Childhood adversity has enduring consequences for individuals throughout life, including increased reactivity to stress that may contribute to marital strain in adulthood. Past research on gendered experiences of heterosexual spouses raises questions about how the influence of childhood adversity might differ for men and women in same-sex marriages. We analyze dyadic diary data from 756 individuals in 106 male same-sex, 157 female same-sex, and 115 different-sex marriages to consider how childhood adversity moderates the association between daily stress and marital strain. Results suggest that the negative consequences of daily stress for marital strain are amplified by past childhood adversity with variation for men and women in same- and different-sex unions, such that women and those in same-sex marriages may experience some protection from the adverse consequences of childhood adversity.
AlmeidaD. M. (2005). Resilience and vulnerability to daily stressors assessed via diary methods. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 64-68.
2.
AndersonJ. P.BlosnichJ. (2013). Disparities in adverse childhood experiences among sexual minority and heterosexual adults: Results from a multi-state probability-based sample. PLoS ONE, 8, 691. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054691
3.
BolgerN.DeLongisA.KesslerR. C.SchillingE. A. (1989). Effects of daily stress on negative mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 808-818.
4.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
BradburyT. N.FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964-980.
6.
CarrD.SpringerK. W. (2010). Advances in families and health research in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 743-761. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00728.x
7.
CherlinA. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848-861.
8.
CohanC. L.BradburyT. N. (1997). Negative life events, marital interaction, and the longitudinal course of newlywed marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 114-128.
CookW. L.KennyD. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101-109. doi:10.1080/01650250444000405
11.
CourtenayW. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 1385-1401.
12.
DaneseA.McEwenB. S. (2012). Adverse childhood experiences, allostasis, allostatic load, and age-related disease. Physiology & Behavior, 106, 29-39.
13.
DeLongisA.CapreolM.HotzmanS.O’BrienT.CampbellJ. (2004). Social support and social strain among husbands and wives: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 470-479.
14.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34.
15.
Kiecolt-GlaserJ. K.NewtonT. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472-503.
16.
KurdekL. A. (2004). Are gay and lesbian cohabiting couples really different from heterosexual married couples?Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 880-900. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00060.x
17.
ManningW. D.BrownS. L.StykesJ. B. (2016). Same-sex and different-sex cohabiting couple relationship stability. Demography, 53, 937-953.
18.
McLeodJ. D. (1991). Childhood parental loss and adult depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 205-220.
19.
MillerG. E.ChenE.ParkerK. J. (2011). Psychological stress in childhood and susceptibility to the chronic diseases of aging: Moving toward a model of behavioral and biological mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 959-997.
20.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2004). How does context affect intimate relationships? Linking external stress and cognitive processes within marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 134-148.
21.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2005). Gender differences in social support: A question of skill or responsiveness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 79-90.
22.
PearlinL. I.SchiemanS.FazioE. M.MeersmanS. C. (2005). Stress, health, and the life course: Some conceptual perspectives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 205-219.
23.
RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105-115.
24.
ReczekC.UmbersonD. (2012). Gender, health behavior, and intimate relationships: Lesbian, gay, and straight contexts. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1783-1790. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.011
25.
RepettiR. L. (1989). Effects of daily workload on subsequent behavior during marital interaction: The roles of social withdrawal and spouse support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 651-659.
26.
RepettiR. L.ReynoldsB. M.SearsM. S. (2015). Families under the microscope: Repeated sampling of perceptions, experiences, biology, and behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 126-146.
27.
RepettiR. L.TaylorS. E.SeemanT. E. (2002). Risky families: Family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 330-366.
28.
RosenfieldS.MouzonD. (2013). Gender and mental health. In AneshenselC. S.PhelanJ. C.BiermanA. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health (2nd ed., pp. 277-296). South Holland, Netherlands: Springer.
29.
SchulzM. S.CowanP. A.CowanC. P.BrennanR. T. (2004). Coming home upset: Gender, marital satisfaction, and the daily spillover of workday experience into couples interactions. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 250-263.
30.
SobolewskiJ. M.AmatoP. R. (2005). Economic hardship in the family of origin and children’s psychological well-being in adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 141-156.
31.
SpringerK. W.HankivskyO.BatesL. M. (2012). Gender and health: Relational, intersectional, and biosocial approaches. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1661-1666.
32.
StoryL. B.BradburyT. N. (2004). Understanding marriage and stress: Essential questions and challenges. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1139-1162.
33.
StoryL. B.RepettiR. L. (2006). Daily occupational stressors and marital behavior. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 690-700.
34.
TamresL. K.JanickiD.HelgesonV. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 2-30.
35.
ThoitsP. A. (2010). Stress and health: Major findings and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, S41-S53.
36.
UmbersonD.KroegerR. A. (2016). Gender, marriage, and health for same-sex and different-sex couples: The future keeps arriving. In McHaleS. M.KingV.Van HookJ.BoothA. (Eds.), Gender and couple relationships (Vol. 6, pp. 189-213). Zug, Switzerland: Springer.
37.
UmbersonD.ThomeerM. B.KroegerR. A.LodgeA. C.XuM. (2015). Challenges and opportunities for research on same-sex relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 96-111. doi:10.1111/jomf.12155
38.
UmbersonD.ThomeerM. B.LodgeA. C. (2015). Intimacy and emotion work in lesbian, gay, and heterosexual relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 542-556. doi:10.1111/jomf.12178
39.
UmbersonD.ThomeerM. B.ReczekC.DonnellyR. (2016). Physical illness in gay, lesbian, and heterosexual marriages: Gendered dyadic experiences. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 57, 517-531.
40.
UmbersonD.WilliamsK.PowersD. A.LiuH.NeedhamB. (2005). Stress in childhood and adulthood: Effects on marital quality over time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1332-1347.
41.
WestT. V.PoppD.KennyD. A. (2008). A guide for the estimation of gender and sexual orientation effects in dyadic data: An actor-partner interdependence model approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 321-336. doi:10.1177/0146167207311199
