This study investigates whether gender inequality in the division of housework and child care may be an obstacle to childbearing and relationship stability among different groups of British couples. Furthermore, it explores whether outsourcing of domestic labor ameliorates any negative effects of domestic work inequality. The empirical investigation uses event-history analysis based on 14 waves (1992-2005) of the British Household Panel Study. The author finds that the association between domestic work arrangements and family outcomes vary by the presence of children, women’s employment, and gender role attitudes. Gender inequality in domestic work reduces relationship stability among egalitarian childless women and among all mothers. For first and second births as outcomes, the association is weaker and depends on the level of inequality and women’s employment status, respectively. Domestic outsourcing is not significant for these family outcomes with the exception of formal child care, which is positively associated with the risk of a second birth.
BeckerG. S. (1991). A treatise on the family (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
BelskyJ.LangM.HustonT. L. (1986). Sex typing and division of labor as determinants of marital change across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 517-522.
3.
BernhardtE.GoldscheiderF. (2008). Domestic gender equality and childbearing: First and second births in Sweden. Paper presented at the European Population Conference, Barcelona, Spain.
4.
BerringtonA.DiamondI. (1999). Marital dissolution among the 1958 British Birth cohort: The role of cohabitation. Population Studies, 53, 19-38.
5.
BrewsterK. L.RindfussR. R. (2000). Fertility and women’s employment in industrialized nations. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 271-296.
6.
ChanT. W.HalpinB. (2002). Union dissolution in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Sociology, 32(4), 76-93.
7.
CookeL. P. (2004). The gendered division of labor and family outcomes in Germany. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 1246-1259.
8.
CookeL. P. (2008). Gender equity and fertility in Italy and Spain. Journal of Social Policy, 38(1), 123-140.
9.
CunninghamM. (2005). Gender in cohabitation and marriage—The influence of gender ideology on housework allocation over the life course. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 1037-1061.
10.
CunninghamM.BeutelA. M.BarberJ. S.ThorntonA. (2005). Reciprocal relationships between attitudes about gender and social contexts during young adulthood. Social Science Research, 34, 862-892.
11.
DeutschM. (1985). Distributive justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
12.
Ekert-JafféO.JoshiH.LynchK.MouginR.RendallM. (2002). Fertility, timing of births and socio-economic status in France and Britain: Social policies and occupational polarization. Population, 57, 475-508.
13.
EnglandP.KilbourneS. B. (1990). Markets, marriage and other mates: The problem of power. In RobertsonR. F. A. S. (Ed.), Beyond the marketplace (pp. 163-188). New York, NY: De Gruyter.
14.
FriscoM. L.WilliamsK. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness and divorce in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 52-73.
15.
GershunyJ.BittmanM.BriceJ. (2005). Exit, voice, and suffering: Do couples adapt to changing employment patterns?Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 656-665.
16.
GiddensA. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
17.
HarkonenJ.DronkersJ. (2006). Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce. A comparison of seventeen countries. European Sociological Review, 22, 501-517.
18.
HaynesM.BaxterJ.HewittB.WesternM. (2009). Lifecourse pathways and housework time: Australia and the United Kingdom. Paper presented at the BHPS Conference 2009, Colchester, England.
19.
Helms-EriksonH. (2001). Marital quality ten years after the transition to parenthood: Implications of the timing of parenthood and the division of housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1099-1110.
20.
HenzU. (2008). Gender roles and values of children: Childless couples in East and West Germany. Demographic Research, 19, 1451-1500.
21.
HenzU.ThomsonE. (2005). Union stability and stepfamily fertility in Austria, Finland, France & West Germany. European Journal of Population, 21(1), 3-29.
22.
KalmijnM. (1999). Father involvement in childrearing and the perceived stability of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 409-421.
23.
KalmijnM.GraafP. M.PoortmanA.-R. (2004). Interactions between cultural and economic determinants of divorce in the Netherlands. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 75-89.
24.
KalmijnM.LoeveA.MantingD. (2007). Income dynamics in couples and the dissolution of marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 44, 159-179.
25.
KnealeD.JoshiH. (2008). Postponement and childlessness: Evidence from two British cohorts. Demographic Research, 19, 1935-1968.
26.
KreyenfeldM. (2002). Time-squeeze, partner effect or self-selection? An investigation into the positive effect of women’s education on second birth risks in West Germany. Demographic Research, 7(2), 15-48.
27.
MacDermidS. M.HustonT. L.McHaleS. M. (1990). Changes in marriage associated with the transition to parenthood: Individual differences as a function of sex-role attitudes and changes in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 475-486.
28.
MajorB. (1987). Gender, justice and the psychology of entitlement. In ShaverP.HendrickC. (Eds.), Sex and gender (pp. 124-148). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
29.
McDonaldP. (1997). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility (Working Papers in Demography, No. 69). Canberra, Australia: Research School of Social Sciences.
30.
OlahL. S. (2003). Gendering fertility: Second births in Sweden and Hungary. Population Research and Policy Review, 22, 171-200.
31.
OnoH. (1998). Husbands’ and wives’ resources and marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 674-689.
32.
OppenheimerV. K. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 431-453.
33.
PinaD. L.BengtsonV. L. (1993). The division of household labor and wives’ happiness: Ideology, employment, and perception of support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 901-912.
34.
PryorJ.TrinderL. (2004). Children, families, and divorce. In ScottJ.TreasJ.RichardsM. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to the sociology of families (pp. 322-339). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
35.
RendallM. S.Ekert-JafféO.JoshiH.LynchK.MouginR. (2009). Universal versus economically polarized change in age at first birth: A French-British comparison. Population and Development Review, 35, 89-115.
36.
RendallM. S.SmallwoodS. (2003). Higher qualifications, first-birth timing, and further childbearing in England and Wales. Population Trends, 111, 18-26.
37.
RogersS. J. (2004). Dollars, dependency, and divorce: Four perspectives on the role of wives’ income. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 59-74.
38.
RubleD. N.FlemingA. S.HackelL. S.StangorC. (1988). Changes in the marital relationship during the transition to first time motherhood: Effects of violated expectations concerning division of household labor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 78-87.
39.
SanchezL.ManningW. D.SmockP. J. (1998). Sex-specialized or collaborative mate selection? Union transitions among cohabitors. Social Science Research, 27, 280-304.
40.
SanchezL.ThomsonE. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers: Parenthood, gender, and the division of labor. Gender & Society, 11, 747-772.
41.
SayerL. C.BianchiS. M. (2000). Women’s economic independence and the probability of divorce: A review and reexamination. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 906-943.
42.
ScanzoniJ. (1978). Sex roles, women’s work and marital conflict: A study of family change. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
43.
SchaferJ. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London, England: Chapman & Hall.
44.
SchoberP. S. (2011). The parenthood effect on gender inequality: Explaining the change in paid and domestic work when British couples become parents. European Sociological Review. Published online May, 2011.
45.
SchoenR.RogersS. J.AmatoP. R. (2006). Wives’ employment and spouses’ marital happiness. Assessing the direction of influence using longitudinal couple data. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 506-528.
46.
Sigle-RushtonW. (2008). England and Wales: Stable fertility and pronounced social status differences. Demographic Research, 19, 455-502.
47.
Sigle-RushtonW. (2010). Men’s unpaid work and divorce: reassessing specialization and trade in British families. Feminist Economics, 16(2), 1-26.
48.
SimpsonI. H.EnglandP. (1981). Conjugal work roles and marital solidarity. In AldousJ. (Ed.), Two paychecks: Life in dual-earner families (pp. 147-172). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
49.
SteeleF.KallisC.GoldsteinH.JoshiH. (2005). The relationship between childbearing and transitions from marriage and cohabitation in Britain. Demography, 42, 647-673.
50.
SteeleF.Sigle-RushtonW.KravdalO. (2009). Consequences of family disruption on children’s educational outcomes in Norway. Demography, 46, 553-574.
51.
StetsJ. E.BurkeP. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 224-237.
52.
ThompsonL. (1991). Women’s sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 181-196.
53.
TorrB. M.ShortS. E. (2004). Second births and the second shift: A research note on gender equity and fertility. Population and Development Review, 30, 109-130.
54.
UhrigN. (2008). The nature and causes of attrition in the British Household Panel Survey (ISER Working Paper, No. 2008-05). Essex, England: Institute for Social & Economic Research, University of Essex.
55.
WallK. (2007). Main patterns in attitudes to the articulation between work and family life: A cross-national analysis. In CromptonR.LewisS.LyonetteC. (Eds.), Women, men, work and family in Europe (pp. 86-115). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
56.
WalsterE.WalsterG. W.BerheideE. (1978). Equity: Theory and research (Vol. 3). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
57.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125-151.
58.
WilkieJ. R.FerreeM. M.RatcliffK. S. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 577-594.
