The primary goal of the current study was to examine the dyadic association between communication patterns (CP), dyadic coping (DC) efforts, dyadic adjustment (DA), and parenting practices (PP), using a sample of 340 married couples (N = 680) in India. The findings from the actor–partner interdependence mediation modeling (APIMeM) indicated that the husbands showed both actor and partner effects between all the variables. The actor and partner effects were not significant for the link between communication patterns and dyadic coping for wives. Still, they showed significant actor and partner effects for the association between dyadic coping and dyadic adjustment, as well as parenting practices. One’s own and spouse’s dyadic coping mediated the association between communication patterns and dyadic adjustment and parenting practices for husbands but not wives. These findings shed light on the communication and coping mechanisms and their link with adjustment and parenting practices among couples beyond Western cultural contexts.
AllendorfK.PandianR. K. (2016). The decline of arranged marriage? Marital change and continuity in India. Population and Development Review, 42(3), 435.
2.
AlvesS.MilekA.BodenmannG.FonsecaA.CanavarroM. C.PereiraM. (2019). Romantic attachment, dyadic coping, and parental adjustment across the transition to parenthood. Personal Relationships, 26(2), 286–309.
3.
ArbuckleJ. L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 user’s guide (p. 635). Amos Development Corporation.
4.
ArcuriA. (2013). Dyadic perfectionism, communication patterns and relationship quality in couples (Doctoral thesis). University of Windsor.
5.
AzizM. (2004). Role stress among women in the Indian information technology sector. Women in Management Review, 19(7), 356–363.
6.
BodenmannG. (1995). A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology [Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie], 54(1), 34–49.
7.
BodenmannG. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In RevensonT. A.KayserK.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Decade of behavior. Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–49). American Psychological Association.
8.
BodenmannG. (2008). Dyadisches coping inventar (DCI). Test manual [Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI). Test manual]. Huber &Hogrefe.
9.
BodenmannG.CinaA. (1999). Der Einfluß von Streß, individueller Belastungsbewältigung und dyadischen Coping auf die Partnerschaftsstabilität: Eine 4-Jahres-Längschnittstudie [The influence of stress and individual and dyadic coping on the stability of partnerships. A 4-year longitudinal study]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 28(2), 130–139.
10.
BodenmannG.ShantinathS. D. (2004). The couples coping enhancement training (CCET): A new approach to prevention of marital distress based upon stress and coping. Family Relations, 53(5), 477–484.
11.
BodenmannG.BradburyT. N.PihetS. (2008). Relative contributions of treatment-related changes in communication skills and dyadic coping skills to the longitudinal course of marriage in the framework of marital distress prevention. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 50(1), 1–21.
12.
BodenmannG.HilpertP.NussbeckF. W.BradburyT. N. (2014). Enhancement of couples’ Communication and dyadic coping by a self-directed approach: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(4), 580.
13.
BodenmannG.MeuwlyN.BradburyT. N.GmelchS.LedermannT. (2010). Stress, anger, and verbal aggression in intimate relationships: Moderating effects of individual and dyadic coping. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 408–424.
14.
BreitensteinC. J.MilekA.NussbeckF. W.DavilaJ.BodenmannG. (2018). Stress, dyadic coping, and relationship satisfaction in late adolescent couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(5), 770–790.
15.
BrownM. (2012). Dyadic coping, relationship satisfaction, and parenting stress among parents of children with an autism spectrum disorder: The role of the couple relationship (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Texas Tech University.
16.
BrownM.WhitingJ.Kahumoku-FesslerE.WittingA. B.JensenJ. (2020). A dyadic model of stress, coping, and marital satisfaction among parents of children with autism. Family Relations, 69(1), 138–150.
17.
CarsonD. K.JainS.RamirezS. (2009). Counseling and family therapy in India: Evolving professions in a rapidly developing nation. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 31(1), 45–56.
18.
CaughlinJ. P.HustonT. L. (2002). A contextual analysis of the association between demand/withdraw and marital satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 9(1), 95–119.
19.
ChenF. M.LiT. S. (2007). Marital enqing: An examination of its relationship to spousal contributions, sacrifices, and family stress in Chinese marriages. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 393–412.
20.
ChiP.EpsteinN. B.FangX.LamD. O.LiX. (2013). Similarity of relationship standards, couple communication patterns, and marital satisfaction among Chinese couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 806–816.
21.
ChristensenA.HeaveyC. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 73–81.
22.
ColnK. L.JordanS. S.MercerS. H. (2013). A unified model exploring parenting practices as mediators of marital conflict and children’s adjustment. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 44(3), 419–429.
23.
CorneliusT. L.AlessiG.ShoreyR. C. (2007). The effectiveness of communication skills training with married couples: Does the issue discussed matter?The Family Journal, 15(2), 124–132.
24.
CrenshawA. O.ChristensenA.BaucomD. H.EpsteinN. B.BaucomB. R. (2017). Revised scoring and improved reliability for the Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 29(7), 1–13.
25.
DalalK.LindqvistK. (2012). A national study of the prevalence and correlates of domestic violence among women in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 24(2), 265–277.
26.
DalyK.AshbourneL.HawkinsL. (2008). Work-life issues for fathers. In KorabiK.LeroD. S.WhiteheadD. L. (Eds.), Handbook of work-family integration (pp. 249–266). Academic Press.
27.
DaviesP. T.Sturge-AppleM. L.WoitachM. J.CummingsE. M. (2009). A process analysis of the transmission of distress from interparental conflict to parenting: Adult relationship security as an explanatory mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1761.
28.
DesaU. (2019). World population prospects 2019 (online ed., Rev. 1). United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division.
29.
DesaiM.MajumdarB.ChakrabortyT.GhoshK. (2011). The second shift: Working women in India. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 26(6), 432–450.
30.
DesaiS.DubeyA.JoshiB. L.SenM.ShariffA.VannemanR. (2007). India Human Development Survey (IHDS) [Computer file]. ICPSR22626-v2. University of Maryland and National Council of Applied Economic Research.
31.
DesaiS.VannemanR., & National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER). (2015). India Human Development Survey-II (IHDS-II), 2011–12 (ICPSR 36151). Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.
32.
DesaiS.VannemanR., National Council of Applied Economic Research, & India Human Development Survey (IHDS). 2005. Inter-university consortium for political and social research [distributor], 2018-08-08. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22626.v12
33.
DionK. K.DionK. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 53–69.
34.
DommarajuP.JonesG. (2011). Divorce trends in Asia. Asian Journal of Social Science, 39(6), 725–750.
35.
DonatoS.PariseM.PaganiA. F.BertoniA.IafrateR. (2014). Demand-withdraw, couple satisfaction and relationship duration. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 200–206.
36.
DonatoS.PariseM.IafrateR.BertoniA.FinkenauerC.BodenmannG. (2015). Dyadic coping responses and partners’ perceptions for couple satisfaction: An actor-partner interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(5), 580–600.
37.
EbrahimiE.Ali KimiaeiS. (2014). The study of the relationship among marital satisfaction, attachment styles, and communication patterns in divorcing couples. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 55(6), 451–463.
38.
EisanejadO.AlizadehZ. (2020). The effectiveness of couples coping enhancement training (CCET) on marital adjustment and marital coping strategies. Applied Psychological Research Quarterly, 11(1), 67–85.
39.
EssauC. A.SasagawaS.FrickP. J. (2006). Psychometric properties of the Alabama parenting questionnaire. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15(5), 595–614.
40.
FalconierM. K.RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (Eds.). (2016). Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 23–35). Routledge.
41.
GabrielB.BodenmannG. (2006). Elterliche Kompetenzen und Erziehungskonflikte: eine ressourcenorientierte Betrachtung von familiären Negativdynamiken. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 15(1), 9–18.
42.
GaoM.DuH.DaviesP. T.CummingsE. M. (2019). Marital conflict behaviors and parenting: Dyadic links over time. Family Relations, 68(1), 135–149.
43.
García-LópezC.SarriáE.PozoP.RecioP. (2016). Supportive dyadic coping and psychological adaptation in couples parenting children with autism spectrum disorder: The role of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(11), 3434–3447.
44.
GiraseR. D.HaralkarS. J.MulajeS. M.MangulikarS. K. (2016). A study of socio-demographic factors leading to divorce—A social problem. National Journal of Community Medicine, 7(2), 116–120.
45.
GiridharadasA. (2008). The uncoupling of India: Divorce rises, as notions of love change. International Herald Tribune, p. 1.
46.
GoV. F.SethulakshmiC. J.BentleyM. E.SivaramS.SrikrishnanA. K.SolomonS.CelentanoD. D. (2003). When HIV-prevention messages and gender norms clash: The impact of domestic violence on women’s HIV risk in slums of Chennai, India. AIDS and Behavior, 7(3), 263–272.
47.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 737–745.
48.
GurjarS. (2016). A study of the socio-psychological problems of divorce women. Journal of Social Work and Development Issues, 5, 156.
49.
HilpertP.BodenmannG.NussbeckF. W.BradburyT. N. (2013). Predicting relationship satisfaction in distressed and non-distressed couples based on a stratified sample: A matter of conflict, positivity, or support?Family Science, 4(1), 110–120.
50.
HosokawaR.KatsuraT. (2017). Marital relationship, parenting practices, and social skills development in preschool children. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 11(1), 2.
51.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (2000). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
52.
HussainP. A. (2014). Differential role of kinship regarding divorce among the muslims of Kashmir valley: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 5(4), 902–905.
53.
IndumathyJ., (2021). Effects of communication, conflict and emotion regulation on coping, adjustment and parenting among married couples: A dyadic approach (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Pondicherry University.
54.
JohnsonM. D.HorneR. M.GalovanA. M. (2016). The developmental course of supportive dyadic coping in couples. Developmental Psychology, 52(12), 2031.
55.
JuvvaS.BhattiR. S. (2006). Epigenetic model of marital expectations. Contemporary Family Therapy, 28(1), 61–72.
56.
KalliathP.KalliathT.SinghV. (2011). When work intersects family: A qualitative exploration of the experiences of dual earner couples in India. South Asian Journal of Management, 18(1), 37–59.
57.
KaneezS. (2015). Perception of subjective well-being among divorced women: A comparative study of hindus and muslims. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13(2), 67–71.
58.
KanthB.RandallA. K.BodenmannG.IndumathyJ. (2020). Partners’ dyadic coping in India: Psychometric properties and validity of the tamil version of the dyadic coping inventory (Manuscript submitted for publication). Interpersona, 14(2).
59.
KayserK.RevensonT. (2016). Including the cultural context in dyadic coping. In FalconierM. K.RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 285–299). Routledge.
60.
KimJ. H. (2019). The effect of married couple communication on the satisfaction of marriage: Focusing on the mediating effect of marital intimacy. Korean Family Resource Management Association, 23(4), 57–73.
61.
KlausliJ. F.Treach-OwenM. (2011). Exploring actor and partner effects in associations between marriage and parenting for mothers and fathers. Parenting, 11(4), 264–279.
62.
KrishnakumarA.BuehlerC. (2000). Interparental conflict and parenting behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Family Relations, 49(1), 25–44.
63.
LandisM.BodenmannG.BradburyT. N.BrandstätterV.Peter-WightM.BackesS.Sutter-Stickel, D., & NussbeckF. W. (2014). Commitment and dyadic coping in long-term relationships. GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 27(4), 139.
64.
LedermannT.MachoS.KennyD. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18, 595–612.
65.
LedermannT.BodenmannG.RudazM.BradburyT. N. (2010). Stress, communication, and marital quality in couples. Family Relations, 59(2), 195–206.
66.
LesthaegheR. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251.
67.
LevesqueC.LafontaineM. F.BureauJ. F. (2017). The mediating effects of emotion regulation and dyadic coping on the relationship between romantic attachment and non-suicidal self-injury. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(2), 277–287.
68.
LewisM. P.SimonsG. F.FennigC. D. (2009). Ethnologue: languages of the world. SIL International. http://www.ethnologue.com
69.
LiP. F.JohnsonL. N. (2018). Couples’ depression and relationship satisfaction: Examining the moderating effects of demand/withdraw communication patterns. Journal of Family Therapy, 40, S63–S85.
70.
LindahlK. M.ClementsM.MarkmanH. (1997). Predicting marital and parent functioning in dyads and triads: A longitudinal investigation of marital processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 11(2), 139–151.
71.
LukmanF.KhanA.BichiA. A.IbrahimO. M. (2020). Direct effect of problem-solving strategies, communication, and negotiation styles towards marital satisfaction among secondary school teachers in Nigeria. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 180–187.
72.
MacKinnonD. P.FairchildA. J. (2009). Current directions in mediation analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 16–20.
73.
MaitraS.GayathriK. R. (2015). Divorce trends and its implications for children’s well-being: A study of family court in Mumbai (Final Report). TISS.
74.
ManimekalaiK.SivakumarI.GeethaS. (2019). Working mothers and parenting: Health status in India. IJAR, 5(9), 168–173.
75.
MannB. J.MacKenzieE. P. (1996). Pathways among marital functioning, parental behaviors, and child behavior problems in school-age boys. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25(2), 183–191.
76.
MedoraN. P. (2007). Strengths and challenges in the Indian family. Marriage & Family Review, 41(1–2), 165–193.
77.
MerzC. A.MeuwlyN.RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (2014). Engaging in dyadic coping: Buffering the impact of everyday stress on prospective relationship satisfaction. Family Science, 5(1), 30–37.
78.
MohanV. (2000). Women, work and their worth. In SharmaS.SharmaN. R. (Eds.), Understanding women behaviour (pp. 53–66). Global Vision Pub House.
79.
NettingN. S. (2010). Marital ideoscapes in 21st-century India: Creative combinations of love and responsibility. Journal of Family Issues, 31(6), 707–726.
80.
NoorN. M. (2004). Work-family conflict, work-and family-role salience, and women’s well-being. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(4), 389–406.
81.
NussbeckF.HilpertP.BodenmannG. (2012). Der Zusammenhang von positivem und negativem Interaktionsverhalten in der Partnerschaft mit Partnerschaftszufriedenheit und Trennungsabsichten. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 24(1), 85–103.
82.
OgawaN.RetherfordR. D.MatsukuraR. (2006). Demographics of the Japanese family. The Changing Japanese Family, 2006, 19–38.
83.
PandaU. K. (2011). Role conflict, stress and dual-career couples: An empirical study. The Journal of Family Welfare, 57(2), 72–88.
84.
PappL. M.WittN. L. (2010). Romantic partners’ individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: Implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(5), 551.
85.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
86.
RajadhyakshaU.BhatnagarD. (2000). Life role salience: A study of dual-career couples in the Indian context. Human Relations, 53(4), 489–511.
87.
RamachandrappaS. (2012). Causes and consequences of divorce in Bangalore city: A sociological approach. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(4), 6–9.
88.
RamuG. N. (1987). Indian husbands: Their role perceptions and performance in single-and dual-earner families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(4), 903–915.
89.
RaoR.SekharK. (2002). Divorce: Process and correlates—A cross-cultural study. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33(4), 541–563.
90.
RaoK.ApteM.SubbakrishnaD. K. (2003). Coping and subjective well-being in women with multiple roles. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 49(3), 175–184.
91.
RehmanU. S.Holtzworth-MunroeA. (2007). A cross-cultural examination of the relation of marital communication behavior to marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 759.
92.
RusuP. P.BodenmannG.KayserK. (2019). Cognitive emotion regulation and positive dyadic outcomes in married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(1), 359–376.
93.
RusuP. P.HilpertP.BeachS. R.TurliucM. N.BodenmannG. (2015). Dyadic coping mediates the association of sanctification with marital satisfaction and well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(6), 843.
94.
SadlerP.EthierN.WoodyE. (2011). Tracing the interpersonal web of psychopathology: Dyadic data analysis methods for clinical researchers. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 2(2), 95–138.
95.
SandhyaS. (2009). The social context of marital happiness in urban Indian couples: Interplay of intimacy and conflict. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35(1), 74–96.
96.
SastryJ. (1999). Household structure, satisfaction and distress in India and the United States: A comparative cultural examination. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30(1), 135–152.
97.
SheltonK. K.FrickP. J.WoottonJ. (1996). Assessment of parenting practices in families of elementary school-age children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25(3), 317–329.
98.
SimA.CordierR.VazS.ParsonsR.FalkmerT. (2017). Relationship satisfaction and dyadic coping in couples with a child with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(11), 3562–3573.
99.
SmithL.HeavenP. C.CiarrochiJ. (2008). Trait emotional intelligence, conflict communication patterns, and relationship satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(6), 1314–1325.
100.
SonawatR. (2001). Understanding families in India: A reflection of societal changes. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 17(2), 177–186.
101.
SpanierG. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15–28.
102.
StoverC. S.ZhouY.KiselicaA.LeveL. D.NeiderhiserJ. M.ShawD. S.NatsuakiM. N.ScaramellaL. V.ReissD. (2016). Marital hostility, hostile parenting, and child aggression: Associations from toddlerhood to school age. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 55(3), 235–242.
103.
StraughanP. (2009). Marriage dissolution in Singapore: Revisiting family values and ideology in marriage. Brill.
104.
StroudC. B.MeyersK. M.WilsonS.DurbinC. E. (2015). Marital quality spillover and young children’s adjustment: Evidence for dyadic and triadic parenting as mechanisms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(5), 800–813.
105.
ThadathilA.SriramS. (2019). Divorce, families and adolescents in India: A review of research. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 61(1), 1–21.
106.
TroxelW. M.MatthewsK. A. (2004). What are the costs of marital conflict and dissolution to children’s physical health?Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 7(1), 29–57.
107.
TsuyaN. O.MasonK. O.BumpassL. L. (2004). Views of marriage among never-married young adults. In TsuyaN. O.BumpassL. L. (Eds.), Marriage, work and family life in comparative perspective: Japan, South Korea and the United States (pp. 39–53). University of Hawaii Press.
108.
UberoiP. (2006). Freedom and destiny: Gender, family, and popular culture in India. Oxford University Press.
VasudevanB.GeethaD. M.BhaskarA.AreekalB.LucasA. (2015). Causes of divorce: A descriptive study from Central Kerala. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 4(20), 3418–3427.
111.
VedesA.HilpertP.NussbeckF. W.RandallA. K.BodenmannG.LindW. R. (2016). Love styles, coping, and relationship satisfaction: A dyadic approach. Personal Relationships, 23(1), 84–97.
112.
XuF.HilpertP.NussbeckF. W.BodenmannG. (2018). Testing stress and dyadic coping processes in Chinese couples. International Journal of Stress Management, 25(1), 84.
113.
YehC. J.AroraA. K.WuK. A. (2006). A new theoretical model of collectivistic coping. In WongP. T. P.WongL. C. J. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping (pp. 55–72). Springer.
114.
YelsmaP.AthappillyK. (1988). Marital satisfaction and communication practices: Comparisons among Indian and American couples. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 19(1), 37–54.
115.
ZangX. (2007). Ethnicity and urban life in China: A comparative study of Hui Muslims and Han Chinese. Routledge.
116.
ZeidnerM.KlodaI.MatthewsG. (2013). Does dyadic coping mediate the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and marital quality?Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 795.
117.
ZempM.BodenmannG.BackesS.Sutter-StickelD.RevensonT. A. (2016). The importance of parents’ dyadic coping for children. Family Relations, 65(2), 275–286.
