This article employs event-history analysis of couple-level data from two waves of the National Survey of Families and Households to examine the effects of spouses’ perceptions of shared time and marital quality and stability on subsequent odds of marital dissolution. Of central importance in the analysis is the role that gender plays, because empirical evidence documents significant gender variation in spouses’ expectations, perceptions, and experience of marriage. When husbands provide the more negative evaluations of marital quality, the couple are more likely to dissolve their marriage; but when more concrete, proximate measures of marital stability are considered, wives’ more negative reports are better predictors of subsequent divorce. The analysis provides a contribution to divorce research by modeling the effects of couple-level, social-psychological dynamics and by highlighting the importance of recognizing the multiple, often conflicting realities of the emotional content of marriage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data (Sage Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 46). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 612-624.
3.
Aries, E. J., & Johnson, F. L. (1983). Close friendship in adulthood: Conversational content between same-sex friends. Sex-Roles, 9, 1183-1196.
4.
Attridge, M., & Berscheid, E. (1994). Entitlement in romantic relationships in the United States: A social-exchange perspective. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships (pp. 117-147). New York: Plenum.
5.
Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Berger, J., Zelditch, M. A., Anderson, B., & Cohen, B. P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 119-246). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7.
Berk, S. F. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.
8.
Bernard, J. (1972). The future of marriage. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Blair, S. L. (1993). Employment, family, and perceptions of marital quality among husbands and wives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 14, 189-212.
10.
Blair, S. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1992). Wives’perceptions of fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 570-581.
11.
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, sex. New York: Morrow.
12.
Booth, A., Johnson, D., White, L. K., & Edwards, J. H. (1984). Women, outside employment and marital instability. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 567-583.
13.
Booth, A., Johnson, D., White, L. K., & Edwards, J. H. (1985). Predicting divorce and permanent separation. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 331-346.
14.
Booth, A., Johnson, D., White, L. K., & Edwards, J. H. (1986). Divorce and marital instability over the life course. Journal of Family Issues, 7, 421-442.
15.
Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Dempsey, K. (1997). Women’s perceptions of fairness and the persistence of an unequal division of housework. Family Matters, 48, 15-19.
17.
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
18.
England, P. (1992). Comparable worth: Theories and evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
19.
England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment and gender: A social, economic and demographic view. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
20.
Fischer, C. S., & Oliker, S. J. (1983). A research note on friendship, gender, and the life cycle. Social Forces, 62, 124-133.
21.
Gager, C. T. (1998). The role of valued outcomes, justifications, and comparison referents in perceptions of fairness among dual-earner couples. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 622-648.
22.
Gager, C.T., & Marini, M. M. (1996, May). Distributive justice in the household: Acomparison of alternative theoretical models. Paper presented at the Population Association of America Meetings, New Orleans, LA.
23.
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
Glenn, E. N. (1987). Gender and the family. In B. Hess & M. M. Ferree (Eds.), Analyzing gender: A handbook of social science research (pp. 321-362). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Goldin, C. (1990). Understanding the gender gap: An economic history of American women. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Greenstein, T. N. (1985). Occupations and divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 347-357.
28.
Greenstein, T. N. (1990). Marital disruption and the employment of married women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 657-676.
29.
Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Gender ideology and perceptions of fairness in the division of household labor. Social Forces, 74, 1029-1042.
30.
Hegtvedt, K. S., & Markovsky, B. (1995). Justice and injustice. In K. Cook, G. Fine, & J. S.House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives in social psychology (pp. 257-280). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
Hill, M. S. (1988). Marital stability and spouses’ shared time: A multidisciplinary hypothesis. Journal of Family Issues, 9, 427-451.
32.
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Basic Books.
33.
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: As elementary forms. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
34.
Huber, J., & Spitze, G. (1980). Considering divorce: An expansion of Becker’s theory of marital instability. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 75-89.
35.
Jacobs, J. (1989). Revolving doors: Sex segregation and women’s careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice. American Sociological Review, 45, 3-32.
37.
Kingston, P. W., & Nock, S. L. (1987). Time together among dual-earner couples. American Sociological Review, 52, 391-400.
38.
Kitson, G. (1992). Portrait of divorce. New York: Guilford.
39.
Lennon, M. C., & Rosenfield, S. (1994). Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 506-531.
40.
Levinger, G. (1982). A social exchange view on the dissolution of pair relationships. In F. I. Nye (Ed.), Family relationships: Rewards and costs (pp. 97-122). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41.
Levinger, G, & Moles, O. (1979). Divorce and separation: Context, causes, and consequences. New York: Basic Books.
42.
Major, B. (1993). Gender, entitlement and the distribution of family labor. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 141-159.
43.
Marini, M. M. (1990). Sex & gender: What do we know. Sociological Forum, 5, 95-120.
44.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 563-591.
45.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the future of the family. Population and Development Review, 20, 293-342.
46.
Perry-Jenkins, M., & Folk, K. (1994). Class, couples, and conflict: Effects of division of labor assessments of marriage in dual-earner families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 165-180.
47.
Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1969). Family sociology or wives’ family sociology? A crosscultural examination of decision making. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 539-552.
48.
Sanchez, L. (1994). Gender, labor allocations, and psychology of entitlement within the home. Social Forces, 73, 533-553.
49.
Sanchez, L., & Gager, C. T. (2000). Hard living, perceived entitlement to a great marriage, and marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 708-722.
50.
Schwartz, P. (1994). Peer marriage. New York: Free Press.
51.
Shelton, B. A. (1991). Women, men and time. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
52.
Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299-322.
53.
Smith, H. L., Gager, C. T., & Morgan, S. P. (1998). Identifying underlying dimensions in spouses’ evaluations of fairness in the division of household labor. Social Science Research, 27, 305-327.
54.
South, S. J., & Spitze, G. (1986). Determinants of divorce over the marital life course. American Sociological Review, 51, 583-590.
55.
Sprecher, S. (1992). How men and women expect to feel and behave in response to inequity in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 57-69.
56.
Sprecher, S., & Schwartz, P. (1994). Equity and balance in the exchange and contribution in close relationships. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships (pp. 11-41). New York: Plenum.
57.
Suitor, J. (1991). Marital quality and satisfaction with the division of labor across the family life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 221-230.
58.
Sweet, J., & Bumpass, L. (1996). The national survey of families and households—Waves 1 and 2: Data description and documentation. Madison, WI: Center for Demography and Ecology. Retrieved from http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/nsfh/home/htm.
59.
Sweet, J., Bumpass, L., Call, V. (1988). The design and content of the national survey of families and households (Working Paper No. NSFH 1). Madison, WI: Center for Demography and Ecology.
60.
Szinovacz, M., & Egley, L. C. (1995). Comparing one-partner and couple data on sensitive marital behaviors: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 992-1010.
61.
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
62.
Thompson, L. (1991). Family work: Women’s sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 181-196.
63.
Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845-871.
64.
Tzeng, J. M., & Mare, R. (1995). Labor market and socioeconomic effects on marital stability. Social Science Research, 24, 329-351.
65.
Umberson, D., Chen, M., House, J. S., Hopkins, K., & Slaten, E. (1996). Gender differences in relationships and psychological wellbeing. American Sociological Review, 61, 837-857.
66.
Varga, K. (1972). Marital cohesion as reflected in time budgets. In A. Szalai (Ed.), The use of time (pp. 82-104). The Hague, the Netherlands: Morton.
67.
Walster, E, Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
68.
White, L. K. (1983). Determinants of spousal interactions: Marital structure or marital happiness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 511-519.
69.
White, L. K. (1990). Determinants of divorce: A review of research in the eighties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 904-912.
70.
Wineberg, H. (1996). The resolutions of separation: Are marital reconciliations attempted?Population Research and Policy Review, 15, 297-310.
71.
Wineberg, H., & McCarthy, J. (1993). Separation and reconciliation in American marriages. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 20, 21-42.
72.
Yogev, S., & Brett, J. (1985). Perceptions of the division of housework and child care and marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 609-618.
