Empirical research to explain why partners in interracial relationships appear to be less committed than partners in intraracial relationships is scarce. The Investment Model has been shown to be a robust predictor of relationship commitment, but has only been applied to interracial relationships on a few occasions. Using a sample of 232 couples (n = 172 intraracial; n = 60 interracial), we found the Investment Model performs comparatively well in interracial and intraracial relationships. However, there were some differences in the influence of investments on commitment. Investments were associated with concurrent commitment in intraracial but not interracial relationships, and an interdependent version of the Investment Model (Actor–Partner Interdependence Investment Model) fit intraracial relationships better than interracial relationships. The results suggest there are nuances in applying the Investment Model to interracial relationships, but that the model is promising for understanding the commitment of partners who experience marginalization.
BrooksJ. E.OgolskyB. (2016). The effects of network approval on accounts of commitment trajectories in intraracial and interracial relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 53, 347–364.
2.
Clark-IbáñezM.FelmleeD. (2004). Interethnic relationships: The role of social network diversity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 293-305.
3.
Craig-HendersonK.LewisR. J. (2015). Methodological considerations and challenges to conducting research on interethnic relationships: Using the right toolkit!Journal of Social Issues, 71, 675–692. doi:10.1111/josi.12143
FuX.ToraJ.KendallH. (2001). Marital happiness and inter-racial marriage: A study in a multi-ethnic community in Hawaii. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32, 47–60.
7.
GainesS. O.Jr.AgnewC. R. (2003). Relationship maintenance in intercultural couples: An interdependence analysis. In CanaryD. J.DaintonM. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 231–253). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
GurungR. R.DuongT. (1999). Mixing and matching: Assessing the concomitants of mixed-ethnic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 639–657. doi:10.1177/0265407599165005
9.
HibblerD. K.ShinewK. J. (2002). Interracial couples’ experience of leisure: A social network approach. Journal of Leisure Research, 34, 135–156
10.
Hohmann-MarriottB. E.AmatoP. (2008). Relationship quality in interethnic marriages and cohabitations. Social Forces, 87, 825–855.
11.
HustonT. L.VangelistiA. L. (1991). Socioemotional behavior and satisfaction in marital relationships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 721–733. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.5.721
12.
ImpettE. A.BealsK. P.PeplauL. A. (2001). Testing the investment model of relationship commitment and stability in a longitudinal study of married couples. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 20, 312–326. doi:10.1007/s12144-001-1014-3
13.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
14.
KillianK. D. (2001). Crossing borders: Race, gender, and their intersections in interracial couples. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 13(1), 1–31. doi:10.1300/J086v13n01_01
15.
LeB.AgnewC. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00035
16.
LeeH. K. (2009). The impact of family satisfaction upon Christian life in Korean-American interracial families. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 904. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/622072157?accountid=14553. (Accession No. 622072157; 2009-99170-471)
17.
LehmillerJ. J.AgnewC. R. (2006). Marginalized relationships: The impact of social disapproval on romantic relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 40–51. doi:10.1177/0146167205278710
18.
MacherS. (2013). Social interdependence in close relationships: The actor–partner-interdependence–investment model (API-IM). European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 84–96. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1926
19.
MillerS. C.OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2004). Perceived Reactions to Interracial Romantic Relationships: When Race is Used as a Cue to Status. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 354-369.
RusbultC. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.
25.
SprecherS. (2001). Equity and social exchange in dating couples: Associations with satisfaction, commitment, and stability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 599–613. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00599.x
26.
StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 595–608. doi:10.2307/353245
27.
UdryJ. R. (1981). Marital alternatives and marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 889–897. doi:10.2307/351345
28.
UtneM. K.HatfieldE.TraupmannJ.GreenbergerD. (1984). Equity, marital satisfaction, and stability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 323–332. doi:10.1177/0265407584013005
YanceyG. (2002). Who interracially dates: An examination of the characteristics of those who have interracially dated. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33, 179–190.
31.
ZhangY.Van HookJ. (2009). Marital dissolution among interracial couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 95–107. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00582.x
