The Commitment Inventory measures interpersonal commitment (dedication) and constraint commitment. Since it was first published, substantial revisions have been made, but there are no published data on the psychometric properties of the new version. Furthermore, little information is available on measuring commitment for unmarried couples. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Commitment Inventory in 320 premarital or cohabiting couples (N = 640). Dyadic confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the hypothesized factor structure of six constraint subscales and one dedication subscale fit the data well for both men and women. Internal consistency coefficients were within acceptable range for most subscales. Within-couple correlations as well as correlations between subscales and with relationship quality, negative communication, and religiosity are presented. Implications for future research are discussed.
Adams, J.M., & Jones, W.H. ( 1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1177-1196.
2.
Agnew, C.R., Van Lange, P.A.M., Rusbult, C.E., & Langston, C.A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939-954.
3.
Badr, H., & Acitelli, L.K. (2008). Attachment insecurity and perceptions of housework: Associations with marital well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 313-319.
4.
Cortina, J.M. ( 1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 56, 754-761.
5.
Crane, D.R., Allgood, S.M., Larson, J.H., & Griffin, W. ( 1990). Assessing marital quality with distressed and nondistressed couples: A comparison and equivalency table for three frequently used measures . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 87-93.
6.
Cronbach, L.J. ( 1951).Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests . Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
7.
Demoss, Y. ( 2004). Brief interventions and resiliency in couples. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering , 65(5), 2619.
8.
Ferguson, J. ( 1993). Factors contributing to satisfying long-term marriages. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering, 54(5), 2808.
9.
Gable, R.K., & Wolfe, M.B. ( 1993). Instrument development in the affective domain: Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings (2nd ed.). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic .
10.
Heubeck, B.G., & Neill, J.T. ( 2000). Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability of the mental health inventory for Australian adolescents. Psychological Reports, 87, 431-440.
11.
Helms, J., Henze, K.T., Sass, T.L., & Mifsud, V.A. ( 2006). Treating Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients as data in counseling research. The Counseling Psychologist , 34, 630-660.
12.
Hunsley, J., Best, M., Lefebvre, M., & Vito, D. ( 2001). The seven-item short form of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Further evidence for construct validity. American Journal of Family Therapy, 29, 325-335.
13.
Impett, E.A., Beals, K.P., & Peplau, L.A. ( 2002). Testing the investment model of relationship commitment and stability in a longitudinal study of married couples. Current Psychology, 20, 312-326.
14.
Johnson, M.P. ( 1973). Commitment: A conceptual structure and empirical application . Sociological Quarterly, 14, 395-406.
15.
Johnson, M.P., Caughlin, J.P., & Huston, T.L. ( 1999). Tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 160-177.
16.
Kline, G.H., Stanley, S.M., Markman, H.J., Olmos-Gallo, P.A., St. Peters, M., Whitton, S.W., . . . Prado, L.M. ( 2004). Timing is everything: Pre-engagement cohabitation and increased risk for poor marital outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 311-318.
17.
Kline, R.B. ( 1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling . New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. ( 2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY : Guilford Press.
19.
Kenny, D.A., & McCoach, D.B. ( 2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling , 10, 333-351.
20.
Lee, S., & Hershberger, S. (1990). A simple rule for generating equivalent models in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 313-334.
21.
Locke, H.J., & Wallace, K.M. ( 1959). Marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251-255.
22.
MacCallum, R.C., Wegener, D.T., Uchino, B.N., & Fabrigar, L.R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185-199.
23.
Markman, H.J., Whitton, S.W., Kline, G.H., Thompson, H., St. Peters, M., Stanley, S.M., . . . Cordova, A. ( 2004). Use of an empirically-based marriage education program by religious organizations: Results of a dissemination trial. Family Relations, 53, 504-512.
24.
Owen, J., Rhoades, G., Stanley, S.M., & Fincham, F.D. ( 2010). "Hooking up" among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653-663. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1
25.
Pistole, C.M., & Vocaturo, L.C. (1999). Attachment and commitment in college students’ romantic relationships. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 710-720.
26.
Rhoades, G.K., Stanley, S.M., & Markman, H.J. ( 2006). Pre-engagement cohabitation and gender asymmetry in marital commitment. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 553-560.
27.
Rhoades, G.K., Stanley, S.M., & Markman, H.J. ( 2009). Couples’ reasons for cohabitation: Associations with individual well-being and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 233-258.
28.
Rosenthal, R. ( 1995). Methodology. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 17-49). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Rusbult, C.E., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351-375.
30.
Schmitt, N. ( 1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350-353.
31.
Spanier, G.B. ( 1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
32.
Spiers, C.J. ( 1998). Commitment and stability in lesbian relationships. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering , 59(6), 3076.
33.
Stanley, S.M. ( 2002, July). What is it with men and commitment, anyway?Keynote address to the sixth Annual Smart Marriages Conference . Washington, D.C.
34.
Stanley, S.M., Amato, P.R., Johnson, C.A., & Markman, H.J. ( 2006). Premarital education, marital quality, and marital stability: Findings from a large, random, household survey. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 117-126.
35.
Stanley, S.M., & Markman, H.J. ( 1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595-608.
36.
Stanley, S.M., & Markman, H.J. ( 1997). Marriage in the 90s: A nationwide random phone survey . Denver, CO: PREP.
37.
Stanley, S.M., Markman, H.J., Prado, L.M., Olmos-Gallo, P.A., Tonelli, L., St. Peters, M., . . . Whitton, S. ( 2001). Community-based premarital prevention: Clergy and lay leaders on the front lines. Family Relations, 50, 67-76.
38.
Stanley, S.M., Markman, H.J., & Whitton, S.W. ( 2002). Communication, conflict, and commitment: Insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey. Family Process, 41, 659-675.
39.
Stanley, S.M., Whitton, S.W., & Markman, H.J. ( 2004). Maybe I do: Interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 496-519.
40.
Stanley, S.M., Whitton, S.W., Sadberry, S.L., Clements, M.L., & Markman, H.J. ( 2006). Sacrifice as a predictor of martial outcomes. Family Process, 45, 289-303.
41.
Whitton, S.W., Stanley, S.M., & Markman, H.J. ( 2006). If I help my partner, will it hurt me? Perceptions of sacrifice in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 64-91.
42.
Wieselquist, J.Rusbult, C.E., Agnew, C.R., & Foster, C.A. ( 1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 77, 942-966.
