We examined the relationship between lone mothers’ repartnering and health in three welfare contexts: the dual-earner, market-oriented, and general family policy model. Drawing on the resources and crisis models, we applied mixture modelling for spell data of the Harmonized Histories data set. We uncovered six distinct repartnering trajectories that varied regarding the timing, type, and stability of higher order unions for different cohorts of lone mothers. Unstable repartnering was more frequent in market-oriented contexts, while contexts with more comprehensive family support fostered more stable repartnering. Although repartnering trajectories were overall not associated with health, these associations differed by welfare context. Mothers experiencing repartnering, though unstable, reported to enjoy better health if living in market-oriented contexts rather than in general or dual-earner contexts. Altogether, our findings suggest that even if higher financial needs in less-generous welfare may translate in more unstable repartnering histories, this seems to have positive spillover effects on mothers’ health.
AdamsP.HurdM. D.McFaddenD.MerrillA.RibeiroT. (2003). Healthy, wealthy, and wise? Tests for direct causal paths between health and socioeconomic status. Journal of Econometrics, 112, 3-56.
2.
AmatoP. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 650-666.
3.
AvisonW. R.DaviesL. (2005). Family structure, gender, and health in the context of the life course. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60, 113-116.
4.
BastinS. (2012). Dynamik alleinerziehender mutterschaft: Partnerschaftsverläufe in der frühen Elternschaftbiographie [Dynamics of lone motherhood: Partnership trajectories in early parental biographies]. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, Sonderheft 2012, 201-228.
5.
BeaujouanE. (2012). Repartnering in France: The role of gender, age and past fertility. Advances in Life Course Research, 17, 69-80.
6.
BergerL. M.CancianM.MeyerD. R. (2012). Maternal re-partnering and new-partner fertility: Associations with nonresident father investments in children. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 426-436.
7.
BernardiL.MortelmansD.LarenzaO. (2018). Changing lone parents, changing life courses. In BernardiL.MortelmansD. (Eds.), Lone parenthood in the life course (pp. 5-30). New York, NY: Springer.
8.
BradyD.BurrowayR. (2012). Targeting, universalism, and single-mother poverty: A multilevel analysis across 18 affluent democracies. Demography, 49, 719-746.
9.
BurstromB.WhiteheadM.ClaytonS.FritzellS.VannoniF.CostaG. (2010). Health inequalities between lone and couple mothers and policy under different welfare regimes: The example of Italy, Sweden and Britain. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 912-920.
10.
BzostekS. H.McLanahanS. S.CarlsonM. J. (2012). Mothers’ repartnering after a nonmarital birth. Social Forces, 90, 817-841.
11.
CooperC. E.McLanahanS. S.MeadowsS. O.Brooks-GunnJ. (2009). Family structure transitions and maternal parenting stress. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 558-574.
12.
De GraafP. M.KalmijnM. (2003). Alternative routes in the remarriage market: Competing-risk analyses of union formation after divorce. Social Forces, 81, 1459-1498.
13.
DewildeC.UunkW. (2008). Remarriage as a way to overcome the financial consequences of divorce: A test of the economic need hypothesis for European women. European Sociological Review, 24, 393-407.
14.
DziakE.JanzenB. L.MuhajarineN. (2010). Inequalities in the psychological well-being of employed, single and partnered mothers: The role of psychosocial work quality and work-family conflict. International Journal for Equity in Health, 9, 1-8
GałęzewskaP.Perelli-HarrisB.BerringtonA. (2017). Cross-national differences in women’s repartnering behaviour in Europe: The role of individual demographic characteristics. Demographic Research, 37, 189-228.
17.
GriffithsR. (2017). No love on the dole: The influence of the UK means-tested welfare system on partnering and family structure. Journal of Social Policy, 46, 543-561.
18.
GuzzoK. B.HemezP.AndersonL.ManningW. D.BrownS. L. (2019). Is variation in biological and residential ties to children linked to mothers’ parental stress and perceptions of coparenting?Journal of Family Issues, 40, 488-517.
19.
IdlerE. L.BenyaminiY. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 21-37.
20.
IvanovaK.KalmijnM.UunkW. (2013). The effect of children on men’s and women’s chances of re-partnering in a European context. European Journal of Population, 29, 417-444.
21.
KeimS. (2018). Are lone mothers also lonely mothers? Social networks of unemployed lone mothers in Eastern Germany. In BernardiL.MortelmansD. (Eds.), Lone parenthood in the life course (pp. 139-169). New York, NY: Springer.
22.
KühnM. (2018). Changes in lone mothers’ health: A longitudinal analysis. In BernardiL.MortelmansD. (Eds.), Lone parenthood in the life course (pp. 357-373). New York, NY: Springer.
23.
MayerK. U. (2004). Whose lives? How history, societies and institutions define and shape life courses. Research in Human Development, 1, 161-187.
24.
MeadowsS. O.McLanahanS. S.Brooks-GunnJ. (2008). Stability and change in family structure and maternal health trajectories. American Sociological Review, 73, 314-334.
25.
MikolaiJ.Lyons-AmosM. (2017). Longitudinal methods for life course research: A comparison of sequence analysis, latent class growth models, and multi-state event history models for studying partnership transitions. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 8, 191-208.
26.
MillarJ. (2010). Lone mothers, poverty and paid work in the UK. In ChantS. (Ed.), The international handbook of gender and poverty: Concepts, research and policy (pp. 147-152). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
27.
OsborneC.BergerL. M.MagnusonK. (2012). Family structure transitions and changes in maternal resources and well-being. Demography, 49, 23-47.
28.
PasteelsI.MortelmansD. (2017). The socioeconomic determinants of repartnering after divorce and separation in Belgium. Demographic Research, 36, 1785-1812.
29.
Perelli-HarrisB.KreyenfeldM.KubischK. (2011). Technical manual for the Harmonized Histories database (MPIDR Working Paper No. 011). Rostock, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
30.
Perelli-HarrisB.Lyons-AmosM. (2015). Changes in partnership patterns across the life course: An examination of 14 countries in Europe and the United States. Demographic Research, 33, 145-178.
Pollmann-SchultM. (2018). Single motherhood and life satisfaction in comparative perspective: Do institutional and cultural contexts explain the life satisfaction penalty for single mothers?Journal of Family Issues, 39, 2061-2084.
33.
SchnorC.PasteelsI.Van BavelJ. (2017). Sole physical custody and mother’s repartnering after divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 879-890.
34.
SobotkaT.ToulemonL. (2008). Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research, 19, 85-138.
35.
StruffolinoE.BernardiL.VoorpostelM. (2016). Self-reported health among lone mothers in Switzerland: Do employment and education matter?Population, 71, 187-213.
36.
ThévenonO. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 37, 57-87.
37.
United Nations. (2005). Generation and gender programme: Survey instruments. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
38.
VanasscheS.CorijnM.MatthijsK.SwicegoodG. (2015). Repartnering and childbearing after divorce: Differences according to parental status and custodial arrangements. Population Research and Policy Review, 34, 761-784.
39.
WangH.AmatoP. R. (2000). Predictors of divorce adjustment: Stressors, resources, and definitions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 655-668.
40.
WickramaK. S.LorenzF. O.CongerR. D.ElderG. H.Jr.Todd AbrahamW.FangS. (2006). Changes in family financial circumstances and the physical health of married and recently divorced mothers. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 123-136.
41.
WilliamsK.SasslerS.NicholsonL. M. (2008). For better or for worse? The consequences of marriage and cohabitation for single mothers. Social Forces, 86, 1481-1511.
42.
WilliamsK.UmbersonD. (2004). Marital status, marital transitions, and health: A gendered life course perspective. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 81-98.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
