The majority of young married Americans lived with their spouses before the wedding, and many cohabited with partners they did not wed. Yet little is known about how cohabitating relationships progress or the role gender norms play in this process. This article explores how cohabiting partners negotiate relationship progression, focusing on several stages where couples enact gender. Data are from in-depth interviews with 30 working-class couples (n = 60). The women in this sample often challenged conventional gender norms by suggesting that couples move in together or raising the issue of marriage. Men played dominant roles in initiating whether couples became romantically involved and progressed to a more formal status. Although women and men contest how gender is performed, cohabiting men remain privileged in the arena of relationship progression. The findings suggest that adherence to conventional gender practices even among those residing in informal unions perpetuates women’s secondary position in intimate relationships.
Berg, S. ( 1988). Snowball sampling. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 8, pp. 528-532). New York, NY: Wiley.
2.
Bernard, J. ( 1981). The good provider role: Its rise and fall. American Psychologist, 36, 1-12.
3.
Bianchi, S., Milkie, M., Sayer, L., & Robinson, J. ( 2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191-228.
4.
Blackwell, D.L., & Lichter, D.T. ( 2000). Mate selection among married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 275-302.
5.
Blood, R., & Wolfe, D. ( 1960). Husbands and wives. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
6.
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. ( 1983). American couples. New York, NY: William Morrow.
7.
Carli, L. ( 1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81-99.
8.
Chandra, A., Martinez, G.M., Mosher, W.D., Abma, J.C., & Jones, J. ( 2005). Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Statistics23, 1-160.
9.
Cherlin, A.J. ( 2004). The deinstitutionalization ofAmerican marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848-861.
10.
Cherlin, A.J. ( 2009). The marriage go round: The state of marriage and family in America today. New York, NY: Knopf.
11.
Ciabattari, T. ( 2004). Cohabitation and housework: The effects on marital intentions . Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 118-125.
12.
Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R., & Waite, L. ( 1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74, 609-626.
13.
de Ruijter, E., Treas, J.K., & Cohen, P.N. ( 2005). Outsourcing the gender factory: Living arrangements and service expenditures on female and male tasks. Social Forces , 84, 305-322.
Elizabeth, V. ( 2000). Cohabitation, marriage, and the unruly consequence of difference. Gender & Society, 14, 87-110.
16.
Ellwood, D.T., & Jencks, C. ( 2004). The uneven spread of single parent families: What do we know? In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 3-77). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
17.
England, P., & Kilbourne, B.S. (1990). Markets, marriages, and other mates: The problem of power. In R. Friedland & A. F. Robertson (Eds.), Beyond the marketplace: Rethinking economy and society (pp. 163-188). New York, NY: Basic Books.
18.
England, P., & Thomas, R.J. ( 2006). The decline of the date and the rise of the college hook-up . In A. Skolnick & J. Skolnick (Eds.), Families in transition (14th ed., pp. 151-162). Boston, MA : Allyn & Bacon.
19.
Felmlee, D.H. ( 1994). Who’s on top? Power in romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 31, 275-295.
20.
Ferree, M.M. ( 1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family Research . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866-884.
21.
Fronczek, P. ( 2005). Income, earnings, and poverty from the 2004 American Community Survey. Retrieved from www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/acs-01.pdf .
22.
Gibson-Davis, C., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. ( 2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1301-1313.
23.
Gilbert, L.A., Walker, S.J., McKinney, S., & Snell, J.L. ( 1999). Challenging discourse themes reproducing gender in heterosexual dating: An analog study. Sex Roles, 41, 753-775.
24.
Goldrick-Rab, S. ( 2006). Following their every move: An investigation of social-class differences in college pathways. Sociology of Education, 79, 61-79.
25.
Goldscheider, F., & Waite, L. ( 1991). New families, no families? The transformation of the American home. Berkley: University of California Press.
26.
Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. ( 1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique . Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513-538.
27.
Heimdal, K., & Houseknecht, S. (2003). Cohabiting and married couples’ income organization: Approaches in Sweden and the United States . Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 525-538.
28.
Hertz, R. ( 1995). Separate but simultaneous interviewing of husbands and wives: Making sense of their stories. Qualitative Inquiry , 1, 429-451. Hohmann-Marriott , B. (2006). Shared beliefs and the union stability of married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1015-1028.
29.
Humble, A., Zvonkovic, A., & Walker, A. ( 2008). "The Royal We": Gender ideology, display, and assessment in wedding work. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 3-25.
30.
Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L.L. ( 2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research , 19, 1663-1692.
31.
Knudson-Martin, C., & Mahoney, A.R. ( 1998). Language and processes in the construction of equality in new marriages. Family Relations, 47, 81-91.
32.
Komarovsky, M. ( 1987). Blue-collar marriage. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
33.
Komter, A. ( 1989). Hidden power in marriage. Gender & Society, 3, 187-216.
34.
Laner, M., & Ventrone, N. ( 1998). Egalitarian daters/traditionalist dates. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 468-477.
35.
Levy, F. ( 1998). The new dollars and dreams. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
36.
Manning, W., & Smock, P. ( 2002). First comes cohabitation and then comes marriage? A research note. Journal of Family Issues,23, 1065-1088.
37.
Martin, P.Y. ( 2004). Gender as a social institution. Social Forces, 82, 1249-1273.
38.
McDonald, G.W. ( 1980). Family power: The assessment of a decade of theory and research, 1970-1979. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 841-854.
39.
Miller, A., and Sassler,S. ( 2010). Stability and Change in the Division of Labor Among Cohabiting Couples. Sociological Forum, 25(4):677-701.
40.
Peplau, L.A. ( 1979). Power in dating relationships. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (pp. 121-137). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
41.
Potuchek, J. ( 1997). Who supports the family? Gender and breadwinning in dual-earner marriage. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
42.
Pyke, K.D. ( 1994). Women’s employment as a gift or burden? Marital power across marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Gender & Society, 8, 73-91.
43.
Reed, J.M. ( 2006). Not crossing the "extra line": How cohabitors with children view their unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1117-1131.
44.
Risman, B. ( 2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with action . Gender & Society, 18, 429-450.
45.
Rose, S., & Frieze, I.H. ( 1989). Young single’s scripts for a first date. Gender & Society, 3, 258-268.
46.
Ross, L., & Davis, A.C. ( 1996). Black-white college student attitudes and expectations in paying for dates. Sex Roles, 35, 43-56.
47.
Rubin, L. ( 1976). Worlds of pain: Life in the working class family. New York, NY: Basic Books.
48.
Rubin, L. ( 1994). Families on the fault line: America’s working class speaks about the family, the economy, race, and ethnicity. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
49.
Sanchez, L., Manning, W., & Smock, P. ( 1998). Sex-specialized or collaborative mate selection? Union transitions among cohabitors. Social Science Research, 27, 280-304.
50.
Sassler, S. ( 2004). The process of entering into cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 491-506.
51.
Sassler, S., & Cunningham, A. (2008). How cohabitors view childbearing . Sociological Perspectives, 51, 3-28.
52.
Sassler, S., & Goldscheider, F. (2004). Revisiting Jane Austen’s theory of marriage timing: Changes in union formation among American men in late 20th century. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 139-166.
53.
Sassler, S., & McNally, J. ( 2003). Cohabiting couples’ economic circumstances and union transitions: A re-examination using multiple imputation techniques. Social Science Research, 32, 553-578.
54.
Sayer, L.C. ( 2005). Gender, time, and inequality: Trends in women’s and men’s paid work, unpaid work, and free time. Social Forces, 84, 285-303.
55.
Smock, P., & Manning, W. ( 1997). Cohabiting partners’ economic circumstances and marriage. Demography, 34, 331-341.
56.
Smock, P., Manning, W., & Porter, M. ( 2005). Everything’s there except money: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680-696.
57.
Stacey, J. ( 1990). Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late twentieth century America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
58.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
Szinovacz, M.E. ( 1987). Family power. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 651-693). New York, NY : Plenum Press.
60.
Tichenor, V. ( 1999). Status and income as gendered resources: The case of marital power. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 638-651.
61.
Tichenor, V. ( 2005). Maintaining men’s dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles, 53, 191-205.
62.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF 1) and Summary File 3 (SF 3), Ohio. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov .
63.
Vogler, C. ( 2005). Cohabiting couples: Rethinking money in the household at the beginning of the 21st century. Sociological Review , 53, 1-29.
64.
Waite, L.J., & Gallagher, M. ( 2000). The case for marriage. New York, NY : Doubleday.
Winkler, A.E. ( 1997). Economic decision-making by cohabitors: Findings regarding income pooling. Applied Economics, 29, 1079-1090.
67.
Winkler, A.E., McBride, T.D., & Andrews, C. ( 2005). Wives who outearn their husbands: A transitory or persistent phenomenon for couples? Demography, 42, 523-535.
68.
Zvonkovic, A., Greaves, K., Schmiege, C., & Hall, L. ( 1996). The marital construction of gender through work and family decisions: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 91-100.
