Mothers' and children's reports of closeness to father are examined using an approach for reconciling discrepant survey responses. This approach is based on a model for the measurement of latent traits. When both mothers and children are asked to report on the closeness of the child to his or her father, tabulations of survey responses show substantial disagreement in the reported evaluation. We adopt a model that explains this disagreement in terms of (a) constant differences between mothers and children, and (b) variability within the sampling population in the actual closeness of father to child. Closeness appears to have an entirely different meaning when fathers are resident than when they are nonresident. But the meaning does not seem to vary (even if feelings do) when the resident father is a stepfather or whether the focal child is a son or a daughter.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen, E. B. (1980). Discrete statistical models with social science applications. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
2.
Arendell, T. (1986). Mothers and divorce. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Bartholomew, D. J. (1987). Latent variable models and factor analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Beer, W. R. (1992). American stepfamilies. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
5.
Bernard, J. (1972). The future of marriage. New York: Bantam.
6.
Bohrnstedt, G. W. , & Borgatta, E. F. (1981). Foreward. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 9-20). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Cherlin, A. J. (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 634-650.
8.
Clogg, C. C. (1984). Some statistical models for analyzing why surveys disagree. In C. F. Turner & E. Martin (Eds.), Surveying subjective phenomena (Vol. 2, pp. 319-366). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
9.
Computing Resource Center. (1992). Stata reference manual: Release 3 (Vol. 3, 5th ed.). Santa Monica, CA: Author.
10.
Duncan, O. D. (1984a). Notes on social measurement: Historical and critical. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
11.
Duncan, O. D. (1984b). The latent trait approach in survey research: The Rasch Measurement Model. In C. F. Turner & E Martin (Eds.), Surveying subjective phenomena (Vol. 1, pp. 210-227). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12.
Duncan, O. D. (1984c). Rasch Measurement: Further examples and discussion. In C. F. Turner & E. Martin (Eds.), Surveying subjective phenomena (Vol. 2, pp. 367-403). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
Francis, B. , Green, M., & Payne, C. (Eds.). (1993). The GLIM system: Generalized linear interactive modelling. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. , & Cherlin, A. J. (1991). Divided families: What happens to children when parents part. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. , Morgan, S. P., & Allison, P. D. (1987). Paternal participation and children's well-being after marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 52, 695-701.
16.
Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. , Nord, C. W., Peterson, J. L., & Zill, N. (1983). The life course of children of divorce: Marital disruption and parental contact. American Sociological Review, 48, 656-688.
17.
Harris, K. M. , & Morgan, S. P. (1991). Fathers, sons, and daughters: Differential paternal involvement in parenting. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 531-544.
18.
Hetherington, E. M. (1981). Children and divorce. In R. W. Henderson (Ed.), Parent-child interaction: Theory, research, and prospects (pp. 33-58). New York: Academic Press.
19.
Hill, M. S. (1992). The role of economic resources and remarriage in financial assistance for children of divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 158-178.
20.
Hout, M. , Duncan, O. D., & Sobel, M. E. (1987). Association and heterogeneity: Structural models of similarities and differences. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1987 (pp. 145-184). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
21.
Ishii-Kuntz, M. , & Coltrane, S. (1992). Remarriage, stepparenting, and household labor. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 215-233.
22.
Marsiglio, W. (1992). Stepfathers with minor children living at home: Parenting perceptions and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 195-214.
23.
Morgan, S. P. , Lye, D. N., & Condran, G. A. (1988). Sons, daughters, and the risk of marital disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 110-129.
24.
Peterson, J. L. (1984). A national longitudinal study of marital disruption—Synopsis. Washington, DC: Child Trends, Inc.
25.
Rasch, G. (1966). An individualistic approach to item analysis. In P. F. Lazarsfeld & N. W. Henry (Eds.), Readings in mathematical social science (pp. 89-107). Cambridge: MIT Press.
26.
Reiser, M. , & Schuessler, K. F. (1991). A hierarchy for some latent structure models. Sociological Methods and Research, 19, 419-465.
27.
Smith, H. L. , & Furstenberg, F. F. (in press). Application of a response model for mother-daughter agreement by race. Social Science Research.
28.
Sobel, M. E. (1988). Some models for the multiway contingency table with a one-to-one correspondence among categories. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1988 (pp. 165-192). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
29.
Wallerstein, J. S. , & Blakeslee, S. (1989). Second chances. New York: Ticknor & Fields.
30.
Wallerstein, J. S. , & Kelly, J. B. (1980). Surviving the breakup. New York: Basic Books.
