Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Despite the increasing proportion of single-mother families, the literature on union formation among unpartnered parents in Latin America is scant. Using a sample from a Chilean longitudinal survey (N = 3,318), we estimated regression models to test associations between single mothers’ economic resources in 2010 and coresidence with the biological father of their children in 2012. We also examined whether these associations differed in subgroups with higher rates of labor market participation. We found that mothers’ paid work was not associated with union formation. Receiving government benefits and living with a parent were associated with lower probability of coresidence with the biological father, even among the most advantaged subgroups. We conclude that in contexts in which most mothers of young children are not doing paid work, economic resources coming from government and extended family may be more consequential than earnings’ potential in influencing single mothers’ union formation behavior.

Keywords

single parents independence hypothesis economic issues family policy Latin America

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apfelbeck

E.-M.

Hermosilla

(2000). Manual de Administración y Tabulación del Test de WAIS. Santiago, Chile.

Becker

(1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813–846.

Binstock

Cabella

Salinas

López-Colás

(2016). The rise of cohabitation in the Southern cone. In Esteve

Lesthaeghe

R. J.

(Eds.), Cohabitation and marriage in the Americas: Geo-historical legacies and new trends (pp. 247–268). Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-31442-6.pdf

Bitler

M. P.

Gelbach

J. B.

Hoynes

H. W.

Zavodny

(2004). The impact of welfare reform on marriage and divorce. Demography, 41(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2004.0011

Bobonis

G. J.

(2011). The impact of conditional cash transfers on marriage and divorce. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 59(2), 281–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/657123

Bzostek

S. H.

McLanahan

S. S.

Carlson

M. J.

(2012). Mothers’ repartnering after a nonmarital birth. Social Forces, 90(3), 817–841. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos005

Cancian

Meyer

D. R.

(2014). Testing the economic independence hypothesis: The effect of an exogenous increase in child support on subsequent marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 51(3), 857–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0295-8

Carlson

Garfinkel

McLanahan

Mincy

Primus

(2004). The effects of welfare and child support policies on union formation. Population Research and Policy Review, 23(5), 513–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-004-2707-8

Carlson

McLanahan

England

(2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography, 41(2), 237–261.

10.

Centro Microdatos. (2013). Presentación: Segunda Ronda Encuesta Longitudinal de la Primera Infancia. Departamento de Economia, Universidad de Chile.

11.

Cuesta

Hakovirta

Jokela

(2018). The antipoverty effectiveness of child support: Empirical evidence for Latin American countries. Social Policy & Administration, 52, 1233–1251. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12437

12.

ECLAC, & ILO. (2019). Employment situation in Latin America and the Caribbean: Evolution of and prospects for women’s labour participation in Latin America (No. 21; Employment Situation in Latin America and the Caribbean). https://www.cepal.org/en/publications/44917-employment-situation-latin-america-and-caribbean-evolution-and-prospects-womens

13.

Esteve

García-Román

Lesthaeghe

(2012). The family context of cohabitation and single motherhood in Latin America. Population and Development Review, 38(4), 707–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00533.x

14.

Gennetian

L. A.

Knox

V. W.

(2003). Staying single: The effects of welfare reform policies on marriage and cohabitation (No. 13; The Next Generation Working Paper Series). MDRC. https://www.mdrc.org/publication/staying-single

15.

Haussler

I. M.

Marchant

(1980). TEPSI test de desarrollo psicomotor 2-5 años (TEPSI test of psychomotor development 2-5 years) (8th ed.). Ediciones Universidad Catolica.

16.

Hofferth

S. L.

(2006). Residential father family type and child well-being: Investment versus selection. Demography, 43(1), 53–77.

17.

INE. (2002). Anuario de estadísticas vitales 2000. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas.

18.

INE. (2015). Mujeres en Chile y mercado del trabajo. Participación laboral femenina y brechas salariales. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas.

19.

INE. (2017). Anuario de estadísticas vitales 2015. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas.

20.

Institute for Family Studies, & Wheatley Institution. (2019). World family map 2019. Mapping family change and child well-being outcomes. https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/reports/worldfamilymap-2019-051819.pdf

21.

Laplante

Castro-Martín

Cortina

Martín-García

. (2015). Childbearing within marriage and consensual union in Latin America, 1980–2010. Population and Development Review, 41(1), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00027.x

22.

Lichter

D. T.

Graefe

D. R.

(2001). Finding a mater? The marital and cohabitation histories of unwed mothers. In Wu

L. L.

Wolfe

(Eds.), Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility (pp. 317–343). Russell Sage Foundation.

23.

Litwin

Perova

Reynolds

S. A.

(2019). A conditional cash transfer and women’s empowerment: Does Bolsa Familia influence intimate partner violence? Social Science & Medicine, 238, 112462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112462

24.

Liu

Esteve

Treviño

(2017). Female-headed households and living conditions in Latin America. World Development, 90, 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.10.008

25.

Lundberg

Rose

(2003). Child gender and the transition to marriage. Demography, 40(2), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180804

26.

Lyngstad

Jalovaara

(2010). A review of the antecedents of union dissolution. Demographic Research, 23(10), 257–292.

27.

Mariani

Özcan

Goisis

(2017). Family trajectories and well-being of children born to lone mothers in the UK. European Journal of Population, 33(2), 185–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9420-x

28.

Moffitt

R. A.

(1998). The effect of welfare on marriage and fertility. In Moffitt

R. A.

(Ed.), Welfare, the family, and reproductive behavior. National Academy Press.

29.

Mutchler

J. E.

Baker

L. A.

(2009). The implications of grandparent coresidence for economic hardship among children in mother-only families. Journal of Family Issues, 30(11), 1576–1597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X09340527

30.

Newborg

(2005). Battelle Developmental Inventory (2nd ed.). Riverside.

31.

OECD. (2018). Family Database. SF3.1: Marriage and divorce rates. http://www.oecd.org/els/family/SF_3_1_Marriage_and_divorce_rates.pdf

32.

OECD. (2019). OECD. Stat. https://stats.oecd.org/

33.

Posadas

Vidal-Fernandez

(2013). Grandparents’ childcare and female labor force participation. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 2(14), 1–20.

34.

Ramm

(2016). Changing patterns of kinship: Cohabitation, patriarchy and social policy in Chile. Journal of Latin American Studies, 48(4), 769–796. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X16000365

35.

Reichman

N. E.

Corman

Noonan

(2004). Effects of child health on parents’ relationship status. Demography, 41(3), 569–584. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2004.0026

36.

Reynolds

(2018). Sex of children and family structure in Brazil: Father and grandmother bias? Revista Brasileira De Estudos De População, 35(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.20947/s102-3098a0069

37.

Reynolds

Fernald

Lia Deardorff

Behrman

(2018). Family structure and child development in Chile: A longitudinal analysis of household transitions involving fathers and grandparents. Demographic Research, 38(58), 1777–1814.

38.

Salinas

(2011). Socioeconomic differences according to family arrangements in Chile. Population Research and Policy Review, 30(5), 677–699.

39.

Salinas

(2016). Changes in cohabitation after the birth of the first child in Chile. Population Research and Policy Review, 35(3), 351–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-015-9378-5

Testing the Economic Independence Hypothesis: Union Formation Among Single Mothers in Chile

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References