There are good reasons to suspect that the transition parents go through when having their second child may be different from when having their first, yet these differences remain understudied. This study focuses on one specific area of possible divergence by looking at how first-time versus second-time mothers decide on maternity leave length. To address this question, a series of in-depth semistructured longitudinal interviews were conducted at three different times over the course of 1 year with 16 pregnant public school teachers; 8 of whom were having their first child and 8 their second child. Findings indicate that some areas in which differences emerged include the level of influence of the Family and Medical Leave Act guidelines, comfort level with using paid child care, and the gendered nature of their parenting ideologies.
BelskyJ.KellyJ. (1994). The transition to parenthood: How a first child changes a marriage. New York, NY: Delacorte Press.
3.
BerkS. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
4.
BianchiS. (2000). Maternal employment and time with children: Dynamic change or surprising continuity?Demography, 37, 401-414.
5.
ClawsonD.GerstelN. (2007). Caring for our young: Child care in Europe and in the United States. In FergusonS. (Ed.), Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families (pp. 726-734). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
6.
ColtraneS. (1989). Household labor and the routine production of gender. Social Problems, 36, 473-490.
7.
Commission on Family and Medical Leave. (1996). A workable balance: Report to Congress on family and medical leave policies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Women’s Bureau.
8.
CowanP.CowanC. P. (1992). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. New York, NY: Basic Books.
9.
CowanP.CowanC. P. (2003). New families: Modern couples as new pioneers. In MasonM.A.SkolnickA.SugarmanS. (Eds.), All our families: New policies for a new century (pp. 244-263). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
FriedM. (1998). Taking time: Parental leave policy and corporate culture. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
11.
GalinskyE.AumannK.BondJ. T. (2009). Times are changing: Gender and generation at work and at home. New York, NY: Families and Work Institute.
12.
GareyA. I. (1999). Weaving work & motherhood. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
13.
GersonK. (1985). Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
15.
HaysS. (1996). Cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
HochschildA. (1985). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
HochschildA. (1989). The second shift. New York, NY: Avon.
18.
HochschildA. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
19.
HydeJ. S.EssexM. J.ClarkR.KleinM. H. (2001). Maternity leave, women’s employment, and marital incompatibility. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 476-491.
20.
HydeJ. S.EssexM. J.HortonF. (1993). Fathers and parental leave: Attitudes and experiences. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 616-641.
21.
KamermanS. B. (2006). Parental leave policies: The impact on child well-being. In MossP.O’BrienM. (Eds.), International review of leave policies and related research (pp. 16-21). London, England: Department of Trade and Industry.
22.
KaufmanG.UhlenbergP. (2000). The influence of parenthood on the work effort of married men and women. Social Forces, 78, 931-947.
23.
KreftingL. (1999). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. In MilinkiA. K. (Ed.), Cases in qualitative research: Research reports for discussion and evaluation (pp.173-181). Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak.
24.
McGovernP.DowdB.GjerdingenD.MoscoviceI.KochevarL.MurphyS. (2000). The determinants of time off work after childbirth. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 25, 527-564.
25.
McMahonM. (1995). Engendering motherhood: Identity and self-transformation in women’s lives. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
MillerT. (2000). Losing the plot: Narrative construction and longitudinal childbirth research. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 309-323.
27.
MossP.DevenF. (2006). Leave policies and research: A cross-national overview. Marriage & Family Review, 39, 255-285.
28.
MossP.O’BrienM. (Eds.). (2006). International review of leave policies and related research (Employment Relations Research Series No. 57). London, England: Department of Trade and Industry.
29.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2009a). Characteristics of public, private, and bureau of Indian education elementary and secondary school teachers in the United States: Results from the 2007-08 schools and staffing survey (NCES 2009-324). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
30.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2009b). Digest of education statistics (NCES 2006-005). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
31.
PadavicI.ReskinB. (2002). Women and men at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
32.
PleckJ. (1993). Are “family-supportive” employer policies relevant to men? In HoodJ. C. (Ed.), Men, work and family (pp. 217-237). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
33.
ReinharzS. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
RismanB. (1998). Gender vertigo: American families in transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
Salmela-AroK.AunolaK. (2006). Couples share similar changes in depressive symptoms and marital satisfaction anticipating the birth of a child. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 781-803.
36.
SanchezL.ThomsonE. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers: Parenthood, gender, and the division of labor. Gender & Society, 11, 747-772.
37.
SingleyS. G.HynesK. (2005). Transitions to parenthood: Work-family policies, gender, and the couple context. Gender & Society, 19, 376-397.
38.
TanakaS. (2005). Parental leave and child health across OECD countries. Economic Journal, 115, 7-28.
39.
UptonR. L. (2000). “The next one changes everything”: Parental adjustment to the second child among middle-class American families (Working Paper for Center for the Ethnography of Everyday Life: Alfred P. Sloan Center for the Study of Working Families). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
40.
UttalL. (2002). Making care work: Employed mothers in the new childcare market. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
41.
WalzerS. (1998). Thinking about the baby: Gender and transitions into parenthood. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
42.
WeissR. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: Free Press.
43.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125-151.
