Increasing support for same-sex marriage (SSM) is often explained as a consequence of rising tolerance of homosexuality across successive generations. This article argues that higher levels of SSM support among young people is also linked to their own emerging plans for couple and family formation. Panel data from 1,836 young Australians participating in the Social Futures and Life Pathways Project was used to analyze change in SSM attitudes between late adolescence (2008, aged 14/15 years) and early adulthood (2013, aged 19/20 years). During this period, the sample became less religious, more expectant of unmarried cohabitation, and more approving of SSM. Being male, living in outside a major city, not living with both biological parents, and being more religious were all associated with lower SSM support. Young people’s views on this issue developed in ways that were indicative of distinct (i.e., traditional vs. pragmatic) orientations toward intimate relationships formed earlier in adolescence.
AgrestiA.FinlayB. (1997). Statistical methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
AlwinD. F.KrosnickJ. A. (1991). Aging, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 169-195.
3.
AndersenR.FetnerT. (2008). Cohort differences in tolerance of homosexuality: Attitudinal change in Canada and the United States, 1981-2000. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 311-330.
BaunachD. M. (2012). Changing same-sex marriage attitudes in America from 1988-2010. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 364-378.
6.
BeckerA. B. (2012). Determinants of public support for same-sex marriage: Generational cohorts, social contact, and shifting attitudes. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24, 524-533.
7.
BramlettB. H. (2012). The cross-pressures of religion and contact with gays and lesbians, and their impact on same-sex marriage opinion. Politics & Policy, 40, 13-42.
8.
BrumbaughS. M.SanchezL. A.NockS. L.WrightJ. D. (2008). Attitudes to gay marriage in states undergoing marriage law transformation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 345-359.
9.
BumpassL. L.SweetJ. A.CherlinA. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 913-927.
10.
CherlinA. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848-861.
11.
CheshireL.WillingI.SkrbišZ. (2013). Unrecognised cosmopolitans: Mobility and openness among globally engaged family farmers. Mobilities, 9, 84-103. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.796784
12.
CoontzS. (2004). The world historical transformation of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 974-979.
13.
de VausD. (1995). Surveys in Social Research, 4th edition.St. Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
14.
DuncanM. L.KemmelmeierM. (2012). Attitudes toward same-sex marriage: An essentialist approach. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 12, 377-399.
15.
DwyerP.WynJ. (2001). Youth, education and risk: Facing the future. London, England: Routledge/Falmer.
16.
FinkelS. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
GiddensA. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
18.
GrossN.SimmonsS. (2002). Intimacy as a double-edged phenomenon? An empirical test of Giddens. Social Forces, 81, 531-555.
19.
HoffmanL. W.KloskaD. D. (1995). Parents’ gender-based attitudes toward marital roles and child rearing: Development and validation of new measures. Sex Roles, 32, 273-295.
20.
HoogheM.ClaesE.HarellA.QuintelierE.DejaeghereY. (2010). Anti-gay sentiment among adolescents in Belgium and Canada: A comparative investigation into the role of gender and religion. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 384-400.
21.
HoogheM.MeeusenC. (2012). Homophobia and the transition to adulthood: A three year panel study among Belgian late adolescents and young adults, 2008-2011. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 1197-1207.
22.
InglehartR.AppelD. (1989). The rise of postmaterialist values and changing religious orientations, gender roles and sexual norms. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1, 45-75.
23.
Katz-WiseS. L.PriessH. A.HydeJ. S. (2010). Gender-role attitudes and behavior across the transition to parenthood. Developmental Psychology, 46, 18-28.
24.
KefalasM. J.FurstenbergF. F.CarrP. J.NapolitanoL. (2011). “Marriage is more than being together”: The meaning of marriage for young adults. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 845-875.
25.
ManningW. D.LongmoreM. A.GiordanoP. C. (2007). The changing institution of marriage: Adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 559-575.
26.
MeierA. M. (2003). Adolescents’ transition to first intercourse, religiosity, and attitudes about sex. Social Forces, 81, 1031-1052.
PowellB.BolzendahlC.GeistC.SteelmanL. C. (2010). Counted out: Same-sex relations and Americans’ definitions of family. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
33.
QuL.WestonR. (2008). Family statistics and trends: Attitudes towards marriage and cohabitation. Family Relationships Quarterly, 8, 5-8.
34.
SherkatD. E.Powell-WilliamsM.MaddoxG.de VriesK. M. (2011). Religion, politics, and support for same-sex marriage in the United States, 1988-2008. Social Science Research, 40, 167-180.
35.
SkrbišZ.WesternM.TranterB.HoganD.CoatesR.SmithJ.. . .MayallM. (2011). Expecting the unexpected: Young people’s expectations about marriage and family. Journal of Sociology, 48, 63-83.
36.
SmockP. J. (2005). Everything’s there except money: How economic factors shape the decision to marry among cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680-696.
37.
StataCorp. (2011). Stata (Version 12) [Statistical software]. College Station, TX: Author.
38.
TreasJ. (2002). How cohorts, education, and ideology shaped a new sexual revolution on American attitudes toward nonmarital sex, 1972-1998. Sociological Perspectives, 45, 267-283.
39.
WesternM.BaxterJ. (2001). Introduction. In BaxterJ.WesternM. (Eds.), Reconfigurations of class and gender (pp. 1-13). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
