Based on a patriarchal perspective, the article presents a pioneer study of Palestinian husbands' beliefs in the following areas: justifying wife beating, holding violent husbands responsible for their behavior, and blaming the battered wives for violence against them. The results revealed the following trends: (a) High percentages of respondents tend to justify wife beating under different circumstances (e.g., the wife's “sexual unfaithfulness”); (b) although the majority of respondents held violent husbands responsible for their behavior, there was a concomitant tendency to understand the husband; and (c) a high percentage of respondents blamed the wife for violence against her. Patriarchal ideology provided a conceptual framework for presentation and discussion of the findings obtained through regression and multiple regression analyses. The implications of the results for future research as well as for prevention and intervention activities are also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abdo-Zubi, N. (1992). Family, women, and social change in the Middle East: The Palestinian case. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
2.
Ata, I. W. (1986). The West Bank Palestinian family. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
3.
Barakat, H. (1985). The Arab family and the challenge of social transformation. In E. W. Fernea (Ed.), Women and the family in the Middle East: New voices of change (pp. 27-48). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
5.
Burt, M. R. (1983). Justifying personal violence: A comparison of rapists and the general public. Victimology: An International Journal, 8(3/4), 131-150.
6.
Choi, A. , & Edleson, J. L. (1996). Social disapproval of wife assaults: A national survey of Singapore. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 27(1), 73-88.
7.
Ciaccio, N. V. , & El-Shakry, O. S. (1993). Egypt. In L. L. Adler (Ed.)., International handbook on gender roles (pp. 46-58). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
8.
Coleman, D. , & Straus, M. A. (1986). Marital power, conflict and violence. Violence and Victims, 1, 139-153.
9.
Dobash, R. E. , & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives. New York: Free Press.
10.
Dobash, R. E. , & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence, and social change. London: Routledge.
11.
Dunn, M. , & DeBonis, N. J. (1979). Teachers' and counselors' guide to accompany a Marriage Role Expectations Inventory. Saluda, NC: Family Life Publications.
12.
Finn, J. (1986). The relationship between sex role attitudes and attitudes supporting marital violence. Sex Roles, 14, 235-244.
13.
Fowler, F. J. (1988). Survey research methods. Newbury CA: Sage.
14.
Gentemann, K. (1984). Wife beating: Attitudes of a non-clinical population. Victimology, 9, 109-119.
15.
Gerber, G. L. (1995). Gender stereotypes and the problem of marital violence. In L. L. Adler & F. L. Denmark (Eds.), Violence and the prevention of violence (pp. 145-155). Westport, CT: Praeger.
16.
Ghabra, S. N. (1987). Palestinians in Kuwait: The family and the politics of survival. Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
Greenblat, C. S. (1983). A hit is a hit is a hit... or is it? Approval and tolerance of the use of physical force by spouses. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research (pp. 235-260). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Greenblat, C. S. (1985). “Don't hit your wife...unless”: Preliminary findings on normative support for the use of physical force by husbands. Victimology, 10, 221-241.
19.
Haj, S. (1992). Palestinian women and patriarchal relations. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 17(4), 761-778.
20.
Haj-Yahia, M. M. (1991). Perceptions of wife beating and the use of different conflict tactics among Arab-Palestinian engaged males in Israel. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
21.
Haj-Yahia, M. M. (1995). Toward culturally sensitive intervention with Arab families in Israel. Contemporary Family Therapy, 17(4), 429-447.
22.
Haj-Yahia, M. M. (1996a). Explaining beliefs about wife-beating among Arab men from Israel through their patriarchal ideology. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23.
Haj-Yahia, M. M. (1996b). Wife abuse in the Arab society in Israel: Challenge for future change. In J. L. Edleson & Z. C. Eisikovitz (Eds.), The future of intervention with battered women and their families (pp. 87-101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Haj-Yahia, M. M. (1997). Predicting beliefs about wife beating among engaged Arab men in Israel. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(4), 530-545.
25.
Haj-Yahia, M. M. (in press). Perceptions of abusive and violent husbands by engaged Arab men from Israel. Journal of Social Psychology.
26.
Herberg, M. , & Ovensen, G. (1993). Palestinian society in Gaza, the West Bank and Arab Jerusalem: A survey of living conditions (Report 151). Oslo, Norway: FAFO.
27.
Hui, H. C. , & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16, 131-152.
28.
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283-294.
29.
Kandiyoti, D. A. (1987). Emancipated but unliberated? Reflections on the Turkish case. Feminist Studies, 13(2), 317-338.
30.
Kandiyoti, D. A. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274-290.
31.
Mann, M. (1986). A crisis in stratification theory? Persons, households, families, lineages, genders, classes, and nations. In R. Crompton & M. Mann (Eds.), Gender and stratification (pp. 40-56). London: Polity.
32.
Marlowe, D. , & Crowne, D. P. (1961). Social desirability and response to perceived situational demands. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25, 109-115.
33.
Marsot, A.L.S. (1984). The changing Arab Muslim family. In M. Kelly (Ed.), Islam: The religious and political life of a world community (pp. 243-257). New York: Praeger Special Studies.
34.
Martin, D. (1976). Battered wives. San Francisco: Glide.
35.
Mugford, J. , Mugford, S., & Easteal, P. (1989). Social justice, public perceptions, and spouse assault in Australia. Social Justice, 16, 102-123.
36.
Russell, M. N. , & Frohberg, J. (July, 1995). Effectiveness of belief system change in treatment of abusive men. Paper presented at the 4th International Family Violence Research Conference, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH.
37.
Saunders, D. G. , Lynch, A. B., Grayson, M., & Linz, D. (1987). The Inventory of Beliefs about Wife Beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. Violence and Victims, 2, 39-57.
38.
Sharabi, H. (1987). A study on the contemporary Arab society. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Talia'ah (Arabic).
39.
Smith, J. I. (1980). Introduction. In J. I. Smith (Ed.), Women in contemporary Muslim societies (pp. 11-23). Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
40.
Smith, M. D. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5(4), 257-274.
41.
Spence, J. T. , & Helmreich, R. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
42.
United Nations . (1989). Violence against women in the family. Vienna: United Nations Office, Center for Social Development and Humanitarian Affairs.
43.
United Nations . (1993). Strategies for confronting domestic violence: A resource manual. Vienna: United Nations Office, Center for Social Development and Humanitarian Affairs.
44.
Yllo, K. A. (1984). The status of women, marital equality and violence against wives: A contextual analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 5, 307-320.
45.
Yllo, K. A. (1988). Political and methodological debates in wife abuse research. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 28-50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
Yllo, K. A. , & Straus, M. A. (1990). Patriarchy and violence against wives: The impact of structural and normative factors. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 383-399). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
