Allen, K. R. (2000). A conscious and inclusive family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 4-17.
2.
Du Bois, B. (1983). Passionate scholarship: Notes on values, knowing and method in feminist social science. In G. Bowles& R. D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women’s studies (pp. 105-116). Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
3.
Elam, D., & Wiegman, R. (Eds.). (1995). Feminism beside itself. New York: Routledge.
4.
Floyd-Thomas, S. M., Gillman, L., & Allen, K. R. (2002). Interdisciplinarity as self and subject: Metaphor and transformation. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 20, 1-26.
5.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Freedman, E. B. (2002). No turning back: The history of feminism and the future of women. New York: Ballantine.
7.
Harding, S. (1987). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism & methodology (pp. 1-14). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
8.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9.
Hawking, S. (1996). A brief history of time (2nd ed.). New York: Bantam.
10.
Patai, D., & Koertge, N. (1994). Professing feminism: Cautionary tales from the strange world of women’s studies. New York: Basic Books.
11.
Stacey, J. (2000). Is academic feminism an oxymoron? In J. A. Howard & C. Allen (Eds.), Feminisms at a millennium (pp. 187-192). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1993). Breaking out again: Feminist ontology and epistemology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
13.
Yllo, K., & Bograd, M. (Eds.). (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
