Using data from the 1979 National Longitudinal Study of Youth, the author investigates the relationship between military service and the transition to the first intimate union. The author argues that active-duty military service promotes marriage over cohabitation. The results are consistent with this argument, showing that active-duty members of the military are much more likely to choose marriage over cohabitation compared to reserve-duty service members, veterans, and comparable civilians. These results are particularly strong for Black men, indicating a possible relationship between working in a largely race-neutral environment and the choice of first intimate union.
Bourg, M., & Segal, M. ( 1999). The impact of family supportive policies and practices on organizational commitment to the Army. Armed Forces & Society, 25, 633-652.
2.
Bumpass, L., & Lu, H. ( 2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29-41.
3.
Bumpass, L., Sweet, J., & Cherlin, A. ( 1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 913-927.
4.
Clarkberg, M. ( 1999). The price of partnering: The role of economic well-being in young adults’ first union experience. Social Forces , 77, 945-968.
5.
Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R., & Waite, L. ( 1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74, 609-632.
6.
Daula, T., Smith, D., & Nord, R. ( 1990). Inequality in the military: Fact or fiction? American Sociological Review, 55, 714-718.
7.
Firestone, J. ( 1987). Sex-appropriate roles: Comparing the attitudes of civilian and military youth. Population Research and Policy Review , 6, 275-296.
8.
Franke, V. ( 2001). Generation X and the military: A comparison of attitudes and values between West Point cadets and college students. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 29, 129-136.
9.
Gilroy, C., Phillips, R., & Blair, J. ( 1990). The All-Volunteer Army: Fifteen years later. Armed Forces and Society, 16, 329-350.
10.
Gorman, L., & Thomas, G. ( 1993). General intellectual achievement, enlistment intentions, and racial representativeness in the U.S. military. Armed Forces and Society, 19, 611-624.
11.
Huston, T., & Melz, H. ( 2004). The case for (promoting) marriage: The devil is in the details. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 943-958.
12.
Lundquist, J. ( 2004). When race makes no difference: Marriage and the military . Social Forces, 83, 731-757.
13.
Lundquist, J. ( 2006). The Black-White gap in marital dissolution among young adults: What can a counterfactual scenario tell us? Social Problems, 53, 421-441.
14.
Lundquist, J. ( 2008). Ethnic and gender satisfaction in the military: The effect of a meritocratic institution. American Sociological Review , 73, 477-496.
15.
Mangum, S., & Ball, D. ( 1987). Military skill training: Some evidence of transferability . Armed Forces and Society, 13, 425-441.
16.
Moskos, C., & Butler, J. ( 1996). All that we can be: Black leadership and racial integration the Army way. New York: Basic Books .
17.
Office of the Undersecretary of Defense. ( 2005). Population representation in the military services. Retrieved December 19, 2007, from http://www.dod.mil/prhome/poprep2002/index.htm
18.
Oppenheimer, V. ( 2003). Cohabitation and marriage during young men’s career-development process. Demography, 40, 127-149.
19.
Pettit, B., & Western, B. ( 2004). Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. American Sociological Review , 69, 151-169.
20.
Phillips, R., Andrisani, P., Daymont, T., & Gilroy, C. ( 1992). The economic returns to military service: Race-ethnic differences. Social Science Quarterly, 73, 340-359.
21.
Sassler, S., & Goldscheider, F. (2004). Revisiting Jane Austen’s theory of marriage timing: Changes in union formation among American men in the late 20th century. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 139-166.
22.
Sassler, S., & Schoen, R. ( 1999). The effects of attitudes and economic activity on marriage . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 147-159.
23.
Segal, D., & Segal, M. ( 2004). America’s military population. Population Bulletin, 59(4).
24.
Smock, P. ( 2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Reviews Sociology , 26, 1-20.
25.
Teachman, J. ( 2007). Race, military service, and marital timing: Evidence from the NLSY-79. Demography, 44, 389-404.
26.
Teachman, J., Call, V., & Segal, M. ( 1993). The selectivity of military enlistment. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 21, 287-309.
27.
Teachman, J., & Tedrow, L. ( 2007). Joining up: Did military service in the early All Volunteer Era affect subsequent civilian income? Social Science Research , 36, 1447-1474.
28.
Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1009-1037.
29.
Waite, L., & Gallagher, M. ( 2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Broadway Books.
30.
Xie, Y., Raymo, J., Goyette, K., & Thornton, A. ( 2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation . Demography, 40, 351-367.
