The failure of cross-border marriages has often been attributed to the large age discrepancy between husband and wife, while disadvantage resulted from the selectivity of husbands from low socioeconomic backgrounds has received less attention. Analyzing couple-level household survey data (N = 871) in Hong Kong, this study compares marital conflict in local and cross-border couples by examining the mediating factors such as age discrepancy and socioeconomic disadvantages. Our analysis suggests that cross-border marriages are subject to significantly more frequent marital conflict than local marriages. It also showed that an age discrepancy from 6 to 9 years (older husband) significantly increased the frequency of marital conflict. However, our analysis showed that counter to common assumptions, socioeconomic disadvantages—particularly the couple’s financial stress—instead of nonnormative age hypergamy explained the higher frequency of marital conflict in cross-border marriages.
AmatoP. R.LoomisL. S.BoothA. (1995). Parental divorce, marital conflict, and offspring well-being during early adulthood. Social Forces, 73, 895-915.
2.
AndersonK. L. (1997). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 655-669.
3.
AtkinsonM. P.GreensteinT. N.LangM. M. (2005). For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1137-1148.
4.
BerardoF. M.AppelJ.BerardoD. H. (1993). Age dissimilar marriages: Review and assessment. Journal of Aging Studies, 7, 93-106.
5.
BoothA.JohnsonD. R.WhiteL. K.EdwardsJ. N. (1985). Predicting divorce and permanent separation. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 331-346.
6.
BrintonM. C. (2001). Women’s working lives in East Asia. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
BrodyG. H.StonemanZ.FlorD.McCraryC.HastingsL.ConyersO. (1994). Financial resources, parent psychological functioning, parent co-caregiving, and early adolescent competence in rural two-parent African-American families. Child Development, 65, 590-605.
8.
BumpassL. L.SweetJ. A. (1972). Differentials in marital instability: 1970. American Sociological Review, 37, 754-766.
9.
BuunkB. P.DijkstraP.KenrickD. T.WarntjesA. (2001). Age preferences for mates as related to gender, own age, and involvement level. Evolution & Human Behavior, 22, 241-250.
10.
ÇelikaksoyA.NielsenH. S.VernerM. (2006). Marriage migration: Just another case of positive assortative matching?Review of Economics of the Household, 4, 253-275.
11.
ChoiS. Y. P.CheungA. K. L.CheungY. W.DavidR. (2014). Bring the subjective back in: Resources and husband-to-wife physical assault among Chinese couples in Hong Kong. Violence Against Women, 20, 1428-1446.
12.
ChoiS. Y. P.CheungF. M. (Eds.). (2012). Women and girls in Hong Kong: Current situations and future challenges. Shatin, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
13.
ChoiS. Y. P.CheungY. W.CheungA. K. L. (2012). Social isolation and spousal violence: Comparing marriage migrants with local women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 444-461.
14.
ChoiS. Y. P.TingK. F. (2008). Wife beating in South Africa: An imbalance theory of resources and power. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 834-852.
15.
Clark-NicolasP.Gray-LittleB. (1991). Effect of economic resources on marital quality in Black married couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 645-655.
16.
ClarkwestA. (2007). Spousal dissimilarity, race, and marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 639-653.
17.
ConstableN. (2003). A transnational perspective on divorce and marriage: Filipina wives and workers. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 10, 163-180.
18.
ConstableN. (Ed.). (2005). Cross-border marriages: Gender and mobility in transnational Asia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
19.
CrawfordD. W.HoutsR. M.HustonT. L.GeorgeL. J. (2002). Compatibility, leisure, and satisfaction in marital relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 433-449.
20.
DeMarisA.BensonM. L.FoxG. L.HillT.Van WykJ. (2003). Distal and proximal factors in domestic violence: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 652-667.
21.
FoxG. L.BensonM. L.DeMarisA. A.Van WykJ. (2002). Economic distress and intimate violence: Testing family stress and resources theories. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 793-807.
22.
FoxG. L.ChanceyD. (1998). Sources of economic distress: Individual and family outcomes. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 725-749.
23.
FuX.ToraJ.KendallH. (2001). Marital happiness and inter-racial marriage: A study in a multi-ethnic community in Hawaii. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32, 47-60.
24.
HansonT. L. (1999). Does parental conflict explain why divorce is negatively associated with child welfare?Social Forces, 77, 1283-1316.
25.
HoffmanK. L.DemoD. H.EdwardsJ. N. (1994). Physical wife abuse in a non-Western society: An integrated theoretical approach. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 131-146.
26.
HoffmanS. D.DuncanG. J. (1995). The effect of incomes, wages, and AFDC benefits on marital disruption. Journal of Human Resources, 30, 19-41.
27.
Hohmann-MarriottB. E.AmatoP. (2008). Relationship quality in interethnic marriages and cohabitations. Social Forces, 87, 825-855.
28.
Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department. (1999). Hong Kong residents with spouses/children in the Mainland of China (Special Topics Report No. 22). Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR Government.
JonesG. W.GubhajuB. (2009). Factors influencing changes in mean age at first marriage and proportions never marrying in the low-fertility countries of East and Southeast Asia. Asian Population Studies, 5, 237-265.
31.
JonesG. W.ShenH. H. (2008). International marriage in East and Southeast Asia: Trends and research emphases. Citizenship Studies, 12, 9-25.
32.
KalmijnM. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395-421.
33.
KaukinenC. (2004). Status compatibility, physical violence, and emotional abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 452-471.
34.
KenrickD. T.KeefeR. C. (1992). Sex differences in age preference: Universal reality or ephemeral construction?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 119-133.
35.
KluwerE. S.JohnsonM. D. (2007). Conflict frequency and relationship quality across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1089-1106.
36.
KolkM. (2012). Age differences in unions: Continuity and divergence in Sweden between 1932 and 2007. Stockholm Research Reports in Demography, 25, 1-37.
37.
LeeY. J.SeolD. H.ChoS. N. (2006). International marriages in South Korea: The significance of nationality and ethnicity. Journal of Population Research, 23, 165-182.
38.
Legislative Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2015). Progress on implementation of the recommendations of the Subcommittee to Study Issues Relating to Mainland-HKSAR Families formed under the House Committee of the Fourth Legislative Council. Retrieved from http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr14-15/english/hc/sub_com/hs51/papers/hs5120151123cb2-292-2-e.pdf
39.
LevingerG.RandsM. (1985). Compatibility in marriage and other close relationships. In IckesW. (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). New York, NY: Springer.
40.
LinG.MaZ. (2008). Examining cross-border marriages in Hong Kong since its return to China in 1997. Population, Space and Place, 14, 407-418.
41.
MertonR. K. (1941). Intermarriage and the social structure: Fact and theory. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 4, 361-374.
42.
MorganC. V.HoffmannJ. P. (2007). International marriages in Japan: A prefecture-level analysis. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 33, 157-182.
43.
NegyC.SnyderD. K. (2000). Relationship satisfaction of Mexican American and non-Hispanic White American interethnic couples: Issues of acculturation and clinical intervention. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26, 293-304.
44.
NewendorpN. D. (2008). Uneasy reunions: Immigration, citizenship, and family life in post-1997 Hong Kong. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45.
OnoH. (1998). Husbands’ and wives’ resources and marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 674-689.
46.
PengY.ChoiS. Y. P. (2013). Mobile phone use among migrant factory workers in South China: Technologies of power and resistance. China Quarterly, 215, 553-571.
47.
PiperN. (1997). International marriage in Japan: “Race” and “gender” perspectives. Gender, Place and Culture, 4, 321-338.
48.
RogersS. J.AmatoP. R. (2000). Have changes in gender relations affected marital quality?Social Forces, 79, 731-753.
49.
ShehanC. L.BerardoF. M.VeraH.CarleyS. M. (1991). Women in age-discrepant marriages. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 291-305.
50.
SoA. Y. (2011). “One country, two systems” and Hong Kong-China national integration: A crisis-transformation perspective. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41, 99-116.
51.
SouthS. J.LloydK. M. (1995). Spousal alternatives and marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 60, 21-35.
52.
StrausM. A.GellesR. J.SmithC. (1990). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
53.
TsaiM. C. (2011). “Foreign brides” meet ethnic politics in Taiwan. International Migration Review, 45, 243-268.
54.
WangH. Z.ChangS. M. (2002). The commodification of international marriages: Cross-border marriage business in Taiwan and Viet Nam. International Migration, 40, 93-116.
ZhangH.TsangS. K. M. (2013). Relative income and marital happiness among urban Chinese women: The moderating role of personal commitment. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1575-1584.
