Chronic illness can have a profound impact on couples’ relationships. In dealing with relational changes, new constructions and forms of relationships may arise. In the context of a larger grounded theory study on relational processes and practices in couples faced with chronic illness, this article focuses on concurrent relationships as an alternative form of relationship construction which embodies an additional relationship existing parallel to that of the couple confronted with chronic illness. Based on qualitative interviews with a subsample of five persons within the larger study, conditions for the development and characteristics of concurrent relationships are presented. From an individual and shared life questioned by chronic illness, concurrent relationships are formed in the attempt to be able to live on together in a new partner relationship and a continued care relationship. This can lead to new constructions of relationships, family life, and social relations in everyday life.
AndersonS.KeatingN. C.WilsonD. M. (2017a). Staying married after stroke: A constructivist grounded theory qualitative study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 24(7), 479-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2017.1342335
2.
AndersonS.KeatingN.WilsonD. (2017b). Reconciling marriage and care after stroke. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 36(3), 386-401. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980817000241
3.
BoylsteinC.HayesJ. (2012). Reconstructing marital closeness while caring for a spouse with Alzheimer’s. Journal of Family Issues, 33(5), 584-612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X11416449.
4.
BrannenJ. (2013). Life story talk: Some reflections on narrative in qualitative interviews. Sociological Research Online, 18(2), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2884
CheslaC.MartinsonI.MuwaswesM. (1994). Continuities and discontinuities in family members’ relationships with Alzheimer’s patients. Family Relations, 43(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.2307/585135
7.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (1985). Managing chronic illness at home: Three lines of work. Qualitative Sociology, 8(3), 224-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989485.
8.
CorbinJ. M.StraussA. (1988). Unending work and care: Managing chronic illness at home. San Francisco, London: Jossey-Bass.
9.
CorbinJ. M.StraussA. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
10.
CoyneJ. C.SmithD. A. (1991). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: A contextual perspective on wives’ distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 404-412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.404
11.
DavisL. L.GillissC. L.Deshefy-LonghiT.ChestnuttD. H.MolloyM. (2011). The nature and scope of stressful spousal caregiving relationships. Journal of Family Nursing, 17(2), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840711405666
12.
ErikssonM.SvedlundM. (2006). ‘The intruder’: Spouses’ narratives about life with a chronically ill partner. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(3), 324-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01290.x
13.
ErikssonE.WejåkerM.DanhardA.NilssonA.KristofferzonM.-L. (2019). Living with a spouse with chronic illness - the challenge of balancing demands and resources. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 422. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6800-7
14.
HagedoornM.HeinF. L.SchulzT.van der HeideJ. J. H.NiesingJ.WesterhuisR.PloegR. J.RanchorA. V. (2015). Are patient and relationship variables associated with participation of intimate partners in couples research? Health Psychology, 34(3), 270-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000141
15.
HellströmI.NolanM.LundhU. (2007). Sustaining ‘couplehood’: Spouses’ strategies for living positively with dementia. Dementia, 6(3), 383-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301207081571
16.
HudsonN.CulleyL.LawC.MitchellH.DennyE.Raine-FenningN. (2016). ‘We needed to change the mission statement of the marriage’: Biographical disruptions, appraisals and revisions among couples living with endometriosis. Sociology of Health & Illness, 38(5), 721-735. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12392
17.
KaplanL. (2001). A couplehood typology for spouses of institutionalized persons with alzheimer’s disease: Perceptions of ‘We’-“I”. Family Relations, 50(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00087.x
KlugeS. (2000). Empirically grounded construction of types and typologies in qualitative social research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1). Art. 14. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.1.1124
20.
LarsenP. (2016). Lubkin’s chronic illness: Impact and intervention (9th ed.). Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
21.
LenzK. (2014). Zeit(en) in der alltäglichen Lebensführung von Paaren. In JurczykK.LangeA.ThiessenB. (Eds.), Doing Family. Warum Familienleben heute nicht mehr selbstverständlich ist (pp. 113-127). Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Juventa.
22.
LyonsR. F.SullivanM. J. L.RitvoP. G.CoyneJ. C. (1995). Relationships in chronic illness and disability. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
23.
Mahrer-ImhofR.HoffmannA.FroelicherE. S. (2007). Impact of cardiac disease on couples’ relationships. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57(5), 513-521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04141.x
24.
MolyneauxV. J.ButchardS.SimpsonJ.MurrayC. (2011). The co-construction of couplehood in dementia. Dementia, 11(4), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301211421070.
25.
MorganD. H. J. (2011). Rethinking family practices. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
MorseJ. M.JohnsonJ. L. (1991). Toward a theory of illness: The illness-constellation model. In MorseJ. M.JohnsonJ. L. (Eds.), The Illness Experience. Dimensions of Suffering (pp. 315-342). Newbury Park, London, New Dehli: SAGE Publications.
27.
MurburgM. M.PriceL. H.JalaliB. (1988). Huntington’s disease: Therapy strategies. Family Systems Medicine, 6(3), 290-303. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0089748
28.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1978). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, DHEW Publication No. (OS) 78-0012.
29.
ÖhmanM.SöderbergS. (2004). The experiences of close relatives living with a person with serious chronic illness. Qualitative Health Research, 14(3), 396-410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303261692
30.
PetersenB. (2010). Jan’s Story. Love lost to the long goodbye of Alzheimer´s. Lake Forest: Behler Publications.
31.
RadcliffeE.LowtonK.MorganM. (2013). Co-construction of chronic illness narratives by older stroke survivors and their spouses. Sociology of Health & Illness, 35(7), 993-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12012
32.
RobinsonC. A. (2017). Families living well with chronic illness: The Healing process of moving on. Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 447-461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316675590.
33.
RollandJ. S. (1994). In sickness and in health: The impact of illness on couples’ relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 20(4), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1994.tb00125.x.
34.
SandersS.PowerJ. (2009). Roles, responsibilities, and relationships among older husbands caring for wives with progressive dementia and other chronic conditions. Health & Social Work, 34(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/34.1.41
35.
SchierM.JurczykK. (2008). “Familie als Herstellungsleistung” in Zeiten der Entgrenzung. Sozialwissenschaftlicher Fachinformationsdienst soFid Familienforschung, 2008(1), 9-18. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-201763.
36.
SchützeF. (1983). Biographieforschung und narratives Interview. Neue Praxis, 13(3), 283-293.
37.
SolomiV. L.CasidayR. E. (2017). In sickness and in health: The strains and gains of caring for a chronically ill or disabled spouse. Chronic Illness, 13(2), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395316664960
38.
SorberM.KapschK.KnechtC.BüscherA.SchneppW. (2016). Couples faced with chronic illness: a literature review about the phenomenon “concurrent relationships”. Nursing Research and Evidence Based Practice. X. International. Nursing Symposium. Conference Proceedings, 188-195.
39.
StraussA.CorbinJ. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: SAGE Publications, Inc.
40.
Strzempko ButtF.CheslaC. (2007). Relational patterns of couples living with chronic pelvic pain from endometriosis. Qualitative Health Research, 17(5), 571-585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307299907
41.
TeunissenG. J.LindhoutP.AbmaT. A. (2018). Balancing loving and caring in times of chronic illness. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(3), 210-222. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-17-00030
42.
VERBI Software (2015). MAXQDA 2020 [computer software]. Berlin: VERBI Software.
43.
World Health Organization. (2020). Noncommunicable diseases progress monitor 2020. Geneva: World Health Organization.
44.
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191-2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
