In this article, the author uses data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth to examine the impact of childhood living arrangements on the characteristics of marriages formed by womenbetween 1970and 1989.The focus is on sociodemographic characteristics of marriage that may be taken to indicate a heightened risk of marital stress or marital disruption. With the exception of parental death,it is foundthat any time spent in an alternative family increases the likelihood that a woman forms a union with characteristics that decrease the like-lihood of a successful union (i.e., women who experience parental divorce are more likely to cohabit before marriage). The author provides several theoretical alternatives for explaining the effects of childhood living arrangements. Two alternatives, selectivity and socialization, appear to be most consistent with the data.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amato, P. (1988). Parental divorce and attitudes toward marriage and family life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 453-461.
2.
Amato, P. (1996). Explaining the intergenerational transmission of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 628-640.
3.
Amato, P., & Booth, A. (1991). Consequences of parental divorce and marital unhappiness for adult well-being. Social Forces, 69, 905-914.
4.
Amato, P., & Keith, B. (1991). Separation from a parent during childhood and adult socioeconomic attainment. Social Forces, 70, 187-206.
5.
An, C., Haveman, R., & Wolfe, B. (1993). Teen out-of-wedlock births and welfare receipt: The role of childhood events and economic circumstances. Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 195-208.
6.
Astone, N., & McLanahan, S. (1991). Family structure, parental practices, and high school completion. American Sociological Review, 56, 309-320.
7.
Avery, R., Goldscheider, F., & Speare, A. (1992). Feathered nest/gilded cage: The effects of parental resources on young adults’ leaving home. Demography, 29, 375-388.
8.
Axinn, W., & Thornton, A. (1992). The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence. Demography, 29, 357-374.
9.
Axinn, W., & Thornton, A. (1993). Mothers, children, and cohabitation: The intergenerational effects of attitudes and behavior. American Sociological Review, 58, 233-246.
10.
Axinn, W., & Thornton, A. (1996). The influence of parents’ marital dissolutions on children’s attitudes toward family formation. Demography, 33, 66-81.
11.
Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Biblarz, T., & Gottainer, G. (2000).Family structureand children’s success: A comparison of widowed and divorced single mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 533-548.
13.
Biblarz, T., & Raftery, A. (1999). Family structure, educational attainment, and socioeconomic success: Rethinking the “pathology of matriarchy.” American Journal of Sociology, 105, 321-365.
14.
Biblarz, T., Raftery, A., & Bucur, A. (1997). Family structure and social mobility. Social Forces, 75, 1319-1339.
15.
Billy, J. O. G., Brewster, K. L., & Grady, W. R. (1994). Contextual effects on the sexual behavior of adolescent women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 387-404.
16.
Brewster, K. L. (1994). Race differences in sexual activity among adolescent women: The role of neighborhood characteristics. American Sociological Review, 59, 408-424.
17.
Bronars,S., & Grogger, J. (1994). The economic consequences of unwed motherhood: Using twin births as a natural experiment. American Economic Review, 84, 1141-1156.
18.
Bulcroft, R., & Bulcroft, K. (1993). Race differences in attitudinal and motivational factors in the decision to marry. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 338-355.
19.
Bumpass, L., Martin,T., & Sweet, J. (1991).The impact of family backgroundand early marital factors on marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 22-42.
20.
Bumpass, L., & Sweet, J. (1972). Differentials in marital instability: 1970. American Sociological Review, 37, 754-766.
21.
Bumpass, L., Sweet, J., & Cherlin, A. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 913-927.
22.
Cherlin, A., Furstenberg, F., Lindsay Chase-Lansdale, P., Kiernan, K., Robins, P., Morrison, D., et al. (1991). Longitudinal studies of effects of divorce on children in Great Britain and the United States. Science, 252, 1386-1389.
23.
Cherlin, A., Kiernan, K., & Chase-Lansdale, P. (1995). Parental divorce in childhood and demographic outcomes in young adulthood. Demography, 32, 299-318.
24.
Cherlin, A., Lindsay Chase-Lansdale, P., & McRae, C. (1998). Effects of parental divorce on mental health throughout the life course. American Sociological Review, 63, 239-249.
25.
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
26.
Conger, R., & Elder, G. (1994). Families in troubled times: Adapting to change in rural America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
27.
Conger, R., Elder, G., Lorenz, F., Conger, K., Simons, R., Whitbeck, L., et al. (1990). Linking economichardshipto marital quality and instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 643-656.
28.
Conger, R., Rueter, M., & Elder, G. (1999). Couple resilience to economic pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 54-71.
29.
Dalaker, J., & Proctor, B. (2000). Poverty in the United States, 1999 (Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 210). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
30.
DaVanzo, J., & Rahman, M. (1993). American families: Trends and correlates. Population Index, 59, 350-386.
31.
DeMaris, A., & MacDonald, W. (1993). Premarital cohabitation and marital instability: A test of the unconventionality hypothesis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 399-407.
32.
DeMaris, A., & Rao, V. (1992). Premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital instability in the United States: A reassessment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 178-190.
33.
Diekmann, A., & Engelhardt, H. (1999). Social inheritance of divorce in postwar Germany. American Sociological Review, 64, 783-792.
34.
England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender: A social, economic, and demographic view. New York: Aldine.
35.
Faust, K., & McKibben, J. (1999). Marital dissolution: Divorce, separation, annulment, and widowhood. In M. Sussman, S. Steinmetz, & G. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (2nd ed., pp. 475-499). New York: Plenum.
36.
Fields, J., & Smith, K. (1998). Poverty, family structure, and child well being: Indicators from the SIPP (Population Division Working Paper Series, No. 23). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
37.
Fields, J., Smith, K., Bass, L., & Lugaila, T. (2001). A child’s day: Home, school, and play (selected indicators of child well being) (Current Population Reports, P70-68).Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
38.
Fossett, M., & Kiecolt, J. (1993). Mate availability and family structure among African Americansin U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 288-302.
39.
Furstenberg, F., & Cherlin, A. (1991). Divided families. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Goldscheider, F., & Goldscheider, C. (1998). The effects of childhood family structure on leaving and returning home. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 745-756.
41.
Goldscheider, F., & Waite, L. (1986). Sex differences in the entry into marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 91-102.
42.
Gottschalk, P., & Danziger, S. (1993). Family structure, family size, and family income: Accounting for changes in the economic well-being of children, 1968-1986. In S. Danziger & P. Gottschalk (Eds.), Uneven tides: Rising inequality in America (pp. 167-193). New York: Russell Sage.
43.
Hagan, J., MacMillan, R., & Wheaton, B. (1996). New kid in town: Social capital and the life course effects of family migration on children. American Sociological Review, 61, 368-385.
44.
Hao, L. (1996). Family structure, private transfers, and the economic well being of families with children. Social Forces, 75, 269-292.
45.
Hauser, R., Brown, B., & Prosser, W. (1997). Indicators of children’s well being. New York: Russell Sage.
46.
Hayward, M., Grady, W., & Billy, J. (1992). The influence of socioeconomic status on adolescent pregnancy. Social Science Quarterly, 73, 750-772.
47.
Hetherington, E., Camara, K., & Featherman, D. (1983). Achievement and intellectual functioning in children in one parent households. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 205-284). San Francisco: Freeman.
48.
Hetheringon,E., Cox, M., & Cox, R. (1982).Effects of divorce on parents and children.In M. Lamb (Ed.), Nontraditional families: Parenting and child development (pp. 233-287). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
Hogan, D., & Kitagawa, E. (1985). The impact of social status, family structure, and neighborhood on the fertility of Black adolescents. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 825-855.
50.
Jockin, V., McGue, M., & Lykken, D. (1996). Personality and divorce: A genetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 82-99.
51.
Keith, V., & Finlay, B. (1988). The impact of parental divorce on children’s educational attainment, marital timing, and likelihood of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 797-809.
52.
Larson,J., & Holman,T. (1994).Premarital predictorsof marital quality and stability. Family Relations, 43, 228-237.
53.
Levy, F. (1995). Income and income inequality. In R. Farley (Ed.), State of the union: America in the 1990s. Volume 2: Social trends (pp. 1-57). New York: Russell Sage.
54.
Li, J., & Wojtkiewicz, R. (1992).A new look at the effects of family structure on status attainment. Social Science Quarterly, 73, 581-595.
55.
Lichter, D., LeClere, F., & McLaughlin, D. (1991). Local marriage markets and the marital behavior of Black and White women. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 843-867.
56.
Lichter, D., McLaughlin, D., Kephart, G., & Landry, D. (1992). Race and the retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriage able men? American Sociological Review, 57, 781-799.
57.
Lloyd, K., & South, S. (1996). Contextual influences on young men’s transition to first marriage. Social Forces, 74, 1097-1119.
58.
Manning, W., & Smock, P. (1995). Why marry? Race and the transition to marriage among cohabitors. Demography, 32, 509-520.
59.
Mare, R., & Winship, C. (1991). Socioeconomic change and the decline of marriage for Blacks and Whites. In C. Jencks & P. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 175-202). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
60.
Matsueda, R., & Heimer, K. (1987). Race, family structure and delinguency: A test of differential association and social control theories. American Sociological Review, 52, 826-840.
61.
McLanahan, S., & Bumpass, L. (1988). Inter generational consequences of family disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 130-152.
62.
McLanahan, S., & Casper, L. (1995). Growing diversity and inequality in the American family. In R. Farley (Ed.), State of the union: America in the 1990s. Volume 2: Social trends (pp. 1-45). New York: Russell Sage.
63.
McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
National Center for Health Statistics. (1998). Sample design, sampling weights, imputation, and variance estimation in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
65.
Oppenheimer, V. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 563-591.
66.
Powell, M., & Parcel, T. (1997). Effects of family structure on the earnings attainment process: Differences by gender. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 419-433.
67.
Qian, Z., & Preston, S. (1993). Changes in American marriage, 1972-1987:Availability conditions and forces of attraction by age and education. American Sociological Review, 58, 482-495.
68.
Rutter, M. (1983). Stress, coping, and development: Some issues and some questions. In M. Rutter (Ed.), Stress, coping, and development in children (pp. 1-42). New York: McGraw-Hill.
69.
Sandefur, G., & Wells, T. (1999). Does family structure really influence educational attainment? Social Science Research, 28, 331-357.
70.
Schoen, R. (1992).First union and the stability of first marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 281-284.
71.
South, S. (1999). Historical changes and life course variations in the determinants of premarital childbearing. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 752-763.
72.
South,S., Crowder, K., & Trent,K. (1998). Children’s residential mobility and neighborhood environment following parental divorce and remarriage. Social Forces, 77, 667-693.
73.
South, S., & Lloyd, K. (1992). Marriage opportunities and family formation: Further implications of imbalanced sex ratios. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 440-451.
74.
South, S., & Spitze, G. (1986). Determinants of divorce over the marital life course. American Sociological Review, 51, 583-590.
75.
Teachman, J. (1983). Early marriage, premarital fertility, and marital dissolution. Journal of Family Issues, 4, 105-126.
76.
Teachman, J, Polonko, K., & Leigh, G. (1987). Marital timing: Race and sex comparisons. Social Forces, 66, 239-268.
77.
Teachman, J., Tedrow, L., & Crowder, K. (2000). The changing demography of America’s families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1234-1246.
78.
Thomson, E., & Colella, U. (1992). Cohabitation and marital stability: Quality or commitment? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 259-267.
79.
Thomson, E., Hanson, T., & McLanahan, S. (1994). Family structure and child well being: Economic resources versus parental behaviors. Social Forces, 73, 221-242.
80.
Thomson, E., McLanahan, S., & Braun-Curtin, R. (1992). Family structure, gender and parental socialization. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 368-378.
81.
Thornton, A. (1985). Changing attitudes toward separation and divorce: Causes and consequences. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 856-872.
82.
Thornton, A. (1991). Influence of the marital history of parents on the marital and cohabitational experiences of children. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 868-894.
83.
Thornton, A., Axinn, W., & Teachman, J. (1995). The influence of school enrollment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60, 762-774.
84.
Thornton, A., & Camburn, D. (1987). The influence of the family on premarital sexual attitudes and behavior. Demography, 24, 323-340.
85.
Trent, K., & South, S. (1992). Sociodemographic status, parental background, childhood family structure, and attitudes toward family formation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 427-439.
86.
Tzeng,M. (1992).The effects of socioeconomic heterogomy and change son marital dissolution for first marriages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 606-619.
87.
Waite, L. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32, 483-508.
88.
Waite, L., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Doubleday.
89.
Wallerstein, J., & Blakeslee, S. (1989). Second chances: Men, women, and children a decade after divorce. New York: Ticknor and Fields.
90.
White, L. (1990). Determinants of divorce: A review of research in the eighties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 904-912.
91.
Wojtkiewicz, R. (1993).Simplicity and complexity in the effects of parental structure on high school graduation. Demography, 30, 701-718.
92.
Wolfe, B., Haveman, R., Ginther, D., & An, C. (1996). The “window problem” in studies of children’s attainments: A methodological exploration. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 970-982.
93.
Wolfinger, N. (1999). Trends in the intergenerational transmission of divorce. Demography, 36, 415-420.
94.
Wolfinger, N. (2000). Beyond the intergenerational transmission of divorce: Do people replicate the pattern of marital instability they grew up with? Journal of Family Issues, 21, 1061-1086.
95.
Wu, L. (1996). Effects of family instability, income, and income instability on the risk of premarital birth. American Sociological Review, 61, 386-406.
96.
Wu, L., & Martinson, B. (1993). Family structure and the risk of a premarital birth. American Sociological Review, 58, 210-232.
