There are limited studies exploring the phenomenon of fatherhood in an Asian context, and no dyad qualitative studies have been conducted to understand grandfathers’ and fathers’ perspectives on parenting. This study aims to explore the intergenerational perspectives of paternal parenting practices in Singapore. A descriptive qualitative approach was adopted. Face-to-face interviews were conducted on 12 grandfather–father dyads from the pediatric general ward in a public tertiary hospital in Singapore. Thematic analysis revealed four themes on the influences that affect grandfathers’ and fathers’ perspectives on parenting: (a) Personal traits influencing fathers’ perspectives, (b) external influences that shape parenting, (c) personal views on parenting, and (d) child’s traits that influence parenting. The findings urge professionals to involve fathers in maternity and pediatric care and encourage fathers to work closely with grandfathers to promote positive child developmental outcomes. Further research is needed to develop educational or supportive programs for fathers and grandfathers.
AllportB. S.JohnsonS.AqilA.LabriqueA. B.NelsonT.KcA.CarabasY.MarcellA. V. (2018). Promoting father involvement for child and family health. Academic Pediatrics, 18(7), 746–753. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2018.03.011
2.
AlmeidaF.FariaD.QueirósA. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3, 369–387. https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089
BagozziR. P.SekerkaL. E.HillV.SgueraF. (2013). The role of moral values in instigating morally responsible decisions. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(1), 69–94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886312471194
5.
BanduraA.WaltersR. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice-Hall.
BergenN.LabontéR. (2019). “Everything is perfect, and we have no problems”: Detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732319889354
8.
BirdittK. S.TigheL. A.FingermanK. L.ZaritS. H. (2012). Intergenerational relationship quality across three generations. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 67(5), 627–638. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs050
9.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss v. 3 (Vol. 1). International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 33, 470–478.
BrownG. L.KoganS. M.KimJ. (2018). From fathers to sons: The intergenerational transmission of parenting behavior among african american young men. Family Process, 57(1), 165–180. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/famp.12273
12.
CanoT.PeralesF.BaxterJ. (2019). A matter of time: Father involvement and child cognitive outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(1), 164–184. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12532
13.
CypressB. S. (2017). Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization, and recommendations. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 36(4), 253–263. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/dcc.0000000000000253
GettlerL. T.KuoP. X.BasA.BorjaJ. B. (2019). The roles of parents in shaping fathering across generations in Cebu, Philippines. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(3), 662–678. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12568
17.
GuzzoK. B. (2011). New father’s experiences with their own fathers and attitudes toward fathering. Fathering, 9(3), 268–290. https://dx.doi.org/10.3149/fth.0903.268
HighamS.DaviesR. (2013). Protecting, providing, and participating: Fathers’ roles during their child’s unplanned hospital stay, an ethnographic study. Journal of Advance Nursing, 69(6), 1390–1399. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06131.x
JesseeV.AdamsonsK. (2018). Father involvement and father-child relationship quality: An intergenerational perspective. Parent Science Practice, 18(1), 28–44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2018.1405700
23.
JungK.HonigA. S. (2000). intergenerational comparisons of paternal korean child rearing practices and attitudes. Early Child Development and Care, 165(1), 59–84. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0300443001650105
24.
LefkowichM. (2019). When women study men: Gendered implications for qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1609406919872388
25.
LiY.CuiN.CaoF.LiuJ. (2016). Children’s bonding with parents and grandparents and its associated factors. Child Indicators Research, 9(2), 551–564. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12187-015-9328-0
26.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(30), 73–84. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
27.
MaddenV.DomoneyJ.AumayerK.SethnaV.IlesJ.HubbardI.GiannakakisA.PsychogiouL.RamchandaniP. (2015). Intergenerational transmission of parenting: Findings from a UK longitudinal study. European Journal of Public Health, 25(6), 1030–1035. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv093
28.
MalterudK. (2012). Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 40(8), 795–805. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494812465030
29.
McBrideD. L. (2016). The role of fathers’ in the care and development of their children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 31(6), 740–741. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2016.07.012
30.
MinuchinS. (1974). Families and family therapy. Harvard University Press.
31.
RobinsonO. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
32.
ShanC. H.HawkinsR. (2014). Childcare and parenting practices in Singapore: A comparison of fathers’ and mothers’ involvement. Journal of Tropical Psychology, 4, e10.
33.
ShoreyS.AngL. (2019). Experiences, needs, and perceptions of paternal involvement during the first year after their infants’ birth: A meta-synthesis. PLoS One, 14(1), e0210388. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210388
34.
ShoreyS.AngL.GohE. C. L. (2018). Lived experiences of Asian fathers during the early postpartum period: Insights from qualitative inquiry. Midwifery, 60, 30–35. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.02.009
35.
SiebenI. (2017). Child-rearing values: The impact of intergenerational class mobility. International Journal of Sociology, 32(3), 369–390. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268580917693954
36.
SnareyJ. R. (1993). How fathers care for the next generation: A four-decade study. Harvard University Press.
37.
ThornB. L.GilbertL. A. (1998). Antecedents of work and family role expectations of college men. Journal of Family Psychology, 12(2), 259–267. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.12.2.259
38.
TullyL. A.CollinsD. A. J.PiotrowskaP. J.MairetK. S.HawesD. J.MoulC.LenrootR. K.FrickP. J.AndersonV. A.KimonisE. R.DaddsM. R. (2018). Examining practitioner competencies, organizational support and barriers to engaging fathers in parenting interventions. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 49(1), 109–122. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10578-017-0733-0
39.
TullyL. A.PiotrowskaP. J.CollinsD. A. J.MairetK. S.BlackN.KimonisE. R.HawesD. J.MoulC.LenrootR. K.FrickP. J.AndersonV.DaddsM. R. (2017). Optimising child outcomes from parenting interventions: Fathers’ experiences, preferences and barriers to participation. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 550. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4426-1
40.
TurneyK.Halpern-MeekinS. (2017). Parenting in on/off relationships: The link between relationship churning and father involvement. Demography, 54(3), 861–886. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0571-5
41.
VaismoradiM.TurunenH.BondasT. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405.
