This study investigates whether financial agreements between husbands and wives, the cost of child care, mothers' wages, and sources of income, rather than just aggregate income, affect a mother's decision to use child care. This study finds that for working mothers, the price of child care is what matters, not their wages; for nonemployed mothers, the reverse is true. However, similar patterns for income effects are found for all mothers. Husbands' incomes do not affect mothers' child care choices, but mothers' own abilities to pay and sources of nonwage income do affect their child care choices. The only detected effect of spouses' incomes on wives' child care choices occurs when husbands pool their incomes with their wives' incomes. Hence, although market child care is a collective consumption good, not all wives in two-parent families have access to husbands' incomes with which to pay for child care.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berger, M. , & Black, D. (1992). Child care subsidies, quality of care, and the labor supply of low-income single mothers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(4), 635-642.
2.
Blau, D. M. , & Robins, P.K. (1988). Child-care costs and family labor supply. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, 374-381.
3.
Cleveland, G. (1990). Choice of child care arrangements: Canadian evidence. Unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto.
4.
Connelly, R. (1989). The effect of child care costs on married women's labor force participation. Unpublished manuscript, Bowdoin College.
5.
Crawford, D.L. , & Pollack, R. A. (1990). Child care policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
6.
Dawson, D. A. , & Cain, V. S. (1990). Child care arrangements: Health of our nation's children, United States, 1988 (National Center for Health Statistics Rep. No. 187). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
7.
Duncan, G. J. , & Hill, R. C. (1974). The child-care mode choice of working mothers. In G. Duncan & J. N. Morgan (Eds.), Five thousand American families: Patterns of economic progress (Vol. 4, pp. 301-324). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
8.
Duncan, G. J. , & Hill, R. C. (1977). The child-care mode choice of working mothers. In G. Duncan & J. N. Morgan (Eds.), Five thousand American families: Patterns of economic progress (Vol. 5, pp. 379-388). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
9.
Ellwood, D. T. (1986). Poor support: Poverty in the American family. New York: Basic Books.
10.
Fine, M. (1986). Why urban adolescents drop into and out of public school. Teachers College Record, 87, 393-409.
11.
Gronau, R. (1977). Leisure, home production, and work: The theory of the allocation of time revisited. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1099-1123.
12.
Gustafsson, S. , & Stafford, F. (1988). Daycare subsidies and labor supply in Sweden (Discussion Paper No. 279). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
13.
Heckman, J. J. (1974). Effects of child-care programs on women's work effort. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2, Part 2), S136-S163.
14.
Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 931-960.
15.
Henriques, I. , & Vaillancourt, F. (1988). The demand for child care services in Canada. Applied Economics, 20, 385-394.
16.
Jaynes, G. D. , & Williams, R.M. (1989). A common destiny: Blacks and American society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17.
Killingsworth, M. (1983). Labor supply. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Lave, J. R. , & Angrist, S. S. (1975). Child care arrangements of working mothers: Social and economic aspects. International Journal of Sociology and the Family, 5, 230-242.
19.
Lazear, E. , & Michael, R. (1988). Allocation of income within the household. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Lehrer, E. , & Kawasaki, S. (1985). Child care arrangements and fertility: An analysis of two-earner households. Demography, 22, 499-513.
21.
Leibowitz, A. , Waite, L., & Witsberger, C. (1988). Child care for preschoolers: Differences by child's age. Demography, 25, 205-219.
22.
Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Presser, H. P. (1986). Shift work among American women and child care. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 551-563.
24.
Ribar, D. C. (1989). Child care and the labor supply of married women: Structural evidence. Unpublished manuscript, Brown University.
25.
Robins, P. (1989). Federal financing of child care: Alternative approaches and economic implications (Discussion Paper No. 890-89). Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
26.
Robins, P. , & Spiegelman, R. (1978). An econometric model of the demand for child care. Economic Inquiry, 16, 83-94.
27.
Spencer, B. , Sebring, P., & Campbell, B. (1987). NLS-72 fifth follow-up sample design report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
28.
Stolzenberg, R. , & Waite, L. (1984). Local labor markets, children, and labor force participation of wives. Demography, 21, 157-170.
29.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1980). Alphabetical index of industries and occupations. Washington, DC: Author.
30.
Walker, J.R. (1991). New evidence on the supply of child care: A statistical portrait of family providers and an analysis of their fees (Discussion Paper No. 949-91). Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
31.
Yaeger, K. E. (1978). Modal choice in the demand for child care by working women: A multinomial logit analysis with quality adjustment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Princeton University.
