The rapid growth of the Latino population in the United States has renewed interest in Latino family research. It has often been assumed that Catholicism is a key factor influencing Latinos’ attitudes toward the family, despite the fact that nearly one third of Latinos are not Catholic. This article uses data from the 2006 National Survey of Religion and Family Life, a survey of working-age adults (aged 18-59 years) in the lower 48 states, to explore the relationship between multiple dimensions of religiosity—denomination, church attendance, prayer, and beliefs about the Bible—and Latinos’ attitudes regarding marriage, divorce, cohabitation, and casual sex. Compared with Catholics, evangelical Protestants tend to hold more conservative attitudes on family-related issues. Latinos who attend services regularly and pray frequently also report more traditional views. Findings involving literalist views of the Bible are more equivocal. Taken together, religious variables are just as potent as socioeconomic and demographic factors in explaining individual-level variation in Latinos’ attitudes. Study limitations are noted, and several directions for future research are identified.
AdamsJ. E. (1986). Marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
2.
AllisonP. D. (2001). Missing data (Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Baca ZinnM.PokA. Y. H. (2002). Tradition and transition in Mexican-origin families. In TaylorR. L. (Ed.), Minority families in the United States: A multicultural perspective (3rd ed., pp. 79-100). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BartkowskiJ. P.EllisonC. G. (2009). Conservative Protestants on children and child-rearing. In Miller-McLemoreB.BrowningD. (Eds.), The child in America’s religions (pp. 42-56). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
5.
BartkowskiJ. P.XuX.LevinM. (2008). Religion and child development: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Social Science Research, 37, 18-36.
6.
BeanF. D.BergR. R.Van HookJ. V. W. (1996). Socioeconomic and cultural incorporation and marital disruption among Mexican Americans. Social Forces, 75, 593-617.
7.
BooneK. C. (1989). The Bible tells them so: The discourse of protestant fundamentalism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
BramlettM. D.MosherW. D. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States (Vital and Health Statistics, Series 23, No. 22). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
9.
BrownE.OrbuchT. L.BauermeisterJ. A. (2008). Religiosity and marital stability among Black American and White American couples. Family Relations, 57, 186-197.
10.
BurdetteA. M.EllisonC. G.SherkatD. E.GoreK. (2007). Are there religious variations in marital infidelity?Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1553-1581.
11.
CallV. R. A.HeatonT. B. (1997). Religious influence on marital stability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 382-392.
12.
Council on Market and Opinion Research. (2003). Tracking response, cooperation, and refusal rates for the industry: 2003 results. Wethersfield, CT: Author.
13.
Diaz-StevensA. M. (1994). Latinas and the church. In DolanJ. P.DeckA. F. (Eds.), Hispanic Catholic culture in the U.S.: Issues and concerns (pp. 240-275). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
14.
Diaz-StevensA. M.Stevens-ArroyoA. (1998). The Emmaus paradigm: Recognizing the resurgence of Latino religion. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
15.
EastP. L. (1998). Racial and ethnic differences in girls’ sexual, marital, and birth expectations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 150-162.
16.
EdgellP. A.GerteisJ.HartmannD. (2006). Atheists as “other”: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. American Sociological Review, 71, 211-234.
17.
EllisonC. G.AcevedoG. A.Ramos-WadaA. I. (2011). Religion and attitudes toward same-sex marriage among U.S. Latinos. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 35-56.
18.
EllisonC. G.BartkowskiJ. P.AndersonK. L. (1999). Are there religious differences in domestic violence?Journal of Family Issues, 20, 87-113.
19.
EllisonC. G.BurdetteA. M.GlennN. D. (2011). Praying for Mr. Right? Religion, family background, and marital expectations among college women. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 906-931.
20.
EllisonC. GBurdetteA. M.WilcoxW. B. (2010). The couple that prays together: Race, ethnicity, religion, and relationship quality among working-age adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 963-975.
21.
EllisonC. G.EchevarriaS.SmithB. (2005). Religion and abortion attitudes among U.S. Hispanics: Findings from the 1990 Latino National Political Survey. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 192-208.
22.
EllisonC. G.GoodsonP. (1997). Conservative Protestantism and attitudes toward family planning in a sample of seminarians. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 512-529.
23.
EspinO. O. (1994). Popular Catholicism among Latinos. In DolanJ. P.DeckA. F. (Eds.), Hispanic Catholic culture in the U.S.: Issues and concerns (pp. 308-359). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
24.
EspinosaG.ElizondoV.MirandaJ. (Eds.). (2005). Latino religions and civic activism in the United States. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
FernandezE. (2007). Mexican-American Catholics. New York, NY: Paulist Press.
26.
FloresE.TschannJ. M.MarinB.PantojaP. (2004). Marital conflict and acculturation among Mexican American husbands and wives. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 10, 39-52.
27.
FuV. K.WolfingerN. H. (2011). Broken boundaries or broken marriages? Racial intermarriage and divorce. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 1096-1117.
28.
GayD. A.EllisonC. G.PowersD. A. (1996). In search of denominational subcultures: Religion and “pro-family” issues revisited. Review of Religious Research, 38, 3-17.
29.
GreblerL.MooreJ. W.GuzmanR. C. (1970). The Mexican American people: The nation’s second minority. New York, NY: Free Press.
30.
GreeleyA. M. (1994). The demography of American Catholics, 1964-1990. In The sociology of Andrew M. Greeley (pp. 545-564). Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
31.
GrovesR. (2006). Non-response rates and non-response bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 646-675.
32.
HempelL. D.BartkowskiJ. P. (2008). Scripture, sin, and salvation: Theological conservatism reconsidered. Social Forces, 86, 1647-1674.
33.
HertelB. R.HughesM. (1987). Religious affiliation, attendance, and support for “pro-family” issues in the United States. Social Forces, 87, 858-882.
34.
HuntL. L. (1999). Hispanic Protestantism in the United States: Trends by decade and generation. Social Forces, 77, 1601-1623.
35.
KeeterS.MillerC.KohutA.GrovesR. M.PresserS. (2000). Consequences of nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 125-148.
36.
LandaleN. S.OgenaN. B. (1995). Migration and union dissolution among Puerto Rican women. International Migration Review, 29, 671-692.
37.
LandaleN. S.OropesaR. S. (2007). Hispanic families: Stability and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 381-405.
38.
LeeJ.PachonH. P. (2007). Leading the way: An Analysis of the effect of religion on the Latino vote. American Politics Research, 35, 252-272.
39.
LehrerE. L.ChiswickC. U. (1993). Religion as a determinant of marital stability. Demography, 30, 385-404.
40.
LichterD. T.CarmaltJ. H. (2009). Religion and marital quality in low-income couples. Social Science Research, 38, 168-187.
41.
MahoneyA. (2010). Religion in families, 1999-2009: A relational spirituality framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 805-827.
42.
MalleyB. (2004). How the Bible works: An anthropological study of evangelical Biblicism. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
43.
ManningW. D. (2001). Childbearing in cohabiting unions: Racial and ethnic differences. Family Planning Perspectives, 33, 217-223.
44.
ManningW. D. (2004). Children and the stability of cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 674-689.
45.
MartinT. C. (2002). Consensual unions in Latin America: Persistence of a dual nuptiality system. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33, 35-53.
46.
MusickK. (2002). Planned and unplanned childbearing among unmarried women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 915-929.
47.
MyersS. M. (2006). Religious homogamy and marital quality: Historical and generational patterns, 1980-1997. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 292-304.
48.
NockS. L.SanchezL. A.WrightJ. D. (2008). Covenant marriage: The movement to reclaim tradition in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
49.
OropesaR. S. (1996). Normative beliefs about marriage and cohabitation: A comparison of non-Latino Whites, Mexican Americans, and Puerto Ricans. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 49-62.
50.
OropesaR. S.GormanB. K. (2000). Ethnicity, immigration, and beliefs about marriage as a tie that binds. In WaiteL. (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 188-211). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
51.
OropesaR. S.LandaleN. S. (2004). The future of marriage and Hispanics. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 901-920.
52.
OropesaR. S.LichterD. T.AndersonR. N. (1994). Marriage markets and the paradox of Mexican American nuptiality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 889-907.
53.
PenaM.FrehillL. M. (1998). Latina religious practice: Analyzing cultural dimensions in measures of religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37,620-635.
54.
PerlP.GreelyJ. Z.GrayM. A. (2006). What proportion of adult Hispanics are Catholic? A review of survey data and methodology. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45, 419-436.
55.
Pew Research Center for People and the Press. (2004). Polls face growing resistance, but still representative. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/211.pdf
56.
PollnerM. L. (1989). Divine relations, social relations, and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30, 92-104.
57.
RaleyR. K. (2000). Recent trends and differentials in marriage and cohabitation. In WaiteL. (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 19-39). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
58.
RaleyR. K.DurdenT. E.WildsmithE. (2004). Understanding Mexican American marriage patterns using a life course perspective. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 872-890.
59.
RegnerusM. D. (2007). Forbidden fruit: Sex and religion in the lives of American teenagers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
60.
SharpS. (2010). How does prayer help manage emotions?Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 417-437.
61.
SmithC.SnellP. (2009). Souls in transition: The religious and spiritual lives of emerging adults. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
62.
SmockP. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1-20.
63.
SteenslandB.ParkJ. Z.RegnerusM. D.RobinsonL.WilcoxW. B.WoodberryR. D. (2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79, 291-318.
64.
SteigengaT. J.ClearyE. L. (Eds.). (2007). Conversion of a continent: Contemporary religious change in Latin America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
65.
StokesC. E.EllisonC. G. (2010). Religion and attitudes toward divorce laws among U.S. adults. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 1279-1304.
66.
ThorntonA.AxinnW. G.HillD. H. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 628-651.
67.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2011). Statistical abstract of the United States: 2011 (131st ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
68.
VaalerM. L.EllisonC. G.PowersD. A. (2009). Religious influences on the risk of marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 917-934.
69.
VegaW. A. (1990). Hispanic families in the 1980s: A decade of research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1015-1024.
70.
WaiteL. J.LehrerE. L. (2003). The benefits from marriage and religion in the United States: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 29, 255-275.
71.
WilcoxW. B. (2005). Family. In EbaughH. R. (Ed.), Handbook of religion and social institutions (pp. 97-120). New York, NY: Springer.
72.
WilcoxW. B.WolfingerN. H. (2007). Then comes marriage? Religion, race, and marriage in urban America. Social Science Research, 36, 569-589.
73.
WilcoxW. B.WolfingerN. H. (2008). Living and loving “decent”: Religion and relationship quality among urban parents. Social Science Research, 37, 828-843.
74.
WilcoxW. B.WolfingerN. H. (forthcoming). Soulmates: Religion and relationships among African-Americans and Latinos. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
75.
WildeM. L. (2001). From excommunication to nullification: Testing supply-side theories of religious marketing with the case of Catholic marital annulments. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 235-249.
76.
WildsmithE.RaleyR. K. (2006). Race-ethnic differences in nonmarital fertility: A focus on Mexican American women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 491-508.
77.
WilliamsN. (1990). The Mexican American family: Tradition and change. New York, NY: General Hall.
78.
WilsonJ.MusickM. A. (1996). Religion and marital dependence. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35, 30-40.
79.
WolfingerN. H.WilcoxW. B. (2008). Happily ever after? Religion, marital status, gender, and relationship quality in urban families. Social Forces, 86, 1311-1337.
80.
WolfingerN. H.WilcoxW. B.HernandezE. I. (2010). Bendito amor [Blessed love]: Religion and relationships among married and unmarried Latinos in urban America. Journal of Latino-Latin American Studies, 3, 171-188.
81.
WuthnowR. (1988). The restructuring of American religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
82.
XuX.HudspethC. D.BartkowskiJ. P. (2005). The timing of first marriage: Are there religious variations?Journal of Family Issues, 26, 584-618.
