The rapid increase of the number of children being born in cohabitation appears to have an important impact on their lives, since they face a higher risk of parental breakup than children born in wedlock. This article aims to provide a cross-national overview of the living arrangements of children following breakup of cohabiting unions and to investigate whether the post-dissolution living arrangements differ between formerly cohabiting and married families. Analyzing the first wave of Generations and Gender Survey for 9 European countries shows that former cohabiters are not more or less likely to establish shared physical custody of their children than formerly married couples; however, formerly cohabiting fathers are somehow less likely to have sole custody of their children. The lower odds of sole-father custody among former cohabiters are caused by the selection of individuals into cohabiting unions (i.e., different demographic characteristics of cohabiting parents and union duration).
AlbertiniM.GarrigaA. (2011).
The effect of divorce on parent–child contacts: Evidence on two declining effect hypotheses. European Societies,
13(2), 257–278.
AllenH. (2014).
Unpacking court divorce decrees, children’s outcomes, and three unconfounded determinants: An evidence-based look. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage,
55(3), 179–205.
4.
AnderssonG. (2004).
Children’s experience of family disruption and family formation: Evidence from 16 FFS countries.Vienna Yearbook of Population Research,
2, 313–332.
5.
AnderssonG.PhilipovD. (2002).
Life-table representations of family dynamics in Sweden, Hungary, and 14 other FFS countries: A project of descriptions of demographic behavior. Demographic Research,
7(4), 67–144.
6.
BausermanR. (2002).
Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole-custody arrangements: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology,
16(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.16.1.91
7.
BausermanR. (2012).
A meta-analysis of parental satisfaction, adjustment, and conflict in joint custody and sole custody following divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage,
53(6), 464–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2012.682901
8.
BaxterJ. (2005).
To marry or not to marry marital status and the household division of labor. Journal of Family Issues,
26(3), 300–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X04270473
9.
BaxterJ.HewittB.HaynesM. (2008).
Life course transitions and housework: Marriage, parenthood, and time on housework. Journal of Marriage and Family,
70(2), 259–272.
10.
BjarnasonT.ArnarssonA. M. (2011).
Joint physical custody and communication with parents: A cross-national study of children in 36 western countries. Journal of Comparative Family Studies,
42(6), 871–890.
11.
BreivikK.OlweusD. (2006).
Adolescent’s adjustment in four post-divorce family structures: Single mother, stepfather, joint physical custody and single father families. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage,
44(3/4), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v44n03-07
12.
BrinesJ.JoynerK. (1999).
The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review,
64(3), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657490
13.
BuchananC. M.MaccobyE. E.DornbuschS. M. (1996). Adolescents after divorce.
Harvard University Press.
14.
BumpassL.LuH.-H. (2000).
Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies,
54(1), 29–41.
CancianM.MeyerD. R.BrownP. R.CookS. T. (2014).
Who gets custody now? Dramatic Changes in children’s living arrangements after divorce. Demography,
51(4), 1381–1396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0307-8
17.
CarlsundÅ.ErikssonU.LöfstedtP.SellströmE. (2013).
Risk behaviour in Swedish adolescents: Is shared physical custody after divorce a risk or a protective factor?European Journal of Public Health,
23(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cks011
18.
ClarkbergM.StolzenbergR. M.WaiteL. J. (1995).
Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces,
74(2), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580494
19.
ColeyR. L.MorrisJ. E. (2004).
Comparing father and mother reports of father involvement among low‐income minority families. Journal of Marriage and Family,
64(4), 982–997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00982.x
20.
CookstonJ. T. (1999).
Parental supervision and family structure: Effects on adolescent problem behaviors. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage,
32(1–2), 107–122.
21.
CôtéD.GaboreanF. (2015).
Nouvelles normativités de la famille: La garde partagée au Québec, en France et en Belgique[New family normativities: Shared physical custody in Quebec, France and Belgium]. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law,
27(1), 22–46.
22.
DemuthS.BrownS. L. (2004).
Family structure, family processes, and adolescent delinquency: The significance of parental absence versus parental gender. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,
41(1), 58–81.
23.
DonnellyD.FinkelhorD. (1993).
Who has joint custody? Class differences in the determination of custody arrangements. Family Relations,
42(1), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/584922
24.
EmeryR. E. (2013). Cultural sociology of divorce: An encyclopedia.
SAGE.
25.
EmeryR. E.OttoR. K.O’DonohueW. T. (2005).
A critical assessment of child custody evaluations: Limited Science and a flawed system. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,
6(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00020.x
26.
FehlbergB.SmythB.MacleanM.RobertsC. (2011).
Legislating for shared time parenting after separation: A research review. International Journal of Law, Policy & the Family,
25(3), 318–337.
27.
FelnerR. D.TerreL.FarberS. S.PrimaveraJ.BishopT. A. (1985).
Child custody: Practices and perspectives of legal professionals. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology,
14(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1401_5
28.
FoxG. L.KellyR. F. (1995).
Determinants of child custody arrangements at divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family,
57(3), 693–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/353924
29.
HaoL.XieG. (2002).
The complexity and endogeneity of family structure in explaining children’s misbehavior. Social Science Research,
31(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.2001.0715
30.
HeuvelineP.TimberlakeJ. M. (2004).
The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family,
66(5), 1214–1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00088.x
31.
HillM. S.YeungW.-J. J.DuncanG. J. (2001).
Childhood family structure and young adult behaviors. Journal of Population Economics,
14(2), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480000039
32.
HobsonB. (2002). Making men into fathers: Men, masculinities and the social politics of fatherhood.
Cambridge University Press.
33.
HofferthS. L.AndersonK. G. (2003).
Are all dads equal? Biology versus marriage as a basis for paternal investment. Journal of Marriage and Family,
65(1), 213–232.
34.
JablonskaB.LindbergL. (2007).
Risk behaviours, victimisation and mental distress among adolescents in different family structures. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology,
42(8), 656–663. 10.1007/s00127-007-0210-3
35.
JubyH.Le BourdaisC.Marcil-GrattonN. (2005).
Sharing roles, sharing custody? Couples’ characteristics and children’s living arrangements at separation. Journal of Marriage and Family,
67(1), 157–172.
36.
KanM. Y.SullivanO.GershunyJ. (2011).
Gender convergence in domestic work: Discerning the effects of interactional and institutional barriers from large-scale data. Sociology,
45(2), 234–251.
37.
KhazovaO. A. (2005).
Allocation of parental rights and responsibilities after separation and divorce under Russian Law Symposium on Comparative Custody Law: Europe. Family Law Quarterly,
39(2), 373–392.
38.
KitterødR. H.LyngstadJ. (2012).
Untraditional caring arrangements among parents living apart: The case of Norway. Demographic Research,
27(5), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2012.27.5
39.
Kranzl-NaglR. (2006). Joint custody after divorce: Austrian experiences.
European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research.
40.
LaughlinL.FarrieD.FaganJ. (2009).
Father involvement with children following marital and non-marital separations. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice About Men As Fathers,
7(3), 226–248.
41.
LiefbroerA. C.DourleijnE. (2006).
Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography,
43(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0018
42.
ManningW. D.SmockP. J.MajumdarD. (2004).
The relative stability of cohabiting and marital unions for children. Population Research and Policy Review,
23(2), 135–159.
43.
MaslauskaitėA.TereškinasA. (2020). Quality of non-resident father–child relationships: Between “caring for” and “caring about.” In MortelmansD.(Ed.), Divorce in Europe: New insights in trends, causes and consequences of relation break-ups (pp. 291–311).
Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25838-2_14
44.
McClainL. R.DeMarisA. (2013).
A better deal for cohabiting fathers? Union Status differences in father involvement. Fathering,
11(2), 199–220.
45.
MelliM. S.BrownP. R. (2008).
Exploring a new family form—The shared time family. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family,
22(2), 231–269.
46.
MikelsonK. S. (2008).
He said, she said: Comparing mother and father reports of father involvement. Journal of Marriage and Family,
70(3), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00509.x
47.
NævdalF.ThuenF. (2004).
Residence arrangements and well-being: A study of Norwegian adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,
45(5), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00418.x
48.
NielsenL. (2011).
Shared parenting after divorce: A review of shared residential parenting research. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage,
52(8), 586–609.
Perelli-HarrisB.GassenN. S. (2012).
How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe. Population and Development Review,
38(3), 435–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00511.x
51.
Perelli-HarrisB.Sigle-RushtonW.KreyenfeldM.LappegårdT.KeizerR.BerghammerC. (2010).
The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review,
36(4), 775–801.
52.
RothbergB. (1983).
Joint custody: Parental problems and satisfactions. Family Process,
22(1), 43–52.
53.
SchiratzkiJ. (1999).
Custody of children in Sweden: Recent developments. Scandinavian Studies in Law: Legal Issues of the Late1990s,
38, 255–262.
54.
SeltzerJ. A. (1990).
Legal and physical custody arrangements in recent divorces. Social Science Quarterly,
71(2), 250.
55.
SobotkaT.ToulemonL. (2008).
Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity acrossEurope. Demographic Research,
19(6), 85–138.
56.
SodermansA. K.MatthijsK.SwicegoodG. (2013).
Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders. Demographic Research,
28(29), 821–848.
57.
SpruijtE.DuindamV. (2009).
Joint physical custody in the Netherlands and the well-being of children. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage,
51(1), 65–82.
58.
SünderhaufH. (2013). Wechselmodell: Psychologie – Recht – Praxis: Abwechselnde Kinderbetreuung durch Eltern nach Trennung und Scheidung [Joint physical custody: Psychology – Law – Practice: Alternating Childcare by Parents after Separation and Divorce].
Springer-Verlag.
59.
SurkynJ.LesthaegheR. (2004).
Value orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research,
S3, 45–86. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.3
60.
TurunenJ. (2017).
Shared physical custody and children’s experience of stress. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage,
58(5), 371–392.
61.
UlveseterG.BreivikK.ThuenF. (2010).
Health-related adjustment of adolescents in various postdivorce family structures with main focus on father custody with and without a stepmother. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage,
51(7), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2010.504088
62.
VanasscheS.SodermansA. K.MatthijsK.SwicegoodG. (2013).
Commuting between two parental households: The association between joint physical custody and adolescent wellbeing following divorce. Journal of Family Studies,
19(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.2013.19.2.139
ŽilinčíkováZ. (2017).
Do Children matter for the stability of cohabitation? A cross-national comparison. Population, English Edition,
72(4), 649–669.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
