Taking Care of Elderly Parents or Children: How Are They Related to the Decision to Hire Foreign Domestic Helpers?

Abstract

Hiring foreign domestic helpers has been seen as a policy to release females from household responsibilities so they can join the labor market. Surprisingly, few studies explore the relative importance of needs to taking care children and elderly. Employing the 2016 Hong Kong census, we found that the number of elderly persons and the number of young children in the household are positively associated with the decision to hire foreign domestic helpers. Our analysis also demonstrates that members are more likely to choose to work and outsource the care of young children to foreign domestic helpers. However, the findings show that households are more likely to take care of elderly without helpers even when household members are employed. Household members may co-ordinate and allocate time to take care of their elderly instead of outsourcing the care to a foreign domestic helper.

Keywords

elderly children Hong Kong foreign domestic helpers hiring decision

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andenaes

(2014). The task of taking care of children: Methodological perspectives and empirical implications. Child & Family Social Work, 19(3), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00897.x

Asato

(2004). Negotiating spaces in the labor market: Foreign and local domestic workers in Hong Kong. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 13(2), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/011719680401300206

Baig

R. B.

Chang

C.-W.

(2020). Formal and informal social support systems for migrant domestic workers. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(6), 784–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220910251

Basnyat

Chang

(2017). Examining live-in foreign domestic helpers as a coping resource for family caregivers of people with dementia in Singapore. Health Communication, 32(9), 1171–1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1220346

Baxter

Hewitt

Western

(2009). Who uses paid domestic labor in Australia? Choice and constraint in hiring household help. Feminist Economics, 15(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700802248989

Buehler

O'Brien

(2011). Mothers’ part-time employment: Associations with mother and family well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(6), 895–906. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025993

Chang

Y.-P.

Schneider

J. K.

(2010). Decision-making process of nursing home placement among Chinese family caregivers. Perspective Psychiatric Care, 46(2), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6163.2010.00246.x

Cheung

A. K.-L.

(2014). Hiring domestic help and family well-being in Hong Kong: A propensity score matching analysis. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 45(4), 475–495. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.45.4.475

Cheung

A. K.-L.

Lui

(2016). Hiring domestic help in Hong Kong. Journal of Family Issues, 38(1), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x14565700

10.

Cheung

A. K.-L.

Lui

(2017). Hiring domestic help in Hong Kong: The role of gender attitude and wives’ income. Journal of Family Issues, 38(1), 73-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14565700.

11.

Cheung

A. K.-L.

Lui

(2022). Does live-in domestic help reduce unpaid household labor? The paradox of intensive parenting and domestic outsourcing. Current Sociology, 70(6), 921-942. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211012744.

12.

Chinn

(2000). A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 19(22), 3127–3131. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0258(20001130)19:22<3127::aid-sim784>3.0.co;2-m

13.

Chow

(2006). The practice of filial piety and its impact on long-term care policies for elderly people in Asian Chinese communities. Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 1(1), 31–35.

14.

Chung

R. Y.-N.

Mak

J. K.-L

(2020). Physical and mental health of live-in female migrant domestic workers: A randomly sampled survey in Hong Kong. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(6), 802–822. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220910215

15.

Constable

(1996). Jealousy, chastity, and abuse: Chinese maids and foreign helpers in Hong Kong. Modern China, 22(4), 448–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/009770049602200404

16.

Constable

(2007). Maid to order in Hong Kong: Stories of migrant workers. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

17.

Cortés

Pan

(2013). Outsourcing household production: Foreign domestic workers and native labor supply in Hong Kong. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(2), 327–371. https://doi.org/10.1086/668675

18.

Dermott

Pomati

(2016). The parenting and economising practices of lone parents: Policy and evidence. Critical Social Policy, 36(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018315602198

19.

Fakih

Marrouch

(2014). Who hires foreign domestic workers? Eevidence from lebanon. Journal of Developing Areas, 48(3), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2014.0060

20.

Gewirtz

(2001). Cloning the blairs: New labour’s programme for the re-socialization of working-class parents. Journal of Education Policy, 16(4), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930110054353

21.

(2019). Foreign domestic helpers hiring and Wwmen’s labor supply in Hong Kong. Chinese sociological review, 51(4), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2019.1630814

22.

Hondagneu-Sotelo

(2001). Doméstica: Immirgant workers cleaning and caring in the shadows of affluence. University of California Press.

23.

Hong Kong Government . (2003). Report of the task force on population policy. Hong Kong Hong Kong Government.

24.

Hong Kong Government . (2020). Statistics on the number of foreign domestic helpers in Hong Kong. Immigration DepartmentHong Kong Government.

25.

Hong Kong Government . (2021a). Employment of domestic helpers from abroad. Immigration Department.

26.

Hong Kong Government . (2021b). Statistics on the number of foreign domestic helpers in Hong Kong. Immigration Department.

27.

International Labour Office . (2010). Decent work for domestic workers. International Labour Organizaiton.

28.

International Labour Organization . (2015). ILO global estimates on migrant workers: Results and methodology. International Labour Office.

29.

International Labour Organization . (2018). ILO global estimates on international migrant workers: Results and methodology. International Labour Office.

30.

Khalilzadeh

Tasci

A. D. A.

(2017). Large sample size, significance level, and the effect size: Solutions to perils of using big data for academic research. Tourism Management, 62, 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.03.026.

31.

Kramer

Hamilton

T. N.

(2019). Sibling caregiving. In Handbook of parenting: Being and becoming a parent (3rd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 372–408). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

32.

Lai

D. W. L.

(2010). Filial piety, caregiving appraisal, and caregiving burden. Research on aging, 32(2), 200–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027509351475

33.

Lai

Y.-t.

Fong

(2020). Workplace aggression in home-based working environment: Experiences of migrant domestic workers in Hong Kong. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(6), 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220910227

34.

Lan

P.-C.

(2003). Maid or madam? Filipina migrant workers and the continuity of domestic labor. Gender and Society, 17(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243202250730

35.

Leung

J. C. B.

(1997). Family support for the elderly in China. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 9(3), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1300/j031v09n03_05

36.

McKenzie

Theoharides

Yang

(2014). Distortions in the international migrant labor market: Evidence from Filipino migration and wage responses to destination country economic shocks. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(2), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.6.2.49

37.

Parrenãs

(2001). Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford University Press.

38.

Parreñas

R. S.

Silvey

Hwang

M. C.

Choi

C. A.

. (2019). Serial labor migration: Precarity and itinerancy among Filipino and Indonesian domestic workers. International Migration Review, 53(4), 1230–1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918318804769

39.

Piper

(2017). Global governance of labour migration: From “management” of migration to an integrated rights-based approach. In Regulatory theory: Foundations and ApplicationsPeter drahos (pp. 375–392). Australian National University Press.

40.

Salaff

J. W.

(1995). Working daughters of Hong Kong: Filial piety or power in the family? Columbia University Press.

41.

Stier

Lewin-Epstein

(2000). Women’s part-time employment and gender inequality in the family. Journal of Family Issues, 21(3), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251300021003006

42.

Tong

Jiang

(2020). Much ado about nothing? Do foreign domestic workers in Hong Kong benefit from capital accumulation? American Behavioral Scientist, 64(6), 823–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220910236

43.

Wang

C.-H.

Chung

C.-P.

Hwang

J.-T.

Ning

C.-y.

(2018). The foreign domestic workers in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Taiwan: Should minimum wage apply to foreign domestic workers? The Chinese Economy, 51(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2018.1447831

44.

Windebank

Martinez-Perez

(2018). Gender divisions of domestic labour and paid domestic services. The Service Industries Journal, 38(11–12), 875–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2018.1484110

45.

Wong

A. K.

(1973). Rising social status and economic participation of women in Hong Kong – Review of a decade. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 1(2), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1163/080382473x00159

46.

Wong

Chau

(2006). The evolving role of filial piety in eldercare in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Social Science, 34(4), 600–617. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853106778917790

47.

Chen

(2020). Better a friend nearby than a brother far away? The health implications of foreign domestic workers’ family and friendship networks. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(6), 765–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220910220

48.

Yeoh

B. S. A.

Huang

(2010). Transnational domestic workers and the negotiation of mobility and work practices in Singapore’s home-spaces. Mobilities, 5(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101003665036