This study examines the influence of social context on the home environment for children aged0 to 14years, testing for differences between Cubans (n = 47), Mexicans(n = 240), Mexican Americans (n = 415), and Puerto Ricans (n = 162). Hierarchical linear models showed significant cultural and acculturation effects on the trajectories of cognitive stimulation and emotional support in the home environment. The home environment of families in which the mother reported more U.S. ancestry showed significant declines in cognitive stimulation, whereas families in which the mother was more likely to use Spanish during the study interview showed significant increases in cognitive stimulation as the child aged. In contrast, no significant acculturation effects were found for the trajectories of emotional support in the home.
Bradley, R. H. (2000). Deceived by omission: The difficulty of matching measurement and theory when assessing the home environment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 307-314.
2.
Bradley, R. H., Corwyn, R. F., Burchinal, M., McAdoo, H. P., & Garcia Coll, C. (2001). The home environments of children in the United States part II: Relations with behavioral development through age thirteen. Child Development, 72, 1868-1886.
3.
Bradley, R. H., Corwyn, R. F., McAdoo, H. P., & Garcia Coll, C. (2001). The home environments of children in the United States part I: Variations by age, ethnicity, and poverty status. Child Development, 72, 1844-1867.
4.
Caldwell, B. M., & Bradley, R. H. (1984). Home observation for measurement of the environment. Little Rock: University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Center for Child Development and Education.
5.
Center for Human Resource Research. (1998). 1996 child and young adult data: Users guide. Columbus: The Ohio State University, Center for Human Resource Research User Services.
6.
Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (1998). The Latino/a condition: A critical reader. New York: New York University Press.
7.
Garcia Coll, C., Lamberty, G., Jenkins, R., McAdoo, H. P., Crnic, K., Wasik, B. H., et al. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67, 1891-1914.
8.
Gutierrez, L., Yeakley, A., & Ortega, R. (2000). Educating students for social work with Latinos: Issues for the new millennium. Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 541-557.
9.
Leon, A. M., & Dzieglielewski, S. F. (1999). The psychological impact of migration: Practice considerations in working with Hispanic women. Journal of Social Work Practice, 13, 69-82.
10.
McLoyd, V. C., Cauce, A. M., Takeuchi, D. T., & Wilson, L. (2000). Marital processes and parental socialization in families of color: A decade review of research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1070-1093.
11.
Mehta, P. D., & West, S. G. (2000). Putting the individual back into individual growth curves. Psychological Methods, 5, 23-43.
12.
Murry, V. M., Brown, P. A., Brody, G. H., Cutrona, C. E., & Simons, R. L. (2001). Racial discrimination as a moderator of the links among stress, maternal psychological functioning, and family relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 915-926.
13.
Padilla, A. M. (1998). Hispanic psychology: A 25-year retrospective look. In W. J. Lonner, D. L. Dinnel, D. K. Forgays, & S. A. Hayes (Eds.), Merging past, present, and future in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 73-81). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
14.
Parcel, T. L., & Dufur, M. J. (2001). Capital at home and at school: Effects on child social adjustment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 32-47.
15.
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. T. (2001). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
16.
Rogler, L. H., Cortes, D. E., & Malgady, R. G. (1991). Acculturation and mental health status among Hispanics: Convergence and new directions for research. American Psychologist, 46, 585-597.
17.
Romo, H. (1984). The Mexican origin population’s differing perceptions of their children’s schooling. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 635-650.
18.
Rumberger, R. W., & Larsen, K. A. (1998). Toward explaining differences in educational achievement among Mexican American language minority students. Sociology of Education, 71, 68-92.
19.
Santisteban, D. A., & Mitrani, V. B. (2003). The influence of acculturation processes on the family. In K. M. Chun, P. B. Organista, & G. Marin (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 121-135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
Solis, J. (1995). The status of Latino children and youth: Challenges and prospects. In R. E. Zambrana (Ed.), Understanding Latino families: Scholarship, policy and practice (pp. 62-81). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Therrien, M., & Ramirez, R. R. (2000). The Hispanic population in the United States: March 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
22.
Umana-Taylor, A. J., & Fine, M. A. (2001). Methodological implications of grouping Latino adolescents into one collective ethnic group. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 23, 347-362.
23.
Zagorsky, J. L., & White, L. (1999). The National Longitudinal Surveys: NLSY79 user’s guide. Columbus: The Ohio State University, Center for Human Resource Research.
24.
Zambrana, R. E. (1995). Understanding Latino families: Scholarship, policy and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Zambrana, R. E., & Dorrington, C. (1998). Economic and social vulnerability of Latino children and families by subgroup: Implications for child welfare. Child Welfare, 77, 5-27.
26.
Zsembik, B. A., & Llanes, D. (1996). Generational differences in educational attainment among Mexican Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 363-374.
