A survey study of the language and literacy practices of first-generation Turkish immigrant families with 3- to 6-year-old children was conducted in England. Information on family socioeconomic background, migration history and language skills of 168 first-generation Turkish parents was collected through structured interviews in Greater London and Northwest England. The study findings suggest that early childhood experiences that are important for the educational attainment of immigrant children may be affected by the family characteristics and the integration experiences of parents. Regression analyses demonstrated that parents from disadvantaged backgrounds engaged in language and literacy activities less often and preferred Turkish as the interaction language at home. Parent’s social integration, measured via parent’s length of residence and English skills, significantly predicted their language use with their children. Low social integration was associated with increased Turkish use, whereas high social integration was associated with more frequent language and literacy activities at home.
AikensN. L.BarbarinO. (2008). Socioeconomic differences in reading trajectories: The contribution of family, neighborhood, and school contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 235-251.
2.
ArriagadaP. A. (2005). Family context and Spanish-language use: A study of latino children in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 86(3), 599-619.
3.
BaydarN.KüntayA. C.YagmurluB.AydemirN.CankayaD.GöksenF.CemalcilarZ. (2014). “It takes a village” to support the vocabulary development of children with multiple risk factors. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1014-1025.
4.
BeckerB. (2010). Who profits most from early parental investments? The effects of activities inside and outside the family on German and Turkish children’s language development. Child Indicators Research, 3(1), 29-46.
5.
BeckerB. (2011). Cognitive and language skills of Turkish children in Germany: A comparison of the second and third generation and mixed generational groups. International Migration Review, 45(2), 426-459.
6.
BeckerB.TuppatJ. (2013). Unequal distribution of educational outcomes between social categories: ‘Children at risk’ from a sociological perspective. Child Indicators Research, 6(4), 737-751.
7.
BiedingerN.BeckerB.RohlingI. (2008). Early ethnic educational inequality: The influence of duration of preschool attendance and social composition. European Sociological Review, 24(2), 243-256.
BusA. G.van IjzendoornM. H.PellegriniA. D. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65, 1-21.
10.
ChaK.GoldenbergC. (2015). The complex relationship between bilingual home language input and kindergarten children’s Spanish and English oral proficiencies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 935-953.
11.
ChenH.-H.HwangF.-M.WangK.-L.ChenC.-J.LaiJ. C.-Y.ChienL.-Y. (2013). A structural model of the influence of immigrant mothers’ depressive symptoms and home environment on their children’s early developmental outcomes in Taiwan. Research in Nursing & Health, 36(6), 603-611.
12.
ComteE. (2018). The history of the European migration regime: Germany’s strategic hegemony. London: Routledge.
13.
CongerR. D.DonnellanM. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 175-199.
14.
CostiganC. L.KoryzmaC. M. (2011). Acculturation and adjustment among immigrant Chinese parents: Mediating role of parenting efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(2), 183-196.
15.
DaglarM.MelhuishE.BarnesJ. (2011). Parenting and preschool child behaviour among Turkish immigrant, migrant and non-migrant families. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 261-279.
16.
DixonL. Q.WuS. (2014). Home language and literacy practices among immigrant second-language learners. Language Teaching, 47(4), 414-449.
17.
DixonL. Q.WUS.DaraghmehA. (2012). Profiles in bilingualism: Factors influencing kindergartners’ language proficiency. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(1), 25-34.
18.
DriessenG.Van der SlikF.De BotK. (2002). Home language and language proficiency: A large-scale longitudinal study in dutch primary schools. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23(3), 175-194.
19.
EnneliP.ModoodT.BradleyH. (2005). Young Turks and kurds. A set of ‘invisible’ disadvantaged groups. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
20.
GilbertL. R.Spears BrownC.MistryR. S. (2017). Latino immigrant parents’ financial stress, depression, and academic involvement predicting child academic success. Psychology in the Schools, 54(9), 1202-1215.
21.
GuioA.-C.MarlierE.GordonD.FahmyE.NandyS.PomatiM. (2016). Improving the measurement of material deprivation at the European union level. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(3), 219-333.
HowardE. R.PáezM. M.AugustD. L.BarrC. D.KenyonD.MalabongaV. (2014). The importance of SES, home and school language and literacy practices, and oral vocabulary in bilingual children’s english reading development. Bilingual Research Journal, 37(2), 120-141.
24.
KaliaV.ReeseE. (2009). Relations between Indian children’s home literacy environment and their english oral language and literacy skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(2), 122-145.
25.
KingR.ThomsonM.MaiN.KelesY. (2008). ‘Turks’ in the UK: Problems of definition and the partial relevance of policy. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 6(3), 423-434.
26.
KleinO.BiedingerN.BeckerB. (2014). The effect of reading aloud daily-differential effects of reading to native-born German and Turkish-origin immigrant children. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 38, 43-56.
27.
LesemanP. P. M. (2000). Bilingual vocabulary development of Turkish preschoolers in the Netherlands. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21(2), 93-112.
28.
LuksyteA.SpitzmuellerC.Y Rivera-MinayaC. (2014). Factors relating to wellbeing of foreign-born Hispanic workers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(6), 685-704.
29.
LytraV. (2015). Language and language ideologies among Turkish-speaking young people in Athens and London. In NortierJ.SvendsenB. (Eds.), Language, youth and identity in the 21st century: Linguistic practices across urban spaces (pp. 183-204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
MarkovizkyG.SamidY. (2008). The process of immigrant adjustment. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(6), 782-798.
31.
MelhuishE. C.SylvaK.SammonsP.Siraj-BlatchfordI.TaggartB. (2001). The effective provision of pre-school education project. Technical Paper 7: Social/behavioural and cognitive development at 3-4 years in relation to family background. London: Institute of Education/DfES. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/18189/10/EPPE_TechnicalPaper_07_2001.pdf.
32.
MelhuishE. C.SylvaK.SammonsP.Siraj-BlatchfordI.TaggartB.PhanM. (2008). Effects of the home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 157-188.
33.
NguyenA.-M. D.Benet-MartínezV. (2013). Biculturalism and adjustment: A meta- analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 122-159.
Pease-AlvarezL. (2002). Moving beyond linear trajectories of language shift and bilingual language socialization. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24(2), 114-137.
37.
PrevooM. J. L.MaldaM.MesmanJ.EmmenR. A. G.YeniadN.Van IjzendoornM. H.LintingM. (2014). Predicting ethnic minority children’s vocabulary from socioeconomic status, maternal language and home reading input: Different pathways for host and ethnic language. Journal of Child Language, 41(5), 963-984.
38.
QuirozB. G.SnowC. E.Jing ZhaoJ. (2010). Vocabulary skills of Spanish-English bilinguals: Impact of mother-child language interactions and home language and literacy support. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14(4), 379-399.
39.
ScheeleA. F.LesemanP. P. M.MayoA. Y. (2010). The home language environment of monolingual and bilingual children and their language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 117-140.
40.
SirkeciI.BilecenT.CostuY.DedeogluS.KesiciM. R.SekerD.TilbeF.UnutulmazK. O. (2016). Little Turkey in great Britain. London: Transnational Press London.
StrandS.De CoulonA.MeschiE.VorhausJ.IvinsC.SmallL.SoodA.GervaisM.C.RehmanH. (2010). Drivers and challenges in raising the achievement of pupils from Bangladeshi, Somali and Turkish backgrounds. Research Report DCSF-RR226. London: Department for Children School and Families. https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationDetail/Page1/DCS FRR226.
SwainJ.HeymanB.GillmanM. (1998). Public research, private concerns: Ethical issues in the use of open-ended interviews with people who have learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 13(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599826894.
TitzmannP. F.FuligniA. J. (2015). Immigrants’ adaptation to different cultural settings: A contextual perspective on acculturation. International Journal of Psychology, 50(6), 407-412.
47.
WardC.BochnerS.FurnhamA. (2001). The psychology of culture shock (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.
48.
WesterenI.HalbergA.-M.LedesmaH. M.WoldA. H.OppedalB. (2018). Effects of mother’s and father’s education level and age at migration on children’s bilingual vocabulary. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(5), 811-833.
49.
WillardJ. A.AgacheA.JäkelJ.GlückC. W.LeyendeckerB. (2015). Family factors predicting vocabulary in Turkish as a heritage language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(04), 875-898.
50.
WinslerA.BurchinalM. R.TienH.-C.Peisner-FeinbergE.EspinosaL.CastroD. C.LaForettD. R.KimY. K.De FeyterJ. (2014). Early development among dual language learners: The roles of language use at home, maternal immigration, country of origin, and socio-demographic variables. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 750-764.
51.
ZhangD. (2008). Between two generations: Language maintenance and acculturation among Chinese immigrant families. New AmericansEl Paso: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLCLFB Scholarly Pub. LLC.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
