Family law reforms brought about a new social movement and lobby group—fathers' rights. This article, based on a 2-year study involving participant observation, ethnographic interviews, and document analysis examines the contradictions between the public and private rhetoric of fathers rightists. Thirty-two members from four fathers' rights groups were interviewed about their postdivorce parenting experiences, their personal troubles with family law practices, and their posturing on the fathers' rights' platform. The fatherhood project of family law reform, although viewed as serving all fathers, is primarily driven by fathers' personal stake in the issues and the hope of changing their current situation. The fathers in this study presented a uniform voice in support of the fathers' rights' public image of caring fathers who want men to be recognized as fathers and who are requesting equitable treatment in matters of child custody, support, and access. However, the interviews revealed that individual members did not support the full application of the concept of equality in postdivorce parenting, child care, and responsibilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albrecht, S. (1980). Reactions and adjustments to divorce: Differences in the experiences of males and females. Family Relations, 29, 59-68.
2.
Ambrose, P. , Harper, J., & Pemberton, R. (1983). Surviving divorce: Men beyond marriage. Brighton, UK: Wheatsheaf.
3.
Arendell, T. (1986). Mothers and divorce: Legal, economic, and social dilemmas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Arendell, T. (1992a). After divorce: Investigations into father absence. Gender & Society, 6(4), 562-586.
5.
Arendell, T. (1992b). The social self as gendered: A masculinist discourse of divorce. Symbolic Interaction, 15(2), 151-181.
6.
Armstrong, P. , & Armstrong, H. (1984). The double ghetto: Canadian women and their segregated work (rev. ed.). Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
7.
Boyd, S. (1989). Child custody law and invisibility of women's work. Queen's Quarterly, 96(4), 831-858.
8.
Boyd, S. (1993). Investigating gender bias in Canadian child custody law: Reflections on questions and methods. In J. Brockman & D. Chunn (Eds.), Investigating gender bias: Laws, courts, and the legal profession (pp. 169-190). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing.
9.
Chambers, D. (1979). Making fathers pay: The enforcement of child support. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Coltrane, S. , & Hickman, N. (1992). The rhetoric of rights and needs: Moral discourse in the reform of child custody and child support laws. Social Problems, 39(4), 400-420.
11.
Conine, J. (1989). Fathers' rights. New York: Walker.
12.
Crean, S. (1988). In the name of the fathers: The story behind child custody. Toronto: Amanita.
13.
Dawson, B. (1988). Fathers' rights groups: When rights wrong women. Broadside, 9(8), 6-7.
14.
Drakich, J. (1988). In whose best interest? The politics of joint custody. In B. Fox (Ed.), Family bonds and gender divisions (pp. 477-496). Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
15.
Drakich, J. (1989). In search of the better parent: The social construction of ideologies of fatherhood. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 3(1), 69-87.
16.
Duncan, G. J. , & Hoffman, S. D. (1985). A reconsideration of the economic consequences of marital dissolution. Demography, 22(4), 485-497.
17.
Eichler, M. (1988). Families in Canada today (2nd ed.). Toronto: Gage.
18.
Fineman, M. (1991). The illusion of equality: The rhetoric and reality of divorce reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Furstenberg, F. , & Nord, C. (1985). Parenting apart: Patterns of childrearing after marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 893-904.
20.
Furstenberg, F. , Nord, C., Peterson, J., & Zill, N. (1983). The life course of children of divorce: Marital disruption and parental contact. American Sociological Review, 48, 656-668.
21.
Glaser, B. , & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
22.
Graycar, R. (1989). Equal rights versus fathers' rights: The child custody debate in Australia. In C. Smart & S. Sevenhuijsen (Eds.), Child custody and the politics of gender (pp. 158-189). London: Routledge.
23.
Gross, P. (1988). An analysis of the information in the official guardian files (Report No. 2, The Ontario Divorce and Custody Project: Phase One). Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
24.
Henderson, J. (1988, May 10). Two are better than one: The fact that a husband and wife break up doesn't make either of them less a parent. Globe and Mail, p. A7.
25.
Hetherington, M. , Cox, M., & Cox, R. (1976, October). Divorced fathers. Family Coordinator, 26(6), 417-428.
26.
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.
27.
Holtrust, N. , Sevenhuijsen, S., & Verbraken, A. (1989). Rights for fathers and the state: Recent developments in custody politics in the Netherlands. In C. Smart & S. Sevenhuijsen (Eds.), Child custody and the politics of gender (pp. 51-76). London: Routledge.
28.
Lamb, L. (1987, January/February). Involuntary joint custody: What mothers will lose if fathers' rights groups win. Herizons, pp. 20-31.
29.
Loewen, J. (1988). Visitation fatherhood today. In P. Bronstein & C. Cowan (Eds.), Men's changing role in the family (pp. 195-213). New York: Wiley.
30.
Maccoby, E. E. , & Mnookin, R. H. (1992). Dividing the child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Maynard, R. (1988, November). Fathers' rights: Now, it's men who call for parental equality. Chatelaine, pp. 61-64.
32.
McClure, M. , & Kennedy-Richardson, K. (1987). Mr. Mom is alive and well in Kitchener-Waterloo. Unpublished manuscript, Provincial Court Kitchener, Ontario, Canada.
33.
McKie, D. , Prentice, B., & Reed, P. (1983). Divorce: Law and the family in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Research and Analysis Division.
34.
Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. London: Oxford University Press.
35.
Ornstein, M. (1983). Equality in the workplace: Accounting for gender differentials in job income in Canada: Results from a 1981 survey (Series A. No. 2). Ottawa: Women's Bureau.
36.
Peacock, D. (1982). Listen to their tears: How Canadian divorce law abuses our own children. Toronto: Douglas & McIntyre.
37.
Polikoff, N. (1983). Gender and child-custody determinations: Exploding the myths. In I. Diamond (Ed.), Families, politics, and public policy: A feminist dialogue on women and the state (pp. 183-202). New York: Longman.
38.
Rauhala, A. (1988). Women alarmed by male activists. Jurisfemme, 8(3), 11-14.
39.
Richardson, J. (1988). Court-based divorce mediation in four Canadian cities: An overview of research results. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services, Canada.
40.
Roman, M. , & Haddad, W. (1978). The disposable parent. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
41.
Sevenhuijsen, S. (1986). Fatherhood and the political theory of rights: Theoretical perspectives of feminism. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 14, 329-340.
42.
Statistics Canada, Household Survey Division, Canadian Centre for Health Information . (1993). Earnings of men and women, 1991. Ottawa: Minister of Industry, Science and Technology.
43.
Strauss, A. (1988). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Wallerstein, J. , & Blakeslee, S. (1989). Second chances. New York: Ticknor & Fields.
45.
Weitzman, L. (1985). The divorce revolution: The unexpected social and economic consequences for women and children. New York: Free Press.
