Based on a qualitative study of families of children with disabilities, this article examines the role of gender in caring for a child with a disability. Findings reveal caring as a complex phenomenon that has at least three meanings: (a) “caring for,” which refers to the caregiving work, (b) “caring about,” referring to the love, and (c) “the extended caring role,” when mothers of children with disabilities extend their caring to a broader societal concern. The findings, which suggest that the responsibilities for caring are still ascribed on the basis of gender, are discussed in relation to traditional disability family studies and the situation of women in today's society.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bogdan, R. , & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: Introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
Brabeck, M. (Ed.), (1989). Who cares? Theory, research and educational implications of the ethic of care. New York: Praeger.
3.
Brown, C. , & Pechman, J. A. (Eds.). (1987). Gender in the workplace. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
4.
Bullock, A. (1985, October). Community care: Ideology and practice. Paper presented at the Motherwork Workshop, Simone DeBeauvoir Institute, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
5.
Bulmer, M. (1987). The social basis of community care. London: Allen & Unwin.
6.
Covert, S. (1988). A survey of family support needs in New Hampshire. Durham: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.
7.
Dalley, G. (1988). Ideologies of caring: Rethinking community and collectivism. London: Macmillan.
8.
DeVault, M. L. (1987). Doing housework: Feeding and family life. In N. Gerstel & H. E. Gross (Eds.), Families and work (pp. 178-191). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
9.
Dornbusch, S. M. , & Strober, M. H. (Eds.). (1988). Feminism, children and the new families. New York: Guilford.
10.
Eichler, M. (1988). Nonsexist research methods. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
11.
Farber, B. (1986). Historical contexts of research on families with mentally retarded members. In J. J. Gallagher & P. M. Vietze (Eds.), Families of handicapped persons: Research, programs, and policy issues (pp. 3-23). Baltimore, MD: P. H. Brookes.
12.
Finch, J. (1984). Community care: Developing non-sexist alternatives. Critical Social Policy, 9, 6-18.
13.
Finch, J. , & Groves, D. (Eds.). (1983). A labour of love: Women, work and caring. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
14.
Gallagher, J. J. , & Vietze, P. M. (Eds.). (1986). Families of handicapped persons: Research, programs, and policy issues. Baltimore, MD: P. H. Brookes.
15.
Gerson, J. H. , & Peiss, K. (1985). Boundaries, negotiation, consciousness: Reconceptualizing gender relations. Social Problems, 32(4), 317-331.
16.
Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
17.
Hammersley, M. , & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in particle. London: Tavistock.
18.
Krauss, M. W. (1986). Patterns and trends in public services to families with a mentally retarded member. In J. J. Gallagher & P. M. Vietze (Eds.), Families of handicapped persons: Research, programs, and policy issues (pp. 237-248). Baltimore, MD: P. H. Brookes.
19.
Lewis, J. , & Meredith, B. (1988). Daughters who care: Daughters caring for mothers at home. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20.
Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
McKaig, K. , Caro, F. G., & Smith, M. (1986). Beyond the threshold: Families caring for their children who have significant developmental disabilities. New York: Community Services Society of New York.
22.
Rich, A. (1986). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution (10th anniv. ed.). New York: Norton.
23.
Ruddick, S. (1989). Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston, MA: Beacon.
24.
Russo, N. F. , & Jansen, M. A. (1988). Women, work and disability: Opportunities and challenges. In M. Fine & A. Asch (Eds.), Women with disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture, and politics (pp. 229-244). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
25.
Sherman, B. R. (1988). Predictors of the decision to place developmentally disabled family members in residential care. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 92(4), 344-351.
26.
Singer, G.H.S. , & Irvin, L. K. (Eds.). (1989). Support for caregiving families: Enabling positive adaptation to disability. Baltimore, MD: P. H. Brookes.
27.
Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
28.
Taylor, S. J. , & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meaning (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
29.
Taylor, S. J. , Racino, J. A., Knoll, J. A., & Lutfiyya, Z. (1987). The nonrestrictive environment: On community integration for people with the most severe disabilities. Syracuse, NY: Human Policy Press.
30.
Thorne, B. , & Yalom, M. (Eds.). (1982). Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions. New York: Longman.
31.
Traustadottir, R. (1988, August). Women and family care: On the gendered nature of caring. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Family Support Related to Disability, Stockholm, Sweden.
32.
Trebilcot, J. (Ed.). (1984). Mothering: Essays in feminist theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
33.
Tronto, J. C. (1989). Women and caring: What can feminists learn about morality from caring? In A. M. Jaggar & S. R. Bordo (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstruction of being and knowing (pp. 172-187). London: Rutgers University Press.
34.
Ungerson, C. (1987). Policy is personal: Sex, gender, and informal care. London: Tavistock.
35.
Waerness, K. (1987). A feminist perspective on the new ideology of “community care” for the elderly. Acta Sociologica, 30(2), 133-150.
36.
Walker, A. (1982). Community care: The family, the state and social policy. Oxford: Martin Robertson/Blackwell.
37.
Wearing, B. (1984). The ideology of motherhood: A study of Sydney suburban mothers. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.
