In this article, we share our challenges and positive experiences of using feminist pedagogy to teach an undergraduate course on gender development. We use a developmental contextual, feminist perspective to address issues related to (a) internalized sexism, (b) contrasts in student's religious beliefs and sexism, (c) students' developmental level, and (d) teaching intersectionality. In response to the challenges, we offer practical applications of integrating feminist pedagogy in the classroom. Finally, we delineate the ways in which our application of feminist pedagogy has benefited us in our growth and offer suggestions for future research.
Allen, K.R. (1995). Opening the classroom closet: Sexual orientation and self-disclosure. Family Relations, 44, 136-141.
2.
Allen, K.R., Floyd-Thomas, S.M., & Gillman, L. (2001). Teaching to transform: From volatility to solidarity in an interdisciplinary family studies classroom. Family Relations , 50, 317-325.
3.
Baber, K.M., & Murray, C.I. (2001). A postmodern feminist approach to teaching human sexuality. Family Relations, 50, 23-33.
4.
Beal, C.R. (1994). Boys and girls: The development of gender roles . New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Blaisure, K.R., & Koivunen, J.M. (2003). Family science faculty members' experiences with teaching from a feminist perspective. Family Relations, 52, 22-32.
6.
Collins, P.H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
7.
Collins, P.H. (1998). Toward a new vision: Race, class, and gender as categories of analysis and connection. In D. L. Anselmi & A. L. Law (Eds.), Questions of gender: Perspectives and paradoxes (pp. 35-45). Boston: McGraw-Hill .
8.
Coltrane, S. (1998). Regulating families and gender. In Gender and families (pp. 132-159). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
9.
Culley, M. (1985). Anger and authority in the introductory women's studies classroom. In M. Culley & C. Portuges (Eds.), Gendered subjects: The dynamics of feminist teaching (pp. 209-217). Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
10.
DeLamater, J.D., & Hyde, J.S. (1990). Essentialism vs. social constructionism in the study of human sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 10-18.
11.
Dube, K. (2004). What feminism means to today's undergraduates . Chronicle of Higher Education, 50, B5.
12.
Ford, D.H., & Lerner, R.M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Goodman, D.J. (2001). Promoting diversity and social justice: Educating people from privileged groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon.
15.
hooks, b. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black . Cambridge, MA: South End.
16.
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
17.
Humble, A.M., & Morgaine, C.A. (2002). Placing feminist education within the three paradigms of knowledge and action. Family Relations, 51, 199-205.
18.
Kuh, G. ( 2006, March 6). Student success in college: Puzzle, pipeline or pathway? Paper presented at Student Success Workshop, Texas Tech University, Lubbock.
19.
Magnusson, D., & Cairns, R.B. (1996). Developmental science: Toward a unified framework . In R. B. Cairns, G. H. Elder, Jr., & E. J. Costello (Eds.), Developmental science (pp. 7-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Marks, S.R. (1995). The art of professing and holding back in a course on gender. Family Relations, 44, 142-148.
21.
Morgaine, C.A. (1994). Enlightenment for emancipation: A critical theory of self-formation. Family Relations, 43, 325-335.
22.
Moulds, C.M. (2004). Feminist approaches to social justice: Activism and resistance in the women's studies classroom. In S. Weir & C. Faulkner (Eds.), Voices of a new generation: A feminist anthology (pp. 108-120). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
Nelson, C. (1999). On the persistence of unicorns: The trade-off between content and critical thinking revisited. In B. Pescosolido & R. Amizade (Eds.), The social worlds of higher education (pp. 168-184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
24.
Prouty, A.M., & Bermúdez, J.M. (1999). Experiencing multiconsciousness: A feminist model for therapy. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy , 11, 19-39.
25.
Renzetti, C.M., & Curran, D.J. (2003). Women, men, and society (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
26.
Sharp, E.A., Walker, M.B., Sorelle-Miner, D., & Bermudez, J.M. (2006, November). The glass ceiling is kind of a bummer: College women's reflections of a gender development course . Roundtable session presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Minneapolis, MN.
27.
Tatum, B.D. (1992). Talking about race, learning about racism: The application of racial identity development theory in the classroom. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 1-24.
28.
Thompson, L. (1992). Feminist methodology for family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 3-18.
29.
Valsiner, J. (1994). Culture and human development: A co-constructionist perspective. In P. van Geert, L.P. Mos, & W. J. Baker (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 247-297). New York: Plenum .
30.
Walker, A.J. (1993). Teaching about race, gender, and class diversity in United States families. Family Relations, 42, 342-350.
31.
Walker, A.J. (1996). Couples watching television: Gender, power, and the remote control. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 813-824.
