Previous research has mainly understood household extension as a family strategy to face economic deprivation, giving little attention to other factors affecting it. Using 2017 data from the National Socioeconomic Characterization Survey, this article evaluates the role played by economic and life-course factors in extended family living arrangements among women in family units in Chile (n = 60,111). Results indicate that economic needs are an important driver for those seeking refuge in someone else’s home, but they are less important for those hosting other relatives within their household. Importantly, the likelihood of living in an extended household—and the position that family units occupy within the household (as head-families or subfamilies)—changes over the life span. Young women (15–34 years) are more likely to live in extended households as sub-families, while middle-aged women (45–64 years) tend to live in extended households as household heads, hosting young cohabiting couples, or lone mothers.
AquilinoW. S. (1990). The likelihood of parent-adult child coresidence: Effects of family structure and parental characteristics. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(2), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.2307/353035
2.
ArriagadaI. (1997). Políticas sociales, familia y trabajo en la América Latina de fin de siglo [Social policies, family and employment in Latin America at the end of the century]. Serie Políticas Sociales 21. UN/ECLAC. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/6221
3.
ArriagadaI. (2001). Familias latinoamericanas: Diagnóstico y políticas públicas en los inicios del nuevo siglo [Latin American families: Assessment and social policies at the beginning of the new century]. Serie de Políticas Sociales, CEPAL, 57. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/6022
4.
ArriagadaI. (2014). Changes and inequalities in Latin American families. In TreasJ.ScottJ.RichardsM. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to the sociology of families (pp. 83–106). John Wiley & Sons.
BennettF.BrannenJ.HantraisL. (2020). Family change, intergenerational relations and policy implications. Contemporary Social Science, 15(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1519195
7.
BernasconiA.RojasF. (2004). Informe sobre la educación superior en Chile: 1980–2003 [Report on higher education in Chile: 1980–2002]. Editorial Universitaria.
8.
Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile. (1998). Historia de la Ley No 19,585. Modifica el Código Civil y otros cuerpos legales en materia de filiación [History of the law No 19,585, which modifies the Chilean Civil Code and other laws on filiation matters]. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional. https://www.bcn.cl/historiadelaley/nc/historia-de-la-ley/6627/
9.
Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile. (2004). Historia de la Ley No 19,947. Establece nueva ley de matrimonio civil [History of the law No 19,947, which establishes the new civil marriage law]. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional. https://www.bcn.cl/historiadelaley/nc/historia-de-la-ley/5731/
10.
BinstockG.CabellaW. (2011). La nupcialidad en el Cono Sur: Evolución reciente en la formación de uniones en Argentina, Chile y Uruguay [Nuptiality in the South Cone: Recent evolution on union formation in Argentina, Chile and Uruguay]. In BinstockG. Y.Melo VieiraJ. (Eds.), Nupcialidad y familia en la América Latina actual [Nuptiality and family in current Latin America]. Serie Investigaciones N° 11 (pp. 35–60). ALAP.
11.
BlankS.TorrecilhaR. S. (1998). Understanding the living arrangements of Latino immigrants: A life course approach. International Migration Review, 32(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/019791839803200101
Castro-MartínT.CortinaC.GarcíaT. M.PardoI. (2011). Maternidad sin matrimonio en América Latina: Análisis comparativo a partir de datos censales [Maternity without marriage in Latin America: Comparative analysis from census data]. Notas de Población, CEPAL, 38(93), 37–76. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/12888
14.
ChangY. H. (2015). Childcare needs and household composition: Is household extension a way of seeking childcare support?Chinese Sociological Review, 47(4), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2015.1062345
15.
ChenF.LiuG.MairC. A. (2011). Intergenerational ties in context: Grandparents caring for grandchildren in China. Social Forces, 90(2), 571–594. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sor012
16.
CohenP. N.CasperL. M. (2002). In whose home? Multigenerational families in the United States, 1998–2000. Sociological Perspectives, 45(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2002.45.1.1
17.
de VosS. (1995). Household composition in Latin America. New York: Plenum Press.
18.
EsteveA.García-RománJ.LesthaegheR. (2012). The family context of cohabitation and single motherhood in Latin America. Population and Development Review, 38(4), 707–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00533.x
GarcíaB.RojasO. (2001, August). Recent transformations in Latin American families: A sociodemographic perspective. Proceedings of the XXIV General Population Conference of IUSSP. Session S45: “The Demography of Latin Americ”Salvador de Bahia, Brazil.
22.
GoldscheiderF.GoldscheiderC. (1999). The changing transition to adulthood. Leaving and returning home. Sage Publications.
23.
González de la RochaM. (1994). The resources of poverty. Women and survival in a MexicancCity. Blackwell Publishers
GoodeW. J. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. Macmillan.
26.
HaasL. (2010). Feminist policymaking in Chile. Penn State University Press.
27.
KahnJ. R.GoldscheiderF.García-ManglanoJ. (2013). Growing parental economic power in parent–adult child households: Coresidence and financial dependency in the United States, 1960–2010. Demography, 50(4), 1449–1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0196-2
28.
KangJ.CohenP. N. (2018). Household extension and employment among Asian immigrant women in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 39(1), 128–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15606489
29.
KangJ.CohenP. N. (2018). Household extension and employment among Asian Immigrant Women in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 39(1), 128–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15606489
30.
KulkarniV. S. (2019). Household extension and earnings among foreign-born Asian and Non-Hispanic White households. Journal of Family Issues, 40(17), 2412–2438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19848819
31.
LeesonG. (2013). The demographics of population ageing in Latin America, the Caribbean and the Iberian Peninsula, 1950–2050. In Montes de OcaV. (Ed.), La agenda del envejecimiento y las políticas públicas hoy [The aging agenda and public policies today] (pp. 53–74). Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales.
32.
MessineoM. J.WojtkiewiczR. A. (2004). Coresidence of adult children with parents from 1960 to 1990: Is the propensity to live at home really increasing?Journal of Family History, 29(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363199003261809
MoserC. O. N. (1997). Household responses to poverty and vulnerability, Volume 1, confronting crisis in Cisne Dos, Guayaquil, Ecuador. Urban management programme policy paper; UMPP no. UMP 21. The World Bank.
38.
MoserC. O. N. (1998). The asset vulnerability framework: Reassessing urban poverty reduction strategies. World Development, 26(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)10015-8
39.
MykytaL.MacartneyS. (2014). The effects of recession on household composition: “Doubling up” and economic well-being. Working Paper, 4. US Census Bureau. Social, Economic and Household Statistics Division.
40.
OrloffA. S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095903
41.
PalmaJ. (2018). Extended living arrangements in Chile: An analysis of subfamilies. [PhD dissertation]. [Cambridge, UK]: University of Cambridge.
42.
PalmaJ.ScottJ. (2020). The implications of changing living arrangements for intergenerational relations in Chile. Contemporary Social Science, 15(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1460487
43.
PilkauskasN. V. (2012). Three-generation family households: Differences by family structure at birth. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 931–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01008.x
44.
PilkauskasN. V.CrossC. (2018). Beyond the nuclear family: Trends in children living in shared households. Demography, 55(6), 2283–2297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0719-y
45.
PilkauskasN. V.GarfinkelI.McLanahanS. S. (2014). The prevalence and economic value of doubling up. Demography, 51(5), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0327-4
46.
RaczynskiD. (2006). Radiografía de la familia pobre [An assessment of poor families]. In ValenzuelaJ. S.TironiE.ScullyT. R. (Eds.), El eslabón perdido. Familia, modernización y bienestar en Chile [The missing link. Family, modernization and welfare in Chile] (pp. 289–330). Taurus.
47.
RammA. (2013). Unmarried cohabitation among deprived families in Chile [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.15902
48.
RauT. (2010). El trabajo a tiempo parcial en Chile [Part-time employment in Chile]. Revista Economía Chilena, 13(1), 39–59.
49.
Salvi del PeroA. (2016). Housing policy in Chile: A case study on two housing programmes for low-income households. OECD Publishing.
50.
Single-RushtonW.McLanahanS. (2002). The living arrangements of new unmarried mothers. Demography, 39(3), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088324
51.
StaabS. (2012). Maternalism, male-breadwinner bias, and market reform: Historical legacies and current reforms in Chilean social policy. Social Politics, 19(3), 299–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxs010
52.
StaabS. (2017). The expansion of childcare services (2006–2010). In StaabS. (Ed.), Gender and the politics of gradual change. Social policy reform and innovation in Chile (pp. 135–161). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34156-9_6
53.
SweetJ. A. (1972). The living arrangements of separated, widowed, and divorced mothers. Demography, 9(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060551
54.
TiendaM.AngelR. (1982). Headship and household composition among Blacks, Hispanics, and other Whites. Social Forces, 61(2), 508–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578239
55.
TiendaM.GlassJ. (1985). Household structure and labor force participation of Black, Hispanic, and White mothers. Demography, 22(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061067
56.
WiemersE. E. (2014). The effect of unemployment on household composition and doubling up. Working Paper 2014–05, Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts Boston.
