The nature and extent of interpersonal exchange of care and help may indicate solidarity and cohesion in modern society. This article focuses on intergenerational solidarity. On the basis of empirical data from an earlier research project on giving in the Netherlands, the authors examine the nature and determinants of intergenerational solidarity and compare the relative importance of familial and intergenerational solidarity with solidarity toward friends. The results of their analyses show that solidarity toward parents and solidarity toward friends are based on different types of feelings. Familial solidarity appears still to have an overriding importance when compared to solidarity toward friends; however, this is so only in terms of the frequency of offered assistance and care and not in terms of the accompanying feelings: love and affection are reserved for helping friends, whereas Durkheimian norms of moral obligation are the main feeling people have when helping their parents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antonucci, T. C. (1990). Social supports and social relationships. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 205-226). New York: Academic.
2.
Bengtson, V. L. , Cutler, N. E., Mangen, D. J., & Marshall, V. W. (1985). Generations, cohorts, and relations between age groups. In R. H. Binstock & E. Shanas (Eds.), Aging and the social sciences. New York: Academic.
3.
Bengtson, V. L. , & Schrader, S. (1982). Parent-child relations. In D. Mangen & W. A. Peterson (Eds.), Research instruments in social gerontology (Vol. 2, pp. 115-186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
Blossfeld, H.-P. , Manting, D., & Rohwer, G. (1993). Patterns of change in family formation in the Federal Republic of Germany and the Netherlands: Some consequences for solidarity between generations. In H. A. Becker & P. L. Hermkens (Eds.), Solidarity of generations: Demographic, economic, and social change and its consequences (Vols. 1 to 3, pp. 175-191). Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
5.
Cantor, M. (1979). Neighbors and friends. Research on Aging, 1, 435-463.
6.
Cheal, D. (1983). Intergenerational family transfers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 805-813.
7.
Durkheim, E. (1967). De la division du travail social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Original work published 1893)
8.
Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-179.
9.
Hammerström, G. (1993). Solidarity and values in three generations. In H. A. Becker & P. L. Hermkens (Eds.), Solidarity of generations: Demographic, economic, and social change and its consequences (Vols. 1 to 3, pp. 683-711).
10.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
11.
Homans, G. F. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
12.
Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Jong Gierveld, J. de (1998). Intergenerationele zorg en steun kent zijn grenzen [Intergenerational care and support has its limits]. Mens & Maatschappij, 73(1), 2-4.
14.
Komter, A. E. (1996). Reciprocity as a principle of exclusion: Gift giving in the Netherlands. Sociology, 30(2), 299-316.
15.
Komter, A. E. , & Schuyt, C.J.M. (1993). Geven in Nederland [Gift giving in the Netherlands]. Amsterdam: Dagblad Trouw.
16.
Komter, A. E. , & Schuyt, C.J.M. (1994). Wegen van wederkerigheid: Geefrelaties tussen ouders en kinderen [Modes of reciprocity: Gift relationships between parents and children]. In C. Brinkgreve, B. Kruithof, B. Van Stolk, & G. De Vries (Eds.), Overdragen en eigenmaken (pp. 16-36). Groningen, the Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.
17.
Komter, A. E. , & Vollebergh, W. (1997). Gift giving and the emotional significance of family and friends. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 747-757.
18.
Kulis, S. S. (1992). Social class and the locus of reciprocity in relationships with adult children. Journal of Family Issues, 13(4), 482-504.
19.
Lash, C. (1977). Haven in a heartless world. New York: W. W. Norton.
20.
Levitt, M. J. , Guacci, N., & Weber, R. A. (1992). Intergenerational support, relationship quality, and well-being. A bicultural analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 13(4), 465-481.
21.
Mangen, D. J. , Bengtson, V. L., & Landry, P. H. (Eds.). (1988). Measurement of intergenerational relations. New York: Sage.
22.
Mayhew, L. (1971). Society: Institutions and activity. New York: Columbia University Press.
23.
Mutran, E. , & Reitzes, D. C. (1984). Intergenerational support activities and well-being among the elderly: A convergence of exchange and symbolic interaction perspectives. American Sociological Review, 49, 117-130.
24.
Nye, F. I. , & Rushing, W. (1969). Toward family measurement research. In J. Hadden & E. Borgetta (Eds.), Marriage and family. Itaska, IL: F. E. Peacock.
25.
Oorschot, W. van , & Komter, A. E. (1998). What is it that ties? Theoretical perspectives on social bond. Sociale Wetenschappen, 41, 5-25.
26.
Popenoe, D. (1988). Disturbing the nest: Family change and decline in modern societies. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
27.
Regt, A. de (1993). Geld en gezin. Financiële en emotionele relaties tussen gezinsleden [Money and family: Financial and emotional relationships between family members]. Amsterdam: Boom.
28.
Roberto, K. A. (1989). Exchange and equity in friendships. In R. G. Adams & R. Blieszner (Eds.), Older adult friendship: Structure and process (pp. 147-165). London: Sage.
29.
Roberts, E. L. , & Bengtson, V. L. (1988, August). Intergenerational cohesion and psychic well-being: Implications over the adult life course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.
30.
Roberts, E. L. , Richards, L. N., & Bengtson, V. L. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in families: Untangling the ties that bind. Marriage and Family Review, 16(1-2), 11-46.
31.
Rossi, A. , & Rossi, P. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent-child relations across the life course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
32.
Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. London: Tavistock.
33.
Salomon, L. M. (1992). America's nonprofit sector: A primer. New York: The Foundation Center.
34.
Tönnies, F. (1887). Gemeinschaft und gesellschaft: Abhandlung des kommunismus und sozialismus als empirschen kulturformen. Leipzig, Germany: Reisland Verlag.
35.
Weiss, L. , & Lowenthal, M. (1975). Life-course perspectives on friendship. In M. Lowenthal, M. Thurmer, & D. Chiriboga (Eds.), Four stages of life: A comparative study of women and men facing transitions (pp. 48-61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Wilson, G. (1993). Intergenerational solidarity from the point of view of people in advanced old age. In H. A. Becker & P. L. Hermkens (Eds.), Solidarity of generations: Demographic, economic, and social change and its consequences (Vols. 1 to 3, pp. 625-643).
