Over the past decade, relationship education has grown as a means of enhancing couple relationships. This longitudinal study was designed to examine the experiences and outcomes of 2,828 adults who participated in the Smart Steps for Stepfamilies: Embrace the Journey program. Self-report measures of relationship quality, commitment, and relationship instability were administered prior to participation, then immediately, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after participation. A three-level growth-curve analysis using hierarchical linear model suggested that stepfamily participants experienced small but statistically significant immediate increases in relationship quality and stability, but those gains diminished over time. The statistical analyses tested for moderating effects of individual and couple characteristics on programmatic outcomes over time. Application of these findings and implications for relationship education for stepfamilies are discussed.
Adler-BaederF.HigginbothamB. J. (2004). Implications of remarriage and stepfamily formation for marriage education. Family Relations, 53, 448-458. doi:10.1111/j.0197- 6664.2004.00053.x
Adler-BaederF.RobertsonA.SchrammD. G. (2010). Community education programs serving couples in stepfamilies: A qualitative study of format, content, and service delivery. Journal of Extension, 48(5), 1-7. Retrieved from https://www.joe.org/joe/2010october/rb1.php
4.
AmatoP. R. (2014). Does social and economic disadvantage moderate the effects of relationship education on unwed couples? An analysis of data from the 15-month building strong families evaluation. Family Relations, 63, 343-355. doi:10.1111/fare.12069
5.
ArnoldL. S.BeelmannA. (2019). The effects of relationship education in low-income couples: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled evaluation studies. Family Relations, 68, 22-38. doi:10.1111/fare.12325
6.
BoothA.JohnsonD.EdwardsJ. N. (1983). Measuring marital instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 387-394. doi:10.2307/351516
7.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BusbyD.LarsonJ. H.HolmanT. B.HalfordW. K. (2015). Flexible delivery approaches to couple relationship education: Predictors of initial engagement and retention of couples. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 3018-3029. doi:10.1007/s10826-014-0105-3
9.
CoieJ. D.WattN.WestS. G.HawkinsD.AsarnowJ.MarkmanH.. . . LongB. (1993). The science of prevention: A conceptual framework for and some directions for a national research program. The American Psychologist, 48, 1013-1022. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.48.10.1013
10.
CordovaJ. V.Eubanks FlemingC. J.IppolitoM. M.HawrilenkoM.SollenbergerJ. W.HarpA. G.WachsK. (2014). The marriage checkup: A randomized controlled trial of annual relationship health checkups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 592-604.
11.
DionM. R. (2005). Healthy marriage programs: Learning what works. Marriage and Child Wellbeing, 15, 139-156. doi:10.1353/foc.2005.0016
12.
FeinD. J.BursteinN. R.FeinG. G.LindbergL. D. (2003). The determinants of marriage and cohabitation among disadvantaged Americans: Research findings and needs. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
13.
GanongL. H.ColemanM. (2017). Stepfamily relationship: Development, dynamics and interventions. New York, NY: Springer.
14.
GottmanJ. M.SilverN. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
15.
HalfordW. K.SandersM. R.BehrensB. C. (2001). Can skills training prevent relationship problems in at-risk couples? Four-year effects of a behavioral relationship education program. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 750-768. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.15.4.750
16.
HawkinsA. J.AmatoP. R.KinghornA. (2013). Are government-supported healthy marriage initiatives affecting family demographics? A state-level analysis. Family Relations, 62, 501-513. doi:10.1111/fare.12009
17.
HawkinsA. J.BlanchardV. L.BaldwinS. A.FawcettE. B. (2008). Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 723-734. doi:10.1037/a0012584
18.
HawkinsA. J.FackrellT. A. (2010). Does relationship and marriage education for lower-income couples work? A meta-analytic study of emerging research. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 9, 181-191. doi:10.1080/15332691003694927
19.
HawkinsA. J.OomsT. (2012). Can marriage and relationship education be an effective policy tool to help low-income couples form and sustain healthy marriages and relationships? A review of lessons learned. Marriage and Family Review, 48, 524-554. doi:10.1080/01494929.2012.677751
20.
HawkinsA. J.StanleyS. M.BlanchardV. L.AlbrightM. (2012). Exploring programmatic moderators of the effectiveness of marriage and relationship education programs: A meta-analytic study. Behavior Therapy, 43, 77-87. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.12.006
21.
HeatonT. B. (2002). Factors contributing to increasing marital stability in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 392-409. doi:10.1177/0192513X02023003004
22.
HigginbothamB. J.Adler-BaederF. (2010). Enhancing knowledge and agreement among ethnically and economically diverse couples in stepfamilies with the Smart Steps: Embrace the Journey program. Journal of Extension, 48, 1-5.
23.
HillR. (1949). Families under stress: Adjustment to the crises of war separation and reunion. New York, NY: Harper.
24.
IsenA.StevensonB. (2010). Women’s education and family behavior: Trends in marriage, divorce and fertility. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
25.
JohnsonM. D. (2013). Optimistic or quixotic? More data on marriage and relationship education programs for lower income couples. American Psychologist, 68, 111-112. doi:10.1037/a0031793
26.
KreiderR. M.EllisR. (2011). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: 2009 (Current Population Reports, P70-125). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p70-125.pdf
27.
LarsonJ.HalfordW. K. (2011). One size does not fit all: Customizing couple relationship education for unique couple needs. In WetchlerJ. L. (Ed.), Handbook of clinical issues in couple therapy (2nd ed., pp. 293-309). New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
LichterD. T.CarmaltJ. H. (2009). Religion and marital quality among low-income couples. Social Science Research, 38, 168-187. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.07.003
29.
Lucier-GreerM.Adler-BaederF. (2012). Does couple and relationship education work for individuals in stepfamilies? A meta-analytic study. Family Relations, 61, 756-769. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00728.x
30.
Lucier-GreerM.Adler-BaederF.HarcourtK. T.GregsonK. D. (2014). Relationship education for stepcouples reporting relationship instability—evaluation of the Smart Steps: Embrace the Journey curriculum. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 40, 454-469. doi:10.1111/jmft.12069
31.
LundquistE.HsuehJ.LowensteinA. E.FaucettaK.GubitsD.MichalopoulosC.KnoxV. (2014). A family-strengthening program for low-income families: Final impacts from the supporting healthy marriage evaluation. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
32.
MarkmanH. J.RhoadesG. K. (2012). Relationship education research: Current status and future directions. Journal of Marital Family Therapy, 38, 169-200. doi:10.111/j.1752-0606.2011.00247.x
33.
NortonR. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 141-151. doi:10.2307/351302
34.
OomsT.WilsonP. (2004). The challenges of offering relationship and marriage education to low-income populations. Family Relations, 53, 440-447. doi:10.1111/j.0197-6664.2004.00052.x
35.
OropesaR. S.GormanB. K. (2000). Ethnicity, immigration, and beliefs about marriage as a “Tie that binds.” In WaiteL. J.BachrachC. (Eds.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 188-211). Hawthorne, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
RauerA. J.Adler-BaederF.Lucier-GreerM.SkubanE.KetringS. A.SmithT. (2014). Exploring processes of change in couple relationship education: Predictors of change in relationship quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 28, 65-76. doi:10.1037/a0035502
39.
RobertsonA.Adler-BaederF.CollinsA.DeMarcoD.FeinD.SchrammD. (2006). Meeting the needs of married, low-income stepfamily couples in marriage education services. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
40.
SchrammD. G.Adler-BaederF. (2012). Marital quality for men and women in stepfamilies: Examining the role of economic pressure, common stressors, and stepfamily-specific stressors. Journal of Family Issues, 33, 1373-1397. doi:10.1177/0192513X11428126
41.
SchrammD. G.GalovanA. M.GoddardH. W. (2017). What relationship researchers and relationship practitioners wished the other knew: Integrating discovery and practice in couple relationships. Family Relations, 66, 696-711. doi:10.1111/fare.12270
42.
StanleyS. M. (2001). Making the case for premarital education. Family Relations, 50, 272-280. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00272.x
43.
StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595-608. doi:10.2307/353245
44.
StanleyS. M.RhoadesG. K.LoewB. A.AllenE. S.CarterS.OsborneL. J.PrenticeD.MarkmanH. J. (2014). A randomized controlled trial of relationship education in the U.S. Army: 2-year outcomes. Family Relations, 63, 482-495. doi:10.1111/fare.12083
45.
SweeneyM. (2010). Remarriage and stepfamilies: Strategic sites for family scholarship in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 667-684. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00724.x
46.
VaterlausJ. M.AllgoodS. M.HigginbothamB. J. (2012). Stepfamily Education Booster Sessions. Social Work with Groups, 35, 150-163. doi:10.1080/01609513.2011.599017
47.
WhittonS. W.RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (2008). Effects of parental divorce on marital commitment and confidence. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 789-793. doi:10.1037/a0012800
48.
WidamanK. F.FerrerE.CongerR. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 10-18. doi:10.1111/j. 1750-8606.2009.00110.x
49.
WolfF. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
50.
ZaveriH.BaumgartnerS. (2016). Parents and children together: Design and implementation of healthy marriage programs (OPRE Report Number 2016-63). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
