This study explores the role of gender ideologies in moderating social judgments of gender norm violators. Three hundred and eleven participants evaluated a male or a female target who was either a primary breadwinner or a primary caregiver. Attributions of personal traits, moral emotions, and marital emotions were examined. Results showed that both traditional and egalitarian individuals applied a double standard when judging deviations from gendered family roles. However, and as predicted, traditional individuals evaluated the normative targets more favorably than the norm-violating targets, whereas egalitarians evaluated the norm-violating targets more favorably. These findings shed light on the important moderating role of gender ideologies and help account for the inconsistencies in previous findings regarding social judgments of gender norm violators.
BiernatM.KobrynowiczD. (1997). Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 544-557.
2.
BiernatM.ManisM. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5-20.
3.
BiernatM.ManisM.NelsonT. E. (1991). Stereotypes and standards of judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 485-499.
4.
BrescollV. L.UhlmannE. L. (2005). Attitudes toward traditional and nontraditional parents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 436-445.
5.
BrewsterK. L.PadavicI. (2000). Change in gender ideology, 1977-1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 477-487.
6.
BridgesJ. S.EtaughC.Barnes-FarrellJ. (2002). Trait judgments of stay-at-home and employed parents: A function of social role and/or shifting standards?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 140-150.
7.
ColemanJ. M.FraniukR. (2011). Perceptions of mothers and fathers who take temporary work leave. Sex Roles, 64, 311-323.
8.
CorrellS. J.BenardS.PaikI. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297-1338.
9.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701-718.
10.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61-149.
11.
DeutschF. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21, 106-127.
12.
DeutschF. M.RoskaJ.MeeskeC. (2003). How gender counts when couples count their money. Sex Roles, 48, 291-304.
13.
DeutschF. M.SaxonS. E. (1998). Traditional ideologies, nontraditional lives. Sex Roles, 38, 331-362.
14.
EckesT. (2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47, 99-114.
15.
EtaughC.FolgerD. (1998). Perceptions of parents whose work and parenting behaviors deviate from role expectations. Sex Roles, 39, 215-223.
16.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social perception: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77-83.
17.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed)stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
18.
FuegenK.BiernatM.HainesE.DeauxK. (2004). Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 737-754.
19.
GershunyJ.BittmanM.BriceJ. (2005). Exit, voice and suffering: Do couples adapt to changing employment patterns?Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 656-665.
20.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
21.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1999). Sexism and other “isms”: Interdependence, status, and the ambivalent content of stereotypes. In SwannW. B.Jr.GilbertL. A.LangloisJ. (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 193-222). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 115-188.
23.
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ. L.AbramsD.MasserB.. . . López LópezW. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 736-775.
24.
HochschildA. (1989). The economy of gratitude. In FranksD. D.McCarthyE. D. (Eds.), The sociology of emotions: Original essays and research papers (pp. 95-113). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
25.
KobrynowiczD.BiernatM. (1997). Decoding subjective evaluations: How stereotypes provide shifting standards. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 579-599.
26.
LobelT. E.SloneM.AshuachY.RevachI. (2001). Division of household labor and social judgments in Israel: The influence of gender and education. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 829-839.
27.
ParkB.SmithJ. A.CorrellJ. (2008). “Having it all” or “doing it all”? Perceived trait attributes and behavioral obligations as a function of workload, parenthood, and gender. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1156-1164.
28.
PrenticeD. E.CarranzaE. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269-281.
29.
RidgewayC. L.CorrellS. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18, 510-531.
30.
RosenwasserS. M.GonzalesM. H.AdamsV. (1985). Perceptions of a housespouse: The effects of sex, economic productivity, and subject background variables. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 258-264.
31.
ScottJ.BraunM. (2009). Changing public views of gender roles in seven nations: 1988-2002. In HallerM.JowellR.SmithT. (Eds.). Charting the globe (pp.358-377). Oxford, England: Routledge.
32.
SmithJ. A. (2009). The daddy shift: How stay-at-home dads, breadwinning moms, and shared parenting are transforming the American family. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
33.
StokesR.HewittJ. P. (1976). Aligning actions. American Sociological Review, 41, 383-849.
34.
SullivanO. (2004). Changing gender practices within the household: A theoretical perspective. Gender & Society, 18, 207-222.
35.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.MashekD. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372.
36.
ZuoJ. (2004). Shifting the breadwinning boundary: The role of men’s breadwinner status and their gender ideologies. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 811-832.
