Although previous scholarship has examined the relationship between religious involvement and a wide range of family outcomes, the relationship between religion and extramarital sexual behavior remains understudied. The authors investigate how religious affiliation, participation, and biblical beliefs explain differences in self-reported marital infidelity. This study examines data from the 1991-2004 General Social Surveys and finds that religious factors are associated with the likelihood of marital infidelity. Both church attendance and biblical beliefs are associated with lower odds of self-reported infidelity. Additionally, the authors find substantial denominational variations in the odds of marital infidelity, particularly among those who strongly affiliate with their religious group.
Bartkowski, J.P. (1996). Beyond biblical literalism and inerrancy: Conservative Protestants and the hermeneutic interpretation of scripture. Sociology of Religion, 57, 259-272.
2.
Bartkowski, J.P. (2001). Remaking the godly marriage: Gender negotiation in evangelical families. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
3.
Boone, K.C. (1989). For the Bible tells them so: The discourse of Fundamentalism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
4.
Booth, A., Johnson, D.R., Branaman, A., & Sica, A. (1995). Belief and behavior: Does religion matter in today's marriage?Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 661-671.
5.
Burdette, A.M., Ellison, C.G., & Hill, T.D. (2005). Conservative Protestantism and tolerance toward homosexuals: An examination of potential mechanisms. Sociological Inquiry, 75, 177-196.
6.
Call, V.R.A., & Heaton, T.B. (1997). Religious influence on marital stability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 382-392.
7.
Choi, K.H., Catania, J.A., & Dolcini, M.M. (1994). Extramarital sex and HIV risk behavior among American adults: Results from the National AIDS Behavior Survey. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 2003 -2007.
8.
Cochran, J.K., & Beeghley, L. (1991). The influence of religion on attitudes toward nonmarital sexuality: A preliminary assessment of reference group theory. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 20, 45-62.
9.
Cochran, J.K., Chamlin, M.B., Beeghley, L., & Fenwick, M. (2004). Religion, religiosity, and nonmarital sexual conduct: An application of reference group theory. Sociological Inquiry , 74, 102-127.
10.
Collins, R. (2005). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Curtis, K.T., & Ellison, C.G. (2002). Religious heterogamy and marital conflict: Findings from the National Survey of Families and Households. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 551-576.
12.
Dobson, J. (2004). Marriage under fire: Why we must win this battle . Sisters, OR: Multnomah Publishers .
13.
Davis, J.A., & Smith, T.A. (1996). GSS (General Social Survey). Norc ed. Chicago: NORC. Ellison, C.G., & Bartkowski , J.P. (2002). Conservative Protestantism and the division of household labor among married couples. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 950-985.
14.
Ellison, C.G., Bartkowski, J.P., & Anderson, K.L. (1999). Are there religious variations in domestic violence?Journal of Family Issues, 20, 87-113.
15.
Ellison, C.G., & Sherkat, D.E. (1993). Obedience and autonomy: Religion and parental values reconsidered. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion , 32, 313-329.
16.
Feld, S.L., Rosier, K.B., & Manning, A. (2002). Christian right as civil right: Covenant marriage and a kinder, gentler, moral conservatism. Review of Religious Research, 44, 173-183.
17.
Finlay, B., & Walther, C.S. (2003). The relation of religious affiliation, service attendance, and other factors to homophobic attitudes among university students . Review of Religious Research, 44, 370-393.
18.
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class?: The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Gallagher, S.K. (2003). Evangelical identity and gendered family life . New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
20.
Gay, D.A., Ellison, C.G., & Powers, D.A. (1996). In search of denominational subcultures: Religious affiliation and pro-family issues revisited. Review of Religious Research, 38, 3-17.
21.
Heaton, T.B. (1988). Four C's of the Mormon family: Chastity, conjugality, children, and chauvinism. In D. L. Thomas (Ed.), The religion-family connection: Social science perspectives (pp. 107-124). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Religious Studies Center.
22.
Heaton, T.B., Goodman, K.L., & Holman, T.L. (1994). In search of a peculiar people: Are Mormon families really different? In M. Cornwall, T. B. Heaton, & L. A. Young (Eds.), Contemporary Mormonism: Social science perspectives (pp. 87-116). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
23.
Heaton, T.B., & Pratt, E.L. (1990). The effects of religious homogamy on marital satisfaction and stability. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 191-207.
24.
Hertel, B., & Hughes, M. (1987). Religious affiliation, attendance, and support for “profamily” issues in the United States. Social Forces, 65, 858-882.
25.
Hill, T.D., Moulton, B.E., & Burdette, A.M. (2004). Conservative Protestantism and attitudes toward homosexuality: Does political orientation mediate this relationship?Sociological Focus, 37, 59-70.
26.
Hoffmann, J.P., & Miller, A.S. (1997). Social and political attitudes among religious groups: Convergence and divergence over time. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 52-70.
27.
Idler, E.L., Musick, M.A., Ellison C. G., George, L.K., Krause, N., Levin, J.S., et al. (2003). NIA/Fetzer measure of religiousness and spirituality: Conceptual background and findings from the 1998 General Social Survey. Research on Aging, 25, 327-366.
28.
Lawler, E.J. (1992). Affective attachments to nested groups: A choice process theory. American Sociological Review, 57, 327-339.
29.
Lehrer, E.L., & Chiswick, C.U. (1993). Religion as a determinant of marital stability. Demography, 30, 385-404.
30.
Leigh, B.C., Temple, M.T., & Trocki, K.F. (1993). The sexual behavior of US adults: Results from a national survey. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 1400-1408.
31.
Levin, J.S., Taylor, R.J., & Chatters, L.M. (1995). A multidimensional measure of religious involvement for African Americans. Sociological Quarterly, 36, 157-173.
32.
Lupfer, M.B., de Paola, S.J., Brock, K.F., & Clement, L. (1994). Making secular and religious attributions: The availability hypothesis revisited. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33, 162-171.
33.
Mahoney, A.M., Pargament, K.I., Jewell, T., Swank, A.B., Scott, E., Emery, E., et al. (1999). Marriage and the spiritual realm: The role of proximal and distal religious constructs in marital functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 321-328.
34.
Myers, S.M. (1996). An interactive model of religiosity inheritance: The importance of family context. American Sociological Review , 61, 858-866.
35.
Pargament, K.I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford.
36.
Pargament, K.I., Magyar, G.M., Benore, E., & Mahoney, A.M. (2005). Sacrilege: A study of sacred loss and desecration and their implications for health and well-being in a community sample. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 59-78.
37.
Pearce, L.D., & Axinn, W.G. (1998). The impact of family religious life on the quality of mother-child relations. American Sociological Review, 63, 810-828.
38.
Petersen, L.R., & Donnenwerth, G.V. (1997). Secularization and the influence of religion on beliefs about premarital sex. Social Forces, 75, 1071-1089.
39.
Regnerus, M.D., & Smith, C.S. (2005). Selection effects in studies of religious influence . Review of Religious Research, 47, 23-50.
40.
Roof, W., & McKinney, W. (1987). American mainline religion. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
41.
Rye, M.S., Pargament, K.I., Pan, W., Yingling, D.W., Shogren, K.A., & Ito, M. (2005). Can group interventions facilitate forgiveness of an ex-spouse? A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 880-892.
42.
Scanzoni, J., & Arnett, C. (1987). Enlarging the understanding of marital commitment via religious devoutness, gender role preferences, and locus of marital control . Journal of Family Issues, 8, 136-156.
43.
Shepherd, G., & Shepherd, G. (1984). A kingdom transformed: Themes in the development of Mormonism. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
44.
Sherkat, D. (1998). Counterculture or continuity? Examining competing influences on baby boomers' religious orientations and participation. Social Forces, 76, 1087-1114.
45.
Sherkat, D. (2004). Religious assortative marriage in the late 20th century: Trends and cohort differences, 1973—1998. Social Science Research, 33, 606-626.
46.
Sherkat, D.E., & Ellison, C.G. (1997). The cognitive structure of a moral crusade: Conservative Protestantism and opposition to pornography. Social Forces , 75, 957-980.
47.
Sherkat, D.E., & Wilson, J. (1995). Preferences, constraints, and choices in religious markets: An examination of religious switching and apostasy. Social Forces, 73, 993-1026.
48.
Smith, T.W. (1994). Attitudes toward sexual permissiveness: Trends, correlates, and behavioral connections. In A. S. Rossi (Ed.), Sexuality across the life course (pp. 63-97). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
Stark, R., & Glock, C. (1968). American piety. Berkeley: University of California Press.
50.
Steensland, B., Park, J.Z., Regnerus, M.D., Robinson, L.D., Wilcox, W.B., & Woodberry, R.D. (2000). The measure of American religion: Towards improving the state of the art. Social Forces , 79, 291-318.
51.
Stolzenberg, R.M., Blair-Loy, M., & Waite, L.J. (1995). Religious participation over the early life course: Age and family life cycle effects on church membership. American Sociological Review, 60, 84-103.
52.
Thornton, A., Axinn, W.G., & Hill, D.H. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 628-651.
53.
Treas, J., & Giesen, D. (2000). Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 48-60.
54.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M.A. (1996). Religion and marital dependency. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35, 30-40.
