Premarital Cohabitation,Marital Dissolution,and Marital Quality in China

Abstract

Using data from the 2018 Chinese Family Panel Studies, this study examines the associations between premarital cohabitation, marital satisfaction, and the probability of a subsequent divorce and captures the gradated variations of marital quality by incorporating divorce and self-rated marital satisfaction into a generic measure of marital quality. Findings show positive associations between cohabitation and divorce and negative associations between cohabitation and marital quality. Results further show that the negative association between cohabitation and marital quality is weakened by better education, higher income, and rural origin, and stronger among men. The consistent negative associations between cohabitation and all the marital quality outcomes indicate the persistent strength of the norm of universal marriage, based on which cohabitation is still considered substantively distinct from marriage both in terms of legal status and social recognition. The diverse social gradients of the cohabitation-marital quality links reflect the heterogeneous social meanings of cohabitation in contemporary China.

Keywords

cohabitation divorce marital quality the second demographic transition trial marriage economic pressures

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Axinn

W. G.

Thornton

(1992). The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence? Demography, 29(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061823

Bennett

L. R.

(2005). Patterns of resistance and transgression in Eastern Indonesia: Single women’s practices of clandestine courtship and cohabitation. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 7(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050412331291397

Boyle

P. J.

Kulu

(2006). Does cohabitation prior to marriage raise the risk of marital dissolution and does this effect vary geographically. In Max planck institute for demographic research working papers WP-2006-051. RePEc. https://doi.org/10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2006-051

Bramlett

M. D.

Mosher

W. D.

(2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce and remarriage in the United States. Vital and Health Statistics, 23(22), 1–93.

Brown

S. L.

Sanchez

L. A.

Nock

S. L.

Wright

J. D.

(2006). Links between premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital quality, stability, and divorce: A comparison of covenant versus standard marriages. Social Science Research, 35(2), 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.03.001

Cohan

C. L.

Kleinbaum

(2004). Toward a greater understanding of the cohabitation effect: Premarital cohabitation and marital communication. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(1), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00180.x

Cuevas

A. J.

(2017). Marriage and cohabitation among rural and urban women in western Mexico. Intimate Relationships and Social Change (Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research, 11, 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1530-353520170000011008.

Dekeseredy

W. S.

Schwartz

M. D.

Alvi

(2008). Which women are more likely to be abused? Public housing, cohabitation, and separated/divorced women. Criminal Justice Studies, 21(4), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786010802554113

Gaetano

(2008). Sexuality in diasporic space: Rural-to-urban migrant women negotiating gender and marriage in contemporary China. Gender, Place and Culture, 15(6), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690802518545

10.

Hall

D. R.

Zhao

J. Z.

(1995). Cohabitation and divorce in Canada: Testing the selectivity hypothesis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(2), 421–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/353695

11.

Hong

Stanton

Yang

Lin

Fang

Wang

Mao

(2006). Rural-to-urban migrants and the HIV epidemic in China. AIDS Behavior, 10(4), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.10072Fs10461-005-9039-5

12.

Jampaklay

Haseen

(2011). Marital unions and unmarried cohabitation in Bangkok, Thailand. Asian Population Studies, 7(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2011.576818

13.

Jay

(2012). The defining decade: Why your twenties matter--and how to make the most of them now. Hachette.

14.

Jones

G. W.

(2010). Changing marriage patterns in Asia. Asia Research Institute.

15.

Jones

G. W.

Zhang

Chia

P. P. Z.

(2012). Understanding high levels of singlehood in Singapore. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(5), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.43.5.731

16.

Kobayashi

K. M.

Kampen

R. M.

(2015). Cohabitation in Asia. In Quah

S. R.

(Ed.), Routledge handbook of families in Asia (pp. 377–395). Routledge.

17.

Kuang

Perelli-Harris

Padmadas

(2019). The unexpected rise of cohabitation in the Philippines: Evidence of socioeconomic disadvantage or a second demographic transition? Asian Population Studies, 15(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2018.1560664

18.

Kulu

Boyle

P. J.

(2010). Premarital cohabitation and divorce: Support for the ‘Trial Marriage’ theory? Demographic Research, 23, 879–904. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.31

19.

Lesthaeghe

(2020). The second demographic transition, 1986–2020: Sub-replacement fertility and rising cohabitation—A global update. Genus, 76(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00077-4

20.

Liefbroer

A. C.

Dourleijn

(2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography, 43(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0018

21.

Meyer

J. W.

(2006). World models, national curricula, and the centrality of the individual. In Benavot

Braslavsky

(Eds.), School knowledge in comparative and historical perspective: changing curricula in primary and secondary education (pp. 259–271). Springer, Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.

22.

Yeung

W. J.

(2018). For money or for a life: A mixed-method study on migration and time use in China. Social Indicators Research, 139(1), 347–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1698-x

23.

Yeung

W. J. J.

(2020). Internal migration, marriage timing and assortative mating: a mixed-method study in China. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(14), 2914–2936. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2019.1585009

24.

National Bureau of Statistics of China (2010). Tabulation of the 2010 census of the people’s Republic of China. https://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/pcsj/rkpc/6rp/indexch.htm

25.

Nguyen

(2007). ‘Relationships based on love and relationships based on needs’: Emerging trends in youth sex culture in contemporary urban Vietnam. Modern Asian Studies, 41(2), 287–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x05002258

26.

Ochiai

(2011). Unsustainable societies: The failure of familialism in East Asia’s compressed modernity. Historical Social Research, 26(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.36.2011.2.219-245

27.

Perelli-Harris

Berrington

Gassen

N. S.

Galezewska

Holland

J. A.

(2017). The rise in divorce and cohabitation: Is there a link? Population and Development Review, 43(2), 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12063

28.

Raymo

J. M.

Iwasawa

Bumpass

(2009). Cohabitation and family formation in Japan. Demography, 46(4), 785–803. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0075

29.

Raymo

J. M.

Park

Xie

Yeung

W. J.

(2015). Marriage and family in East Asia: Continuity and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112428

30.

Reinhold

(2010). Reassessing the link between premarital cohabitation and marital instability. Demography, 47(3), 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0122

31.

Reynolds

Walther

C. S.

(2020). The social capital of rural demography of marriage, cohabitation, and divorce. In Farris

Bourque

(Eds.), International handbook on the demography of marriage and the family (pp. 139–156). Springer.

32.

Samart

(2007). Unmarried cohabitation in Thailand: The case of migrant workers in Bangkok. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University.

33.

Song

Lai

(2020). Cohabitation and gender equality: Ideal and real division of household labor among Chinese youth. China Review, 20(2), 53–80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26915621

34.

Sun

S. H.

Chong

W. E.

Lim

(2014). Gender and divorce in contemporary Singapore. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 45(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.45.1.127

35.

Svarer

(2004). Is your love in vain? Another look at premarital cohabitation and divorce. The Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.XXXIX.2.523

36.

Teachman

(2004). Premarital sex, premarital cohabitation, and the risk of subsequent marital dissolution among women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2), 444–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x

37.

Thornton

Axinn

W. G.

Xie

(2008). Marriage and cohabitation. University of Chicago Press.

38.

Williams

(2010). Attitudes toward marriage in northern Vietnam: What qualitative data reveal about variations across gender, generation, and geography. Journal of Population Research, 26(4), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-010-9024-3

39.

Williams

Kabamalan

Ogena

(2007). Cohabitation in the Philippines: Attitudes and behaviours among young women and men. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(5), 1244–1256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00444.x

40.

Woods

L. N.

Emery

R. E.

(2002). The cohabitation effect on divorce. Causation or selection? Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 37(3-4), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v37n03_06

41.

Xie

(2013). Gender and family in contemporary China. Population Studies Center Research Report, 13–808.

42.

Xia

(2014). The changes in mainland Chinese families during the social transition: A critical analysis. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 45(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.45.1.31

43.

Yang

(2011). Between traditionalism and modernity: Changing values on dating behaviour and mate selection criteria. International Review of Modern Sociology, 37(2), 265–287. https://www.jstor.com/stable/41421416

44.

Yang

Yen

(2011). A comparative study of marital dissolution in East Asian societies: Gender attitudes and social expectations towards marriage in Taiwan, Korea and Japan. Asian Journal of Social Science, 39(6), 751–775. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853111X619210

45.

Yeung

W. J.

(2016). Paradox in marriage values and behaviour in contemporary China. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2(3), 447–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150X16659019

46.

Yoo

(2015). Living cohabitation in the Republic of Korea: The reported experiences of lesbians, gays, and heterosexuals. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Women’s Studies, University of York.

47.

Xie

(2015). Cohabitation in China: Trends and determinants. Population and Development Review, 41(4), 607–628. https://doi.org/10.11112Fj.1728-4457.2015.00087.x

48.

Zhang

(2017). Premarital cohabitation and marital dissolution in post-reform China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(5), 1435–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12419

49.

Zimmermann

Easterlin

R. A.

(2006). Happily ever after? Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and happiness in Germany. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00135.x