such as ‘whoever spanks you, loves you’ (Qirjako et al., 2014, p. 173). The majority of adults, including 74.8% of parents and 68.5% of teachers, report that smacking is an acceptable way to teach respect (Save the Children, 2019). Results from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) in Albania (UNICEF, 2005) display that 49% of children had experienced some kind of psychological or physical punishment. More recent data from UNICEF (2014) show that toddlers are particularly affected by this phenomenon, with 72% of Albanian 2–4 year olds having experienced any form of violent discipline (either physical or psychological) in the past month. Evidence from the same source further demonstrate the vulnerability and high risk of victimisation of Albanian youth, with Albania ranking the third among all Central and Eastern European countries with the highest homicide rate of children and adolescents in 2012.

Nevertheless, the studies on domestic violence in Albania to date are of a prevalence nature. Scientific debate on family and children particularly in Albania is very recent and remains isolated, with the mechanism of transmission from parents to children not yet considered an issue (Sado et al., 2018). UNICEF (2018) further claims that there are few attempts at evidence-based policy-making in Albania. The implementation of preventive efforts informed by data has been proven to contribute to the reduction of violence against children and to its individual and social consequences (World Health Organization, 2010). However, these evidence-based preventive efforts tend to be limited to affluent countries (Murray et al., 2018a). Even though LMICs, such as Albania, are disproportionately affected by this phenomenon, they currently lack the knowledge and capacity to tackle it (Cyr & Alink, 2017; de Ribera et al., 2019). There is currently a low evidence base on child maltreatment and on the factors that influence parenting in LMICs (de Ribera et al., 2019; Stoltenborgh et al., 2015; Ward et al., 2016). Nevertheless, a key requirement for responding to the needs of populations in LMICs is to determine the extent of the problem and to identify relevant risk factors (Ezzati et al., 2002).

Study Aims

Although research on parenting and child maltreatment has advanced in many ways over the past decades, the complexity of this issue leaves many critical questions demanding further attention, particularly in rather under-studied societies (Nadan et al., 2015). The exact mechanisms through which mothers parent and/or maltreat their children are not yet fully known (Schelbe & Geiger, 2017). For example, there is little empirical research examining how parental belief systems and cognitions shape parenting (Sigel et al., 2014). Moreover, little is known about how a mother’s own temperament, personality, and/or poor regulation and psycho-social functioning – not necessarily tied to the challenges associated with her parental roles – influence her parenting practices. Developmental scientists have been recently suggesting researchers to examine the well-being of ‘mothers as persons’ (Luthar et al., 2015, p. 273), rather than as solely confined within their roles as caretakers.

The aim of this article is hence twofold. First, it builds on the existing knowledge of predictors of maternal parenting practices by investigating a wide variety of potential predictors based on previous studies, such as maternal exposure to violence, maternal mental well-being, personality characteristics, attitudes towards maltreatment, sense of parental competency and demographic information, without focussing on any particular group of characteristics. Scrutinising all potential predictors simultaneously allows for the identification of the most prominent predictors of parenting practices. Second, it presents novel data on the link between maternal parenting practices and maternal characteristics in a LMIC such as Albania. Since the dataset employed in the present study is cross-sectional, conclusions regarding the direction of the relationship between independent predictors and dependent outcomes need to be drawn with caution.

Methods

Study Design and Sample

The questionnaire design of this study has been partly informed by the Evidence for Better Lives Study (EBLS), a comparative birth-cohort study led by the Violence Research Centre at the University of Cambridge (see Valdebenito et al., 2020). However, the present study is focused on mothers of toddlers rather than the period of pregnancy, as is the case in EBLS. This is a cross-sectional study which took place in Tirana, the capital and most populous city in Albania (INSTAT, 2018). With an area of 41.8 square kilometres, it is located in the centre of the country, and it is the leading economic and political centre in Albania. Its population in 2020 amounted to 850,530 inhabitants (Bashkia Tiranë, 2020). Tirana has 34 public nurseries and 11 administrative units, which Dumani et al. (2017) have grouped into four main clusters based on these units’ socio-economic developmental level. Public nurseries were the location of participant recruitment. Eight out of the 34 public nurseries in Tirana were selected to participate in the study. The sample consists of 328 mothers of two-to-three-year-old toddlers, who were registered in Tirana’s public nurseries.

The nurseries were the unit of randomisation, and they were randomly selected based on the socio-economic status of the geographical area in which they were located. Three main steps were followed to select the final target sample of eight nurseries. First, all the 34 public nurseries in Tirana were grouped by the 11 administrative units. Second, the nurseries were allocated the developmental cluster score of the administrative unit they were located in. Each developmental cluster was given a number from one to four. Third, two nurseries per cluster were selected through systematic random sampling, with the sampling fraction per cluster being calculated by dividing two with the total number of nurseries in each respective cluster. Mothers of two-to-three-year-old children were contacted in each of the chosen nurseries based on convenience and availability, with the number of participants per nursery ranging from 38 to 45. Four inclusion criteria guided the recruitment of mothers: (1) They had to live in the same administrative unit as the nursery at hand; (2) They had to have at least one child aged two to three years old; (3) Their toddler had to be registered in the nursery at hand; (4) The mother had to be older than 18 years of age. The overall participation rate was 84%.

Instruments and Measures

Dependent Variables

Punitive Parenting

Punitive parenting was measured via four items selected out of five items from the sub-scale ‘Punitive Parenting’ of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire Pre-school Version (Clerkin et al., 2007; de la Osa et al., 2014).¹ The main criteria for choosing the items were the items’ factor loadings as presented in the study conducted by de la Osa et al. (2014). The items that scored highest in the ‘Punitive Parenting’ factor were selected to measure ‘Punitive Parenting’ in the current study. Items are ranked on a 5-point Likert scale: Never = 1; Almost never = 2; Sometimes = 3; Often = 4; Always = 5. The respondents were give no time-frame, implying that frequency of punitive parenting was measured throughout the toddler’s life-course. Mean scores were calculated to build the ‘punitive parenting’ composite measure (α = .60). Possible scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher levels of punitive parenting.

Table 1.

List of Scales.

Measure	Source	Reliability (α)
Depression	PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al., 2001)	.77
Perceived stress	Cohen et al. (1983)	.78
Aggression	Selected items from the brief aggression questionnaire (Webster et al., 2014)	.69
Adult ADHD symptoms	Selected adapted items from van de Glind et al. (2013)	.56
Self-control	Selected items from Maloney et al. (2012)	.75
Substance use	Adapted version of WHO ASSIST Working group (2002)	—
Partner supportiveness	Goldberg and Carlson (2014)	.84
Support from friends and family	Selected items from perceived social support scale (Zimet et al., 1988)	.75
Adverse childhood experiences	WHO (2011) international ACE-IQ questionnaire (adapted)	—
Intimate partner violence	Adapted version of WHO (2005) multi-country study on women health and domestic violence against women	—
Punitive parenting	Selected items from Alabama parenting questionnaire pre-school version (de la Osa et al., 2014)	.60
Inconsistent parenting	Selected items from Alabama parenting questionnaire pre-school version (de la Osa et al., 2014)	.45
Positive parenting	Selected items from Alabama parenting questionnaire pre-school version (de la Osa et al., 2014)	.58
Child maltreatment	Adapted selected items from ICAST-P (Runyan et al., 2009)	.66
Parenting sense of competence	Adapted selected items from the parenting sense of competence scale (Gibaud-Wallston & Wandersman, 1978)	.72
Maltreatment attitudes	Researcher developed – with selected items from Deater-Deckard et al. (2003) and Jabraeili et al. (2015)	.89

Inconsistent Parenting

Inconsistent parenting was measured via five items selected out of seven items from the sub-scale ‘Inconsistent Parenting’ of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire Pre-school Version (Clerkin et al., 2007; de la Osa et al., 2014). The main criteria for choosing the items were the items’ factor loadings as presented in the study conducted by de la Osa et al. (2014). The items that scored highest in the ‘Inconsistent Parenting’ factor were selected to measure ‘Inconsistent Parenting’ in the current study. Items are ranked on a 5-point Likert scale: Never = 1; Almost never = 2; Sometimes = 3; Often = 4; Always = 5. The respondents were give no time-frame, implying that frequency of inconsistent parenting was measured throughout the toddler’s life-course. Mean scores were calculated to build the ‘inconsistent parenting’ composite measure (α = .45).² Possible scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher levels of inconsistent parenting.

Positive Parenting

Positive parenting was measured via five items selected out of 12 items from the sub-scale ‘Positive Parenting’ of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire Pre-school Version (Clerkin et al., 2007; de la Osa et al., 2014). The main criteria for choosing the items were the items’ factor loadings as presented in the study conducted by de la Osa et al. (2014). The items that scored highest in the ‘Positive Parenting’ factor were selected to measure ‘Positive Parenting’ in the current study. Items are ranked on a 5-point Likert scale: Never = 1; Almost never = 2; Sometimes = 3; Often = 4; Always = 5. The respondents were given no time-frame, implying that frequency of positive parenting was measured throughout the toddler’s life-course. Mean scores were calculated to build the ‘positive parenting’ composite measure (α = .58). Possible scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher levels of positive parenting.

Child Maltreatment

15 adapted items out of the 45 items of the ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool Parent Version (ICAST-P) were used to capture maternal abusive behaviour towards her toddler (see Runyan et al., 2009). Parents are asked about omissions in care and about acts of discipline or violence towards the index child. The present study only focuses on physical discipline (4 items), psychological discipline (8 items), and neglect (3 items) throughout the toddler’s life-course. All items in this survey are ranked on a 5-point Likert scale: Never = 0; Once or twice = 1; Three to five times = 2; Six to ten times = 3; More than 10 times = 4. Mean scores were calculated to build the ‘child maltreatment’ composite measure (α = .66). Possible scores range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating higher levels of child maltreatment.

Independent Variables

Maternal Depression

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms experienced by the mother in the last month (Kroenke et al., 2001). Questions measure anhedonia, dysphoria, sleep disturbances, fatigue, changes in eating, low self-esteem, concentration difficulties, hypo-or-hyper-active behaviours, and thoughts of suicide in the past month. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale: Not at all = 0; Several days = 1; More than half the days = 2; Nearly every day = 3. Mean scores were calculated to build the depression composite measure (α = .77). Possible scores range from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.

Maternal Perceived Stress

The level of maternal stress in the past month was measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (Cohen, 1994; Cohen et al., 1983; Cohen & Williamson, 1988). This scale consists of ten items that measure how stressful certain life situations are rated by respondents during the last month, via a 5-point Likert scale. Nevertheless, in accordance with the EBLS team, the scale was adapted to a 4-point Likert scale: Not at all = 1; Several days = 2; More than half the days = 3; Nearly every day = 4. Mean scores were calculated to build the stress composite measure with four items being reverse-coded (α = .78). Possible scores range from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating higher levels of stress.

Maternal ADHD Symptoms

ADHD symptoms were measured via five items. Three of the items in this section are adapted from the ASRS (see Adler et al., 2006), while the remaining two are adapted from the age 20 wave of the Zürich Project on the Social Development from Childhood to Adulthood (z-proso). This strategy was also followed by the EBLS team (see Murray et al., 2022). The five items measured how the mother behaved or felt in the past month, including concentration levels, stillness, distraction, and procrastination. This measure was a 5-point frequency scale: Never = 1; Rarely = 2; Sometimes = 3; Often = 4; Always = 5. Mean scores were calculated to build the ADHD symptoms composite measure (α = .56). Possible scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher levels of maternal ADHD symptoms.

Maternal Aggression

Aggression was measured using an adapted version of the Brief Aggression Questionnaire. The original Brief Aggression Questionnaire consists of 12 items and uses four sub-scales to measure the trait of aggression. The four sub-scales are physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility (Webster et al., 2014). This study focuses on three sub-scales, namely, physical aggression, anger, and hostility; and employs six items in total, two items per sub-scale. When choosing the items, the items with the highest factor loadings in the study conducted by Webster et al. (2014) were prioritised. While the original scale uses a 10-point Likert-type scale, this study employs a 5-point Likert scale: Never = 1; Rarely = 2; Sometimes = 3; Often = 4; Always = 5. Mean scores were calculated to build the aggression composite measure (α = .69). Possible scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher levels of maternal aggression.

Maternal Self-Control

Self-control was measured through seven out of 13 items of the Brief Self-Control Scale, a survey measuring operational aspects of self-control (Maloney et al., 2012). Actions and thoughts related to temptation, self-discipline, and impulsive behaviour, among others, are scored using a 5-Likert Scale: Not at all = 1; Slightly = 2; Somewhat = 3; Mostly = 4; Very much = 5. Mean scores were calculated to build the self-control composite measure with six items being reverse-coded (α = .75). Possible scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher levels of self-control.

Parental Sense of Competence

The mother’s parental sense of competence was measured via 10 adapted selected items from the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC) (Gibaud-Wallston & Wandersman, 1978). The PSOC is an instrument commonly used to measure parental self-efficacy and satisfaction with parenting (also see Johnston & Mash, 1989; Ohan et al., 2000; Oltra-Benavent et al., 2020). The PSOC is a 17-item scale, with 2 sub-scales: satisfaction and efficacy. When choosing the items, representation from the two sub-scales and factor loadings from previous studies were prioritised. While in the original version each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale, this study employs a 5-point Likert scale: Strongly disagree = 1; Disagree = 2; Neutral = 3; Agree = 4; Strongly agree = 5. Mean scores were calculated to build the ‘parental sense of competence’ composite measure with five items being reverse-coded (α = .72). Possible scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher levels of the mother’s parental sense of competence.

Maltreatment Attitudes

This scale consisted of 15 items and measured the mother’s attitude towards child physical maltreatment, emotional maltreatment, and neglect. The five items on endorsement of spanking by parents were retrieved from Deater-Deckard et al. (2003). The five items on the attitude towards emotional maltreatment and the five items on the attitude towards neglect were developed by the author, with certain items taken from Jabraeili et al. (2015). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale: Strongly disagree = 1; Disagree = 2; Neutral = 3; Agree = 4; Strongly agree. Mean scores were calculated to build the ‘maltreatment attitudes’ composite measure (α = .89). Possible scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher levels of maltreatment attitudes embraced by the mothers.

Maternal Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs)

Maternal adverse experiences before the age of 18 were measured via 18 adapted items out of 31 items of the ACE-International Questionnaire (World Health Organisation, 2011). The 18 items included in the current study belonged to the following nine domains: (1) living with substance abusers; (2) living with household members who were mentally ill or suicidal; (3) living with household members who were imprisoned; (4) parental separation or divorce, one or no parents; (5) violence against household members; (6) emotional abuse; (7) physical abuse; (8) sexual abuse; (9) physical neglect. The first four domains, which consist of five items, ask yes/no questions, while the items in the rest of the domains are rated on a 4-point Likert scale: Never = 1; Once = 2; A few times = 3; Many times = 4. The ACEs composite measure consists of the sum scores of the first five items and the dichotomised versions of the rest of the 13 items.

Intimate Partner Violence

Exposure to IPV during the mother’s lifetime was measured using an adapted scale extracted from the World Health Organisation’s (2005) Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence Against Women (also see Garcia-Moreno et al., 2006). Seven items measure controlling behaviour by the current partner, six items measure physical IPV, four items measure emotional IPV, and three items measure sexual IPV (No = 0; Yes = 1). The composite measure of lifetime IPV was calculated by summing up the yes/no items on controlling behaviour as well as the items on physical, emotional, and sexual IPV. Possible scores range from 1 to 20 with higher scores indicating higher exposure to IPV.

Control Variables

Control variables included in the regression models involved the following: father’s quality time spent with the child (ordinal, but treated as continuous), age of the child in months (open answer, continuous), mother experienced birth complications (0 = no; 1 = yes), mother’s age in years (open answer, continuous), mother’s educational level (0 = below undergraduate degree; 1 = undergraduate degree or above), mother’s marital status (0 = not married; 1 = married), household income (ordinal, but treated as continuous), lifetime maternal substance use [0 = no; 1 = yes; measured via four adapted items taken from the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST), a screening questionnaire developed by the World Health Organisation (2002)], maternal support from friends and family [measured by nine out of 12 items of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), developed by Zimet et al. (1988), using a 5-point Likert-type scale. The composite measure was calculated through mean scores (α = .75), with higher scores indicating higher levels of support from friends and family], maternal support from the partner [measured via the Partner Supportiveness Scale (Goldberg & Carlson, 2014), a five-item survey, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The composite measure was calculated through mean scores (α = .84), with higher scores indicating higher levels of support from the partner], and the mode of questionnaire delivery (measured by two dummy variables: the first variable was coded as 0 = self-completed, 1 = face-to-face interview; the second variable was coded as = self-completed, 1 = online interview).

Translation and Data Collection

The instruments were translated in whole by four individuals, who were native Albanian speakers, proficient in English, and who were familiar with psychometrics as well as the health sector. Three modes of questionnaire delivery were employed to collect the data: face-to-face interview (N = 170), self-completed (N = 116), and online interview (N = 42).³ While the initial plan was to only conduct face-to-face interviews, adaptations had to be made due to the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the participants’ availability. Even though it is not ideal to have heterogenous modes of data collection, this approach might be valuable insofar that it helps us better understand how different modes of data collection may affect response levels. The data collection process was carried out by the author and lasted from September 2020 to May 2021.

Data Analysis

Characteristics of the study population were described using counts and percentages for categorical variables and means (SD) for continuous variables. Some continuous variables were also transformed into dummy variables to get a better understanding of prevalence rates. Four ordinary least square (OLS) linear regression models were built to examine the association between the four dependent variables measuring parenting practices (punitive parenting, inconsistent parenting, positive parenting, and child maltreatment) as well as all the independent variables. Bivariate regression models measured the link between dependent variables and each individual predictor and control variable separately, while multiple regression models measured the association between the dependent variables and all predictor and control variables simultaneously. This would allow us to better understand and compare the predictive power of each independent variable on its own, as well as to identify the independent variables with the highest and most significant predictive power when all the independent variables are considered together. Identifying the predictors with the highest significance would help us target our efforts in terms of prevention and intervention.

Tests to see whether the independent variables for each of the four multiple regression models were not highly correlated and met the assumption of collinearity indicated that multicollinearity was not a concern (M_VIF = 1.57). As suggested by the literature, VIFs between 1 and 5 indicate that there is a moderate correlation, but it is not severe enough to warrant corrective measures (Daoud, 2017). When running the regression models, multiple imputation was used as a method of handling missing data. There were no visible patterns of missing values, hence suggesting that these values were missing at random. Thirty-seven imputations were run to primarily address the missing values in the ‘household income’ (n_miss = 37) variable. The reason behind the high level of missingness in this variable was related to the fact that 35 mothers preferred not to answer the question regarding household income. All analyses were conducted using STATA IC Release16. Materials and analysis code for this study are available by emailing the corresponding author.

Ethical Considerations

Ethical approval and institutional access were obtained from the Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge and the General Directory of Nurseries and Kindergartens at the Municipality of Tirana. Permission to conduct the study was also obtained by each director of the eight nurseries selected to participate in the study. Before starting the data collection process, all participating mothers were given information sheets and asked to sign an informed consent form.

Results

Describing the Study Population

Table 2 presents descriptive statistics of the study sample based on the variables included in the regression models. The mothers’ mean age was 32.3 years (SD = 4.24), with a range between 22 and 46 years. Most mothers were married (87.50%), had not experienced birth complications (79.88%), had finished undergraduate studies or above (83.54%), and had used at least one type of substance – tobacco products, alcoholic beverages, drugs, sedatives or sleeping pills – once in their lifetime (82.26%). The majority of mothers had a monthly household income of 60,000–100,000 ALL⁴ (34.15%). Most fathers spent quality time with the target child often (32.62%) and the target toddlers had a mean age of 31.2 months (SD = 5.77).

Table 2.

Descriptive Data of the Dependent, Independent, and Control Variables.

Characteristics		Number (n)	Percentage (%)
Dependent variables
Punitive parenting	Mean (SD)	2.12 (.66)
Punitive parenting	Possible scale range	1–5
Inconsistent parenting	Mean (SD)	2.51 (.63)
Inconsistent parenting	Possible scale range	1–5
Positive parenting	Mean (SD)	4.72 (.30)
Positive parenting	Possible scale range	1–5
Child maltreatment	Mean (SD)/at least one type	.39 (.32)	88.99
	Physical abuse	.13 (.24)	32.11
	Psychological abuse	.59 (.49)	84.40
	Neglect	.23 (.42)	34.86
	Possible scale range	0–4
Independent variables
Maternal depression	Mean (SD)	.62 (.44)
Maternal depression	Possible scale range	0–3
Maternal perceived stress	Mean (SD)	1.86 (.48)
Maternal perceived stress	Possible scale range	1–4
Maternal ADHD symptoms	Mean (SD)	2.41 (.68)
Maternal ADHD symptoms	Possible scale range	1–5
Maternal aggression	Mean (SD)	1.64 (.57)
Maternal aggression	Possible scale range	1–5
Maternal self-control	Mean (SD)	4.10 (.70)
Maternal self-control	Possible scale range	1–5
Mother’s parental sense of competence	Mean (SD)	4.05 (.40)
Mother’s parental sense of competence	Possible scale range	1–5
Mother’s maltreatment attitudes	Mean (SD)	1.69 (.53)
	Physical maltreatment	1.89 (.83)
	Emotional maltreatment	1.84 (.64)
	Neglect	1.33 (.44)
	Possible scale range	1–5
Mother’s adverse childhood experiences	Mean (SD)	2.99 (2.23)
	Possible scale range	0–18
	At least one type	291	89.00
	<4	261	79.82
	≥4	66	20.18
Mother’s lifetime intimate partner violence	Mean (SD)	1.37 (2.45)
	Median [min, max]	0 [0, 17]
	Possible score range	0–20
	At least one type	165	51.24
	Controlling behaviour	92	28.57
	Emotional IPV	129	40.06
	Physical IPV	43	13.35
	Sexual IPV	3	.93
Control variables
Father’s quality time spent with the child	Never	10	3.05
	Sometimes	39	11.89
	Often	107	32.62
	Very often	70	21.34
	Always	102	31.10
Age of the child (months)	Mean (SD)	31.2 (5.77)
Age of the child (months)	Median [min, max]	36 [21, 45]
Mother experienced birth complications	Yes	66	20.12
Mother experienced birth complications	No	262	79.88
Maternal age (years)	Mean (SD)	32.3 (4.24)
Maternal age (years)	Median [min, max]	32 [22, 46]
Mother’s education level	Below undergraduate degree	54	16.5
Mother’s education level	Undergraduate degree or above	274	83.54
Mother’s marital status	Married	287	87.50
Mother’s marital status	Not married	41	12.50
Household monthly income (ALL)	<30,000	16	4.88
	30,000–60,000	71	21.65
	60,000–100,000	112	34.15
	100,000–200,000	77	23.48
	>200,000	15	4.57
Maternal substance use (lifetime)	Yes	269	82.26
Maternal substance use (lifetime)	No	58	17.74
Mother’s support from friends and family	Mean (SD)	4.40 (.61)
Mother’s support from friends and family	Possible scale range	1–5
Mother’s support from the partner	Mean (SD)	4.33 (.63)
Mother’s support from the partner	Possible scale range	1–5
Questionnaire mode of delivery	Face-to-face interview	170	51.83
	Self-completed	116	35.37
	Online interview	42	12.80

Most mothers had experienced at least one type of ACE (89%), with 20.18% of mothers having experienced four ACEs or more. 51.24% had experienced at least one type of IPV (controlling behaviour, emotional, physical, or sexual violence) in their lifetime, with 28.57% of mothers enduring controlling behaviour from their partners, 40.06% having experienced emotional IPV, 13.35% physical IPV, and .93% sexual IPV. In terms of parenting practices, the reported mean of positive parenting (M = 4.72)⁵ was higher than of punitive parenting (M = 2.12) and of inconsistent parenting (M = 2.51). As far as child maltreatment is concerned, the mean of mother-reported psychological abuse towards her toddler (M = .59) was higher than the mean of physical abuse (M = .13) and the mean of neglect (M = .23). Almost 89% of mothers had used at least one type of child maltreatment towards their toddler. 32.11% had used physical abuse, 84.4% had used psychological abuse, and 34.86% had neglected their toddler at least once. However, generally, mothers had high disapproval of child maltreatment (M = 1.69; SD = .53).

Predictors of Punitive Parenting

In the bivariate regression analyses, maternal depressive symptoms (β = .26, p < .001), stress (β = .30, p < .001), ADHD symptoms (β = .35, p < .001), aggression (β = .30, p < .001), maltreatment attitudes (β = .45, p < .001), intimate partner violence (β = .26, p < .001), adverse childhood experiences (β = .35, p < .001), age of the child (β = .13, p < .05), maternal substance use (β = .16, p < .01), as well as the delivery mode being in the form of face-to-face interviews (β = .24, p < .001) and online interviews rather than self-completed (β = .13, p < .01), were all positively significantly associated with punitive parenting. Self-control (β = −.24, p < .001), the mothers’ parental sense of competence (β = −.29, p < .001), father’s quality time spent with the child (β = −.21, p < .01), mother’s support from friends and family (β = −.14, p < .05), and mother’s support from the partner (β = −.20, p < .01) were all negatively significantly associated with punitive parenting (see Table 3, Column 1.1).

Table 3.

Bivariate and Multiple Regression Results for Predictors of Positive and Negative Parenting.

Independent Variables	Punitive Parenting		Inconsistent Parenting		Positive Parenting		Child Maltreatment
Independent Variables	Bivariate Regression^a	Multiple Regression^b	Bivariate Regression^c	Multiple Regression^d	Bivariate Regression^e	Multiple Regression^f	Bivariate Regression^g	Multiple Regression^h
Maternal mental well-being
Depressive symptoms	.26***	−.04	.19**	.02	−.26***	.003	.34***	−.005
Stress	.30***	.10	.22***	.03	−.24***	.05	.31***	−.02
ADHD symptoms	.35***	.13*	.25***	.09	−.28***	−.15*	.39***	.08
Maternal individual characteristics
Aggression	.30***	.04	.25***	.05	−.24***	−.009	.38***	.08
Self-control	−.24***	.02	−.25***	−.11	.28***	.07	−.36***	−.09
Maternal parenting skills and attitudes
Parenting sense of competence	−.29***	−.05	−.15**	.03	.40***	.22***	−.37***	−.09
Maltreatment attitudes	.45***	.36***	.31***	.26***	−.32***	−.09	.45***	.24***
Maternal victimisation
Intimate partner violence (IPV)	.26***	.07	.21***	.06	−.24**	−.14	.34***	.09
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)	.35***	.13*	.20**	.06	−.12	.06	.43***	.20**
Control variables
Father’s quality time spent with the child	−.21**	−.10	−.14*	−.07	.30***	.21**	−.24***	−.10
Age of the child (Months)	.13*	.16**	.03	.07	.04	−.02	.15**	.20***
Mother experienced birth complications	.08	−.01	.05	−.02	.02	.12*	.18**	.06
Maternal age	−.08	−.05	−.01	−.01	.01	−.01	−.14**	−.11**
Maternal education level (undergraduate degree or above)	.05	.18**	−.09	−.04	.15*	.03	−.10	.02
Maternal marital status (married)	.001	.08	.02	.09	−.06	−.13**	−.05	.04
Household income	.03	.06	−.002	.07	.06	−.02	−.04	.01
Maternal substance use	.16**	−.02	.11*	.02	−.18**	−.09	.23***	.04
Mother’s support from friends and family	−.14*	.01	−.07	.02	.30***	.19***	−.18**	.003
Mother’s support from the partner	−.20**	.11	−.17**	.06	.20**	−.10	−.26***	.06
Mode of delivery (face-to-face interview)	.24***	.16**	.07	−.09	−.24***	−.01	.28***	.16**
Mode of delivery (online interview)	.13**	.12*	.03	−.06	.004	.04	.15**	.13*
R²		.39		.18		.32		.47
F		13.25***		3.41***		5.87***		14.56***

Note. All the regression coefficients presented are standardised beta coefficients (β).

Robust standard errors were specified when building the models to account for the fact that the data is clustered.

* indicates p < .05; ** indicates p < .01; *** indicates p < .001.

^an = 327.

^bn = 327.

^cn = 323.

^dn = 323.

^en = 327.

^fn = 327.

^gn = 327.

^hn = 327.

In the multiple regression model, which included all the predictors simultaneously, only maternal ADHD symptoms (β = .13, p < .05), maltreatment attitudes (β = .36, p < .001), maternal adverse childhood experiences (β = .13, p < .05), age of the target child (β = .16, p < .01), maternal education level (β = .18, p < .01), as well as the delivery mode being in the form of face-to-face interviews (β = .16, p < .01) and online interviews (β = .12, p < .05) rather than self-completed were positively significantly associated with punitive parenting (see Table 3, Column 1.2). No variables were negatively significantly associated with punitive parenting in the multiple regression model. The multiple regression equation with ‘punitive parenting’ as an outcome variable was significant [F (21, 302.9) = 13.25, p < .001)], with an R² of .39. The sample size both in the bivariate and multiple regressions was 327.

Predictors of Inconsistent Parenting

In the bivariate regressions, inconsistent parenting was significantly predicted by maternal depressive symptoms (β = .19, p < .01), stress (β = .22, p < .001), ADHD symptoms (β = .25, p < .001), aggression (β = .25, p < .001), maltreatment attitudes (β = .31, p < .001), intimate partner violence (β = .21, p < .001), adverse childhood experiences (β = .20, p < .01), maternal substance use (β = .11, p < .05) in a positive direction, and by maternal self-control (β = −.25, p < .001), the mothers’ parental sense of competence (β = −.15, p < .01), father’s quality time spent with the child (β = −.14, p < .05), support from the partner (β = −.17, p < .01) in a negative direction (see Table 3, Column 2.1).

In the multiple regression model, only maternal maltreatment attitudes (β = .26, p < .001) were positively significantly associated to inconsistent parenting, with no variables being negatively significantly associated to inconsistent parenting (see Table 3, Column 2.2). The multiple regression equation with ‘inconsistent parenting’ as an outcome variable was significant [F (21, 298.9) = 3.41, p < .001)], with an R² of .18. The sample size both in the bivariate and multiple regressions was 323.

Predictors of Positive Parenting

The bivariate analyses in Column 3.1, Table 3, showed that positive parenting was significantly positively associated with maternal self-control (β = .28, p < .001), the mother’s sense of parental competence (β = .40, p < .001), the father’s quality time spent with the target toddler (β = .30, p < .001), the mother’s education level (β = .15, p < .05), the mother’s support from friends and family (β = .30, p < .001), and the mothers’ support from the partner (β = .20, p < .01). The bivariate analyses also showed that positive parenting was negatively associated with maternal depressive symptoms (β = −.26, p < .001), stress (β = −.24, p < .001), ADHD symptoms (β = −.28, p < .001), aggression (β = −.24, p < .001), maltreatment attitudes (β = −.32, p < .001), intimate partner violence (β = −.24, p < .01), substance use (β = −.18, p < .01), and the questionnaire being delivered face-to-face rather than self-completed (β = −.24, p < .001).

The multiple regression in Column 3.2, Table 3, displayed that positive parenting was significantly positively associated with the mother’s parental sense of competence (β = .22, p < .001), the father’s quality time spent with the target toddler (β = .21, p < .01), the mother having experienced birth complications (β = .12, p < .05), and the mother’s support from friends and family (β = .19, p < .001). The multiple regression also portrayed that positive parenting was significantly negatively associated with maternal ADHD symptoms (β = −.15, p < .05) and the mother being married (β = −.13, p < .01). The multiple regression equation with ‘positive parenting’ as an outcome variable was significant [F (21, 302.9) = 5.87, p < .001)], with an R² of .32. The sample size both in the bivariate and multiple regressions was 327.

Predictors of Child Maltreatment

In the bivariate regression analyses (Table 3, Column 4.1), child maltreatment was significantly positively predicted by maternal depressive symptoms (β = .34, p < .001), stress (β = .31, p < .001), ADHD symptoms (β = .39, p < .001), aggression (β = .38, p < .001), maltreatment attitudes (β = .45, p < .001), intimate partner violence (β = .34, p < .001), adverse childhood experiences (β = .43, p < .001), age of the toddler (β = .15, p < .01), whether the mother had experienced birth complications (β = .18, p < .01), maternal substance use (β = .23, p < .001), as well as the questionnaire being delivered through face-to-face interview (β = .28, p < .001) and online interview (β = .15, p < .01). The significant negatively associated predictors were the following: self-control (β = −.36, p < .001), the mother’s sense of parental competency (β = −.37, p < .001), father’s quality time spent with the target toddler (β = −.24, p < .001), maternal age (β = −.14, p < .05), mother’s support from friends and family (β = −.18, p < .01), and mother’s support from the partner (β = −.26, p < .001).

In the multiple regression model (Table 3, Column 4.2), child maltreatment was positively significantly predicted by maltreatment attitudes (β = .24, p < .001), maternal adverse childhood experiences (β = .20, p < .01), age of the child (β = .20, p < .001), as well as the questionnaire being delivered via face-to-face interviews (β = .16, p < .01) and online interviews (β = .13, p < .05) rather than self-completed. The only negatively significantly associated predictor of child maltreatment was maternal age (β = −.11, p < .01). The multiple regression equation with ‘child maltreatment’ as an outcome variable was significant [F (21, 303.0) = 14.56], with an R² of .47. The sample size both in the bivariate and multiple regressions was 327.

Discussion

Using cross-sectional data from a representative sample of 328 mothers whose two-to-three-year-old toddlers were registered in public nurseries in Tirana, Albania, various relevant variables related to maternal psychological well-being, individual characteristics, behavioural tendencies, and inter-personal relationships were entered in bivariate and multiple regression analyses to ascertain the predictors of positive and negative parenting. In general, results from the bivariate associations confirm findings from previous studies which have found a link between maternal mental well-being, ACEs, parental self-efficacy, exposure to IPV, substance use, social support, support from the partner, and levels of positive and negative parenting (Assel et al., 2002; Bryanton et al., 2008, 2009; Davis et al., 2011; Fujiwara et al., 2012; Gage & Silvestre, 2010; Herbell et al., 2020; Shin et al., 2022; Westbrook & Harden, 2010). Moreover, results from the bivariate regressions suggest that maternal individual characteristics such as aggressive tendencies and self-control are significantly associated with both negative and positive parenting practices. This is a rather interesting finding which adds to the literature that explores the influence of a mother’s temperament and/or self-regulation on her parenting practices (Belsky & Barends, 2002; De Haan et al., 2009; Huver et al., 2010).

The bivariate analyses also showed that apart from support from the partner, the father’s quality time spent with the child was negatively associated with the mothers resorting to punitive parenting, inconsistent parenting, as well as to child maltreatment. The father’s quality time spent with the child was also positively associated with the mother using positive parenting practices, both in the bivariate and multiple regression analyses. In addition to previous studies which have highlighted the important role of the father–child relationship in child development (e.g. Barker et al., 2017; Ramchandani et al., 2013), the finding from this study suggests that the father–child relationship could affect the child also indirectly through its link to the mother–child relationship. This finding is particularly important for the Albanian culture, given its patriarchal structure and traditional gender roles with the father typically being seen as the head of the household and the mother as the caregiver and nurturer (Zhupa, 2013). The importance of the father–child relationship and its impact on the mother’s parenting, as highlighted in the current study, further sheds light on the need to encourage Albanian families to build healthier, less hierarchical and more interdependent relationships among the parents and the children.

Regarding maternal age, previous studies indicate conflicting findings on its association with violence against children (Pearson et al., 2022), with some findings showing that lower maternal age predicts negative parenting (Kendler et al., 1997; Trentacosta et al., 2010) and others that it predicts positive parenting (Bryanton et al., 2018). The current study adds clarity to the literature by showing that maternal age is a negative significant predictor of child maltreatment, both in the bivariate and multiple regressions, meaning that the older the mother the less likely she is to resort to child maltreatment. However, maternal age does not seem to have a significant association with either punitive, inconsistent, or positive parenting in the present study. An additional finding of interest in the current study was the lack of effect of the ‘household income’ variable on all the parenting outcomes and the little to no effect of the ‘maternal education’ variable. This result is in contrast with other studies in the Balkan region, which have found that wealth and the education level of parents is significantly related to the use of non-violent methods of disciplining children (Petrovic et al., 2016).

Another finding worth noting with regards to the bivariate regression models is the significant link that the mode of questionnaire delivery has on the four outcome variables. While Ward et al. (2018) found higher disclosure rates of child maltreatment in self-completion than in interviewer-based data collection modes, the present study suggests that mothers tended to report higher rates of punitive parenting and child maltreatment in the face-to-face and online interview as compared to when the survey was self-completed. The findings further show that the mothers had the tendency to report significant lower rates of positive parenting in the face-to-face interview as compared to when they completed the survey on their own. The mode of delivery being face-to-face as compared to self-completed remained a significant predictor of maternal reporting of punitive parenting and child maltreatment even in the multiple regression models. Several reasons might explain these findings.

First, during the in-person and/or online interviews, the mothers had the space to develop trust and an emotional connection with the researcher. The lack of a trustworthy human connection might have propelled the mothers into feeling suspicious or embarrassed to disclose the truth in the self-completed version of the questionnaire. It can be argued that the presence of an interviewer encourages respondents to feel relaxed and therefore more forthcoming (e.g. Lee, 1993; Sykes & Hoinville, 1985). Second, during the interviews, the mothers might have felt that they had the time to reflect on their answers while also having the opportunity to require more explanation or clarity. In the self-completed version however, the mothers might have filled in the survey hastily without reading the items properly and reflecting on them thoroughly. It is of worth to note that the mothers completed the questionnaire at home or at work (while being advised to be alone), not in the researcher’s presence. The ‘uncontrolled’ setting could have also played a role in the mothers’ responses. Third, the outcomes could have also been impacted by the ‘interviewer effect’, whereby the mothers might have presumed that the researcher had certain expectations from the interview and was searching for data that looked a particular way. Fourth, since the participants were not randomly assigned to each mode of delivery group, there could have been an inherent difference in the characteristics of the participating mothers that opted out for telephone interview versus self-completed questionnaire versus face-to-face interview.

As far as the multiple regression models are concerned, we see that the proportion of the variance of ‘inconsistent parenting’ explained by the independent variables as well as the model fit is quite low when compared to the other outcomes. One reason that might explain this discrepancy is the low Cronbach’s alpha value of the ‘inconsistent parenting’ variable, thus raising doubts about the validity and reliability of the findings from the second model. It is useful to note that other studies administering the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire have also found lower alpha values for the ‘inconsistent parenting’ sub-scale in comparison to the other sub-scales (e.g. see Sebre et al., 2020; Liang et al., 2021), thus suggesting that ‘inconsistent parenting’ has lower construct validity than the other Alabama Parenting Questionnaire scales. The model fit of the regression analyses for the ‘positive parenting’ outcome was also rather low. This result can be attributed to the fact that the ‘positive parenting’ variable is notably left-skewed, which lives little space for the independent variables to have an influence on its variation. Nevertheless, when examining the ‘punitive parenting’ and ‘child maltreatment’ outcomes, we see that the R² and F values are higher and the significance of the predictor variables comparatively similar. This result is noteworthy insofar that it adds to the literature on the overlap and distinction of ‘child maltreatment’ and ‘punitive parenting’ instruments (see Backhaus et al., 2022).

A further observation of interest in the multiple regression models is the consistent significance of mothers’ attitudes towards child maltreatment across the negative parenting outcomes (punitive parenting, inconsistent parenting, and child maltreatment) and the significance of mothers’ sense of parental competence for positive parenting practices. Not only are these two variables highly significantly associated with the respective outcomes, but they also take precedence over most of the other relevant independent variables. The descriptive statistics results implied that mothers in the present study expressed high disapproval of child maltreatment, while the rates of punitive parenting and child maltreatment were quite substantial. Data from UNICEF (2014) further suggest that many households practise physical punishment even though they do not regard it as an appropriate form of discipline, thus implying that parents resort to impulsive decisions due to depletion of their own cognitive and emotional self-regulation resources even when they rationally acknowledge that maltreating children is not right or effective. Similar findings are reported by Lansford and Deater-Deckard (2012), who showed that across 24 developing countries, a larger proportion of parents report using corporal punishment than believe that it is necessary to use corporal punishment in child-rearing. Analogous results were found in a study carried out in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Northern Macedonia and Serbia, which demonstrated that most of the respondents believed that physical punishment was not necessary to raise their children properly, but less than 30% practiced only non-violent discipline at home (Petrovic et al., 2016).

Despite this discrepancy, the multiple regression analyses suggest that favourable attitudes towards child maltreatment are significantly associated with negative parenting practices even when other relevant factors are taken into consideration. Establishing relations between cognitions and practices in parenting has proved elusive with these relations appearing only weak (e.g. Okagaki & Bingham, 2005; Sigel & McGillicuddy-De Lisi, 2002). The finding from the current study is however in line with the results reported by Kochanska et al. (1989), whereby significant associations were found between authoritarian parental attitudes and harsh discipline strategies. Given that the nature of the collected dataset in the present study is cross-sectional, caution needs to be exercised regarding to the direction of the relationship between child maltreatment attitudes and negative parenting practices. While it can be argued that favourable attitudes towards child maltreatment are a consistent significant predictor of negative parenting practices even when accounting for other relevant factors, it can also be the case that maternal negative parenting practices shape mothers’attitudes towards child maltreatment. Under Festinger’s (1962) theoretical framework of cognitive dissonance, mothers may attempt to reduce cognitive dissonance by adapting their attitudes to their behaviour.

The significant association between positive parenting practices and maternal levels of parental sense of competence, even after accounting for other relevant variables, further demonstrates the link between maternal cognitive patterns and parental behaviour. While the causal direction still remains an issue, previous research conducted in the West has found that parental self-efficacy beliefs are both a powerful direct predictor of specific positive parenting practices and a mediator of the effects of most of the correlates of parenting quality, including maternal depression, child temperament, social support, and poverty (Albanese et al., 2019; Coleman & Karraker, 1998). A study conducted by Bornstein et al. (2018) further concluded that mothers who were more knowledgeable, satisfied, and attributed successes in their parenting to themselves when their toddlers were 20 months of age, engaged in increased supportive parenting during joint activity tasks 2 years later when their children were 4 years of age. The findings from the present study call for the need of maternal change of beliefs and parenting behaviour within the Albanian society, ideally through the widespread implementation of parent training programmes which are either in their infancy or still lacking in Albania (see Dai et al., 2018). Systematic reviews of randomised and quasi-randomised evaluations suggest that parenting programmes can increase positive parenting, reduce punitive parenting, and decrease child behaviour problems in children from birth to 12 years old (e.g. Barlow et al., 2010; Furlong et al., 2012).

Three additional independent variables that were significant predictors in more than one multiple regression model were: maternal ADHD symptoms, maternal ACEs, and age of the child. While maternal ADHD symptoms are a positive significant predictor of ‘punitive parenting’ and a negative significant predictor of ‘positive parenting’, maternal ACEs are a positive significant predictor of ‘punitive parenting’ and ‘child maltreatment’. The later finding is in line with the literature that explores the continuity of violence from one generation to another, a phenomenon also known as the cycle of violence (Britto et al., 2017; Widom & Wilson, 2015). As previously mentioned, empirical studies in other parts of the world have indeed also shown that mothers who have experienced a high number of ACEs report higher levels of parent-to-child aggression (Shin et al., 2022). The finding regarding the significant predictive power of maternal ADHD symptoms for punitive and positive parenting practices, when all other relevant factors are controlled for, adds to the current evidence base that has demonstrated that mothers with higher levels of ADHD Symptoms report lower levels of involvement and positive parenting and higher levels of maladaptive parenting practices (Chronis-Tuscano et al., 2008). Nevertheless, rarely has this literature focused on the impact of ADHD symptoms on the parenting of toddlers specifically, with this link being under-recognised, under-studied, and under-addressed in LMICs (Fayyad et al., 2017; Murray et al., 2022). The age of the child, on the other hand, is only positively associated to punitive parenting and child maltreatment, thus suggesting that the older the child, within the toddlerhood years, the more likely are the mothers to use harsh parenting practices.

Strengths and Limitations

The main strengths of this study are related to the fact that it makes use of a probabilistic rather than a convenience sampling method, to the relatively high overall participation rate (84%), to all the data being collected by the author, and to it presenting novel data on the predictors of parenting practices in Albania. The limitations are concerned with the limited sample size, the delivery of the questionnaire through three different modes of data collection, the restricted possibility of generalising the findings to all Albanian mothers and toddlers, the study outcomes being self-reported, as well as with the fact that this is a cross-sectional rather than a longitudinal study, which thus prevents one from drawing causal conclusions about the data. The low Cronbach’s alpha value of the ‘inconsistent parenting’ variable and the left-skewness of the ‘positive parenting’ variable can be considered as two further limitations of this study.

Conclusion

This study was an initial attempt at uncovering the unexplored predictors of positive and negative parenting practices among mothers of toddlers in Tirana, Albania. Among others, the bivariate regression analyses found a link between maternal age, mental well-being, ACEs, exposure to IPV, substance use, social support, support from the partner, aggressive tendencies, self-control, and levels of positive and negative parenting. Results from multiple regression models showed that maternal attitudes towards child maltreatment were a dominant significant predictor of negative parenting practices (punitive parenting, inconsistent parenting, and child maltreatment) and that maternal sense of parental competence was a dominant significant predictor of positive parenting practices. The results from multiple regression analyses further demonstrated that the mothers’ reporting of punitive parenting and child maltreatment was significantly predicted by the mode of delivery being face-to-face as compared to self-completed, even when other relevant factors were controlled for.

In terms of implications for practice, findings from the current study suggest a need for supporting mothers as individuals and as women through psychological support, gender equality initiatives, and freedom from violence more broadly. The findings further call for the implementation of parental support groups and parent training programmes in the Albanian society to help change maternal belief systems regarding effective parenting practices and healthy early child development. Previous research has shown that the cycle of abuse is broken when social services such as support groups, mentoring programmes, or therapeutic interventions are provided for parents who are deemed at risk of abusing their children (Grille, 2008; Hall et al., 1998; Hunter & Kilstrom, 1979).

In terms of implications for research, it is advisable for future empirical research in the field of parenting to consider administering solely one mode of data collection in order to allow for consistency in results as well as for higher validity and reliability of findings. Moreover, it would also be interesting for future research on methodological issues to further examine the impact that the mode of questionnaire delivery can have on self-reported sensitive information, for example, through conducting rigorous randomised controlled trials or propensity score matching. It would be particularly of worth to investigate these methodological issues in LMICs given that most identified studies to date on the impact of delivery mode on the reporting of sensitive information have been conducted in HICs. Future studies should further consider increasing the sample size and taking a longitudinal approach to data collection.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by Cambridge Trust and Newnham College, University of Cambridge.

ORCID iD

Klea Ramaj

Notes

References

Adler

L. A.

Spencer

Faraone

S. V.

Kessler

R. C.

Howes

M. J.

Biederman

Secnik

(2006). Validity of pilot adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS) to rate adult ADHD symptoms. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 18(3), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401230600801077

Albanese

A. M.

Russo

G. R.

Geller

P. A.

(2019). The role of parental self‐efficacy in parent and child well‐being: A systematic review of associated outcomes. Child: Care, Health, and Development, 45(3), 333–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12661

Assel

M. A.

Landry

S. H.

Swank

P. R.

Steelman

Miller‐Loncar

Smith

K. E.

(2002). How do mothers’ childrearing histories, stress and parenting affect children’s behavioural outcomes? Child: Care, Health and Development, 28(5), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2002.00285.x

Backhaus

Leijten

Meinck

Gardner

(2022, June 15). Different instrument, same content? A systematic comparison of child maltreatment and harsh parenting instruments. [Paper presentation]. ISPCAN 2022. Tallinn.

Bakermans-Kranenburg

M. J.

Van Ijzendoorn

M. H.

Juffer

(2003). Less is more: Meta- analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood. Psychological Bulletin, 129(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.195

Barker

Iles

J. E.

Ramchandani

P. G.

(2017). Fathers, fathering and child psychopathology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.015

Barlow

Johnston

Kendrick

Polnay

Stewart‐Brown

(2006). Individual and group‐based parenting programmes for the treatment of physical child abuse and neglect. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005463.pub2

Barrero-Castillero

Morton

S. U.

Nelson

C. A.

Smith

V. C.

(2019). Psychosocial stress and adversity: Effects from the perinatal period to adulthood. NeoReviews, 20(12), e686–e696. https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.20-12-e686

Bayındır

Ural

(2019). The investigation of self-regulation skills of preschoolers according to their attachment styles to their mothers and maternal parenting behaviors. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(6), 2597–2608. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3456

10.

Belsky

Barends

(2002). Personality and parenting. In Bornstein

M. H.

(Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Being and becoming a parent (pp. 415–438). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

11.

Bornstein

M. H.

(2015). Children’s parents. In Bornstein

M. H.

Leventhal

Lerner

R. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Volume 4: Ecological settings and processes (7th ed., pp. 55–132). John Wiley and Sons Inc.

12.

Bornstein

M. H.

Putnick

D. L.

Suwalsky

J. T.

(2018). Parenting cognitions → parenting practices → child adjustment? The standard model. Development and Psychopathology, 30(2), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579417000931

13.

Britto

P. R.

Lye

S. J.

Proulx

Yousafzai

A. K.

Matthews

S. G.

Vaivada

Perez-Escamilla

Rao

Fernald

L. C. H.

MacMillan

Hanson

Wachs

T. D.

Yao

Yoshikawa

Cerezo

Leckman

J. F.

Bhutta

Z. A.

MacMillan

(2017). Nurturing care: Promoting early childhood development. Lancet (London, England), 389(10064), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31390-3

14.

Bryanton

Gagnon

A. J.

Hatem

Johnston

(2008). Predictors of early parenting self-efficacy: Results of a prospective cohort study. Nursing Research, 57(4), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNR.0000313490.56788.cd

15.

Bryanton

Gagnon

A. J.

Hatem

Johnston

(2009). Does perception of the childbirth experience predict women’s early parenting behaviors? Research in Nursing and Health, 32(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20314

16.

Caspi

Moffitt

T. E.

Morgan

Rutter

Taylor

Arseneault

Tully

Jacobs

Kim-Cohen

Polo-Tomas

(2004). Maternal expressed emotion predicts children’s antisocial behavior problems: Using monozygotic-twin differences to identify environmental effects on behavioral development. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.149

17.

Chronis

A. M.

Lahey

B. B.

Pelham

W. E.

Jr. Williams

S. H.

Baumann

B. L.

Kipp

Jones

H. A.

Rathouz

P. J.

Rathouz

P. J.

(2007). Maternal depression and early positive parenting predict future conduct problems in young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Psychology, 43(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.70

18.

Chronis-Tuscano

Raggi

V. L.

Clarke

T. L.

Rooney

M. E.

Diaz

Pian

(2008). Associations between maternal attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and parenting. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(8), 1237–1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9246-4

19.

Clerkin

S. M.

Marks

D. J.

Policaro

K. L.

Halperin

J. M.

(2007). Psychometric properties of the Alabama parenting questionnaire-preschool revision. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410709336565

20.

Cohen

(1994). Perceived stress scale. Mindgarden, 1–5. https://www.mindgarden.com/documents/PerceivedStressScale.pdf

21.

Cohen

Kamarck

Mermelstein

(1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404

22.

Cohen

Williamson

G.M.

(1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In Spacapan

Oskamp

(Eds.), The social psychology of health (pp. 31–67). Sage.

23.

Coleman

P. K.

Karraker

K. H.

(1998). Self-efficacy and parenting quality: Findings and future applications. Developmental Review, 18(1), 47–85. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1997.0448

24.

Cooklin

A. R.

Giallo

Rose

(2012). Parental fatigue and parenting practices during early childhood: An Australian community survey. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(5), 654–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01333.x

25.

Cyr

Alink

L. R.

(2017). Child maltreatment: The central roles of parenting capacities and attachment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.002

26.

Dai

Y. G.

Brennan

Como

Hughes-Lika

Dumont-Mathieu

Rathwell

I. C.

Minxhozi

Aliaj

Fein

D. A.

(2018). A video parent-training program for families of children with autism spectrum disorder in Albania. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 56, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.08.008

27.

Dallaire

D. H.

Pineda

A. Q.

Cole

D. A.

Ciesla

J. A.

Jacquez

LaGrange

Bruce

A. E.

(2006). Relation of positive and negative parenting to children’s depressive symptoms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35(2), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_15

28.

Daoud

J. I.

(2017). Multicollinearity and regression analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 949(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/949/1/012009

29.

Davidov

Grusec

J. E.

(2006). Untangling the links of parental responsiveness to distress and warmth to child outcomes. Child Development, 77(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00855.x

30.

Davis

R. N.

Davis

M. M.

Freed

G. L.

Clark

S. J.

(2011). Fathers’ depression related to positive and negative parenting behaviors with 1-year-old children. Pediatrics, 127(4), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1779

31.

Deater-Deckard

Lansford

J. E.

Dodge

K. A.

Pettit

G. S.

Bates

J. E.

(2003). The development of attitudes about physical punishment: An 8- year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(3), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.17.3.351

32.

De Haan

A. D.

Prinzie

Deković

(2009). Mothers’ and fathers’ personality and parenting: The mediating role of sense of competence. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1695–1707. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016121

33.

de la Osa

Granero

Penelo

Domènech

J. M.

Ezpeleta

(2014). Psychometric properties of the Alabama parenting questionnaire-preschool revision (APQ-Pr) in 3 year-old Spanish preschoolers. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(5), 776–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9730-5

34.

de Ribera

O. S.

Trajtenberg

Shenderovich

Murray

(2019). Correlates of youth violence in low- and middle-income countries: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 49, 101306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.07.001

35.

Domitrovich

C. E.

Bierman

K. L.

(2001). Parenting practices and child social adjustment: Multiple pathways of influence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(2), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2001.0010

36.

Dumani

Bici

Dumani

Subashi

Kondi

(2018). Dissemination of demographic and socio-economic developments in Tirana with special attention to youth education. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 8(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesr-2018-0020

37.

Elgar

F. J.

Mills

R. S.

McGrath

P. J.

Waschbusch

D. A.

Brownridge

D. A.

(2007). Maternal and paternal depressive symptoms and child maladjustment: The mediating role of parental behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(6), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9145-0

38.

Ezzati

Lopez

A. D.

Rodgers

Vander Hoorn

Murray

C. J.

Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group. (2002). Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet (London, England), 360(9343), 1347–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11403-6

39.

Fayyad

Sampson

N. A.

Hwang

Adamowski

Aguilar-Gaxiola

Al-Hamzawi

Andrade

L. H.

Borges

de Girolamo

Florescu

Gureje

Haro

J. M.

Karam

E. G.

Lee

Navarro-Mateu

O’Neill

Pennell

B. E.

Piazza

WHO World Mental Health Survey Collaborators. (2017). The descriptive epidemiology of DSM- IV adult ADHD in the world health organization world mental health surveys. Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 9(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-016-0208-3

40.

Festinger

(1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.

41.

Fujiwara

Okuyama

Izumi

(2012). The impact of childhood abuse history, domestic violence and mental health symptoms on parenting behaviour among mothers in Japan. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(4), 530–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01272.x

42.

Furlong

McGilloway

Bywater

Hutchings

Smith

S. M.

Donnelly

(2012). Behavioural and cognitive‐behavioural group‐based parenting programmes for early‐onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8(2), 1–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008225.pub2

43.

Gage

A. J.

Silvestre

E. A.

(2010). Maternal violence, victimization, and child physical punishment in Peru. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34(7), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.12.004

44.

Garcia-Moreno

Jansen

H. A. F. M.

Ellsberg

Heise

Watts

C. H.

WHO Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence Against Women Study Team . (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet, 368(9543), 1260–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8

45.

Gibaud-Wallston

Wandersman

L. P.

(1978). Parenting sense of competence scale. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

46.

Glascoe

F. P.

Leew

(2010). Parenting behaviors, perceptions, and psychosocial risk: Impacts on young children’s development. Pediatrics, 125(2), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-3129

47.

Goldberg

J. S.

Carlson

M. J.

(2014). Parents’ relationship quality and children’s behavior in stable married and cohabiting families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(4), 762–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12120

48.

Grille

(2008). Parenting for a peaceful world. Children’s Project.

49.

Gustafsson

H. C.

Cox

M. J.

The Family Life Project Key Investigators . (2012). Relations among intimate partner violence, maternal depressive symptoms, and maternal parenting behaviors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(5), 1005–1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01010.x

50.

Hall

L. A.

Sachs

Rayens

M. K.

(1998). Mothers’ potential for child abuse: The roles of childhood abuse and social resources. Nursing Research, 47(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199803000-00007

51.

Herbell

Bloom

Sharps

Bullock

L. F. C.

(2020). Keeping it together for the kids: New mothers’ descriptions of the impact of intimate partner violence on parenting. Child Abuse and Neglect, 99, 104268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104268

52.

Hunter

R. S.

Kilstrom

(1979). Breaking the cycle in abusive families. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 136(10), 1320–1322. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.136.10.1320

53.

Huver

R. M.

Otten

De Vries

Engels

R. C.

(2010). Personality and parenting style in parents of adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 33(3), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.07.012

54.

INSTAT . (2018). Albanian demographic and health survey 2017–18. Institute of Statistics, Institute of Public Health, and ICF Macro.

55.

Jabraeili

Asadollahi

Asghari Jafarabadi

Hallaj

(2015). Attitude toward child abuse among mothers referring health centers of Tabriz. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.5681/jcs.2015.008

56.

Johnston

Mash

E. J.

(1989). A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1802_8

57.

Kelley

S. J.

(1998). Stress and coping behaviors of substance‐abusing mothers. Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses, 3(3), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6155.1998.tb00215.x

58.

Kendler

K. S.

Sham

P. C.

MacLean

C. J.

(1997). The determinants of parenting: An epidemiological, multi-informant, retrospective study. Psychological Medicine, 27(3), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291797004704

59.

Kochanska

Kuczynski

Radke-Yarrow

(1989). Correspondence between mothers’ self-reported and observed child-rearing practices. Child Development, 60(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1989.tb02694.x

60.

Kroenke

Spitzer

R. L.

Williams

J. B.

(2001). The PHQ‐9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x

61.

Kuczynski

Mol

J. D.

(2015). Dialectical models of socialization. In Overton

W. F.

Molenaar

P. C. M.

Lerner

R. M.

Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Volume 1: Theory and method (Eds.), (7th ed., pp. 113–161). John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

62.

Lachman

J. M.

Cluver

L. D.

Boyes

M. E.

Kuo

Casale

(2014). Positive parenting for positive parents: HIV/AIDS, poverty, caregiver depression, child behavior, and parenting in South Africa. AIDS Care, 26(3), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2013.825368

63.

Lansford

J. E.

Deater-Deckard

(2012). Childrearing discipline and violence in developing countries. Child Development, 83(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01676.x

64.

Lee

R. M.

(1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.

65.

Liang

Shou

Wang

M. C.

Deng

Luo

(2021). Alabama parenting questionnaire-9: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 33(10), 940–951. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001031

66.

Loeber

Stouthamer-Loeber

(1986). Family factors as correlates and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency. Crime and Justice, 7, 29–149. https://doi.org/10.1086/449112

67.

Luthar

S. S.

Crossman

E. J.

Small

P. J.

(2015). Resilience and adversity In Lamb

M. E.

Lerner

R. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Volume 3: Sociomotional processes (7th ed., pp. 201–246). John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

68.

Maccoby

E. E.

(2000). The uniqueness of the parent-child relationship. In Collins

W. A.

Laursen

(Eds.), Relationships as developmental contexts (pp. 157–175). Erlbaum.

69.

Maloney

P. W.

Grawitch

M. J.

Barber

L. K.

(2012). The multi-factor structure of the brief self-control scale: Discriminant validity of restraint and impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.10.001

70.

McConnell

Breitkreuz

Savage

(2011). From financial hardship to child difficulties: Main and moderating effects of perceived social support. Child: Care, Health and Development, 37(5), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01185.x

71.

Mijatović

(2018). Report following the commissioner’s for human rights of the Council of Europe visit to Albania from 21 to 25 May 2018. Council of Europe.

72.

Murray

A. L.

Kaiser

Valdebenito

Hughes

Baban

Fernando

A. D.

Madrid

Ward

C. L.

Osafo

Dunne

Sikander

Walker

Van Thang

Tomlinson

Eisner

(2020). The intergenerational effects of intimate partner violence in pregnancy: Mediating pathways and implications for prevention. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 21(5), 964–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018813563

73.

Murray

A. L.

Taut

Baban

Hemady

C. L.

Walker

Osafo

Sikander

Tomlinson

Du Toit

Marlow

Ward

Fernando

Madrid

T. V.

Hoang

T. D.

Dunne

Hughes

Fearon

Valdebenito

Eisner

(2022). Associations between ADHD symptoms and maternal and birth outcomes: An exploratory analysis in a multi-country cohort of expectant mothers. Journal of Attention Disorders, 26(14), 1882–1894. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jv9q5

74.

Nadan

Spilsbury

J. C.

Korbin

J. E.

(2015). Culture and context in understanding child maltreatment: Contributions of intersectionality and neighborhood-based research. Child Abuse and Neglect, 41, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.10.021

75.

Ngai

F. W.

Wai-Chi Chan

W. Y.

(2010). Predictors and correlates of maternal role competence and satisfaction. Nursing Research, 59(3), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181dbb9ee

76.

Nofziger

(2008). The “cause” of low self-control: The influence of maternal self-control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(2), 191–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427807313708

77.

Nordling

J. K.

Boldt

L. J.

O’Bleness

Kochanska

(2016). Effortful control mediates relations between children’s attachment security and their regard for rules of conduct. Social Development, 25(2), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12139

78.

Ohan

J. L.

Leung

D. W.

Johnston

(2000). The parenting sense of competence scale: Evidence of a stable factor structure and validity. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 32(4), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087122

79.

Okagaki

Bingham

G. E.

(2005). Parents’ social cognitions and their parenting behaviors. In Luster

Okagaki

(Eds.), Parenting: An ecological perspective (2nd ed., pp. 3–33). Erlbaum.

80.

Oltra‐Benavent

Cano‐Climent

Oliver‐Roig

Cabrero‐García

Richart- Martínez

(2020). Spanish version of the parenting sense of competence scale: Evidence of reliability and validity. Child and Family Social Work, 25(2), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12693

81.

Pearson

Page

Zimmerman

Meinck

Gennari

Guedes

Stöckl

(2022). The co-occurrence of intimate partner violence and violence against children: A systematic review on associated factors in low- and-middle-income countries. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221082943

82.

Petrovic

Vasic

Petrovic

Santric-Milicevic

(2016). Positive parenting attitudes and practices in three transitional eastern European countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia and Serbia. International Journal of Public Health, 61(5), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0823-y

83.

Qirjako

Burazeri

Amursi

(2014). Prevalence of childhood physical abuse in Albania. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(4), 172–176.

84.

Ramchandani

P. G.

Domoney

Sethna

Psychogiou

Vlachos

Murray

(2013). Do early father–infant interactions predict the onset of externalising behaviours in young children? Findings from a longitudinal cohort study. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 54(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02583.x

85.

Roksa

Potter

(2011). Parenting and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 84(4), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040711417013

86.

Runyan

D. K.

Dunne

M. P.

Zolotor

A. J.

Madrid

Jain

Gerbaka

Menick

D. M.

Andreva-Miller

Kasim

M. S.

Choo

W. Y.

Isaeva

Macfarlane

Ramirez

Volkova

Youssef

R. M.

Isaeva

(2009). The development and piloting of the ISPCAN child abuse screening tool—parent version (ICAST-P). Child Abuse and Neglect, 33(11), 826–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.09.006

87.

Sado

Benassi

Spaho

(2018). How the early childhood well-being lies within the family context in Albania. Child Indicators Research, 11(4), 1301–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9476-5

88.

Save the Children . (2019). A school-based intervention reduces physical violence against children in Albania. Save the Children. Retrieved from. https://theevaluationfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Albania-Evidence-Brief.pdf

89.

Schelbe

Geiger

J. M.

(2017). Intergenerational transmission of child maltreatment. Springer. https://cam.ldls.org.uk/vdc_100073627386.0x000001

90.

Sebre

S. B.

Miltuze

Limonovs

(2020). Integrating adolescent problematic internet use risk factors: Hyperactivity, inconsistent parenting, and maladaptive cognitions. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(7), 2000–2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01726-0

91.

Sherr

Macedo

Cluver

L. D.

Meinck

Skeen

Hensels

I. S.

Sherr

L. T. S.

Roberts

K. J.

Tomlinson

(2017). Parenting, the other oldest profession in the world – A cross-sectional study of parenting and child outcomes in South Africa and Malawi. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 5(1), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2016.1276459

92.

Shin

S. H.

Tomlinson

C. A.

Nelson-Hence

Ksinan Jiskrova

(2022). Understanding the intergenerational cycle of trauma and violence: Maternal adverse childhood experiences and parent-to-child aggression risk. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(5–6), 4998–5018. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221120884

93.

Sigel

I. E.

McGillicuddy-De Lisi

A. V.

(2002). Parental beliefs and cognitions: The dynamic belief systems model. In Bornstein

M. H.

(Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. 3. Status and social conditions of parenting (2nd ed., pp. 485–508). Erlbaum.

94.

Sigel

I. E.

McGillicuddy-DeLisi

A. V.

Goodnow

J. J.

(2014). Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children . Psychology Press.

95.

Simkiss

D. E.

MacCallum

Fan

E. E.

Oates

J. M.

Kimani

P. K.

Stewart-Brown

(2013). Validation of the mothers object relations scales in 2–4 year old children and comparison with the child–parent relationship scale. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(49), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-49

96.

Stoltenborgh

Bakermans‐Kranenburg

M. J.

Alink

L. R.

van Ijzendoorn

M. H.

(2015). The prevalence of child maltreatment across the globe: Review of a series of meta‐analyses. Child Abuse Review, 24(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2353

97.

Sykes

Hoinville

(1985). Telephone interviewing on a survey of social attitudes: A comparison with face-to-face procedures. Social and Community Planning Research.

98.

Thompson

R. A.

(2015). Relationships, regulation, and early development. In Lamb

M. E.

Lerner

R. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Volume 3: Sociomotional processes (7th ed., pp. 201–246). John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

99.

Thomson

R. M.

Allely

C. S.

Purves

Puckering

McConnachie

Johnson

P. C.

Golding

Gillberg

Wilson

(2014). Predictors of positive and negative parenting behaviours: Evidence from the ALSPAC cohort. BMC Pediatrics, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-247

100.

Tiranë

(2020). Popullsia e Tiranës. [The Municipality of Tirana]. Retrieved from: https://opendata.tirana.al/?q=popullsia-e-tiran%C3%ABs-2020

101.

Trentacosta

C. J.

Neppl

T. K.

Donnellan

M. B.

Scaramella

L. V.

Shaw

D. S.

Conger

R. D.

(2010). Adolescent personality as a prospective predictor of parenting: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(6), 721–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021732

102.

UNICEF . (2005). Albania: Multiple indicator cluster survey. UNICEF. Retrieved from. https://www.rhsupplies.org/uploads/tx_rhscpublications/MICS3_Albania_FinalReport_2005_Eng.pdf

103.

UNICEF . (2014). Hidden in plain sight: A statistical analysis of violence against children. UNICEF. Retrieved from: http://files.unicef.org/publications/files/Hidden_in_plain_sight_statistical_analysis_EN_3_Sept_2014.pdf

104.

UNICEF . (2018). Albania annual report. UNICEF.

105.

Valdebenito

Murray

Hughes

Băban

Fernando

A. D.

Madrid

B. J.

Ward

Osafo

Dunne

Sikander

Walker

S. P.

Thang

V. V.

Tomlinson

Fearon

Shenderovich

Marlow

Chathurika

Taut

Eisner

(2020). Evidence for better lives study: A comparative birth-cohort study on child exposure to violence and other adversities in eight low- and middle-income countries - foundational research (study protocol). BMJ Open, 10(10), Article e034986. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034986

106.

van de Glind

van den Brink

Koeter

M. W.

Carpentier

van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen

Kaye

Skutle

E.-H. H.

Franck

Konstenius

Moggi

Dom

Verspreet

Demetrovics

Kapitány-Fövény

Fatséas

Auriacombe

Schillinger

… Levin

F. R..

(2013). Validity of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) as a screener for adult ADHD in treatment seeking substance use disorder patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 1(132), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.010.Validity

107.

Ward

C. L.

Artz

Leoschut

Kassanjee

Burton

(2018). Sexual violence against children in South Africa: A nationally representative cross-sectional study of prevalence and correlates. Lancet Global Health, 6(4), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30060-3

108.

Ward

C. L.

Sanders

Gardner

Mikton

Dawes

(2016). Effective implementation of parenting programmes in low-and middle-income countries: A public health research agenda. Child Abuse and Neglect, 54, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.11.002

109.

Webster

G. D.

Dewall

C. N.

Pond

R. S.

Jr. Deckman

Jonason

P. K.

B. M.

Nichols

A. L.

Schember

T. O.

Crysel

L. C.

Crosier

B. S.

Smith

C. V.

Paddock

E. L.

Nezlek

J. B.

Kirkpatrick

L. A.

Bryan

A. D.

Bator

R. J.

(2014). The Brief Aggression Questionnaire: Psychometric and behavioral evidence for an efficient measure of trait aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21507

110.

Westbrook

T. R.

Harden

B. J.

(2010). Pathways among exposure to violence, maternal depression, family structure, and child outcomes through parenting: A multigroup analysis. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01042.x

111.

WHO ASSIST Working Group . (2002). The Alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST): Development, reliability and feasibility screening test (ASSIST): Development, reliability and feasibility. Addiction, 97(9), 1183–1194. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00185.x

112.

Widom

C. S.

Wilson

H. W.

(2015). Intergenerational transmission of violence. In Lindert

Levav

(Eds.), Violence and mental health. Springer.

113.

Wilson

Minnis

Puckering

Gillberg

(2009). Should we aspire to screen preschool children for conduct disorder? Archives of Disease in Childhood, 94(10), 812–816. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.158535

114.

World Health Organisation . (2010). Violence prevention: The evidence. WHO. Retrieved from. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/77936

115.

World Health Organisation . (2005). Multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses . WHO.

116.

World Health Organisation. (2011). Adverse childhood experiences international questionnaire (ACE-IQ). WHO. Retrieved from. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/adverse-childhood-experiences-international-questionnaire-(ace-iq)

117.

Zhupa

I. K.

(2013). Albanian society in the optics of traditional values. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(8), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n8p141

118.

Zimet

G. D.

Dahlem

N. W.

Zimet

S. G.

Farley

G. K.

(1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201

Predictors of Positive and Negative Parenting Practices Among Mothers of Two-to-Three-Year-Old Children: Findings From Tirana,Albania

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Parenting Practices and Their Implications

Predictors of Parenting

Parenting Practices in Albania and in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries (LMICs)

Study Aims

Methods

Study Design and Sample

Instruments and Measures

Dependent Variables

Punitive Parenting

Inconsistent Parenting

Positive Parenting

Child Maltreatment

Independent Variables

Maternal Depression

Maternal Perceived Stress

Maternal ADHD Symptoms

Maternal Aggression

Maternal Self-Control

Parental Sense of Competence

Maltreatment Attitudes

Maternal Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs)

Intimate Partner Violence

Control Variables

Translation and Data Collection

Data Analysis

Ethical Considerations

Results

Describing the Study Population

Predictors of Punitive Parenting

Predictors of Inconsistent Parenting

Predictors of Positive Parenting

Predictors of Child Maltreatment

Discussion

Strengths and Limitations

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

Notes

References