Drawing from an ecological systems framework, we qualitatively explored how Confucian-heritage Asian American emerging adults compared with non-Hispanic European American emerging adults on views of sibling relationships and birth order. Thematic analysis of 48 semistructured interviews revealed positive sibling relationship themes for both ethnocultural groups: mutual support, companionship, and appreciation; comfort from shared burden of negative parental interactions; and pride in one another. Birth order themes were also similar across the groups. Firstborns reported a strong pressure to be a role model to later-borns, provide sibling care, assume family responsibilities, and not expect to rely on younger siblings. Despite these similarities, Asian American firstborns were unique in taking comfort in having siblings who share a less traditional Asian cultural perspective than their parents. They also described additional pressure from being the oldest within an immigrant family.
ArnettJ. J. (2003). Conceptions of the transition to adulthood among emerging adults in American ethnic groups. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2003(100), 63-76.
2.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
BarriballK.WhileA. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: A discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 328-335.
4.
BradleyD. (2007). Birth-order terms in Lisu: Inheritance and contact. Anthropological Linguistics, 49, 54-69.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
6.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
CheahC. S.LeungC. Y.ZhouN. (2013). Understanding “tiger parenting” through the perceptions of Chinese immigrant mothers: Can Chinese and U.S. parenting coexist?Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 30-40.
8.
ChungR. (2001). Gender, ethnicity, and acculturation in intergenerational conflict of Asian American college students. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7, 376-386.
9.
CicirelliV. G. (1994). Sibling relationships in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 7-20.
10.
CohenD.Hoshino-BrowneE.LeungA.-K. (2007). Culture and the structure of personal experience: Insider and outsider phenom- enologies of the self and social world. In
ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 1–67). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11.
CongerK.LittleW. M. (2010). Sibling relationships during the transition to adulthood. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 87-94.
12.
De BaryW. T.De BaryW. T. (2009). The trouble with Confucianism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
DornerL. M.OrellanaM. F.JiménezR. (2008). “It’s one of those things that you do to help the family”: Language brokering and the development of immigrant adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 515-543.
14.
DunnJ. (2007). Siblings and socialization. In GrusecJ. E.HastingsP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 309-327). New York, NY: Guilford.
15.
EastP. L.HamillS. B. (2013). Sibling caretaking among Mexican American youth: Conditions that promote and hinder personal and school success. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 35, 542-564.
16.
FuligniA. J.TsengV.LamM. (1999). Attitudes toward family obligations among American adolescents from Asian, Latin American, and European backgrounds. Child Development, 70, 1030-1044.
17.
GoettingA. (1986). The developmental tasks of siblingship over the life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 703-714.
18.
HillC. E. (2012). Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Ishii-KuntzM. (1997). Intergenerational relationships among Chinese, Japanese, and Korean Americans. Family Relations, 46, 23-32.
21.
JuangL. P.CookstonJ. T. (2009). A longitudinal study of family obligation and depressive symptoms among Chinese American adolescents. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 396-404.
22.
KiangL.FuligniA. J. (2009). Ethnic identity and family processes among adolescents from Latin American, Asian, and European backgrounds. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 228-241.
23.
KimmelD. C.YiH. (2004). Characteristics of gay, lesbian, and bisexual Asians, Asian Americans, and immigrants from Asia to the USA. Journal of Homosexuality, 47, 143-172.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
26.
LeeR. M.LiuH. T. T. (2001). Coping with intergenerational family conflict: Comparison of Asian American, Hispanic, and European American college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 410-419.
27.
LeungA. K. Y.CohenD. (2011). Within-and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 507-526.
28.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
29.
MaynardA. E. (2004). Sibling interactions. In GielenU. P.RoopnarineJ. (Eds.), Childhood and adolescence: Cross-cultural perspectives and applications (pp. 229-252). Westport, CT: Praeger.
30.
McHaleS. M.UpdegraffK. A.WhitemanS. D. (2012). Sibling relationships and influences in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 913-930.
31.
McHaleS. M.UpdegraffK. A.WhitemanS. (2013). Sibling relationships. In PetersonG.BushK. R. (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 329-351). New York, NY: Springer.
32.
McHaleS. M.WhitemanS. D.KimJ.CrouterA. C. (2007). Characteristics and correlates of sibling relationships in two-parent African American families. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 227-235.
33.
MyersS. A.BryantL. E. (2008). The use of behavioral indicators of sibling commitment among emerging adults. Journal of Family Communication, 8, 101-125.
34.
NuckollsC. W. (1993). An introduction to the cross-cultural study of sibling relations. In NuckollsC. W. (Ed.), Siblings in South Asia: Brothers and sisters in cultural context (pp. 19-44). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
36.
PaulsenJ. L. (2013). Communication among emerging adult siblings (Masters Theses & Specialist Projects; Paper 1265). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1265
37.
PykeK. (2005). “Generational deserters” and “black sheep”: Acculturative differences among siblings in Asian immigrant families. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 491-517.
38.
PykeK. D.JohnsonD. L. (2003). Asian American women and racialized femininities: “Doing” gender across cultural worlds. Gender & Society, 17, 33-53.
39.
SaroglouV.FiasseL. (2003). Birth order, personality, and religion: A study among young adults from a three-sibling family. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 19-29.
40.
ScharfM. (2005). Sibling relationships in emerging adulthood and in adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20, 64-90.
41.
StewartR. B.KozakA. L.TingleyL. M.GoddardJ. M.BlakeE. M.CasselW. A. (1998). Adult sibling relationships: Validation of a typology. Personal Relationships, 8, 299-324.
42.
SuC. T.McMahanR. D.WilliamsB. A.SharmaR. K.SudoreR. L. (2014). Family matters: Effects of birth order, culture, and family dynamics on surrogate decision-making. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62, 175-182.
43.
Suárez-OrozcoC.QinD. B. (2006). Gendered perspectives in psychology: Immigrant origin youth. International Migration Review, 40, 165-198.
44.
TriandisH. C.GelfandM. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.
45.
UbaL. (1994). Asian Americans: Personality patterns, identity, and mental health. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46.
VoorpostelM.van der LippeT.DykstraP. A.FlapH. (2007). Similar or different? The importance of similarities and differences for support between siblings. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1026-1053.
47.
WatsonR. S. (1986). The named and the nameless: Gender and person in Chinese society. American Ethnologist, 13, 619-631.
48.
WeisnerT. (1993). Overview: Sibling similarity and difference in different cultures. In NuckollsC. W. (Ed.), Siblings in South Asia: Brothers and sisters in cultural context (pp. 1-17). New York, NY: Guilford.
49.
WhitemanS. D.McHaleS. M.CrouterA. C. (2007). Competing processes of sibling influence: Observational learning and sibling deidentification. Social Development, 16, 642-661.
50.
WhitemanS. D.McHaleS. M.SoliA. (2011). Theoretical perspectives on sibling relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3, 124-139.
51.
WuK.GarciaS. M.KopelmanS. (2018). Frogs, ponds, and culture: Variations in entry decisions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(1), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/194855061770673
52.
YeeB. K.SuJ.KimS.YancuraL. (2009). Asian American and Pacific Islander families. In TewariN.AlvarezA. N. (Eds.), Asian American psychology: Current perspectives (pp. 295-315). New York, NY: Routledge.
53.
YehK.-H.BedfordO. (2004). Filial belief and parent-child conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 132-144.
54.
Zukow-GoldringP. (2002). Sibling caregiving. In BomsteinM. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (pp. 253-286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
