Recent studies pointed out that practically all adolescents are regular users of information and communications technology (ICT). Since the most usual context for the use of technology is the home, our aim is, on the one hand, to characterize the family technology context among adolescents aged between 11 and 18 years and, on the other hand, to analyse the relationship between multitasking and the different variables found within this family context. Participants were 977 adolescents. Significant relationship between the number of devices in the home and the frequency with which these are used are showed. Although a 60% of the adolescents have no parental rules over this use, there does not appear to be any relationship between the existence, or lack thereof, of rules over the use of ICT and multitasking. To reduce adolescents amount of media multitasking, we would recommend having fewer devices in the home rather than imposing rules about their use.
BaumgartnerS. E.WeedaW. D.van der HeijdenL. L.HuizingaM. (2014). The relationship between media multitasking and executive function in early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(8), 1120–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614523133.
2.
CainM. S.LeonardJ. A.GabrieliJ. D. E.FinnA. (2016). Media multitasking in adolescence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(6), 1932–1941. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1036-3.
3.
CasasF.FiguerC.GonzálezM.MaloS. (2007). Los medios audiovisuales entre los padres y los hijos. Cultura Y Educación, 19(3), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1174/113564007782194499.
DikciusV.PikturnieneC.PakalniskieneV.SeimieneE.KavaliauskeM.ReardonJ. (2017). The impact of parents' technology readiness and their susceptibility to interpersonal influence on adolescents' participation in parental decision making to purchase technological products. Marketing and Innovation Management, 3, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.3-12
6.
DomoffS. E.RadeskyJ. S.HarrisonK.RileyH.LumengJ. C.MillerA. L. (2019). A naturalistic study of child and family screen media and mobile device use. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1275-1.
7.
EttingerK.CohenA. (2020). Patterns of multitasking behaviours of adolescents in digital environments. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 623–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09982-4.
FletcherA. C.BlairB. L. (2016). Implications of the family expert role for parental rules regarding adolescent use of social technologies. New Media and Society, 18(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538922.
10.
HinikerA.SchoenebeckS. Y.KientzJ. A. (2016). Not at the dinner table: Parents’ and children’s perspectives on family technology rules. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing,1376–1389. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819940.
11.
INE (2019). Encuesta sobre equipamiento y uso de tecnologías de información y comunicación en los hogares. https://ine.es/prensa/tich_2019.pdf.
12.
Jake-SchoffmanD. E.Turner-McGrievyG.WilcoxS.MooreJ. B.HusseyJ. R.KaczynskiA. T. (2018). The mFIT (motivating families with interactive technology) study: A randomized pilot to promote physical activity and healthy eating through mobile technology. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 3(3), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-018-0052-8.
13.
KononovaA.ChiangY. H. (2015). Why do we multitask with media? Predictors of media multitasking among internet users in the United States and Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.052.
14.
KumarR. (2016). ICT uses by 14–20-year-olds in India: Imperatives of parental intervention. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 7(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc.7.2.197_1.
15.
LauW. W. F.YuenA. H. K. (2016). The relative importance of paternal and maternal parenting as predictors of adolescents’ home internet use and usage. Computers and Education, 102, 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.002.
16.
Len-RíosM. E.HughesH. E.McKeeL. G.YoungH. N. (2016). Early adolescents as publics: A national survey of teens with social media accounts, their media use preferences, parental mediation, and perceived internet literacy. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.10.003
17.
LivingstoneS.HelsperE.J. (2008). Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396.
18.
MaloS.Martín-PerpiñáM. M.ViñasF. (2018). Excessive use of social networks: Psychosocial profile of Spanish adolescents. Comunicar, 56(3), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.3916/C56-2018-10.
19.
Martín-PerpiñáM. M.ViñasF.MaloS. (2019). Media multitasking impact in homework, executive function and academic performance in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema, 31(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.178.
20.
MascheroniG. (2014). Parenting the mobile internet in Italian households: Parents’ and children’s discourses. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 440–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2013.830978.
21.
MayK. E.ElderA. D. (2018). Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(13), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0096-z.
22.
MegíasI.RodríguezE. (2018). Jóvenes en el mundo virtual: Usos, prácticas y riesgos. Recoletos, Spain: Fundación MAPFRE.
23.
MostmansL. (2016). Internet mediation and the family gap: Explorative ethnographic interviews in new family forms in Belgium. Journal of Children and Media, 10(4), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2016.1222298.
24.
MurphyK.McLauchlanS.LeeM. (2017). Is there a link between media-multitasking and the executive functions of filtering and response inhibition?Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.001.
25.
NelissenS.Van den BulckJ. (2018). When digital natives instruct digital immigrants: Active guidance of parental media use by children and conflict in the family. Information Communication and Society, 21(3), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281993.
OphirE.NassC.WagnerA. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 15583–15587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106.
28.
ÖzgürH. (2016). The relationship between internet parenting styles and internet usage of children and adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.081.
29.
Paus-HasebrinkI.BauwensJ.DüragerA. E.PonteC. (2013). Exploring types of parent–child relationship and internet use across Europe. Journal of Children and Media, 7(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2012.739807.
Rodríguez-de-DiosI.Van OostenJ. M. F.IgartuaJ. J. (2018). A study of the relationship between parental mediation and adolescents’ digital skills, online risks and online opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.012.
32.
RosenL. D.CheeverN. A.CarrierL. M. (2008). The association of parenting style and child age with parental limit setting and adolescent my space behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.005.
33.
Sánchez-ValleM.de FrutosB.Vázquez-BarrioT. (2017). Parent's influence on acquiring critical internet skills. Comunicar, 25(53), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.3916/C53-2017-10.
34.
Shifflet-ChilaE. D.HaroldR. D.FittonV. A.AhmedaniB. K. (2016). Adolescent and family development: Autonomy and identity in the digital age. Children and Youth Services Review, 70, 364–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.10.005.
35.
ShinW. (2015). Parental socialization of children’s internet use: A qualitative approach. New Media and Society, 17(5), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813516833.
36.
SiivakA.NevskiE. (2020). Older siblings as mediators of infants' and oddlers'(digital) media use, In ErstadO.FlewittR.Kümmerling-MeibauerB., et al. (Eds.), The routledge handbook of digital literacies in early childhood (pp. 123–133). Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
37.
SmahelD.MachackovaH.MascheroniG.DedkovaL.StaksrudE.ÓlafssonK.LivingstoneS.HasebrinkU. (2020). EU kids online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. Hamburg, Germany: EU Kids Online. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.47fdeqj01ofo
SrivastavaJ.NakazawaM.ChenY.W. (2016). Online, mixed, and offline media multitasking: Role of cultural, socio-demographic, and media factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 720–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.040.
40.
Sureda-NegreJ.Comas-ForgasR.Morey-LópezM. (2010). Menores y acceso a internet en el hogar: Las normas familiares. Comunicar, 17(34), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.3916/C34-2010-03-13.
41.
ValckeM.BonteS.De WeverB.RotsI. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers and Education, 55(2), 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.009.
42.
van der SchuurW.BaumgartnerS.SumterS.ValkenbugP. (2015). The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.035.
43.
VoorveldH. A.van der GootM. (2013). Age differences in media multitasking: A diary study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(3), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.816709.
